Spirit of 1776 on January 17, 2008 at 12:22 AM

IMO, a good thing to be guilty of.

Your candidate has executive experience in implementing sanctuary policies. Mine does not. I’d prefer the latter.

MadisonConservative on January 16, 2008 at 7:58 PM

Your candidate, likes to lobby give legal advise to dictators and terrorists..

And he was also registered as a foreign agent, makes one wonder where his loyalties are..

Manchurian Candidate.

Nah.. could be interesting for me if I thought that the issue of role models could be more straight forward.. like everybody follow the Spurs example and stop acting like a bully for Pete’s sake.

The Lakers/Spurs match up is what turned me off sports, sad to say.

Yeah David R. did act too holier-than-thou sometimes (he’s an associate paster now) but still, the damn refereeing was so over-the-top bad, it’s sick.

I mauled too many pillows to go back there now.

Mcguyver on January 17, 2008 at 1:01 AM

Funny, I’m often comprehended and rarely misunderstood. *scratches head*

Mcguyver on January 17, 2008 at 12:53 AM

Dude, I just got back from tae kwon do class where I was sparring and practicing disarming men with knives. I don’t care about the colors. You got the wrong girl, especially if we’re talking rainbow colors.

Mcguyver on January 17, 2008 at 12:26 AM

You’re just trying to bait me. You seriously don’t want to talk sports (of any kind with me). You think I’m opinionated about politics!?!

So I take it you put the duct tape away. I’m sure there are much better uses for it.

Sultry Beauty on January 16, 2008 at 10:22 PM

I saw your “schedule”, argh!

There was a day when I proposed to start a I-hate-the-Lakers-club, seriously!

I saw this guy who had a hand printed sign in truck window, “I HATE THE LAKERS!”
So I thought, SWEET! I followed him until he parked and I pitched the proposal to him! Funny.

But soon after that the three bully gang (shaq, meshaq Kobe and abendigo any Laker) split up and of course the rest is history.

4/10 of a freaking second! Give me a freaking break! I can count to three thousand every time that is replayed! Jackasses.

Sadly with the advent of the what’s his name (gambler) that got arrested and the bullshit calls from the same, pretty much stole my interests in the game. I rather go fishing or read a book.

Here’s my favorite quote from that era: NBA = Narcissistic Basketball Association, a three ring bully presentation that Barnum and Baileys would be proud of.

csdeven on January 16, 2008 at 11:41 PM

“but they accuse me of putting too much faith in my fellow man.”

Perhaps I’m guilty of that. Either way, I’m glad to live in a nation where we can talk about these things in the hypothetical.

Spirit of 1776 on January 16, 2008 at 10:13 PM

I agree. I’ve tried to make that argument to some 2nd amendment nuts a few times, but they accuse me of putting too much faith in my fellow man. I don’t see how the government could do much harm to us because I trust my neighbors would never take up arms against me.

I like owning guns. It makes me safe that I have them. Not safe from the government because I don’t fear them in a military sense. I feel safe from the bad guys that might hurt my family.

Mcguyver on January 16, 2008 at 9:37 PM

Ouch! San Antonio, huh? Being that I’m a hugh Lakers fan, that might take some warming up to for me.

But if they did decide to go after us with every weapon in the arsenal, there really wouldn’t be much we could do about it.

Yes, I agree, but two thoughts. For the government to bring it’s force on the citizens, it has to do it by citizens (military or governmental). And I think at that stage it’s self-defeating. With those weapons, what is left to be governed.

Spirit of 1776 on January 16, 2008 at 7:54 PM

Yes, but only in the sense that the government would go further than we would. I doubt the US government would bring it’s full force to bear on the citizens, so it could be argued that the 2nd does provide us a bit of recourse.

But if they did decide to go after us with every weapon in the arsenal, there really wouldn’t be much we could do about it.

Why can’t I get GQ guy with the mind of some of these guys. It’s devastating. One of my guy friends told me that I use HA for fourplay.

Sultry Beauty on January 16, 2008 at 4:22 PM

Ahem… GQ guy here……

Possibly willing to relocate…

[gets out duct tape to fix suitcase]

Wow..can I kill a thread or what?

tickleddragon on January 16, 2008 at 9:01 PM

We tried…I think this one was doomed. I for one am off to the liquor store to stock up for Saturday night. See everyone there!

I haven’t been reading too terribly much today, but I don’t think I’ve seen him today. He may be over at LGF…or maybe even at his job, hee hee.

RushBaby on January 16, 2008 at 8:46 PM

I’ve not seen him in a while either. Hmmmm.

Spirit of 1776 on January 16, 2008 at 8:46 PM

My response is I’m going to start calling you Dr. Phil and Johnny Cochran depending on your responses.

MadisonConservative on January 16, 2008 at 8:26 PM

In respect to RB 8:24, (which I think would suit us very for the future as well regarding that past thread), I’ll leave my answer to this: Your 2nd sentence is the one relevant. Why the reference? The intent is the motive. The motive is the goal. That’s my point. CS recognizes it (as you can see at 7:43). Having said that, subject closed on my end. If you want the last word, I’ll leave it unanswered on this subject and this thread.

Where’s doriengray?

tickleddragon on January 16, 2008 at 8:43 PM

I haven’t been reading too terribly much today, but I don’t think I’ve seen him today. He may be over at LGF…or maybe even at his job, hee hee.