New Luntz poll: Which candidate’s supporters have the most sex?
posted at 1:13 pm on January 11, 2008 by Allahpundit
Believe it. The candidates whose supporters have the least sex aren’t a big surprise, either.
Dare I make a joke about the name by which Fred’s supporters are colloquially known?
I guess I just did.
Update: Says See-Dub in the comments, “Not Lazy, no sir. Quite busy, in fact.”
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Okay, now come up with a joke about the paulnuts…
Weight of Glory on January 11, 2008 at 1:15 PM
No mention as to how many bag are needed to have sex with some of those lib beasts. Or whether they only do lights out at night.
bbz123 on January 11, 2008 at 1:16 PM
Thanks for that. Really.
emailnuevo on January 11, 2008 at 1:16 PM
Would anyone really admit they prefer looks over intelligence?
smithinmich on January 11, 2008 at 1:17 PM
I guess Fredheads have to set the real gold standard!
…that’s all I’ve got.
emailnuevo on January 11, 2008 at 1:17 PM
Would anyone really admit they prefer looks over intelligence?
Tough call after that “blondes make men stupid” study.
bbz123 on January 11, 2008 at 1:19 PM
Unnecessary, AP. Unnecessary.
Vizzini on January 11, 2008 at 1:20 PM
Captain obvious.
Weight of Glory on January 11, 2008 at 1:20 PM
why do these pollsters ask such idiotic personal questions? they are supposed to be political pollsters, right? not everything is about sex. shocker, I know
funky chicken on January 11, 2008 at 1:20 PM
Not Lazy, no sir. Quite busy, in fact.
Now if you’ll excuse me…
see-dubya on January 11, 2008 at 1:21 PM
Admitting that would hurt your chances of getting in bed with other members of the focus group I would think.
Luntz focus groups could become the new speed dating. I think I’ll give one a try if they ever come to Pittsburgh.
bert169 on January 11, 2008 at 1:21 PM
Good news for Bill.
Now I know the survey is full of cr@p.
amerpundit on January 11, 2008 at 1:22 PM
wondered why i liked fred so much ;) and i am more a looks then brains type of guy myself lol
good lord is it just me or are most the words in that article bunched together?
with the migrain i got right now i could hardley read it…
trailortrash on January 11, 2008 at 1:25 PM
Take a look at Jeri, then ask whose supporters get most in the mood.
MadisonConservative on January 11, 2008 at 1:25 PM
LOL
Fredhead…that’s all I’m sayin *snicker*
spacekicker on January 11, 2008 at 1:28 PM
OT: Rush is calling for us to vote for real conservatives, Fred and Romney. Not to let drive by media tell us its over.
lan astaslem on January 11, 2008 at 1:28 PM
When the survey answers are restricted to sex without a partner, the Paul campaign wins hand over fist.
Jack M. on January 11, 2008 at 1:29 PM
Should have asked the Paulnuts how many of them have sex and think of Ron Paul while doing it.
Come to think of it Im glad I DONT know
William Amos on January 11, 2008 at 1:29 PM
Jack M. on January 11, 2008 at 1:29 PM
winnerrr
trailortrash on January 11, 2008 at 1:30 PM
Rush just said the emails he got after the debate re: Thompson’s smackdown of Huck were “just shy of orgasmic”.
someguy on January 11, 2008 at 1:31 PM
Oh man! What a great idea for a reality dating T.V. show! You can have a couple on a date, and a focus group watching with those little “dial” doohickeys. Then we can watch the lines spike and sink in relation to how the group thinks the date is going.
Weight of Glory on January 11, 2008 at 1:32 PM
Leave it to you…
amerpundit on January 11, 2008 at 1:32 PM
HA!
Weight of Glory on January 11, 2008 at 1:33 PM
Ha-Ha-Ha!!!!!
kcd on January 11, 2008 at 1:34 PM
Well played, moronblog poet laureate.
Kid from Brooklyn on January 11, 2008 at 1:35 PM
I wish all conservative’s on the radio/tv/blogosphere had said the same thing from the very beginning.
davenp35 on January 11, 2008 at 1:36 PM
I’m TOTALLY pushing for Fred & Romney.
Spanglemaker on January 11, 2008 at 1:41 PM
I’ve got a little sex education for BKennedy, right here.
Editor on January 11, 2008 at 1:41 PM
Remind me not to shake a Paul’s supporter hand.
right2bright on January 11, 2008 at 1:41 PM
If you stand perfectly still, they won’t see you.
emailnuevo on January 11, 2008 at 1:44 PM
Paulnuts can go f*** themselves for all I care.
thirteen28 on January 11, 2008 at 1:44 PM
Where does he find these people? Does he expect us to believe that if we turn on the television we will find endless hours of Jeopardy? Someone as clueless as Luntz should not have chosen polling as a profession.
pedestrian on January 11, 2008 at 1:45 PM
Well now, that fits right in with this thread topic!
db on January 11, 2008 at 1:51 PM
It’s gotta be the nose…
heatherrc77 on January 11, 2008 at 1:53 PM
That clinches it.
Fred! or bust!!
Your Jewish Master on January 11, 2008 at 1:55 PM
This is coming from a lady, NOTHING sexy about a sexual predator!
kcd on January 11, 2008 at 1:55 PM
Hillary supporters aren’t getting any, but her husband is.
JammieWearingFool on January 11, 2008 at 1:58 PM
Fred gets elected in November, new Baby Boom starts next August!
RushBaby on January 11, 2008 at 1:59 PM
Alpha is as alpha does.
TexasDan on January 11, 2008 at 2:00 PM
Is it because we Fredheads don’t understand the Cialis ’4 hour warning’ because we consider that a normal condition?
OK: seriously, I need to show this to the wife and let her know we’re behind the curve here ;)
michaelo on January 11, 2008 at 2:04 PM
Looks/sex are overrated.
SECOND LOOK AT INTELLIGENCE
/cheap bridge for sale…
Entelechy on January 11, 2008 at 2:08 PM
Hah. “Fred,” and “bust” in the same sentence.
:X :x :x !!!
blatantblue on January 11, 2008 at 2:20 PM
…and they say liberals are, well, liberal, and conservatives are, well, heartless.
…because sex is overrated, a great percentage of them spend intelligent time with one witty beta male blogger on HA.
…even more intelligent, than above.
…independents/Democrats are more liberal than conservatives, duh…but not by much…proof that all are rabbits.
…58% of them are delusional or blind.
…non-item, because CinCs shouldn’t be rated by sexiness anyway. Same should go for Clinton, but he changed that…forever.
…non-item, because CinCs shouldn’t be rated by sexiness anyway. Same should go for Clinton, but he changed that…forever.
…sicko factor is equal among lefties/righties.
…libertarians approve (hopefully they’re all adults).
…heh, those holy bible-thumpers!
…and bridges are for sale, cheaply, and Hillary is a real warm person.
Entelechy on January 11, 2008 at 2:25 PM
They’re confusing correlation with causality.
Support Fred– Have more sex!
snickelfritz on January 11, 2008 at 2:27 PM
well, it is a ron paul
reLOVEution
blatantblue on January 11, 2008 at 2:31 PM
Just got a note from the Thompson campaign. Looks like they are still looking for cash. So if you have any and feel so inclined, go to: http://www.fred08.com
bnelson44 on January 11, 2008 at 2:34 PM
Another inequality that will be made more socially just under the Democrats. Do you want the false hope of Obama, or the experience of Hillary? Silky would just have mandatory sex worker visits.
pedestrian on January 11, 2008 at 3:00 PM
To be fair, it doesn’t say they’re awake when it happens.
Mark Jaquith on January 11, 2008 at 3:02 PM
…and people of normal stature are nuts over Dennis Kucinich.
James on January 11, 2008 at 3:10 PM
Didn’t have to tell me… Both me and my lady are for FRED
HotAirExpert on January 11, 2008 at 3:10 PM
Well, I would have seen the thread early but, well, you know
Go Fred!
Wind Rider on January 11, 2008 at 3:22 PM
According to Jack M. they do.
Esthier on January 11, 2008 at 4:13 PM
It’s all part of that undesirable psychosis called Fredheadism. It involves a detachment from reality and illusions of grandeur. Be honest, did any of you Fredheads see that focus group from SC. Those Fred supporters all looked like they were missing a few chromosomes, and definitely were not getting any, regardless of what they bragged about to their friends outside the Dairy Queen. The only prime material was that cutie in the front row and she couldn’t stand Fred.
tommylotto on January 11, 2008 at 4:17 PM
Folks, those who know about chromosomes advise to stay away from people who have a few too many, not from those who lack some.
Entelechy on January 11, 2008 at 4:22 PM
Heh, I don’t care who ya are, that’s just funny!
4shoes on January 11, 2008 at 5:05 PM
Why does AP start these stupid threads?
duff65 on January 11, 2008 at 5:10 PM
Doesn’t all depend on what the definition of “having sex” is?! Have we learned nothing from Bubba?
drunyan8315 on January 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM
Because 1) it’s an actual poll question, which is totally on-topic.
And 2) it makes for great snark, which is totally aligned with the website.
James on January 11, 2008 at 6:21 PM
I would. I even prefer stupid to intelligent.
Darth Executor on January 11, 2008 at 8:06 PM
The other 86% of Thompson supporters claim to have every intention of having sex some day. The other 88% of Obama supporters express a real desire to change to the frequency of the other 12%
The other 49% of Republicans admit to watching Dr. Ruth with their partner while the remaining 33% of Democrats prefer to watch Dr. Sue from Canada.
Bradky on January 12, 2008 at 2:27 AM
Look, the orgasmic machinations of the Fredheads here doesn’t qualify as real sex. This survey was taken by people whom have obviously been lurking at HA watching the “FRED!!!” orgasims. Heck I’d bet if asked, they say the Fredheads have more mutual masturbation than any other group.
;-)
csdeven on January 12, 2008 at 10:07 AM