csdeven on January 14, 2008 at 12:54 AM

He wants to cut off all debate and ends up sounding like a Stalinist. I keep waiting for the Thought Police to swoop in and arrest me for daring to support candidates other than Fred Thompson.

His intent was to try and clean of the mess…Everything that he has been a part of and wants to do is in our best interest of this country!!!

jerrytbg on January 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Do you have any idea how moronic that sounds?
Buy Danish on January 13, 2008 at 5:53 PM

He lives in an echo chamber. It’s always the same and he has ceased to consider it’s validity or lack thereof.

Just click on my handle. It’ll take you here. Scroll down and Click on “view results”.

I asked Thompson whether he was proud of his role in enacting the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation in ’01.

“Yes,” replied the former Tennessee senator without hesitation. [...]

More recently, Thompson, defended McCain-Feingold passionately in interviews with syndicated columnist George Will and radio talk show host Laura Ingrahm.

That was written 9.22.07 (so you have the frame of reference for “recently”)

Even his flirtation with the CFR

Hm, didn’t he go up to SCOTUS to defend it? Or is that part of a prolonged flirtation.

btw: “Senator McCain’s chief of staff, declared in 2001 that “if McCain-Feingold passes, it will not have happened if it weren’t for Fred Thompson.”

What is inarguable is that America now has what amounts to a federal speech code, enforced with jail terms of up to five years.

An exaggeration? Judge for yourself. Consider the sorts of cases the Federal Election Commission now finds itself deciding:

Item—In June, the FEC ruled that the Bill of Rights Educational Foundation, an Arizona nonprofit corporation headed by a conservative activist named David Hardy, could not advertise Hardy’s pro-gun documentary (The Rights of the People) on television and radio during the pre-election season. The FEC noted that the film featured federal candidates and thus qualified as “electioneering communication.” Hardy, according to news accounts (I could not reach him by phone or e-mail), yanked the film until after the election.

THE NEW YORK TIMES reports that Fred Thompson is surging in South Carolina. And I just got an email from a journalist who says that crowds at Thompson events are suddenly over-capacity. Is it a tipping point for Thompson, or just a blip? Stay tuned.

Goodnight.

Buy Danish on January 13, 2008 at 10:02 PM

Gee. How did I know that you were going to go there. I don’t save links but the one that counters this I should have. It goes to his regretting having supported that.. His intent was to try and clean of the mess. Just know that Fred is a Federalist ! Everything that he has been a part of and wants to do is in our best interest of this country!!! Bar none!!! Even his flirtation with the CFR. I put Fred in the same patriotic vain as Pat Tillman and I know what Pat gave up.!!! And there ain’t a Vet that comes on this site that doesn’t know of what I speak!!!! Sorry, but you touched a nerve.

jerrytbg on January 13, 2008 at 9:36 PM

McCain-Feingold.

Goodnight.

Fred doesn’t make the cut.

Buy Danish on January 13, 2008 at 9:17 PM

show me!

Romney 26.2
McCain 25.3

Buy Danish on January 13, 2008 at 6:15 PM

nor I you. 2nd amendment. Mitt & Rudy don’t make the cut.

jerrytbg on January 13, 2008 at 6:21 PM

Even if we were to stipulate that you are correct (big if there), my First Amendment comes before your Second Amendment.

Fred doesn’t make the cut.

All I can tell you is that my opinions are based on my own informed opinions–Buy Danish

LOL!

maverick muse on January 13, 2008 at 7:33 PM

You finally got me on something, Moonbat.

……ON WITH THE BATTLE!

Mcguyver on January 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM

’tis cool.

Now then, please update us on the polls?

True.

Huck has an awfully big but………..
fred5678 on January 13, 2008 at 7:40 PM

is that spelled correctly?

jerrytbg on January 13, 2008 at 8:13 PM

It was also an unchallenging hanging curve ball. No glory in that.

Huck has an awfully big but………..
fred5678 on January 13, 2008 at 7:40 PM

is that spelled correctly?

jerrytbg on January 13, 2008 at 8:13 PM

I debated making that pun, but deferred to this polite company.

is that spelled correctly?

volsense on January 13, 2008 at 3:09 PM

Having lived in Michigan almost all my life, I can tell you that 90% of the state is conservative, but unfortunately the idiots that live in Detroit, Ann Arbor and Lansing out number the people in the state that have to work for a living and who know what it’s like to balance a budget. Granholm and her politics of tax, tax, tax has run the state into bankruptcy and until she and her ilk are out of the state, they will continue to do so. Unfortunately they still control politics in the state due to just their sheer numbers.

wccawa on January 13, 2008 at 7:16 PM
Dude, them’s fighting words.

Signed,
A vet

THANKS FOR YOUR SERVICE!

That truth is on generically greater level than just saying that everything matters so much that I have to get bent all out of shape about it and break the HA comment posts beyond reason.

It is not at all directed to our faithful servicemen and woman, who showed that their is no greater love and sacrifice that one can make, than risking one’s life for others.

In the end, I always believe that all that sacrifice will be avenged and justified.

Mike Huckabee is not the one to become the vehicle for such, rather, he is an aberration allowed to happen in our time to show us what we collectively don’t want to happen.
And, even Mike Huckabee will be but a rotten stick-in-the-mud memory to trace our roots in a real principled, representative, Republic values.

AGAIN, THANKS FOR YOUR SERVICE.

……ON WITH THE BATTLE!

Buy Danish & Co. have dedicated all their heart, might, mind and strength to their designated revisionist con man.

The same criticism applies to Huckabee supporters.

Conservative principles are not their source of inspiration. Self adulation is their rationale that they’ll defend to the death of the conservative movement.

There is not much time left.

We desperately need to defeat John Mccain.

You are correct, sir!

Mike Huckabee is the only candidate capable of beating Juan Mcamnesty.

Huck is shamesty in sheep’s clothing.

Like him or not he is the only candidate capable of defeating Mccain.

No.

Not only would Juan Mccain make a terrible president and would destroy the country with his amnesty for illegals and family reunification plans…he has NO chance of beating the dems. 80% of the country is against amnesty for illegals and would not vote for Mr. Amnesty

Yes!

Face it… it is either Mccain or Huckabee make the right choice

Hunter, Mitt, and Thompson are the only ones for strict enforcement, with no ifs, ands, or buts. Huck has an awfully big but with his subsidized tuition for illegal aliens. A non-starter. Read what really works - right now – in 4 states. Only 46 to go.

HaraldHardrada on January 13, 2008 at 5:35 PM