Huckabee strikes back: Fred did nothing in eight years in the Senate; Update: Huck camp to phone every evangelical pastor in Michigan for GOTV
posted at 11:25 am on January 11, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Not true. He was quite the wingman for McCain on campaign finance reform, wasn’t he?
This attack, oddly enough, parallels Fred’s insofar as it too works to Maverick’s advantage. Even the most idgit-y of idgit voters knows McCain’s name, knows he has loads of Senate experience, and knows that he’s accomplished a lot there. What they might not know, especially given his surge vogue of late, are the specifics of those “accomplishments” — pushing amnesty, voting against the Bush tax cuts, CFR, etc etc etc. And since Fred’s unwilling to remind them, it may come down to a simple question of who’s more likely between the two of them to get “results,” irrespective of what those results might be.
I tacked on a bit of unrelated red meat at the end, devoured by Huck with appropriate gusto.
Update: Via Ace, here’s what the “Christian leader” message means on the ground.
[P]ro-Huckabee organizers say they are focusing their entire effort on turning out evangelical church goers. They plan to call every evangelical pastor in the state over the next few days. Those ministers can’t endorse any candidate from the pulpit — but they can tell their parishioners that “it’s their Christian duty,” to turn out on primary day, said Glenn. “And we know who they’ll be voting for.”
To help drive that message home, thousands of volunteers will be dropping leaflets and waving signs in church parking lots across Michigan this Sunday. Glenn says there will also be several news conferences across the state through the January 15 vote featuring groups of pastors announcing their personal support for Huckabee, an organized wave of callers into Michigan’s Christian radio stations, and phone trees targeting the state’s largest churches from within.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
SECOND LOOK AT SAFE HIGHWAYS FOR CHILDREN!!!
wccawa on January 11, 2008 at 2:24 PM
Priceless!
shick on January 11, 2008 at 2:24 PM
If that is true, what would you suggest if Huckabee gains the nomination?
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:24 PM
This is sadly true. Let me rephrase that for you. Huckabee got more of WJC’s agenda accomplished than even Bill himself.
shick on January 11, 2008 at 2:27 PM
Loved that comment! An no Jesus was not a Republican, not a fiscal conservative, not conservative on Islamofascism, partly because he predated Islamofascism by 6 centuries. Jesus had no concept of democracy, so stop making this democracy about the allegiance to Jesus! Enough of Huck’s lies being forgiven because of his godliness.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 2:27 PM
Wow. Huck was governor of Alaska, too?
I had no idea. OK. You’ve changed my mind.
wccawa on January 11, 2008 at 2:30 PM
No I didn’t but you were suggesting that ultra was over the top. Beyond the acceptable. But you still fail to realize that what you consider ‘ultra’ really is just plain conservativism.
shick on January 11, 2008 at 2:30 PM
Huck’s shameful denial of Evolution makes HIM the missing link. While there is no evidence for any of Huck’s beliefs, religious or political, there is plenty of evidence for Evolution. How much crap do people need to take from this “Christian Leader”?
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 2:30 PM
Speaking as an evangelical from Michigan, I’m pretty sure this is going to hurt him, not help him.
OneGyT on January 11, 2008 at 2:33 PM
Stunning. You win — I loose automatically by default for using the wrong postal code for Arkansas.
Damn!
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:33 PM
I don’t think so. I think there are shades of grey.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:35 PM
Huck is nothing but a stalking horse for Hillary promoted by the evil Dick Morris.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 2:36 PM
Pardon the long post…
On mormons…. basically, there appears to be a orchestrated effort by LDS to shed the “cult” status and be considered another christian denomination. Their teachings and history prove they are not “christian” (by it’s historical definition), and their early teachings were that all mainstream christian denominations are heresy (Hence the need for J.Smith and the book of Mormon to set things straight.) The main “moral” issue for not voting for a mormon is that it somehow “legitimizes” the LDS opening up new avenues for recruitment by their “missionaries”.
In one respect, the arguement is correct. While Mitt may never use the presidency to push his religion, the LDS certainly will use the fact that the president is a mormon to increase their numbers. What that has to do with presidential politics is another debate.
On voting Pro-Choice…. simply that this is a life and death issue, and is not negotiable. Abortion is murdering innocent life. There is no rationalizing around that. The only non-religious based question should be at what point a “fetus” becomes “human”. There is no scientific basis for saying “at birth”. Roe v. Wade used “viability” as a non-religious indicator of life, but as medicine made that point earlier and earlier, the liberals successfully pushed the “start of life” back to the moment of birth. When that became a problem, they simply redefined what birth is (ie. partial birth abortions -or- is that partial-life abortions?) The question is how can a christian vote for someone who, for example, says he believes life begins at conception, but he wont impose his beliefs on voters. Or worse, vote for someone who believes babies born up to their head are not actually “alive”?
I’m not promoting these points of view, I’m just reporting.
AverageJoe on January 11, 2008 at 2:37 PM
I guess I’m a missing link too.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Considering what I last posted about your comment consider this. No republican’s actions should come to the point where they can be brought to that comparison.
I’m sorry Wise Golden but you have to stop fighting it and swallow that bitter pill.
shick on January 11, 2008 at 2:41 PM
AverageJoe: I am not disagreeing with you, but do you think that LDS critics are just a little fearful of competition and by extension may be showing their hands that they’re really not all that confident in their own faith?
When did capitalists become so fearful of competition? I thought the Republicans were the capitalists.
gabriel sutherland on January 11, 2008 at 2:42 PM
Sadly, yes. Literal belief in random stuff unsupported by any evidence because you were taught it as a child or because you woke up one day and “felt” it is true is not worthy of a critically thinking adult. Just because a billion people do the same is no excuse. There is a billion people believing a very different but equally unlikely fairy tale. And LDS? Some guy writes some stuff 200 years ago, and now the big questions is: “Is it a cult or not?” What the heck is “cult” other than a religion that hasn’t been around for at least a thousand years?
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM
Gulp.
Okay, now what?
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:44 PM
Your lack of perspicuity has been consistent.
shick on January 11, 2008 at 2:50 PM
I pity you as much as you pity me. But, I’m not going to try to change your opinion on God, and you know fool well that you’re not going to change mine. By the way, I’m guessing every candidate, including the Democrats, believes in intelligent design.
That’s a guess — feel free to prove me wrong because I’d love to know their opinion.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:51 PM
Fred’s gas tank just hit $700K. It was at $600K just a few hours ago.
Holy Shiite!
wccawa on January 11, 2008 at 2:51 PM
I too detest that smiling idiot. He’s no conservative. And he cannot refute anything Fred said.
Buttercup on January 11, 2008 at 2:52 PM
So that’s your answer?
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:52 PM
If you truly swallowed the pill, you would be seeing Huckabee for what he truly is, a pseudo-conservative.
shick on January 11, 2008 at 2:54 PM
Buttercup on January 11, 2008 at 2:52 PM
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 2:55 PM
They’re also furiously researching fatal accidents that took place in Michigan so the Huckster can make jokes about them. Because nothing says “Christian Leadership” like humor based on the terrible misfortunes of others.
And I’m not picking on real Christians or real Christianity, because they wouldn’t do that. So don’t flame me. I’m just picking on Elmer Gantrabee and his shameless panderiffic snake oil routine.
I detest that smiling idiot. He’s no conservative. And he cannot refute anything Fred said. Also, Fred is better than Cats.
ReubenJCogburn on January 11, 2008 at 2:55 PM
Agreed. I’m sure no one used similar labels in the early days of Christianity, right? Mitt’s religion is no weirder than any other IMO. They all have their idiosyncracies.
RW Wacko on January 11, 2008 at 2:56 PM
Inattention to quotes again…
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 2:56 PM
Regardless of whether or not Huckabee wins the nomination and goes on to win the White House, the federal government is going to be raising taxes. If Huckabee win’s he’ll have to raise taxes to pay for all of his new programs and enforce his nanny-state, and if he loses, many of these mega-churches will probably have to start paying taxes.
FloatingRock on January 11, 2008 at 2:58 PM
My question is simple, who do you favor?
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:59 PM
(Sigh)
shick on January 11, 2008 at 2:59 PM
You’re right — that was really in poor taste.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:01 PM
ALL religions seem weird to non-practitioners and all new religions are called “cults”. Learn about the “cargo” cults in the south pacific, it’s a fascinating topic.
I don’t mind anyone believing any of this stuff because it’s just a part of the human condition but when they start (a) demeaning the other guys beliefs because they are cultist (b) or start behaving like protesting lesbians in San Francisco screaming “we’re loud, proud, and unafraid” and want to elect an idiot, I draw the line.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:01 PM
This is why I don’t follow using that logic as a reason to not vote for Mitt for president. But if I had two equal choices, with just that being the difference, then maybe.
Evangelical christians are confident in their faith, but as true capitalist, why give the competition help when you don’t have to. I have no problem with them declaring they are not a “cult” (using the derogatory definition of the term), but I do have a problem with them trying to redefine “christianity” to make them fit in. Same arguement as how people here dislike Huckabee calling himself a conservative republican when they feel he is truly a liberal.
AverageJoe on January 11, 2008 at 3:03 PM
I have not seen it. Where are all of these Christians who are doing these things?
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:04 PM
It’s a metaphor. I was actually thinking of your own statements yesterday that there are so many of you that you can throw your weight around and elect candidates in either party. This attitude of “Yeah, I’m a part of a big crowd so I feel strong” is anathema to me, to use a religious term.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:08 PM
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 2:30 PM
I guess I’m a missing link too.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Why not, created to evolve. These two concepts easily coexist.
jerrytbg on January 11, 2008 at 3:09 PM
Makes me shudder. Just thinking about it made me vomit in my mouth a little bit.
Buttercup on January 11, 2008 at 3:09 PM
I’d really like to hear some Huckster supporter try to defend that statement, but I doubt I’ll get any takers, because genuinely religious people probably find it just as detestable as I do. So the best they can do is try to pretend that it never happened. But the fact that he’d make a crack like that and not see anything wrong with it says a lot about who Mike Huckabee is on the inside. Maybe his idiot dog-torturing son came by his lack of compassion naturally after all.
ReubenJCogburn on January 11, 2008 at 3:11 PM
Haha…I don’t mean to make it into a deist/theist/true believer religious debate with Wise Golden as the center of attention.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:12 PM
That’s intelligent design. I’m joking when I say missing link. I don’t believe in the missing link any more than I believe the latest liberal wisdom of global warming being caused by man. Evolution is just made up liberal stuff IMO. I just don’t have enough “faith” to believe it.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:14 PM
I’m just hoping that the Republican party will get a similar feeling, understand that this is just a hangover and it’s time to move on and spit Huck the human piece of puke out.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:15 PM
Fine — I’ll stop.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:15 PM
Fred Thompson. The others have issues of which I can not sort out which are worse.
shick on January 11, 2008 at 3:15 PM
Exactly TWO states have voted! TWO out of 50 and the elites are telling you it’s over! Get serious! They can’t even get the polling correct! It isn’t over. Conservatives haven’t even voted yet!
sabbott on January 11, 2008 at 3:16 PM
It shows what a fallacy the Christian Coalition support of Reagan Policies was/is. Huckabee is right: The Reagan Era is OVER! Conservativism is dead!
Welcome to Socialist America, can I take your order?
Sultry Beauty on January 11, 2008 at 3:16 PM
Mr.CFR/Fred Thompson has sunk to a new low by doing juan mcamnesty’s bidding in the debate last night. What a disgrace.
HaraldHardrada on January 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM
The liberals loved Huck, he campaigned for them. Crapbag.
John_Locke on January 11, 2008 at 3:20 PM
Do you think Juan Mccain has any chance whatsoever of winning the genral election?? No way! 80% of Americans oppose amnesty for illegals..Why on earth would we nominate Mr. Amnesty himself.
Fred Thompson is a liar and hypocrite…he says he is opposed to amnesty but yet he wants Juan Mcamnesty to be president! Hopefully all you Fred heads will take notice.
HaraldHardrada on January 11, 2008 at 3:20 PM
I think about as close as anyone could come to defending it would be to say that it was a gaffe that just came to him at the moment and sounded good inside his head. I wish he wouldn’t have said it though.
Not to change the subject, but man – did you see Bret Hume hand it to Ron Paul. Bret slapped him so hard it left a bruise on my face.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:21 PM
Sadly the surest cure from Socialist fantasies seems to be living under Socialism, which doesn’t bode well for the immediate future. Idiots don’t like to learn by other people’s mistakes. Oh no, they need to feel it for themselves!
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:21 PM
Yes, it’s pathetic. Identity politics at it’s worst, made more so by the fact that they’re pretending to be “conservative”, which is antithetical to identity politics.
Are there any Red Dwarf fans here? Some of these Huckabee supporters that signed up the other day remind me of talkie-toaster. Would you like some toast?
FloatingRock on January 11, 2008 at 3:21 PM
That’s a highly unique point of view, at least outside the small circle of people who oppose both McPain and Fred. Inside the circle it’s surprisingly widespread!
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:24 PM
Even though I detest Ron Paul’s foreign policy..I will say that Fox was completely unfair to him. It just further proves that Fox is totally committed to the amnesty establishment candidates.
Why are they so biased towards Huckabee and Paul??
Simple…. because Huckabee and Paul are outsider non establishment candidates (although Paul is a terrible one).
HaraldHardrada on January 11, 2008 at 3:26 PM
Well until Fred appeared on O’Reilly Fox was so highly biased against Fred that serious people started writing serious articles about it. Then yesterday it was like a brand new day.
Why they don’t like Paul? Could a part of it be that his supported had attacked Hannity and Fox isn’t shy about taking sides in idiotic disputes?
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:29 PM
Igor R.
Don’t get me wrong…. Ron Paul would be a disaster if he was elected..he’s an absolutely terrible candidate.
He is a blame America firster and for the actor to say that Huckabee is one of those is a complete lie. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Mr. CFR exposed himself as the liar that he is last night.
Fred: “I am against amnesty for illegals…that’s why I endorse Juan Mccain for president”
HaraldHardrada on January 11, 2008 at 3:33 PM
I happen to agree with Fred that calling our timid foreign policy arrogant and talking about bunker mentality, and wanting to close Gitmo because “they” don’t approve is indicative of blaming America first.
And until Fred actually endorses Mav the Nut I don’t see that he is a liar. Remember SOMEONE ELSE spread the rumors of his impending endorsement to hurt him in Iowa.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:36 PM
Has any other candidate picked up on the “no bridges fell while I was gov” line.
BTW… there are stong evangelical ties in the twin cities. (note: Billy Graham Evangelistic Association began there.) Very insensitive if you ask me.
AverageJoe on January 11, 2008 at 3:38 PM
That’s a blatant lie. Fred never said that.
FloatingRock on January 11, 2008 at 3:38 PM
Too bad he’s not running for President. Seriously though, he’s okay. It’s hard not to like Fred when he pulls out lines like the one he used last night about the virgins. I liked Huckabee’s line about “get ready to see the gates of hell” just as much.
Presidents don’t really change anything in four years. All they do is hold Congress in check and send the hammer of Thor down upon anyone that messes with us and shape the Supreme Court….actually, I guess they do a lot now that I think about it.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:39 PM
If Ron Paul is allowed to debase any further debates, he should be required to wear a Bozo wig and a big red nose. That way people who don’t follow politics could identify the clown even before he opens his mouth.
ReubenJCogburn on January 11, 2008 at 3:39 PM
He doesn’t have to say it… he trashes Huck all night and says NOTHING about Juan. It’s obvious. If he was really trying to win he would be attacking Juan considering he is the “supposed” front runner.
HaraldHardrada on January 11, 2008 at 3:41 PM
Ok, I’ve been scanning the comments, correct me if I’m wrong.
CSDeven is defending Fred?
And its snowing in Baghdad…
Draw your own conclusions.
gekkobear on January 11, 2008 at 3:43 PM
And super big shoes? That’s awesome!
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:43 PM
So you’re saying that he didn’t have to say it because you just made it up? That was my point.
FloatingRock on January 11, 2008 at 3:43 PM
I liked both lines almost equally. Those of us who follow “Fred Facts” know that the virgin line has a history.
Presidents matter a great deal. I’m not Bush’s greatest fan but he will indeed be on Mt. Rushmore one day because he stood up against an avalanche of those who wanted to pull out of Iraq prematurely and WON.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:45 PM
You tell me why he doesn’t bash “my good friend” Mccain then. Considering that he would have to if he really was trying to win.
HaraldHardrada on January 11, 2008 at 3:47 PM
Have you ever considered alternate explanations that are widely available on blogs:
-They are friends from way back and Fred has trouble criticizing friends.
-McCain needs to win in MI to help Fred with the Romney factor
-Huck is the true competitor for the evangelical vote and if/when he falls McCain’s supporters will fall in line.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:47 PM
Hey…we agree on something. I said Bush would be on Mt. Rushmore in 50 years yesterday while you were calling me a tard. I’d like to talk to you about Jesus now. Please respond with your home phone number.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:49 PM
I don’t have to make excuses for your lies. Invent your own—-that’s what you’re going to do anyway in spite of what anybody else says.
FloatingRock on January 11, 2008 at 3:50 PM
Everybody knows if Thompson doesn’t win south carolina he is finished! The proof is that he isn’t trying to win south carolina…he is trying to help Mccain win south carolina!
HaraldHardrada on January 11, 2008 at 3:52 PM
Haha…I remember about you talking about Mt Rushmore, that line was for you. Thanks for your offer, but trust me I’ve had MANY conversations in my past with people who wanted to teach me about Jesus. And sadly, ever since someone threatened to kill me for my views while asking for my phone number I don’t give it out.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:52 PM
Has anyone ever noticed that when McCain really, really hates someone, he calls them “my dear friend?” Like Colmbs on Fox’s H&C.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:52 PM
If Thompson was trying to win South Carolina he would of slammed Mcamnesty..he had plenty of opportunities!
HaraldHardrada on January 11, 2008 at 3:53 PM
Ahhh. You’re on to me. I was going to kill you.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:54 PM
That’s a joke.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:55 PM
Whatever happened to the wisdom of:
“That government is best which governs least.”
— Thomas Paine
I guess all you RINOS prefer it when your Senators write up a bunch of new laws, make a bunch of new regulations and come up with a bunch of new entitlement programs????
LegendHasIt on January 11, 2008 at 3:56 PM
And here’s a good example:
FloatingRock on January 11, 2008 at 3:56 PM
Huckabee is a flat out liar.
sonnyspats1 on January 11, 2008 at 3:57 PM
I know.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:59 PM
When I heard Huckabee tout his record as governor and how he “made government work” for what seemed like the 100th time last night, I was sure hoping Fred or Mitt was going to borrow one of those lines that Reagan always delivered so effectively – “government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.”
kgs_mvs on January 11, 2008 at 4:02 PM
RW Wacko on January 11, 2008 at 2:56 PM
Perhaps you missed all of the HA discussions to date on the LDS, truly not worth perpetuating ad nauseam as the brainwashed refuse to perceive what would confound their premise and disturb their proliferation. If they were such nice people, they’d keep their religion to themselves like today’s Quakers, Amish, Catholics, Jews, et.al.
At face value, your opinion seems about right. When you see September Dawn, would you still say such? Besides the federal hearings, there were 1857 witness participants who left Southern Utah crying confessions the rest of their lives, and private correspondences and personal journals that substantiate the historical accuracy of the Mountain Meadows Massacre event as portrayed, substantiating Brigham Young’s direct order. Yes, that was then. But this is now, and now came from then. The constant revisions accomplished by their authorities have yet to alter this fact: there is NO REDRESS to wrongs committed by authorities upon members; there is NO TOLERANCE for disputing the revised record provided by that church’s authorities. In that sense, cult does not suffice their description so well as theocratic fascism.
Their public propaganda and missionary discussions NEVER address the fine print blood covenants hidden behind doors and curtain veils, and that is a deceitful way to raise generations and proselytize all these years. Historically, Mormon officials actively campaigned against the USA until they wanted statehood and were deprived until they swore off polygamy FOR THE TIME BEING, FORCED BY A CORRUPT US GOVERNMENT, polygamy to be reinstated by Christ at the second coming for all to obey during the millenium. Records of plural marriages were not kept when the US Government took control of Utah and persecuted polygamists. The Mormon Church official denial of the % of polygamous members is repulsive to all those who endured that awful commandment, held to it by blood covenant at risk of either death or excommunication, literally left in the wilderness to die for disagreeing with the church authority. It wasn’t simply the general authorities in SLC who held this power over life and death of members because EVERY bishop was called from God by direct revelation. THAT tradition was still taught through 1980 here in the United States of America. Who cares at this point if they’ve changed their story AGAIN in order to promote themselves?
The powers that produced and paid for George’s and Mitt’s run for POTUS will never permit freedom of thought and religion amongst those born under their blood covenant. IMO, there isn’t another “Christian” cult more like Islam than they.
It is no wonder that Mitt would ‘CHANGE’ as much as Obama.
maverick muse on January 11, 2008 at 4:06 PM
Changed to reflect reality.
BKennedy on January 11, 2008 at 4:35 PM
Again, I’m gonna say, “Scary Troll.”
Sultry Beauty on January 11, 2008 at 4:46 PM
I’ll blame AP for this. **walks out shaking head…**
Sultry Beauty on January 11, 2008 at 4:49 PM
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 3:52 PM
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 3:54 PM
and here I thought you two were starting to fight nice lmao
on a serious note, I haven’t read all the posts nor have seen who the big endorsement is for Fred, anybody know?
jerrytbg on January 11, 2008 at 4:51 PM
Fixed it for ya, Mike.
Fixed again
sleepy-beans on January 11, 2008 at 4:52 PM
It wasn’t significant: “Human Events”. Jed Babbin there has always been pro-Fred, so it’s not earth-shattering.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 4:58 PM
Funny, I didn’t realize how much Huckabee did for Alaska. Sorry, Wise – no offense. That’s just a pet peeve of this former Arkansan. I was out by the time Huck took the reigns so I can’t comment much about his governorship, although my family aren’t fans of his OR Clintons. I think most people in the state would rather both of those families moved to NY.
pecan pie on January 11, 2008 at 4:58 PM
In response to Fred’s substantive criticism yesterday, today all Huck could say was that Fred needs to take some Metamucil.
Is that how Huck expresses his concern for a true Conservative “movement”? Or he is just showing his “preventive health care” credentials?
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 5:08 PM
Let’s see, Huck might be a 12 hours late in this return volley.
Huck was given the Republican equivalent of proving his manhood and this is all he can do for a rebuttal? 12 hours later? With no chance for Fred! to respond?
Captain America on January 11, 2008 at 5:16 PM
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 5:08 PM
good one!!
jerrytbg on January 11, 2008 at 5:20 PM
Dimwitted Gomer thinks for 12 hours and comes up with a statement that typically needs only 6 hours of Huck-type brain power.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 5:20 PM
After you go to bed tonight, I’m going to comment on this.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 5:29 PM
Why? Am I supposed to experience a nightmare at that point?
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 5:32 PM
I need 6-12 hours to form my response.
Wise Golden on January 11, 2008 at 5:34 PM
Oh, I see…you must’ve just taken Metamucil to start formulating it.
Igor R. on January 11, 2008 at 5:35 PM
You nailed it. Watch him. The stuipid is strong with that one.
wccawa on January 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM
Anecdotal: My company has a facility in Bay City. Of the 5 people I talked to there none of them liked Hucky. I didn’t ask who they DID like…dumb of me!
SouthernGent on January 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM
at this rate I’m expecting Huck to reduce himself to RP style rants in saaaaaay 3wks, no, scrach that, make it 2, right after he gets blown out of the water in SC.
jerrytbg on January 11, 2008 at 6:10 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »