That woman who’s challenging Indiana’s voter ID law? Registered to vote in two states.
posted at 9:45 am on January 10, 2008 by Bryan
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
Your delicious irony of the day comes from Florida and Indiana. The litigant who is trying to kill off Indiana’s voter ID law is a walking, talking case of potential voter fraud. She certainly appears to have broken the law by registering to vote in both Indiana and Florida, and by claiming homestead tax exemption in both states. But let’s re-write the law so she doesn’t have to provide proper ID before voting!
According to Ewing and Ann Nucatola, public information director for the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Ewing surrendered her Indiana driver¹s license in 2000, when she moved to Florida and obtained her Florida license. Nucatola said that a driver must have a Florida address to obtain a Florida driver¹s license.
“And if they own property in two states they have to get a license that says ‘valid in Florida only,’” Nucatola said.
Ewing said Monday that her license is a “regular” one that she uses in both states. She renewed it in 2007 on a Punta Gorda, Fla. address.
At the Charlotte County, Fla. voter registration office, Sandy Wharton, vote qualifying office manager, said Ewing registered to vote in Charlotte County on Sept. 18, 2002, and signed an oath that she was a Florida resident and understood that falsifying the voter application was a third-degree felony punishable by prison and a fine up to $5,000. Wharton said her office checked Ewing’s Florida residency and qualified her on Oct. 2, 2002. On Oct. 4, 2002, they mailed her Florida voter card to her, to the West Lafayette, Ind. address that Ewing gave as a mailing address.
However, Ewing didn’t vote in Florida that year, nor has she ever voted in Charlotte County, Wharton said. But, just a month after receiving her Florida voter card, she did vote in the November 2002 elections in Tippecanoe County, Ind., according to Heather Maddox, co-director of elections and registration in Tippecanoe.
Ewing confirmed that she is registered in both states to vote, but at first said the Florida registration came automatically with her driver’s license. She repeatedly denied signing the oath on the Florida application. She also said Indiana mailed her an absentee ballot, but she didn’t use it or vote that year.
However, Heather Maddox, co-director of election registration in Tippecanoe County, said Ewing voted in Indiana in 2002, 2003 and 2004, before the Indiana ID law took effect in 2005.
When informed that the Florida voter office said she’d registered personally in 2002 for a Florida voter card, and that this newspaper had a copy of her application, Ewing said, “Well, why did I do that? I¹m confused. I can’t recall.” She reiterated that, even though she’s registered in two states, she only votes in Indiana, adding that she does have a car plated in Florida.
That doesn’t satisfy Florida officials.
“She can only be registered to vote in the place where she claims residency,² Wharton said. “You can’t be registered in two states. She has to claim one place or the other.”
Ordinarily when someone registers to vote in Florida, the state informs the election board where the applicant was previously registered. But according to Wharton, Ewing did not inform Florida that she was ever registered to vote anywhere else.
“She signed an oath saying she was a qualified elector and a legal resident of Florida,” Wharton said. “And the space where she was supposed to tell us where she was previously registered, she left blank.”
And she’s probably not alone in this.
Tuesday Ewing said the homestead “problem came up” when she married in 2002. “But that was taken care of,” she said. She also said her main residence is in Indiana, and that she pays “some” taxes in Indiana on a “small annuity” she receives.
“But I feel like I’m a victim here,” Ewing said. “I never intended to do anything wrong. I know a lot of people in Florida in this same situation – they call us ‘Snowbirds,’ you know.”
Let’s take her at her word, even though she seems to be lying to Florida officials, and accept that she never intended to do anything wrong. What about people who do intend to commit voter fraud? Uh-huh. Gee, I wonder why the Supreme Court may be showing some support for Indiana’s voter ID law.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « 1 [2]
BS!
Ask the voters in the State of Washington how hundreds of convicted felons were illegally issued ballots after the polls had closed so that a Democrat could be “elected” governor.
Ask the voters in the State of Oregon why the State provides “service fairs” in Spannish where people can sign up for social services, get driver’s licenses and register to vote all at once.
Ask why in the State of Oregon registering to vote requires only that you sign a card affirming you are a citizen and can legally vote - without any need to verify citizenship or criminal record.
Or why (again in Oregon) virtually every election boxes of ballots go mysteriously missing and are never found.
A democratically elected government is only as legitimate as the process. If we allow noncitizens to vote, or citizens to vote multiple times then the results of those elections are no more valid than rule by divine right or military might.
Maybe what we need is to despense with the secret ballot and let the chips fall where they may!
Browncoatone on January 10, 2008 at 8:37 PM
Links to these stats, to your sources, please.
Theophile on January 10, 2008 at 9:46 PM
It’s not “People” that have the right to vote. It’s U.S. Citizens who are at least 18 years of age, who haven’t voted previously in the election, who haven’t committed a Felony in the last ten years and who haven’t been declared incompetent by a court who may vote. The law is simply there in order to make sure that the “People” attempting to vote have the legal qualifications and right to do as such.
It’s the exact same reason that they require driver’s licenses in order to drive. It’s not a problem, especially in states where they will give you a free I.D.. It’s only an impediment to those who are not qualified (Illegal Aliens, Felons, etc.).
Theophile on January 10, 2008 at 10:13 PM
My mother worked for the Nassau County Board of Elections..
I asked her,” how can you tell if a person is a legitimate applicant for voter registration”?
She responded,” They werent allowed to ask such questions”.
This was ten years or so ago, and I was astounded to the fact that such an easily verifiable fact would just be ignored.
And I have no doubt where these votes are generally cast.
Jimmy Carter was correct in saying Americas voting system is flawed, except hes on the side of the problem.
Seriously, you cant verify if someone is a citizen of the U.S. when registering to vote!
Sonosam on January 10, 2008 at 11:53 PM
so they should not be allowed to vote because of this?
google is your friend. But still, here’s a source, the charges I listed were from 2002-2006. The convictions (86) were even fewer at the time of the articles writing (April 12, 2007). Most of the charges were mistakes not fraud. Facts suck don’t they? Once again this is a transparent attempt to disenfranchise lower-class voters and it is nothing new.
crr6 on January 11, 2008 at 12:36 AM
“Once again this is a transparent attempt to disenfranchise lower-class voters and it is nothing new.”–crr6
You’re being just a little presumptious and condescending, don’t you think? Just who are these “lower-class voters” that you so fervently want to protect? Why do you suppose that showing an ID is any more burdensome to them than to any of us? Do you have a political bias maybe that motivates your opinion?
You seem to be up on your stats, so I wonder if you can tell me how many times between 2002-2006 a legitimate voter has been denied the opportunity to vote because of restrictive requirements at the polls?
drewas on January 11, 2008 at 1:51 PM
Remember the motto of the Democrat Party:
“Vote early and vote often!”
Scorched_Earth on January 11, 2008 at 4:10 PM
Comment pages: « 1 [2]