Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Scary Larry O’Donnell: Silky’s a loser; Update: First black president versus second black president?

posted at 2:20 pm on January 11, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Someone had to say it. Reality-based indeed:

John Edwards is a loser. He has won exactly two elections in his life and lost 31. Only one of his wins and all of his losses were in presidential primaries and caucuses. He remains perfectly positioned to continue to lose with a Kucinich-like consistency. Nothing but egomania keeps Edwards in the race now. All presidential candidates are egomaniacs but some of them have party status worth preserving that forces them to drop out when they hit the wall. A loser like Edwards has no status or dignity to lose. Campaigning and losing is his life. So, he will continue his simple-minded, losing campaign and deny Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton the one-on-one contest they deserve.

If John Edwards stays in the race, he might, in the end, become nothing other than the Southern white man who stood in the way of the black man. And for that, he would deserve a lifetime of liberal condemnation.

It’s an identity politics round-robin! Obama’s supporters are attacking Hillary for being racially insensitive, Hillary’s supporters are attacking Obama for being condescending towards women, Edwards’s supporters are attacking Edwards for being chauvinistic, and now inevitably comes the attack on Edwards for being de facto racist in his campaign ambitions. Is it time for Silky to deploy Elizabeth for another round of why Hillary’s (comparatively) bad for women? Or a reprise from Michelle Obama of why you have to be able to “run your own house” if you want to run the White House? There’s no telling to what depths the “tolerance” will sink as the polls tighten, although we’ve already had a preview from Scary Larry himself of how it’ll go in the general if Mitt somehow pulls it out. Your exit quotation of the day: “If you’re a woman, you vote for Hillary because of what it means to women everywhere.”

Update: Actually, this should have been exit quotation of the day.

Addressing Oprah directly, Roseanne adds, “You are a closeted republican and chose Barak [sic] Obama because you do not like other women who actually stand for something to working American Women besides glamour, angels, Hollywood and dieting!”

Wednesday night, Roseanne seemed to throw her support behind Hillary Clinton, stating, “I have decided that having a woman president before any man of any color is what these times call for.” But by Thursday morning she assured she “liked Obama, too.”

Update: Politico stirs the pot, with an assist from Drudge bearing a “race war” headline. So much for post-racial politics:

A series of comments from Senator Hillary Clinton, her husband, and her supporters are spurring a racial backlash and adding a divisive edge to the presidential primary as the candidates head south to heavily African-American South Carolina…

Many analysts think Clinton won New Hampshire on the back of a feminist backlash against criticism from her rivals and the media, and now, after his own defeat, it’s Obama’s turn. Race is particularly complicated turf this year, however, in a contest that features two towering figures who pride themselves for breaking racial barriers in American politics…

Thursday, a key player in black South Carolina politics, Rep. James Clyburn, told the New York Times he’d consider endorsing Obama in response to what he considered a lack of respect in the Clinton campaign’s approach to Obama…

“Some of the Obama people are clearly trying to use Hillary’s comments about Martin Luther King and distort them into something she did not say, which is outrageous,” said former Pennsylvania Rep. William Gray. “It’s a hot issue in South Carolina, and they’re spreading the word all over. I hope that the good senator will make sure that none of his people are doing that. We don’t need to have a debate about race or gender.”

Billy Jeff’s taking a beating for calling coverage of Obama’s campaign a “fairy tale,” i.e. that a black man could never be elected president. His comments at the time had nothing to do with race, though: They were about Obama’s shifting positions on Iraq and the alleged negativity of the Clinton campaign vis-a-vis Obama’s. See for yourself.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

NEW LOOK AT SILKY PONY

If you judge a man by his enemies….

funky chicken on January 11, 2008 at 2:24 PM

Addressing Oprah directly, Roseanne adds, “You are a closeted republican and chose Barak [sic] Obama because you do not like other women who actually stand for something to working American Women besides glamour, angels, Hollywood and dieting!”

Heads. Exploding. Everywhere.

Does anyone notice that liberal women with the first name Rose are invariably oversized physically, emotionally, and egotistically?

BKennedy on January 11, 2008 at 2:24 PM

So, he will continue his simple-minded, losing campaign and deny Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton the one-on-one contest they the victory he deserve

TheBigOldDog on January 11, 2008 at 2:26 PM

Kos should tell dems to vote for democrats. But I think he knows they are reluctant to back any of their crappy candidates so he tells them to vote republican

William Amos on January 11, 2008 at 2:28 PM

Actually Im surprized the Obama people havent tried harder to get rid of Edwards he is taking votes from him.

Im just shocked they have called Edwards “Judas with really nice hair” for preventing the second coming of Obama

William Amos on January 11, 2008 at 2:31 PM

Hillary’s supporters are attacking Obama for being condescending towards women, Edwards’s supporters are attacking Edwards for being chauvinistic, and now inevitably comes the attack on Edwards for being de facto racist in his campaign ambitions.

It`s like watching a dog chase it`s own tale, amusing.

ThePrez on January 11, 2008 at 2:33 PM

I’m sure Hillary loves having Roseanne’s support, anyone else remember this story?

doubleplusundead on January 11, 2008 at 2:34 PM

But by Thursday morning she assured she “liked Obama, too.”

Some of her best friends are black. This is getting fun now.

“If you’re a bald man, you vote for Fred because of what it means to bald men everywhere.”

pedestrian on January 11, 2008 at 2:35 PM

Actually Im surprized the Obama people havent tried harder to get rid of Edwards he is taking votes from him.

Agreed. Obama wouldn’t really consider Edwards as a VP anyway if he wins the candidacy, right? So you’d think he’d be more aggressive with Edwards.

tneloms on January 11, 2008 at 2:36 PM

Wednesday night, Roseanne seemed to throw her support behind Hillary Clinton, stating, “I have decided that having a woman president before any man of any color is what these times call for.”

Adviser: Roseanne, they are going to label you a racist!
Roesanne: OMG, you’re right! Get that Reporter on the phone.

But by Thursday morning she assured she “liked Obama, too.”

TheBigOldDog on January 11, 2008 at 2:36 PM

Silky goes down hill from here. Kerry Heinz endorsed Hussain. Wonder if they will go huntin together? “Can I get me a huntin license here?”

kcd on January 11, 2008 at 2:43 PM

I sit in awe of the intelligence of the Democrats. These are the people who are supposed to be smarter than everybody?

I bet if you took a poll and respondents actually answered honestly, you would find that there are less people who vote Democrat because of their stance on issues (as opposed to the race and genitals of the candidate) than people who watch porn for the plot and acting.

bert169 on January 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM

It’s a circular firing squad on the Dem side. But if they think it’s ugly politics now, just wait for the General Election.

Obama, Hillary and Edwards are the perfect storm of target rich environments for the GOP.

DrW on January 11, 2008 at 2:46 PM

Actually Im surprized the Obama people havent tried harder to get rid of Edwards he is taking votes from him.

I have the other way around. Edwards supporters are middle classers, unions, and senior citizens. These people aren’t going to Obama in great, or decent numbers.

If Edwards drops, think his supporters shift more to Hillary then Obama. The real question is, do 6 in 10 go Hillary, 8 in 10, more?

gabriel sutherland on January 11, 2008 at 2:46 PM

Wonder what family crisis Edwards will wheel out this time to drum up some ca$h for his doomed campaign…

Swinehound on January 11, 2008 at 2:46 PM

doubleplusundead on January 11, 2008 at 2:34

Wow! She’s way out there.

TheBigOldDog on January 11, 2008 at 2:46 PM

It’s a circular firing squad on the Dem side.

DrW on January 11, 2008 at 2:46 PM

But there is no one in the middle. Its more like the identity politics of the Serbs, Croats, and Bosnians, but fought with with pc-gotchas instead of rape.

If experience his so important to Hillary, why didn’t she support Biden?

pedestrian on January 11, 2008 at 2:50 PM

Roseanne

Wait – this is still the 21st century, right? We didn’t go back to the 20th when I wasn’t paying attention, did we?

calbear on January 11, 2008 at 2:54 PM

Dont forget about the Dead Baby constituency, Silky Pony says they talk to him too.

firepilot on January 11, 2008 at 2:56 PM

Silky’s a lawyer; he can’t help but argue until he makes a deal… is that what he wants? He knows he’s a loser, but will stick at it until one of them offers him VP?

Frozen Tex on January 11, 2008 at 3:09 PM

Silky is a loser.

Most campaigns give away bumperstickers and buttons.

He’s selling them online.

Sadly, no hair care products available.

JammieWearingFool on January 11, 2008 at 3:10 PM

One of the lib dimwits figured it out.

solarenergy (See profile | I’m a fan of solarenergy)
By calling Edwards “a loser,” he’s calling all of Edwards’ supporters “losers” too.

Yep.

Brass Pair on January 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM

Silky’s a loser, water is wet, Olberdolt is an idiot, the sky is blue….

Metro on January 11, 2008 at 3:14 PM

Actually Roseanne’s “I like Obama too” diatribe says she should be for Silky.

She thinks there are 4 pillars of American Politics. One is Sexism, one is Racism, and two are Class warfare (which is so crucial that it gets two pillars).

So, shouldn’t she support the class warfare contingency? Or does she not read what she writes? That would at least explain how she stays intelligent enough to speak.

And seriously, if Silky can’t get the sexism support as well? He just need another couple of effeminate magazine covers.

gekkobear on January 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM

She thinks there are 4 pillars of American Politics. One is Sexism, one is Racism, and two are Class warfare (which is so crucial that it gets two pillars).

gekkobear on January 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM

Yeah, for fat and ugly.

Brass Pair on January 11, 2008 at 3:28 PM

Wonder what family crisis Edwards will wheel out this time to drum up some ca$h for his doomed campaign…

Swinehound on January 11, 2008

My first thought was testicular cancer, but you gotta have a pair to have that. Maybe the Pink Sapphire will close.

thekingtut on January 11, 2008 at 3:30 PM

Next up:

The Clinton apparatus [let's stick with Bolshevik terms - shall we?] will label the Obama apparatus as being “anti-feminist.”

I’m loving this class war between the proletariat defenders of the classless society.

OhEssYouCowboys on January 11, 2008 at 3:32 PM

Edwards will go for the identity group of workers (Edwards being a child of a worker himself), in contrast to Hillary’s housewives and Obama’s welfare cheats.

pedestrian on January 11, 2008 at 3:36 PM

Oh, and at the end of this class war, according to the media Oceania will never have been at war with Eurasia.

pedestrian on January 11, 2008 at 3:41 PM

Oh, and at the end of this class war, according to the media Oceania will never have been at war with Eurasia.

pedestrian on January 11, 2008 at 3:41 PM

Beautiful.

OhEssYouCowboys on January 11, 2008 at 3:48 PM

Will some state PLEASE accept John Edwards. Every time he opens his piehole he makes North Carolinians look stupid for ever electing him.

Les in NC on January 11, 2008 at 4:08 PM

“If you’re a woman, you vote for Hillary because of what it means to women everywhere.”

If you’re a thinking woman, you don’t vote for Hillary.

On the Clinton/Obama fights – were it not so dangerous for this country, whichever of the two wins, this w/b the entertainment of millennia – it’s that rich.

Entelechy on January 11, 2008 at 4:10 PM

I always find it interesting that you find much more racism, both subtle and overt, on the left side of the isle.

The soft racism of low expectations, the harder racism of Edwards being in the wrong position as a white man in front of a black man’s destiny, and let us not forget calling black republicans “house-n (well, you know).” Not to mention the racist demagoguery that Sharpton and Jackson spit out from one crisis to the next.

Seems the only ones not talking about race are the Republicans. Well, other than Ron Paul.

lodestonejames on January 11, 2008 at 4:51 PM

Needless to say, Jonah Goldberg was right.

Jaibones on January 11, 2008 at 5:04 PM

Roseanne Barr Translated:

“Shame on you for being gender biased, you should be gender biased for the Hilldebeast…And, BTW, I like the way he dances.”

franksalterego on January 11, 2008 at 5:34 PM

Ah, the race card.

Even CNN is promoting the upcoming Dumbs’ debate by calling it a discussion on race.

madmonkphotog on January 11, 2008 at 5:47 PM

Social warfare is inevitable in a zero-sum, group identity culture. Though we all know multiculturalism contains the seeds of its own destruction, I didn’t expect to see it so soon.

Let this snake eat its tail. None too soon. Yippeeee.

petefrt on January 11, 2008 at 6:26 PM

The Dems are lucky nobody really expects them to have any actual policies, just make vapid content-free assertions about their own worthiness. They be tokin’ on helium all day long.

drunyan8315 on January 11, 2008 at 6:36 PM

“Some of the Obama people are clearly trying to use Hillary’s comments about Martin Luther King and distort them into something she did not say, which is outrageous,” said former Pennsylvania Rep. William Gray.

Right. Like liberals have been doing to conservatives since forever. Except now that the distortion is against a Dem, it’s suddenly so unfair, isn’t it?

F***ing liberal hypocrites.

Ali-Bubba on January 11, 2008 at 8:49 PM

It’s always fun, these blue-on-blue battles. The emerging meme today seems to be that to run against a black man is de facto racist. That should be good for some fun. Now, where’s my popcorn?

Splunge on January 11, 2008 at 9:52 PM

I love it when the Dems set up their little IP boobie-traps and then get snared in them.

AUINSC on January 12, 2008 at 4:06 PM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.