New post-debate SC poll shows Fred in with a bullet at … fourth; Video: New Fred ad airs in South Carolina
posted at 3:24 pm on January 14, 2008 by Allahpundit
The first survey since his bravura debate performance last week. I was worried it would show him in the lead and our commenters who’ve been sniffing that polls don’t matter and are always wrong would have to revisit their assessment. Whew!
But say this much for ol’ Fred. If the only thing he accomplishes in this campaign is to derail Huckamania, he’ll have accomplished much. There are worse things to be than a de facto stalking horse:
Over the past several days, the only real movement in South Carolina’s Republican Presidential Primary has been a four-point gain for Fred Thompson and a five-point decline for Mike Huckabee.
The big winner from that trade-off is John McCain.
The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey shows McCain at 28%, Huckabee at 19%, Mitt Romney at 17%, and Fred Thompson at 16%. Rudy Giuliani and Ron Paul are tied with 5% support. Giuliani is betting his entire campaign on a strong showing in Florida, where he is now tied for the lead with three others.
He’s losing ground in the Gallup national poll too. Best-case scenarios tomorrow: A close Romney win splitting the field or a disastrous Romney loss, driving Mitt from the race and leaving Fred to pick up his supporters. Worst-case scenario: Anything else. It’s also worth noting that first place and fourth place in Florida right now are separated by two points. Too bad Fred’s in fifth. Oh well — by the time we get there, things will have shaken out anyhow.
Update: Fredporn!
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
That’s all right. People usually get ClusterHuck quicker.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:45 PM
SimplyKimberly on January 14, 2008 at 4:43 PM
Very good question. Where will Mitt’s supporters go?
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 4:45 PM
There is no way Fred is going to overcome McCain’s lead unless McCain converts to Islam.
bnelson44 on January 14, 2008 at 4:47 PM
Thanks, you’re a good sport. I screwed up the delivery with too many “then’s” but I guess it still worked.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:47 PM
Well not to Huck, that’s for sure.
bnelson44 on January 14, 2008 at 4:47 PM
Sorry, but if my choices are either Huckabee or McCain, I am writing in my vote. I won’t vote for either one under any circumstance.
McCain is a liar.
Huckabee is a pro-life, light weight Jimmy Carter wannabe.
I can’t support either one.
SimplyKimberly on January 14, 2008 at 4:48 PM
I think when the smoke clears, it will look more like:
Thompson at 26%
McCain at 21%,
Huckabee at 16%,
Romney at 13%, and
Fredalanche!© ◄ Donate!
TheSitRep on January 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM
SimplyKimberly, be honest. You don’t like McCain because he’s an old fart. lol
froghat on January 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM
Well he is already a dhimicrat.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM
You have it backwards- if one is to vote for the lesser of two evils, Huckster comes out on the losing end. The only justification I could see for voting McCain would be to beat the Huckster.
Hollowpoint on January 14, 2008 at 4:44 PM
Wrong! Juan Mccain=amnesty+family reunification = third world America.
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM
I think I would prefer McCain, God forbid.
Gianni on January 14, 2008 at 4:50 PM
Juan Mccain
=amnesty+family reunification = third world America.
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM
Fixed it for you. Can’t believe we’re back to this crap again.
Gianni on January 14, 2008 at 4:51 PM
Huck is a bigger liar than McCain. McCain denies the obvious, like an alcoholic denying his addiction (yeah, it’s not amnesty) and Huck purposefully twists and finesses his record.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:51 PM
The reason why I don’t like John McCain are too many to list here, his age being the least of those reasons.
The main reason I dislike him is he isn’t a Republican.
SimplyKimberly on January 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM
Who will get more votes in SC?
Fred Thompson or Fred Durst? lolololol
froghat on January 14, 2008 at 4:53 PM
Want a free trip to Aztlan? Than McCain is your Juan.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:53 PM
Do McShamnesty and the Huckster go after each other at all?
Darksean on January 14, 2008 at 4:53 PM
Best case scenario for Fred is that the bidding for ANYONE-BUT-JOHN opens up, and that he can stand up as the candidate with the momentum and the best chance of re-uniting the Reagan coalition. In that case, Rudy’s last gasp in Florida might sap John’s strength at a key moment for the centrists (aka RINOs).
For that reason the only MI results that would really be harmful to Fred would be stronger-than-expected Huckabee and Mitt finishes that powerfully boost both of their campaigns, attracting too many of the voters and donors that Fred needs. A strong John finish in MI and limp results for Mitt and Mike might be just what Fred needs.
If and only if Fred finishes very strongly in SC, then he’ll at least get some “Is Fred Maybe Alive After All?” stories, along with whatever gaggle of headlines he can group together: A fundraising spike, movement in nationwide and other polls, maybe another strong debate performance in L.A. this month. If a strong up-the-middle result in Florida follows, that would make him the story going into Superduper Tuesday, with disappointments in other campaigns (even if one of them ekes out a victory) as sidebars.
Likely? I can’t quite say I think so. Possible? Why not?
CK MacLeod on January 14, 2008 at 4:54 PM
Exactly. At least McCain admits he agreed with the bill before he started claiming he didn’t. Huckster claims he was against it all along, when he clearly wasn’t.
Gianni on January 14, 2008 at 4:54 PM
Fred Thompson
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:54 PM
Who will get more votes in SC?
Fred Thompson or Fred Durst? lolololol
froghat on January 14, 2008 at 4:53 PM
Hilarious!
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 4:55 PM
I wish you were right about Graham losing, but I can’t see it happening. Most conservatives who are paying attention will not vote for Graham, but too much of the voting public go based on name recognition. The also-rans will have no chance to dent his built-in incumbent advantage.
I’ll probably right in a name, since I swore I would never vote for him again. However, honestly, I really don’t want any of the no-names winning either. They have no experience and would be run over in Washington. I wish it were differently, but it’s not.
That said, the best I can hope for is to see him barely get reelected and have it scare him straight.
wardrobedoor on January 14, 2008 at 4:55 PM
Never. That’s what gives the rise to the McCain/Huck ticket rumors.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:55 PM
Global Warming? Keating Five? Keep McCain’s dream alive!
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:56 PM
Huck is a snake oil salesmen straight out of some old comedy. I can’t even think of another politician who would lie so casually about easily verifiable things. Hillary lies about her intentions, but that’s a lot harder to prove.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 4:58 PM
The only reason Fred is down in the polls is because of the obvious bias of the polltakers, and even if they had instead chosen to place Fred in the lead it would only have been an obvious ploy to suppress Fred’s voter turnout! You can’t win no matter who you are, Allahpundit! Heh heh heh heh heh… (In the voice of Ace Ventura, from the opening scene on the cliff in When Nature Calls.)
Seriously though, even if Fred were in the lead I would still worry the polls are wrong. I used to do some day trading so I understand how difficult it is to predict the future based on analysis of historical data. It’s not exactly the same thing, but there are some similarities.
FloatingRock on January 14, 2008 at 4:59 PM
I’m with ya! There are many of us and the Repub party should take heed or face having a bunch of Repub conservatives make write-ins or just not vote for a president!
jwp1964 on January 14, 2008 at 4:59 PM
Bush almost got the amnesty bill through even though he was a lame duck president with no power.
Make no mistake about it… if an energized Mccain wins he WILL get it through and you can kiss America bye bye!
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 5:00 PM
If Fred does just ONE piece of theatrics demonstrating that he is “passionate” he will win the SC primary by a landslide. People are begging him during his campaign appearances to give them what they want. A leader HAS to give the followers what they want when they are begging for it. That’s how the world works.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM
That’s exactly right. The same of course is true of any of the Dems AND Huck.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:03 PM
“I’m still mystified as to what Fred’s campaign strategy is.”
Limeygeek
It is what IT IS! is the strategy.
Fred’s got REAL covered…..ain’t seen one like that since last time the creek rose upto the shed.
naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah………………….
creek risin’ is a powerful force!!
& something else Fred supports:
http://www.laurelzimmer.com/2008/01/11/citizen-arm-thyself/
lobosan5 on January 14, 2008 at 5:03 PM
I’m still hoping the conservative base will pull together and think! I dont get it! All they have to do is ask themselves, “who is the most conservative candidate?” Problem solved. Obviously coservatives are scrambling to find the most popular candidate instead of most conservative. This is not brain surgery, although those considering Huckabee or McCain may have some type of brain disfunction. I will be voting Thompson!
kcd on January 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM
But do people want real or an illusion?
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:05 PM
Or we will get Mitt, who just basically decided it was better to lie about his position on abortion and immigration and gay rights and much of the Republican base has bought this hook, line and sinker. Blah blah.
Georgealbert on January 14, 2008 at 4:38 PM
I support Rudy too, but please don’t smear Mitt with a bunch of baloney about him “lying” on abortion and so forth.
Buy Danish on January 14, 2008 at 5:05 PM
He is not being elected by the conservative base only.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:05 PM
Mitt is my second choice (oh what choices we’ve got!), but the guy changes his whole position set like a snake changes skin.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:07 PM
If you want to live in pain, you’ll support that nut McCain!
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:08 PM
I’ve been to the promised land – and I loved it. Ronaldus was a giant. I won’t be voting for any pusillanimous pecksniffian pissant Huckster under ANY circumstances. Nor will I vote for the certifiable McCain. Nope, I’d vote for the maniac Ron Paul before I’d vote for either of those poseurs.
We need Fred. Damn, we need him badly. I’m going to send money today. And Allah, you’re just plain wrong to try and marginalize Fred OR his supporters.
FREEDOM!!!!
Charles Martel on January 14, 2008 at 5:11 PM
What’s with these anti-Fred! trolls, HaraldHardrada and froghat?
How can Fred! be done when the majority of primaries haven’t even be held? I swear, some people are just dumber than rocks. Are you two competing in a “Who can be more mindless?” competition perchance? Or is it that you’re affiliated with a rival campaign and are truly worried about a Fred! surge?
If Fred! was actually done why would you even have to say anything? And why would you keep laughing at each other’s lame jokes? Fred Durst vs. Fred Thompson? That’s funny?
Yikes.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 5:12 PM
Outstanding!
Gregor on January 14, 2008 at 5:13 PM
Seriously! Aren’t Republicans supposed to be smarter than the Dims?
Think Dammit!
Fred!!!
SimplyKimberly on January 14, 2008 at 5:14 PM
Screw the polls. They no longer have any credibility (unless you count their ability to push agendas).
fabrexe on January 14, 2008 at 5:14 PM
Fredmania:
http://www2.beaufortgazette.com/blogs/post/17044
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:16 PM
And the winner on illegal immigration is…Fred Thompson!
http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez2008.html
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:18 PM
NY Republicans for Fred
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/suffolk/ny-lijani145537790jan14,0,5370593.story
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM
Gun owners support Fred:
http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/article4136.html
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:20 PM
Yeah, the recent open enrollment REALLY increased the # of mental midgets here at HotAir.
Fred Durst?!?……..please don’t waste our time……loser.
omnipotent on January 14, 2008 at 5:21 PM
Jesusland endorses Fred Thompson. What more could the Evangelicals want???
http://www.earnedmedia.org/ue0114.htm
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:21 PM
Only idiots defend Huck. And Chuck is an idiot.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59670
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:25 PM
.
All depends from which direction the Wind is blowin’.
At this point in the History of the two-leggeds
REAL has little to no meaning,
(I give you an industry that can grow Diamonds like Shitakis)
while the illusion means you can keep your ipod headphones on & dig Da dancin’spell, O Hell Yes! no matter what happens in Kenya or Canada.
Real is what you have when the power goes down, or after a month w/out makeup & a tweezer.
Fear not, Igor,,this illusion thing is flying for the fan along w/ the sht.
May the American Citizens wake up in time.
.
O!….& did I say…GO FRED!!!
lobosan5 on January 14, 2008 at 5:32 PM
Well, Fred is getting good crowds this afternoon in SC:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1953656/posts
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:36 PM
Mitt Romney is not leaving the race after Michigan, win or lose.
This race is going to the last man standing so Romney will not jump out.
EJDolbow on January 14, 2008 at 5:37 PM
What’s with these anti-Fred! trolls, HaraldHardrada and froghat?
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 5:12 PM
Personally I am unable to support an attorney who gave legal advice to Libyan muslim nazi terrorists and claims he is pro life but was a lobbyist for abortion groups and also has a muslim jihadist on his team!
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 5:39 PM
Now, now, I’m no friend of Spence, but let’s tell the truth. Repeat after me: SPENCER ABRAHAM IS A LEBANESE CHRISTIAN.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:46 PM
AND HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL!!!
& here’s a little piece of real:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tXUvxiVshY
lobosan5 on January 14, 2008 at 5:49 PM
I’d prefer to beat both those scumfurters.
snickelfritz on January 14, 2008 at 5:54 PM
HaraldHardrada, you are ridiculous! Pssst: I hear that Rudy Giuliani hates freedom, makes love to Islamofascists, and gives money to the ACLU. ALL AT THE SAME TIME!
What a caricature you are! Right To Life endorses Fred! and supposedly THEY are the “stooopid” ones. LoL. Too funny. You’re like three sandwiches short of a picnic.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 5:55 PM
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 5:46 PM
Yes, a lebanese Christian just like Barack Hussein Obama’s owner Antoin Rezko….it doesn’t matter that Rezko has relatives in lebanon who are members of Hezzbollah!
Pay no attention folks…nothing to see here.
He’s a Christian….just like B Hussein Obama, a Louis Farakhan Christian…a Christian muslim.
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 5:57 PM
.
Words are a curious phenomenom…it all depends on what order you put them in, how you emphasize them, & the small details you happen to leave out.
.
It also depends on how dull & stupid your listening audience is & weither or not they are paying attention to the finer details.
lobosan5 on January 14, 2008 at 5:58 PM
Harald claims to be an investment banker from CA,..but,..I dunno.., doesn’t seem too busy. Might just manage that secret front group that siphons money into Huck’s pocket from tobacco companies.
a capella on January 14, 2008 at 6:00 PM
Oh, yeah, I forgot about the donations from the bioresearch company using stem cells.
a capella on January 14, 2008 at 6:02 PM
Is this a “power of positive thought” thing? He’ll have to gain 10 points overnight.
Wise Golden on January 14, 2008 at 6:04 PM
I hope you are right; however, I see it more likely of a second place finish for Fred. He does not go on the offensive against McCain enough. He needs to talk about McCain’s involvement with the “Gang of 14″, his push for Amnesty, his opposition to the Bush tax cuts, and his current “Green” energy bill that would destroy many American business and cost jobs.
GO FRED!!!!
azcop on January 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM
I like this one better!
Sultry Beauty on January 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM
And I have gentile relatives in Washington State who still use the word “Jew” as a verb — does that make make me an anti-semite? You’re an idiot.
And you sound like a Grade-A bigot…
He can claim whatever he wants. All he appears to be is an ignoramus who believes in guilt by association. People like him make me sick.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 6:06 PM
I have been pushing that idea for a long time. I’m glad to hear others think and feel the same way. That would be a great ticket.
azcop on January 14, 2008 at 6:07 PM
Or this one…
Sultry Beauty on January 14, 2008 at 6:09 PM
Thank you!
Another notable Lebanese Christian is Brigitte Gabriel.
Scroll down for a speech she gave at Duke.
You want to question make bigoted comments about her too?
Buy Danish on January 14, 2008 at 6:09 PM
Sorry, hit the submit button by mistake.
You want to question [her creds and] make bigoted comments about her too?
Buy Danish on January 14, 2008 at 6:11 PM
Well “open borders” Spence is no Brigitte Gabriel with whom I had an honor to speak on a radio program, but he is also not Mubarack Hussein Obama.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 6:18 PM
lol! Tobacco money launderer I love it!
It’s going to be quite a shock to go back to how it was before the primaries started! When we’re all on the same side again.
I must admit I’m completely obsessed with politics now and probably lose 30-40% of my workday because of it.
It’s election year what do you expect?
This month is Huckabee month.
Next month is bash Hillary time…all the way till november.
I have to see your non stop anti Huck talk all the time…a little anti Fred talk won’t kill you.
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 6:25 PM
But Huck is just SO pathetic. Why do we need Huck, why??? Or as John Edwards asks in that special whiny voice of his: “WHAH??? WHAH???”
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 6:30 PM
If you support Huckabee you are not a Conservative. It’s that simple. A vote for him is WORSE than a vote for a Democrat. At least four years of liberal Democratic rule can be blamed on their party. Four years of liberal Republican rule will doom the GOP.
Anti-Huckabee folks actually bring up substantial issues, such as the fact that he worked to elect Democrats. You just make bigoted remarks about people you don’t know much about. I think that says a lot about you.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 6:32 PM
We need Huckabee to beat the dems!
He is our best candidate. He’s the most likeable and honest candidate out there.
Imagine Hildebeast standing next to him debating…she will look like the spawn of satan compared to him and the majority of America already knows that Hillary is corrupt and dishonest.
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 6:33 PM
I don’t like him and can probably swing a dead cat and hit thousands more who more than don’t like Huck, they loathe him for trying to hijack the republican party for his own interests. He needs to do the right thing and admit he’s a prolife Democrat and leave us conservatives alone.
ihasurnominashun on January 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM
Surely you jest Master Harald. Of all the reasons in the world this one takes the cake. First of all, it’s just as likely to be Obama, and Hillary looks like the spawn of satan compared to anyone to those who are capable of seeing her as the spawn of satan. There’s just no way a former preacher is getting the majority vote in the general.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM
ihasurnominashun on January 14, 2008 at 6:36 PM
Who’s your candidate Fred CFR Thompson? Juan Mccain?
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM
Also you must admit Huckabee is the only one who stands a chance against Mubarack Hussein Obama!
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 6:40 PM
If we have to elect a pandering, identity-politicking, high-taxing, felon-pardoning, illegal-loving theo-socialist to feel like we’ve won, we’ve already lost.
snickelfritz on January 14, 2008 at 6:41 PM
My candidate is the only true conservative in the race. I’m pretty sure even YOU can figure it out from that hint.
ihasurnominashun on January 14, 2008 at 6:42 PM
I was speaking more less to issues and more to HaraldHarHarHar’s bigotry which casts a very wide net.
Why does it not surprise me that he’s for the Huckster?
Buy Danish on January 14, 2008 at 6:43 PM
Truer words were never spoken…er…typed!
ihasurnominashun on January 14, 2008 at 6:43 PM
Huckster is a lightweight. He’d get slaughtered as his horrible record and blatantly dishonest representation of it came to light with Republicans staying home in disgust.
Hollowpoint on January 14, 2008 at 6:44 PM
He is a Democrat! You’re blinded by his halo.
Honest? HONEST? He says he’s not going to run a negative ad, shows it to the press, and then runs it anyways. Wooooooooo! Gotta love that kinda honesty. Speaking truth to power.
Wow. You’ve consumed far too much kool-aid. Did you not see the poll results featured on Drudge last week that had Huckabee LOSING to Obama and Hillary?
Huckabee is a joke of a candidate for the GOP. Anyone who supports him is essentially supporting the demise of the Conservative Coalition.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 6:44 PM
There’s just no way a former preacher is getting the majority vote in the general.
Igor R.
Why not? Don’t you think everyone is sick to death of corrupt lying special interest controlled politicians?
Don’t you think Huckabee would be considered a fresh breath of air to everyone? Imagine…an honest politician.
Nobody questions Huckabee’s integrity or honesty.. only opposing republicans.
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 6:44 PM
Argh. Messed that one up too!
I was speaking less to issues and more to …
Buy Danish on January 14, 2008 at 6:44 PM
Did you not see the poll results featured on Drudge last week that had Huckabee LOSING to Obama and Hillary?
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 6:44 PM
Sorry pal, but I’m not buying any of these poll results especially from Drudge after his Huckabee Easy kill story was proven to be a favor from him to Romney!
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 6:47 PM
Huckabee is a LIAR, Harald. A liar! He lied to everyone about that negative campaign add. What would stop him from lying about something else? The man has no morals. He pays lip-service to the bible and its teachings. Shame on that pandering, populist Democrat.
And shame on you for being such a bigot. You should be ashamed of yourself.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 6:49 PM
I question Huckascam’s fitness to be POTUS.
Just on foreign policy alone he scares me to death because he is so thoroughly clueless.
I recently saw a comparison drawn between Huck and the slimy President Logan on 24 and I can really see how they match up.
If Huck or McCain get the nod, I am writing in my vote. I just cannot support either one.
SimplyKimberly on January 14, 2008 at 6:50 PM
And I’m not buying any of your pro-Huckabee, anti-Fred! rhetoric. You don’t understand what matters to conservative voters who AREN’T evangelical christians. You cannot out-liberal the Democrats. Obama is far better at plucking the heart strings of Christians than Huckabee is.
If Huckabee wins the GOP Nom, I’m voting Obama. It’s as simple as that. And the scary part is that I’m not the only person who is willing to do this. It’s a matter of party preservation.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 6:51 PM
Huckabee is the only candidate running that,like Reagan, will take away the millions of Christian democrats who have been stranded in the wrong party now that the dems have gone far left/socialist.
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 6:52 PM
Actually, there are lots of questions about Huck’s honesty and integrity, back from before he was a Republican presidential candidate. Check into his ‘gift registry,’ his ‘furniture,’ and other fun stuff when he was just following in the tradition of ‘other’ Arkansas governors.
snickelfritz on January 14, 2008 at 6:52 PM
Huckaphoney is already pandering to his special interest group. The Evangelicals. He pandered to the illegals by giving them in state tuition and by being the ONLY “republican” at the Spanish Channel debate. Oh, Huck’s a pander bear alright!! You really are desperate.
ihasurnominashun on January 14, 2008 at 6:53 PM
A vote for Hussein Obama is literally a vote for Ahmadinejad
and is considered treason in my book.
HaraldHardrada on January 14, 2008 at 6:54 PM
That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Why would Christian Democrats vote for a liberal Republican over a liberal Democrat? Why? ONE GOOD REASON, please.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 6:55 PM
At the moment they don’t because it’s the primary season and he is the Dems’ dream opponent. But you don’t think the guy who just changed his views on illegal immigration in one day and stole major portions of someone else’s plan verbatim without attribution (not that that guy minds, but still) will be questioned later? Fred is not my relative, I wasn’t born supporting him. I though Huck was OK at first. It’s only after I learned more about him I got horrified.
Igor R. on January 14, 2008 at 6:56 PM
Okay, it’s obvious that Harald Hardrada is a troll only seeking to stir up trouble. No one can honestly believe the pig poop he’s slinging. I’m done feeding the troll.
ihasurnominashun on January 14, 2008 at 6:56 PM
You are a bigot. Unbelievable. You just compared a vote for a sincere, liberal Democrat to a vote for an anti-semitic, theocratic lunatic. Amazing! And you called me a traitor!
LoL
I would much rather have four years of liberal Democrat rule over four years of liberal Republican rule. We can recover from the former; we are doomed by the latter.
HebrewToYou on January 14, 2008 at 6:59 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »