Actually I learned the phrase “belligerent little prick” from your buddy MadisonC and he insists it’s not a profanity, so take it up with him.
Buy Danish on January 10, 2008 at 11:14 AM

Johnny said it, so I can say it too…That is your defense? Brilliant, just brilliant…a new low for HotAir. He said, so I can say it.
*
And he ain’t my buddy, when he and I don’t agree, we will debate…but we won’t take it personally…really, look at yourself, your gaining weight from carrying all of that anger, it is weighing heavy on your soul.
But then, with those postings, and cleansing your soul…you may end up being the Biggest Loser.

Any response to Mitt buying an RV instead of a red truck? Hmmmmm?

right2bright on January 10, 2008 at 1:05 PM

Bet the pickup gets better gas mileage…

SECOND LOOK AT ECO-FRIENDLY FRED!

then provided no proof to back up your claim.

Issues indeed.

csdeven on January 10, 2008 at 9:26 AM

Oh, that’s what you two love birds are talking about? That I said Mitt is buying votes by spending a record amount, and you take offense to that…well you sure tko’d me on that, oh yeah…the funny thing is that remark was toward someone else, CSDeven just jumped in because he thinks Mitt is God, and you can’t diss your God…is Mitts kids on his payroll still?
Record spending—buying votes, what happened to your “inference law”? Buy Danish
And BuyDanish, learn to be civil…you will be banned for using this as your personal vendetta blog. You hijack the posting, by posting filthy remarks that have nothing to do with subject. Stick with the subject, and cut out the personal attacks, I am telling you they are adding weight to you…it is heavy to carry all of that anger.
*
Any response to Mitt buying an RV instead of a red truck? Hmmmmm?
Move on kids, there is enough excellent posting without you guys gumming up the system with filth and lies.

he will still be around after that and not suffer much aside from media ridicule

It was a T.K.O.
Buy Danish on January 10, 2008 at 11:14 AM

Heh.

right2bright on January 10, 2008 at 8:28 AM

Rambling bloviators who can’t string a coherent sentence together don’t win debates.

I bet you had you mouth washed out with soap

Actually I learned the phrase “belligerent little prick” from your buddy MadisonC and he insists it’s not a profanity, so take it up with him.

csdeven on January 10, 2008 at 9:26 AM

It was a T.K.O.

Breaking from Fox news.

a discussion of issues.
right2bright on January 10, 2008 at 8:28 AM

I didn’t clean your clock, you cleaned your own clock when you accused a fellow HA member of being bought off and then provided no proof to back up your claim.

Issues indeed.

Who is in the lead with the most delegates thus far???

A fact you will NEVER hear in the news… why? Because big news corporations WANT AMNESTY passed. That’s what it’s all about this year.

They will never say it. But that’s it.

The bottom line is that csdeven cleaned your cuckoo clock today despite any delusions to the contrary.

Buy Danish on January 9, 2008 at 11:00 PM

I doubt that (you mean when cs talked insistently about Freds red truck and his kid on the payroll, and now Mitt buys an RV and puts 5 kids on the payroll? Oh yeah, CS is real clever, swallowed his tongue and left HA for a few weeks out of embarrassment, yeah he’s on your team…), but it is obvious you keep score…this isn’t a ball game, it is to more than a debate, a discussion of issues. You show you want to win, and when losing resort to this:

Take heart though! You and r2b are both belligerent little pricks with little pea brains.
GFY!
Buy Danish on January 9, 2008 at 11:32 PM

Like I said, you never made the debate team, but I bet you had you mouth washed out with soap…you poo poo head. (and lose some weight, all that anger makes you heavy)

I don’t think Obama would do that, but I’m quite sure Hillary would work in any subtle digs she could about the polygamy, and what it might suggest about Mitt’s attitude towards women.

But I forget, neither Hillary nor Obama would have to say it. There are plenty of reporters and columnists who would say it for them.

I will pre-concede (is that a word?) that polygamy and segregation are in the past for the LDS, and are not relevant to the campaign. Also pre-conceded: that the LDS abandoned polygamy a long time ago, and that segregation was hardly exclusive to the Mormons.

theregoestheneighborhood on January 9, 2008 at 11:15 PM

To which Mitt would probably respond with something subtle about Bill Clinton supporting polygamy, if only he wern’t tied down at the moment.

Answer: Hey, God changed his mind. Whatta ya gonna do?

Mojave Mark on January 9, 2008 at 11:31 PM

Not touching that one….

MadisonConservative on January 9, 2008 at 10:52 PM

You’re an Idjit because (among other things) you constantly swoop into the middle of conversations that have nothing to do with you, in that belligerent little pricky way of yours, and more often than not you make a complete fool of yourself.

You make absolutely no sense and you get hysterical prickly over question marks and apostrophes.

No matter how many times something is explained to you you still don’t get it, like, for instance, the fact that I have told you over and over again that it is your hypocrisy and not your language that annoys me.

Take heart though! You and r2b are both belligerent little pricks with little pea brains.

GFY!

Couldn’t you just hear Obama in a debate saying something like, “I appreciate that you’re not a racist, governor, given that just 30 years ago, I would not have been allowed to join your church.”

Answer: Hey, God changed his mind. Whatta ya gonna do?

Of course, if it hasn’t been tried yet during the last generation of racially-divisive politics, maybe it never will be.

Couldn’t you just hear Obama in a debate saying something like, “I appreciate that you’re not a racist, governor, given that just 30 years ago, I would not have been allowed to join your church.”

You know, I think that might honestly work more against Obama than Mitt, especially to evangelical Dems.

Couldn’t you just hear Obama in a debate saying something like, “I appreciate that you’re not a racist, governor, given that just 30 years ago, I would not have been allowed to join your church.”

I don’t think Obama would do that, but I’m quite sure Hillary would work in any subtle digs she could about the polygamy, and what it might suggest about Mitt’s attitude towards women.

But I forget, neither Hillary nor Obama would have to say it. There are plenty of reporters and columnists who would say it for them.

I will pre-concede (is that a word?) that polygamy and segregation are in the past for the LDS, and are not relevant to the campaign. Also pre-conceded: that the LDS abandoned polygamy a long time ago, and that segregation was hardly exclusive to the Mormons.

Odd only Mitt supporters have used that tactic, and one other gal (sometimes I suspect BuyDanish is her), who was banned last year used to do that.

right2bright on January 9, 2008 at 8:29 PM

Kerist. Any more theories, pea brain?

You’ll pardon me if I don’t respond sympathetically to your complaints about “insults”. You fill these pages with malicious, malevolent manifestos day in and day out, insulting not only our intelligence but members of the LDS faith on a regular basis.

So if someone says the quarterback made a bad throw, you think that person thinks they are better then the quarterback? Blah Blah Blah…

right2bright on January 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM

If one quarterback tells the other quarterback that he sucks as a quarterback, there might be an analogy here. Which there isn’t, so you have demonstrated once again what a clueless clod you are.

The bottom line is that csdeven cleaned your cuckoo clock today despite any delusions to the contrary.

There’s only one thing worse than being a rich guy, a phony rich guy. Mitt is unelectable. End of story

froghat on January 9, 2008 at 11:05 AM

There’s only one thing worse than having a lot of idiotic opinions, and that would be sharing every one that comes to mind in your first 24 hours at HotAir.

Douche.

I do care that commenters who swoop in here like harpies and start “reprimanding” commenters for expressing their thoughts

Like you did to me because I said “prick”. Your irony is like BUTTAH.

When someone states that the person they are debating is a poor debater it is fair to infer that they think they are better at it. Is that really too difficult for you?

Actually, it’s fairer to infer that the stater of who has poor debating skills is familiar with someone who has better debating skills, not necessarily themselves. But hey, I’m just an idjut because I don’t shut up and realize that everything you say is right, even when you say something completely different from thread to thread.

You’re questioning my intellect because I’ve pointed out your inconsistencies and your propensity for blurting things out without knowing what you’re talking about, like claiming DS was a Fredhead. Much like BKennedy made the same sort of claim that I was a southerner, he was wrong and made no admission of such. I once admitted my error in inferring that your tone was what it was not. You refused to admit to overreacting. That is because you are a gigantic hypocrite who justifies taking internet comments personally, then admonishes those that do…you admonish others for using personal insults and attacks, and then do so yourself…you tell others not to be silly enough to analyze people by their comments, then speculate on their age and brain cell count…you tell others not to jump into conversations that don’t concern them, while regularly doing it yourself.

You’re a nut, and you’ve gotten off your last one with me. You can try doriangrey and your other obsessions, dragging your petty frustrations from post to post after they tire of your trolling infatuations. I’m finished, honey. Buh bah.

MadisonConservative on January 9, 2008 at 7:05 PM

Wow. More cross-post attempts at building a case against little old MadisonConservative(sorry csdeven). I’ll go back to my previous label of psychotic.

What are the rules MadisonC? Can you show them to me? You try a little drive-by shooting, fail miserably, shoot yourself in the foot, and then complain that I refer to it?

You whine about not being admired by others as being polite(can’t imagine why). What does that make you?

I do not give a flip if you are polite (or aren’t) and I could not care less about being “admired by others”.
I do care that commenters who swoop in here like harpies and start “reprimanding” commenters for expressing their thoughts, and call them liars for telling the truth. It’s all very Orwellian, really.

In other words, you’re calling me stupid because you think I’m stupid. Maybe you should look up “recursion”. Inference over the internet of another person based on comments? Nah, that’s not armchair psychology.

I’m questioning your intellect because you make idiotic statements and draw idiotic conclusions. When someone states that the person they are debating is a poor debater it is fair to infer that they think they are better at it. Is that really too difficult for you?

If I draw the conclusion that you are not the brightest bulb in the shed, it is based on a preponderance of the evidence.