Mitt raised more than $5 million today?

posted at 9:24 pm on January 9, 2008 by Bryan

After a disappointing second place finish in New Hampshire? I guess rumors of Romney’s death have been greatly exaggerated. I think that makes him today’s biggest cash generator.

Today, in Boston, fundraisers and friends gathered and raised over 5 Million dollars for the Mitt campaign. Compare that to Hillary who raised $750,000 the day after her stunning victory.

By the way, they raised almost $110,000 out of Arizona alone! Does that top McCain’s total take.

Here’s the campaign’s official announcement of the haul. That is some major scratch. And for a guy who keeps coming in second. As Darth Vader might say, impressive.

But here’s the thing. I’ve been discussing the status of the candidacies with friends in email along with just surveying the landscape after New Hampshire. Mitt so far has two second place finishes in contested states and a first in Wyoming, which amounts to uncontested since he was the only candidate to have had any organization there. On paper, Romney is an impressive candidate if you go by his resume. No one else on either side can match him on experience outside and inside government, but experience isn’t everything. If it was, Obama wouldn’t even be in the hunt anymore. Ideas aren’t everything either, or Fred’s campaign would have more of a pulse. Thompson put out a serious plan to cut government spending today, but because his campaign lacks buzz, the plan didn’t generate much coverage. Fred’s impressive as an idea guy and someone who can cut the media down to size and I think he’d make a good commander in chief. Well, I think. He hasn’t run the best campaign, that’s for sure. But neither has Huckabee, who seems like a nice guy who tends to wing it more than is wise, and neither have McCain or Giuliani but one of these guys has to win it eventually.

The way I see things right now, we have three viable candidates and two secondary candidates. The former include McCain, Huckabee and Romney and in more or less that order even though Romney leads the delegate count. The secondary candidates right now have to be Giuliani and Thompson, in that order. They’re all facing various death scenarios; McCain doesn’t play well with the base and doesn’t have a lot of cash, while Huckabee seems to be getting locked into a niche candidacy and Romney just needs to pick up a real win somewhere or he may end up on life support no matter how much money he has. The danger for him is that by becoming locked in second place, he becomes a de facto second choice guy. That’s no way to get to the general election, where second place leaves you out of luck. But any of these three could win if things break the right way, and if a couple drop out it’s not impossible to see even Fred sneaking up and winning. But by staying in, they’re all sucking up various parts of the conservative base and leaving an opening for Giuliani to do well enough in the big states on Super Terrific Tuesday to win.

What I’m saying is, this thing is still wide open. With Romney picking up a huge chunk of cash today, he’s showing that his supporters aren’t dispirited and he’s not done yet.

Update: A point of comparison is probably worth tossing out. Wired has Hillary Clinton pulling in a little over $1.1 million since the NH primary, but that’s without any pitch. The Romney camp pulled its haul in as a National Call Day. He pulled in more than Hillary, but Hillary wasn’t making a special effort. So there’s that.

In the money game, most donors on both sides are tapped out, but the Democrats still seem to have an advantage in that their pool of donors remains larger than the Republicans.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

I’m wit’ Mitt

eucher on January 9, 2008 at 9:26 PM

Oh Please God, let that be an omen for Arizona

Shay on January 9, 2008 at 9:26 PM

- Estimated Primary Election Funds: $1.5 Million

- Estimated General Elections Funds: $3.5 Million

I’m glad you put that up. There is no quit here. More money for the General then the Primary. That says something.

Spirit of 1776 on January 9, 2008 at 9:27 PM

Bryan, do you have a preference yet? I’m pretty sure I’m voting for Rudy here in FL, I think he’s the most electable; but who knows anymore.

lorien1973 on January 9, 2008 at 9:28 PM

He leads in delegates, he won Wyoming, and he has a good chance to take Michigan. He has executive experience. He is handsome. He is a good communicator. He’s conservative on immigration, abortion, national defense, Iraq, the jihad, taxes, and spending. He is a Mormon but he doesn’t wear his religion on his sleeve. He would appear to be a front-runner for the right-wing.

Too bad he lacks humility. If he cracked a few self-deprecating jokes, the ice would melt and he’d be more likeable.

indythinker on January 9, 2008 at 9:31 PM

If Mitt keeps finishing second in all the states and just yanks the rest of the field around on who is getting first, wouldn’t that benefit him in a brokered convention?

John_Locke on January 9, 2008 at 9:35 PM

Honestly, my preferences change from day to day, which is unlike me. I’m usually a decided voter pretty early. There are things I like and dislike about all our guys. Mitt has the resume and the obvious organizational skills and I think he’s probably more conservative than his old campaign stances, but those old campaign stances and some of his record in MA aren’t ideal, to say the least. Fred is Mr. Conservative, or at least that’s his handle, but he’s also Mr. CFR (yeah, he apologized but he shouldn’t have supported it in the first place). Huckabee is staunchly pro-life and I probably see eye to eye with him on social issues across the board but everywhere else I think he’s instinctively too liberal. McCain would inspire, but he would also betray the party. Giuliani would probably be a good war leader but he’s probably good for at least a couple of serious scandals while in office. And on some issues he’s just hard to take. I could vote for any of these guys against a Democrat but against each other, it’s one tough call.

Bryan on January 9, 2008 at 9:36 PM

Well old Mitch Romney ain’t doing too well in this poll

http://www.thesitrep.com/pres.htm

It’s a virtual Fredalanche©

TheSitRep on January 9, 2008 at 9:36 PM

Too bad he lacks humility. If he cracked a few self-deprecating jokes, the ice would melt and he’d be more likeable.

indythinker on January 9, 2008 at 9:31 PM

Agreed. He definitely needs some advice from Hillary on how to sound like a human.

John_Locke on January 9, 2008 at 9:36 PM

Oh Please God, let that be an omen for Arizona

Shay on January 9, 2008 at 9:26 PM

Arizona is a Fred state! Says so on my bumper sticker, so it must be true.

joewm315 on January 9, 2008 at 9:36 PM

Wait a minute. Something is fishy here. He pulled his ads from Florida and S.C. the same day he makes 5 mill? Wha wha what? Huh?

froghat on January 9, 2008 at 9:37 PM

Bryan,

If this goes all the way to a brokered convention, being everybody’s second choice would be a good thing for Romney.

bert169 on January 9, 2008 at 9:37 PM

Make that $5,000,025 after my donation a minute ago!

krabbas on January 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM

What I’m saying is, this thing is still wide open.

B-I-N-G-O!

I know this is a political discussion blog, but let’s ease off on all the overconfident conclusions about who is going to be the nominee, and who’s out when.

MadisonConservative on January 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM

MadisonConservative on January 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM

Yeah I gave up yesterday

John_Locke on January 9, 2008 at 9:42 PM

Too bad he lacks humility. If he cracked a few self-deprecating jokes, the ice would melt and he’d be more likeable.

Humility? How would that manifest? I mean JM cracks jokes all the time, and he is not humble.

John_Locke on January 9, 2008 at 9:35 PM

Agreed. It’s not that likely, but with everything going the way it is, one of the not likely scenarios will win.

Spirit of 1776 on January 9, 2008 at 9:43 PM

Too bad he lacks humility. If he cracked a few self-deprecating jokes, the ice would melt and he’d be more likeable.

After Ed Rollins crassly expressed the desire to punch Mitt’s teeth out, Romney’s response was “Just don’t touch the hair”. I found that to be humorous and, if not exactly self-deprecating, illustrative of a guy who doesn’t take his image too seriously.

It’s ironic that Romney’s looks are used against him, and he’s portrayed as an empty suit, when it seems to me as if Obama is the vapid pretty boy.

Priscilla on January 9, 2008 at 9:43 PM

Mitt Romney should just change his name to Pretty Boy

froghat on January 9, 2008 at 9:44 PM

I know this is a political discussion blog, but let’s ease off on all the overconfident conclusions about who is going to be the nominee, and who’s out when.

MadisonConservative on January 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM

I absolutely positively agree with you.

That being said, if Fred doesnt win in South Carolina, he’s probably out.

Always Right on January 9, 2008 at 9:46 PM

Make that $5,000,025 after my donation a minute ago!

Right on! It’s up to $5,000,025.02 after I just added my two cents!

Rod on January 9, 2008 at 9:46 PM

Huckabee is staunchly pro-life and I probably see eye to eye with him on social issues across the board but everywhere else I think he’s instinctively too liberal.

Just remember with Huckabee and some of the others, especially in Executive roles, He had to actually Govern as a Republican in a Democrat State, dominated by Dems for most of the time since the Civil War. the guys that were just 1 vote of many, can naturally have a more conservative and “principled” record, they don’t have to actually govern.

Guys like Mitt, Rudy and Huckabee, if they had the record we all desire, wouldn’t exist. Because they never would’ve had political careers to get to this point. At the end of the day, they atleast are on the right team which says alot about where they stand ideologically. And we can atleast have influence against their actions.

jp on January 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM

I just donated $25 today for Mitt!

Go Mitt!!

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM

After a disappointing second place finish in New Hampshire? I guess rumors of Romney’s death have been greatly exaggerated.

Of course they have… What don’t people understand about him winning the delegates game?

RightWinged on January 9, 2008 at 9:48 PM

Fred Thompson 63% 17 Fredalanche©

Mitt Romney 22.2% 6

Mike Huckabee 11.1% 3

Rudy Giuliani 3.7% 1

John McCain. 0% 0

http://www.thesitrep.com/pres.htm

TheSitRep on January 9, 2008 at 9:48 PM

Good analysis Bryan. I think your point about 2 tiers of candidates is a little more accurate than the “wide open” description that some in the media are using. It is interesting, as you point out, how easy it is to write a death scenario for each of the candiates. It’s a little frightening that I see all of the candidates losing–and I mean in the primaries not in the general. But the rules say nomination has to go to one of them, unless the convention deadlocks and the party reaches out to draft someone like Dave Petraeus.

dedalus on January 9, 2008 at 9:49 PM

At the end of the day, they atleast are on the right team which says alot about where they stand ideologically. And we can atleast have influence against their actions.

jp on January 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM

Did the Arkansas GOP endorse Huck for this run? If not, why not?

a capella on January 9, 2008 at 9:50 PM

$70 million spent, at least $17 million of his own and Romney is in fifth place and without a win in either of the two states he was expected to carry.

That is pretty sad.

Jay on January 9, 2008 at 9:51 PM

jp on January 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM

That’s true, and it’s why I think Romney is probably instinctively more conservative than his record would indicate. He’s a Mormon, they tend to be very conservative, but he ran for Senate and then governor in a very liberal state, so he tacked left out of necessity. But without having the experience of being a governor, he wouldn’t be a viable presidential candidate. If he had lived and run in a more conservative state he wouldn’t have the problematic record, but then again he wouldn’t be able to say that he won as a Republican in a liberal state. Pretty much everything in his record cuts both ways. That partly explains the ambivalence he generates, I think, and why he may be developing Second Place Guy syndrome.

Bryan on January 9, 2008 at 9:51 PM

Wait a minute. Something is fishy here. He pulled his ads from Florida and S.C. the same day he makes 5 mill? Wha wha what? Huh?

froghat on January 9, 2008 at 9:37 PM

Better piscine than ranine, frogboy.

Mitt Romney should just change his name to Pretty Boy

froghat on January 9, 2008 at 9:44 PM

Har har!

Now go back to doing push-polling for Huckabee.

Tzetzes on January 9, 2008 at 9:53 PM

Go Mitt! I think Mitt’s a man of integrity with huge accomplishments. Romney’s a star by almost every measure. And when you stack him up against his GOP competitors, he looks about the best on conservative values.

BTW,. I could say the same for Rudi about huge accomplishments.

Either could beat Hillary or Barak, IMO. Probably Mitt is favored.

So I root for them both.

petefrt on January 9, 2008 at 9:54 PM

This is still a marathon and I think Mitt is the only one with the determination, resources, and message to cross the finish line.

Greenhorn on January 9, 2008 at 9:56 PM

I’m hoping either Thompson or Mitt really tear it up at the debates coming up.
Mitt’s 2nd place wins against candidates that barely represent conservative principles (if any but Fred actually do) really do add up to be more than the sum of their parts I think.

blankminde on January 9, 2008 at 9:57 PM

He definitely needs some advice from Hillary on how to sound like a human.

DUDE!

Funny, yes…but that’s gonna leave a mark.

I’m not 100% in the tank for Mitt yet, but if someone doesn’t whip out the paddles soon on Fred, I will be.

I agree with Bryan; this is a tough decision. Aside from Paul – and for me, Huck – I could vote for any of ‘em in the general.

sulla on January 9, 2008 at 9:58 PM

Jay on January 9, 2008 at 9:51 PM

Hey appreciate your site!

As to the $. I don’t buy into the argument that his money is wasted. All the candidates had name recognition coming into the race on the right. McCain, the press loved him. Rudy, heck my dog knows his name. You get the picture. So he spent a cool 70 million to get what these guys already had – national name recognition.

And he would be better if he had won either or both Iowa and NH, but expected is a strong word. Hoped is probably more accurate.

Spirit of 1776 on January 9, 2008 at 9:59 PM

jp on January 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM

Um, the Dems were from the South in the Civil War. The North was all Republicans. Republicans ruled MA until like the 50s due in no small part to the Kennedy machine. The State has gone down hill steadily since.

TheBigOldDog on January 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM

Um, the Dems were from the South in the Civil War. The North was all Republicans. Republicans ruled MA until like the 50s due in no small part to the Kennedy machine. The State has gone down hill steadily since.

TheBigOldDog on January 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM

Let me clarify, I was speaking of Huckabee’s record in Arkansas as Gov., Huck had to deal with a Dem stronghold. Arkansas has on the State level been mostly Democrat since the Civil War, however culturally conservative.

Mitt and Rudy are obvious here, in what I’m describing. I agree with Bryan on Mitt, point I’ve been making to people I know. With Rudy I think the Social issues aren’t that big a deal but still somewhat suspect with him since he hasn’t repudiated those views.

There is a post on this blog if you scroll down on Huckabee and the history of Arkansas Politics. This blogger is a reformed pastor in Arkansas, a libertarian republican and pragmatist.

http://benhouseblog.blogspot.com/

jp on January 9, 2008 at 10:08 PM

Well,that’s a positive sign,no!

canopfor on January 9, 2008 at 10:13 PM

one other point, to get elected you have to convince what, 60 million Americans atleast to go vote for you. If this election is going to be more on domestic issues and the ‘mood’ of the country is economic populism, I’d much rather have the Huckster’s version of that than a Dem. hopefully huck would do more on the lip service side and rhetoric and less on the actual policy.

Kinda how the Prescription Drug plan played out with Bush. Atleast they put market forces in it and kept out the Dems desire for the Govt to negotiate prices and take the market forces out of the equation

jp on January 9, 2008 at 10:15 PM

Fred Thompson 63.6% 35 Fredalanche©

Mitt Romney 25.5% 14

Mike Huckabee 7.3% 4

Rudy Giuliani 1.8% 1

John McCain. 1.8% 1
http://www.thesitrep.com/pres.htm

TheSitRep on January 9, 2008 at 10:15 PM

Mittalanche©

sue me SitRep.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 10:15 PM

Here is a new poll.

Please vote truthfully for the candidate you like the least.

Mcguyver on January 9, 2008 at 10:20 PM

Here is a new poll.

Please vote truthfully for the candidate you like the least.

Mcguyver on January 9, 2008 at 10:20 PM

I looked at the results and said, “hey, 100% hate Huckabee.” Then I looked again, and I was the only one who’d voted…

Tzetzes on January 9, 2008 at 10:22 PM

Here is a new poll.

Please vote truthfully for the candidate you like the least.

Mcguyver on January 9, 2008 at 10:20 PM

Darn! I never read instructions, ARRRGH!
I voted for my boy Fred.

Tragic world!
Fredalanche©

TheSitRep on January 9, 2008 at 10:26 PM

When you consider a field like the one we have now, it’s not so much their overall stances as their priorities. I think Rudy would stay focused on terrorism, border security and tax cutes. I think Romney would stay focused on cutting costs, tax cuts and gaining effeciencies like a true manager. Fred would be committed to tax cuts, border security and if we’re lucky social security reform.

McCain will focus on terrorism, but what’s his second priority going to be, global warming? And I don’t know what Huck’s focus would be, but I feel very confident he wouldn’t push for tax cuts or border security.

So… it’s a matter of where they’ll spend their political capital should they win. On that basis, I’d be happiest with Fred but I’d also be happy with Mitt or Rudy. The other two worry me about misplaced priorities.

Spolitics on January 9, 2008 at 10:28 PM

Dude I’m getting a Fredache© from all this Fredalanche stuff.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 10:29 PM

Dude I’m getting a Fredache© from all this Fredalanche stuff.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 10:29 PM

Might I suggest some Tylenolalanche© or some aspirinalanche©

TheSitRep on January 9, 2008 at 10:32 PM

Well old Mitch Romney ain’t doing too well in this poll

http://www.thesitrep.com/pres.htm

It’s a virtual Fredalanche©

TheSitRep on January 9, 2008 at 9:36 PM
WOW…how could Fred be ahead in a small poll with less than 70 people on a website that features a Draft Fred sticker right on the home page?! Let’s just go ahead and swear him in now.

malan89 on January 9, 2008 at 10:33 PM

Dude I’m getting a Fredache© from all this Fredalanche stuff.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 10:29 PM

Juss take yerseff some Arkensas snake-oil and you’ll feel all betta soon.

Tzetzes on January 9, 2008 at 10:37 PM

FredOn. FredOff. Apply directly to the forehead.

Fred is off. UFO man got more votes.

Mitt is leading in the delegate count. Isn’t that what the primaries are all about? Someone please tell me if I’m wrong.

faraway on January 9, 2008 at 10:40 PM

FrogHead – up yours, froggy boy. If you only want to vote for ugly, poor politicians, that’s your call. Good luck in life.

SitRep – dude, you’re pushing your own goofy poll?

Jaibones on January 9, 2008 at 10:41 PM

Juss take yerseff some Arkensas snake-oil and you’ll feel all betta soon.

Tzetzes on January 9, 2008 at 10:37 PM

Is Huck a snake handler? I hope he gets bit.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 10:43 PM

I’ve been a Mitt fan all along. Ever since I heard his pledge to cap non military discretionary spending at inflation minus one percent. It’s nice to see that he still has a chance in all of this.

The past week hasn’t been good for us Mitt fans; and I’ll admit that Guliani’s fiscal plan has wooed me. I still have to stick with My Man Mitt because he is the best one with the best chance of winning.

Go Mitt!

Jeff_McAwesome on January 9, 2008 at 10:44 PM

Is Huck a snake handler? I hope he gets bit.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 10:43 PM

A snake-oil salesman. A huckster. A guy who never answers a question straight.

Tzetzes on January 9, 2008 at 10:46 PM

haha I never thought huckster was a REAL word. Now I’m laughing.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 10:51 PM

Huckster: seller of small articles, usually of cheap or shoddy quality, or one engaged in haggling or making petty bargains…

I can’t stop laughing.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 10:54 PM

Heh.

Hey, Allah, Mitt’s pulled in $5mm today. What do you say, should he quickly repay a $5mm loan from his own account and wrap it up?

Jaibones on January 9, 2008 at 11:00 PM

I just donated $50.00 to the Huckster! :) no lie…

CCRWM on January 9, 2008 at 11:01 PM

I just donated $50.00 to the Huckster! :) no lie…

CCRWM on January 9, 2008 at 11:01 PM

You bastard.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 11:02 PM

A couple of days like that and Mitt is going to have enough money for the next (2012) Presidential campaign ;-)

Go get them Mitt!

mr.nice on January 9, 2008 at 11:05 PM

The poll I would be most interested in, and it wouldn’t be an internet poll is who is the second choice for the most candidates. i heard before that Fred got a lot of second choice votes and i wonder if this is still true.

I assume Mitt’s money is coming from the Mormon community and I certainly can’t dismiss the power of having such a close knit group backing him. However, I think it is becoming apparent that Mitt is strongly disliked by the supporters of McCain and Huckabee and has no chance of pulling them away. I believe Fred could if Romney dropped out. So despite having the huge money advantage Mitt has been unable to get past the antipathy towards him. The right thing to do would be to drop out. Only Fred can attract voters from McCain and Huckabee but he is hampered by the fact that Mitt is rich enough to keep his ads running.

Bill C on January 9, 2008 at 11:06 PM

i heard before that Fred got a lot of second choice votes

Yea, I heard Kucinich 1st, Fred 2nd.

faraway on January 9, 2008 at 11:09 PM

Mitt for VP ! He deserves the silver !

William Amos on January 9, 2008 at 11:10 PM

Hell he’s paying Hugh Hewitt and most of the other pundits to shill for him 24/7, he should have as much money as Hillary or Obama!

Chakra Hammer on January 9, 2008 at 11:17 PM

ALL the money in the world will not erase his flip-flops and lies!

I saw my dad marching with martin Luther King..

ummm.. let me define “saw”.. err umm

i’ve been a hunter pretty much all my life..

uhhh well.. uhh i shot a varmint once or twice… WTF..

Chakra Hammer on January 9, 2008 at 11:19 PM

I just donated $50.00 to the Huckster! :) no lie…

CCRWM on January 9, 2008 at 11:01 PM

Why? Did you make the mistake of looking into his eyes?
Never look directly into his eyes!

Tzetzes on January 9, 2008 at 11:22 PM

Chakra, more like little white lies and momentary wavering. Be easy on him.

faraway on January 9, 2008 at 11:24 PM

Chakra Hammer on January 9, 2008 at 11:19 PM

His position moves don’t bother me because they are all in one direction – toward the right. But it’s the little throwaway lines – that’s the worst part about him. The line about being a life-long hunter, or the line about his sons’ service. Even the MLK thing was nothing until he went dictionary on us. Talk about stubbing your own toe. Especially since we know the idgit voter is out there.

Spirit of 1776 on January 9, 2008 at 11:25 PM

However, I think it is becoming apparent that Mitt is strongly disliked by the supporters of McCain and Huckabee and has no chance of pulling them away.

How so? I think that there is an unspoken alliance between McCain and Huckabee right now, but what makes you conclude that is true of his supporters? We don’t have a lot of McCain or Huck supporters, but here most Fred supporters would support Mitt and Mitt supporters would support Fred.

Spirit of 1776 on January 9, 2008 at 11:27 PM

We don’t have a lot of McCain or Huck supporters, but here most Fred supporters would support Mitt and Mitt supporters would support Fred.

Spirit of 1776 on January 9, 2008 at 11:27 PM

Amen. If my man Mitt left the race I’d go for Fred.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 11:30 PM

Amen. If my man Mitt left the race I’d go for Fred.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 11:30 PM

Same. My picks are:

Romney or Thompson

* * *

Giuliani or McCain

* * *

Obama or Hilary

* * *

His Satanic Majesty

* * *

Huckabee or Edwards

Tzetzes on January 9, 2008 at 11:36 PM

We ALL better support the nominee or we’ll get stuck with more Ruth Bader Ginsburg type justices. God help us then.

Mojave Mark on January 9, 2008 at 11:38 PM

I would put McCain below Satan.

Looks like somebody bought Huckabee’s snake oil and wasn’t too happy.

CABE on January 9, 2008 at 11:39 PM

Darn! I never read instructions, ARRRGH!
I voted for my boy Fred.

Tragic world!
Fredalanche©

TheSitRep on January 9, 2008 at 10:26 PM

Instant Karma!

I donated $25.00 to My Man Mitt today too, so add that to the total. PayPal makes it so easy, I might just throw in $25.00 more.

McGuyver/Sit Rep -

What’s with the ads on that poll site? They aren’t into niche advertising, that’s for sure.

Buy Danish on January 9, 2008 at 11:53 PM

With Rudy I think the Social issues aren’t that big a deal but still somewhat suspect with him since he hasn’t repudiated those views.

jp on January 9, 2008 at 10:08 PM

No disresepct, but if you want somebody who takes a poll to decide what he should think, Rudy’s probably not your guy.

I respectfully disagree with him on abortion, but he is a law-and-order guy who will appoint the right kind of judges to Supreme Court. He believes that abortion is wrong but in the end an individual matter of conscience. That is not the same as believing the Supreme Court should decide that for us by fiat.

LagunaDave on January 10, 2008 at 12:10 AM

Can any of you “Huckabees” explain to me the following?

When asked about his lack of foreign policy credentials and the resulting impact on his ability to successfully continue waging the WOT, he stated he is the only candidate with a degree in Religious Theology which he posits makes him more capable of handling the religious aspect of the WOT.

When asked about Mitt Romney’s religion he indicated he didn’t know much about Mormonism and asked if that wasn’t the religion that believes that Jesus & the Devil were brothers.

My questions are …

(1) Isn’t his response to the later question puzzling giving his response to the earlier question?

(2) Is the subtle pejorative of the later response typical of a humble/pious Christian?

(3) Is this Christian behavior?

MsDollie on January 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM

Can any of you “Huckabees” explain to me the following?

MsDollie on January 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM

I believe the correct biblical term is Huckabite.

Tzetzes on January 10, 2008 at 12:18 AM

Sorry, I just can’t see giving money to RINOs with a quarter-billion dollar personal net worth.

I did, however, give Duncan Hunter another $25.00 today.

LegendHasIt on January 10, 2008 at 12:21 AM

McCain is also earning money now.

bnelson44 on January 10, 2008 at 12:31 AM

Huh? Willard Romney gave $5 million to his friends just so they could give it back to his campaign?

Willard Romney is finished. Does anybody even like him or more importantly…trust him?

Has anybody heard about Willard’s company selling dengerous technology to communist china? Duncan Hunter has been talking about this for two months now.

HaraldHardrada on January 10, 2008 at 12:57 AM

Michigan is interesting because there are a lot of people like me here who remember his father. Mitt is just like his father, in appearance, and manners.

There just isn’t a negative for George Romney here. But that was a long time ago and younger voters will not remember. I get nostalgic for the decency of the Romney governorship and it is hard consider the son a separate entity. The dad was right-moderate and the son seems similar.

How will the Romney name play on election day in Michigan?

Folk outside this state do not know the history

entagor on January 10, 2008 at 1:00 AM

I believe the correct biblical term is Huckabite. Tzetzes on January 10, 2008 at 12:18 AM

heh

Is that in First or Second Huckalonians?

Mojave Mark on January 10, 2008 at 1:04 AM

entagor on January 10, 2008 at 1:00 AM

Are you a resident then? How do you think it will play out among the three of them?

Spirit of 1776 on January 10, 2008 at 1:05 AM

Willard Romney is finished. Does anybody even like him or more importantly…trust him?
HaraldHardrada on January 10, 2008 at 12:57 AM

Name one republican candidate who has more votes this election cycle? More people like him and trust him then any other candidate. While he is certainly not a lock to win the nomination he is far from finished.

lan astaslem on January 10, 2008 at 2:07 AM

Go Mitt

Richard Bushnell on January 10, 2008 at 2:16 AM

Sorry, but this looks like another Romney lie to me.

Warner Todd Huston on January 10, 2008 at 2:18 AM

Why I’m a Mitt Guy –

In Kalifornia (as the Governator says), Republicans are few and far between. So governating requires getting hostile press/media and Dems to go along out of fear of the public. Ahnuld has not done very well in getting much of anything done as the budget and state free-fall.

Mitt by all accounts has governed fairly well without a free-fall of the budget. Those in Republican states with a relatively sane legislature don’t know how difficult that can be. And to my way of thinking, the next President will have to deal with a deeply Dem Congress.

I’m also unhappy with GWB failure to do anything about the bureaucracy. CIA and State are out of control. Mitt’s proven he can kick butt organizationally, even in crisis — like the SLC Olympics. Rudy also has these qualities and I like him but for my taste Mitt is more conservative.

I like Rudy too, I respect what he did in NYC and understand how hard it was. But I think Mitt’s organizational skills in working with Dems are better. He is less likely to pick fights he can’t win. But I’d take Rudy.

I like Fred. But he just can’t shake Arthur Branch slowness in responding, and lacks the management skills.

Can’t stand McAmnesty and Huckafool.

whiskey_199 on January 10, 2008 at 2:36 AM

I was surprised to see that one of his top financial backers is eBay CEO Meg Whitman.

That has to be a first.

WoosterOh on January 10, 2008 at 4:44 AM

TheSitRep on January 9, 2008 at 9:48 PM

Your internet poll fails because it does not give the Ron Paul spammers the option to SPAM your poll.

BKennedy on January 10, 2008 at 5:13 AM

Mitt is loser in the general election for so many reasons, not the least of which is that he is a total phony. You guys who believe his conversion on abortion and immigration on his way to trying to get the Repub nomination are just deceiving yourself.

And the guy is tone deaf when it comes to the general election; I mean he actually said that in the first 90 days of Mitt administration he will begin massive deportations of illegals. Even if that can be done, it makes him sound emotional and histrionic. Save me from Mitt, please

georgealbert on January 10, 2008 at 6:29 AM

That is some major scratch. And for a guy who keeps coming in second. As Darth Vader might say, impressive.

But when Ron Paul raised $6 million in a day, nary a peep from you.

Impressive.

fossten on January 10, 2008 at 7:53 AM

But when Ron Paul raised $6 million in a day, nary a peep from you.

Impressive.

fossten on January 10, 2008 at 7:53 AM

I’m pretty sure HA covered that Guy Fawkes Day thing.

What is Stormfront (Dr. Paul) paying you?

BKennedy on January 10, 2008 at 8:10 AM

Bryan- do your thoughts change if Fred wins, not second or third, but WINS South Carolina?

Ex-tex on January 10, 2008 at 8:42 AM

$70 million spent, at least $17 million of his own and Romney is in fifth place and without a win in either of the two states he was expected to carry.

That is pretty sad.

Jay on January 9, 2008 at 9:51 PM

Make that over $150 million, heading for $200 million…the most any candidate has ever spent, ever in a primary race. An astounding amount of money…unprecedented, the return should have been much much higher.
At this pace he will spend more then twice on his race (if it goes all the way ) then the combined total of Dems and Repub in 2004.
The presidents job better have a good dental plan, I don’t think $400,000 per year is enough for spending billions to win.

right2bright on January 10, 2008 at 8:45 AM

just deceiving yourself.
georgealbert on January 10, 2008 at 6:29 AM

Since the beginning of the primary season, Mitt has received more votes and more delegates. He has broad appeal in all contests so far. He totally took Wyoming. Huck has appeal in Iowa, but not in NH. McCain has appeal in NH but not in Iowa. Mitt has appeal in both states.

It’s amazing that you can come in here and accuse all Mitt supporters of being purposely deceiving themselves. I wonder if you turn that criticism to candidates who are is much worse shape than him? Perhaps your candidate is doing as well? Well, that has to be a fact because in the context of ACTUALLY winning the nomination, no one on the rep side has performed better than Mitt.

csdeven on January 10, 2008 at 8:45 AM

right2bright on January 10, 2008 at 8:45 AM

So what?

csdeven on January 10, 2008 at 8:49 AM

But when Ron Paul raised $6 million in a day, nary a peep from you.

Impressive.

fossten on January 10, 2008 at 7:53 AM

I’m not going to do your research for you, but if you took the time to research the archives, you would not have posted that attack.
A weak, unfounded statement…nice try tool.

right2bright on January 10, 2008 at 8:54 AM

I’m with Mitt!

I donated, even though I’m not working right now.

He can and will be a breath of fresh air in D.C.

madmonkphotog on January 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM

Comment pages: 1 2