Das poker d assi casino en line poker texas holdem rules strip poker flash la règle de la roulette…

It is a very liberal, dilettantish, not very serious interpretation of libertarianism, which explains its editors’ absurd vacillation on the Ron Paul issue.

And their need to denounce wiretapping that leads us to terrorists overseas, and drug control laws, while somehow ignoring hate crimes laws and the overbearing taxation experienced by a large swath of Americans.

Radicals for Capitalism was a good read though.

There’s no conspiracy.

Keljeck on January 16, 2008 at 3:47 PM

I didn’t say there was. All I’m saying is that it is something more than a club where men of industry and power get together over cigars to talk about their frigid wives (or gay lovers).

Thanks for the compliment.

You’re welcome.

It’s fun to watch Ron Paul supporters twist themselves into knots trying to justify these newsletters. You amuse me. Please continue.

Jim Treacher on January 16, 2008 at 4:20 PM

Thanks for the compliment.

What’s important to you about bashing another canddidate rather than supporting yours?

It’s fun to watch Ron Paul supporters twist themselves into knots trying to justify these newsletters. You amuse me. Please continue.

Usually I just type, I’m a bit tired now, didn’t notice my grammar error until later and there’s no edit function. Sorry if that syntax error was distressing.

Just because I don’t believe that the CFR is part of a concerted effort to erode our sovereignty, returning to the Gold Standard at this point is an impossibility, and a 19th century foreign policy is invalid in a 21st century world, doesn’t make me a neocon.

I know what a neocon is. I know I am not one. And yes I am at college, and I work to come here.

By the way, it’s spelt “college.” If you’re going to mock someone else’s grammar errors, at least be careful to cover up your own.

Keljeck on January 16, 2008 at 4:13 PM

Fair enough…

but realize…I did hijack this blog from its original intent…and that was my plan.

A good grasp of NLP is something I highly recommend for you Keljeck. Good luck in school.

Peace!

I don’t think Ron is anywhere near the right person to be president but he has less faults in my eyes than the others except Fred Thompson. Of course his anti-war cr@p is B$ but at least my taxes wont go up…… just saying.

I’ve seen you on many of Michelle’s posts, especially the ones that bash Ron Paul.

What’s important to you about bashing another canddidate rather than supporting yours?

We Paulite’s spend our time supporting our candidate, not bashing the others. While we support our candidate, our hope is to open the eyes of others. Unlike you and the Michele Malkin clan, they are not having an effect on changing our minds with continual unsubstantiated negative attacks.

If your candidate is Fred, Rudy, John, Huck or McRomney, what are you doing to convince Ron Paul supporters here that they are better? Answer: nothing

So how does this help your cause? Answer: it doesn’t

So in a sense, you’re wasting your time, but we Paulite’s aren’t.

Fed Up on January 16, 2008 at 4:04 PM

Usually I just type, I’m a bit tired now, didn’t notice my grammar error until later and there’s no edit function. Sorry if that syntax error was distressing.

Just because I don’t believe that the CFR is part of a concerted effort to erode our sovereignty, returning to the Gold Standard at this point is an impossibility, and a 19th century foreign policy is invalid in a 21st century world, doesn’t make me a neocon.

I know what a neocon is. I know I am not one. And yes I am at college, and I work to come here.

By the way, it’s spelt “college.” If you’re going to mock someone else’s grammar errors, at least be careful to cover up your own.

Giuliani – Gun grabber, gay lover, abortion addict
Huckabee – Jesus freak, amnesty adorer, criminal lover
Romney – Gun grabber, universal health care nazi
McCain – Iraq war addict, Amnesty adorer, basic fool

You forgot “Jew-lover” in there, and probably a few more.

Did you take those in collge?

Jim Treacher on January 16, 2008 at 4:07 PM

got me…lol

There is no reasoning with someone who is still in collge and hasn’t lived.

And don’t forget to take some english grammar classes…

Did you take those in collge?

This line of reasoning can be applied easily elsewhere.

“It is the message of _________ that matters, not his supporters.”

Insert anyone you like. Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, Hitler, and on and on and on…

eanax on January 16, 2008 at 3:55 PM

Good point. Let me rephrase it to; “some of his supporters.”

I’m not a neocon. And I don’t engage in conspiracy theories.

I’m mocking you because you are a Ron Paul supporter who just put on your tinfoil hat.

The preceding message has been paid for by the New World Order.

Keljeck on January 16, 2008 at 3:49 PM

Hey yo,

I’m done conversing with you. There is no reasoning with someone who is still in collge and hasn’t lived.

I’m mocking you because you are a Ron Paul supporter who just put on your tinfoil hat.

And don’t forget to take some english grammar classes…

See you on the other side of a dollar collapse…and no, you don’t have a clue as to what a neocon is because you have been neoconned: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7632521363638501689

Then why did you say “you” in the post?

The general “you,” hon. I was agreeing with you that Ron Paul supporters don’t matter. Hope that helps.

It is the message of Ron Paul that matters, not his supporters. Give it up.

Fed Up on January 16, 2008 at 3:14 PM

This line of reasoning can be applied easily elsewhere.

“It is the message of _________ that matters, not his supporters.”

Insert anyone you like. Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, Hitler, and on and on and on…

I said there is some truth to this too. Try reading some of the books I gave you and open up your eyes to something other than a neocon’s point of view.

Fed Up on January 16, 2008 at 3:44 PM

Hey yo.

I’m not a neocon. And I don’t engage in conspiracy theories.

I’m mocking you because you are a Ron Paul supporter who just put on your tinfoil hat.

The preceding message has been paid for by the New World Order.

Too bad the racists & white supremeists jumped on board their cause because the mainstream media did not. This is what always happens, this is why The Right has to be very careful – there is a fine line of demarcation with these people who feel the lack of coverage of the crime was unfair and those who believe a lily white country would cure all of our ills

…

…in the minds of many on The Left and in the middle. They tend to lump everyone who was concerned about the absence of press coverage of these horrific murders with the Stormfront crowd.

Good-f*cking-grief. Do some research. The CFR has been at the head of every international development that has removed sovereignty from the United States, in favor of globalist, internationalism.

Drum on January 16, 2008 at 3:43 PM

Coincidence? Or Conspiracy?

The CFR is a group with a vast amount of intellectuals. For example, one of my professors last semester is a member. He’s dead set against Iraq, and believes that we have too forceful of a foreign policy. He’d rather we tone it down and free trade and all of that.

There are members for one thing in CFR, there are members for another. They are heading these things because it’s a large group. They probably head a lot of failed measures as well.

There’s no conspiracy.

NWO? Hulk Hogan, Kevin Nash, and Scott Hall?

Sorry to break it to you bud but I’m NWO 4 LIFE!

Because that’s just TOO SWEEEEEEEET!!!!

Keljeck on January 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM

Mock me? What did I say that would cause this? I said I’m no expert on this, but Doug Gnazzo is and I invited you to debate it with him. But I know you won’t because you don’t have a leg to stand on except trying to mock people.

I said there is some truth to this too. Try reading some of the books I gave you and open up your eyes to something other than a neocon’s point of view.

To my knowledge, the CFR doesn’t require that everyone believe the same thing. It’s a group of people that discuss foreign policy issues.

Keljeck on January 16, 2008 at 3:15 PM

Good-f*cking-grief. Do some research. The CFR has been at the head of every international development that has removed sovereignty from the United States, in favor of globalist, internationalism.

The intelligent libertarian kids in his base will dump the chaff and keep the wheat

I love it. Bidinotto is “wheat.” Why? Oh, because he’s pro-war. Pro-intervention. Anti free trade (he’s all for managed trade that calls itself free). Pro-pornography. Pro-abortion.

And you find Ron Paul to be dangerous.

Good one, Allah.

Neo-Nazi’s for Ron Paul: stormfront.org

or one workign with his Michigan Campaign:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TRBb_zBgZM

/enlightenment

jp on January 16, 2008 at 3:08 PM

That tape is a rally for the 2 white Christians that were murdered down in Tennessee – Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. Michelle covered it – the MM ignored it and many on The Right covered their tragic story.

Too bad the racists & white supremeists jumped on board their cause because the mainstream media did not. This is what always happenes, this is why The Right has to be very careful – there is a fine line of demarcation with these people who feel the lack of coverage of the crime was unfair and those who believe a lily white country would cure all of our ills.

I think ChralesALindberg on youtube is probably the head of Stormfront – right?

Probably because of my love of fiat money, or the blacks.

Jim Treacher on January 16, 2008 at 3:36 PM

Then why did you say “you” in the post? I take offense to this without any statements to back it up.