But, Hitlery used the question to soaked up the sympathy vote.

In 2006, you’ll be ripping and tearing at yourselves so fiercely that your nation – the only one on Earth actually fighting against resurgent caliphate Islam in this long struggle over the very future of civilization – will become so preoccupied with criticizing yourselves and trying to gain short-term political advantage, that you’ll all forget that there’s actually a war for your survival going on. Twenty-five years from now, every man or woman in America who wishes to vote will be required to read Thucydides on this matter. And others as well. And there are tests. If you don’t know some history, you don’t vote . . . much less run for office. America’s vacation from knowing history ends very soon now . . . for you, I mean. And for those few others left alive in the world who are allowed to vote.”

Hi Brian,
When you say ‘we’ I’m pretty sure you mean the Democrats (and the MSM, but I repeat myself). There aren’t many on this site (oh, maybe a few honest ones plus the Soros trolls) who would agree that they are the ‘we’ you refer to, but most like ‘me’ won’t.

Best Wishes,

‘me’

Rush is now making the argument that Obama may have won in Iowa because the the caucus’s are open. And if most of your friends were for Obama, you didnt want to look like a racist and go sit with Hillary so they all went with their friends and went to the Obama campt. To where in NH it wasnt like that, they told pollsters that they were going to vote for Obama but when it came time in the private they voted for Hillary. Again, hes just throwing it out there.

Wow

broker1 on January 9, 2008 at 2:34 PM

What!?! Liberals acting against their principals!?! No way…

/s/

Princess Diana, as Melanie Phillips said.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on January 9, 2008 at 2:38 PM

Melanie Phillips is awesome.

I think I may be sick.

Mega Dittos

You must give credit to the Clinton machine for pulling off their ‘rise from the ashes’ gambit.

Because they have now expended their crying routine, I can hardly wait to see what they’ll do next – the magnificent bastards.

What’s really frightening is to think back on Time contributor and White House correspondent Nina Burleigh’s comments on the last “rock star” president:

“I would be happy to give him a b—job just to thank him for keeping abortion legal. I think American women should be lining up with their presidential kneepads on to show their gratitude for keeping the theocracy off our backs.”

I wonder what these awestruck wackos have in mind for the Big O.

Woman who stoked Hillary’s tears didn’t vote for her

Love means never havng to say you’re sorry.

End liberal Women’s Suffrage.

Conservative women like Michelle Malkin, Tammy Bruce, and Laura Ingram should be encouraged to vote early and often.

Mike Honcho on January 9, 2008 at 1:46 PM

Amen. I was talking about voting with some other women in my neighborhood and we were discussing how hard it was to be completely informed about local candidates. Both the liberal Dems said, “We just look for the women and vote for them.” Arggh.

I think there is something to the idea that people are just looking for anyone they can rally around after eight years of Clinton shenanigans and the ugliness of the anti-Bush brigrades for the last several years. My liberal NY in-laws and relatives are all swooning over Obama and they were die-hard Hillary fans just months ago. Obama fits the liberal “I don’t care how or if it works, I just want to feel like I’m changing the world” mentality perfectly.

(I apologize if everything is run together but there were no line breaks on Preview and nothing I did to change that would work.)

Wow

Still, I can see why many would appreciate his message and see it as a breath of fresh air and a further perceive it as a true voice of change.

And that’s frightening to those of us with our heads screwed on straight, since terrorists are lurking at our water’s edge.

The MSM and the Dems have waved their magic wands and terrorism has all but disappeared. Let’s all feel safe, and shed tears because we are.

Wake up America.

jewells45 on January 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM

You’re absolutely right about this. On Fox, they discussed that people involved choose on issues but most voters choose on “likeability” and actively say that “issues dont mean much to me, personality does”.

One 35 year old woman in Luntz group after the debate in NH said that McCain was her man and then she said “But a friend of mine said he was too old and yeah, I changed my mind”.

Are you kidding? Im not a McCain fan but to say that some guy says 3 words to you and you get swayed? Wow.

They could be handing Clinton her hat for that reason. She will have to convince the Democrat powers-that-be (not voters) that she is better for them.

After all – Democrats are masters of voter fraud. They can/will make the primaries come out any way they want.

If they conclude they can win no matter what then it is Clinton. If they don;t want to take any chances then it will be Obama.

When I tell my mother or her friends or relatives so and so said this or so and so has this position on this, they have no idea. Now I really shouldn’t include my mother I guess. Her problem is she is too lazy to inform herself, she’s a diehard democrat and whoever is popular at the moment is her man (or woman). Sad, I know.

But many other people I know I have explained someones position and they really just had no idea. I just want to shake them and say, fer chrissakes, your gonna vote? Get informed first, PLEASE!

I think I may be sick.

I already am. All this after only two states?!

I hearby declare that I am on sick leave due to an uncontrollable case of crying until November 4. Who will be crying then?

But in the end, she said it was Obama’s message of hope and change that won her vote.

“I went to see Obama on Friday and he moved me to tears, I was in awe,” she said in a telephone interview with ABC News. “I’m 64 years old and nobody does that to me.”

One of Reagan’s strong points was that he had a message of hope and a vision for the future. I think that more than anything else created the “Reagan-democrats”. In a war weary nation, uncertain and leery of the future in a confused and chaotic world, a message of hope is going to play well. Reagan brought hope through a vision of self-determination, individual liberty and peace through strength. Although Obama is nearly the opposite in his policies, the end message has a similarity. I can see former Reagan-democrats being Obama-democrats, and maybe he’ll create Obama-Republicans.

I wouldn’t go to his camp because his policies are more of the same failed socialism that has weakened the nation and could eventually destroy the America we know and love. Still, I can see why many would appreciate his message and see it as a breath of fresh air and a further perceive it as a true voice of change.

I think I may be sick.

Right there with you.