Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Geraghty: Fred ready to go “all in” in South Carolina? Update: Staff taking pay cuts

posted at 5:19 pm on January 8, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

Another reason for the ‘Heads to be pulling hard for St. John tonight:

Thompson and the people around him know that South Carolina is a must-win. Mitt Romney may look very damaged by the time South Carolina votes, however, and Team Fred thinks they’re a likely first choice for Romney fans losing faith in their man. (Would Mitt fans go to “Don’t Mormons believe Jesus and Satan are brothers” Huckabee or “You are the candidate of change” McCain?)

Also, expect Thompson to spend an enormous amount of time laying out all the ways that Huckabee is not an across-the-board conservative. Thompson’s people believe the ball is bouncing his way, as he’ll soon be able to make the case he’s the only remaining candidate who can rally all wings of the Republican coalition.

The across-the-board conservative versus Maverick versus Huckabee. Advantage: Huckabee.

Meanwhile, black voters appear to be shifting towards Obama, guaranteeing another crushing Hillary defeat two weeks from now.

Update: Fred trims the sails.

Campaign spokesman Darrel Ng declined to say how much salaries will be reduced, but said the campaign has raised a half million dollars since the Iowa caucuses, and will be gearing up for airtime on local television stations in South Carolina starting Thursday.

“This campaign is going to be a South Carolina campaign,” Campaign Manager Bill Lacy said in a written statement.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

It takes approx 1 year to build coal to oil facilities and biomass to oil facilities. We have enough coal and biomass to produce 150% of the total oil that we consume annually not just the amount that we import. If we did this we would not only produce all of our own oil but we would be able to export oil also. Legislate huge tax breaks(1 year) Build synthetic oil facilities(another year). Done.

HaraldHardrada on January 8, 2008 at 10:18 PM

Somehow I doubt you have any idea what you are talking about.

Myth: Alternative energy sources are environmentally benign

Advocates of alternative energy sources, commonly believe that these energy supplies have very little impact on the environment. Sunlight as a source of energy would seem to be an ideal energy source with virtually no negative environmental consequences. Or, converting a relatively more polluting source of energy such as coal into a less polluting liquid fuel appears to be a good exchange.

Reality:

Converting coal to some liquid fuel form which could be used in transportation is possible but to do so to the extent of replacing oil would involve the greatest mining endeavor the world has ever seen. It would require strip mining vast quantities of western land each year. If alternative energy considerations do not include coal, but rather are thought of in terms of solar energy, biomass, nuclear power, wind, hydropower, tidal, ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) or shale oil, they also have environmental impacts.

These have been discussed in more detail in Chapter 22, Mineral Development and the Environment, but some of the environmental problems are briefly summarized here. Solar energy collectors in numbers sufficient to be significant in our energy supplies would use very large amounts of land. Mining the materials used to make these collectors would have an impact. Because the collectors would not have an infinite life, there would be the continual problem of replacement, involving more mining operations.

doriangrey on January 8, 2008 at 10:34 PM

doriangrey on January 8, 2008 at 10:34 PM

But, but, it’s green technology! Who cares if we destroy half the countryside, solar is clean! /econut.

BKennedy on January 8, 2008 at 10:57 PM

doriangrey on January 8, 2008 at 10:34 PM

I am not a member of the church of global warming. I don’t think our policy makers should be either. Global warming effects have been intentionally DRASTICALLY overestimated and manmade global warming has been disproven.

As far as liquified coal goes…America is the saudi arabia of coal, biomass and oil shale. We have huge untapped resources that the libs refuse to let us use due to “global warming”

HaraldHardrada on January 8, 2008 at 10:59 PM

Sure are a lot of people trying to scare the Fred! supporters into giving up.

Let’s face it: New Hampshire doesn’t like southern candidates in general. They expect a leader to be high-energy, and probably wondered what was wrong with Fred.

Now is exactly the wrong time for Fred supporters to throw in the towel. Of the early states in the primaries, only South Carolina gives a really good idea of how a candidate will play in the south. I’m betting Fred! will do just fine there.

Of course, to be a viable candidate, he’ll have to do better than just “fine.” South Carolina will answer the question whether hoping in Fred! is a reasonable hope. He doesn’t necessarily have to win, but he has to do well enough that people will believe he could win the south.

Sure, Mitt’s done okay so far, but “so far” is only Iowa and New Hampshire, and he didn’t even win either of those, even with all the advantages of money and organization.

It’s too early to give up on Fred!, and too early to decide that Mitt is the front runner.

theregoestheneighborhood on January 8, 2008 at 11:13 PM

The Huckster is a snake oil salesman and the sooner people realize it the sooner Fred can start kicking it into high gear and win the nomination. Go FRED 08

limowilliam on January 8, 2008 at 11:20 PM

Why? He never bothered to show up in NH and never spent a dime advertising there. Yet people are still voting for him. Granted only 1%, but still considering he never even tried in NH thats not bad.

doriangrey on January 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM

I just thought there would be more than 1% of Republicans who want a conservative with a conservative record.
I’m still down for the struggle. I’m waiting for SC before I abandon Fred, even though my wallet’s starting to complain.

joewm315 on January 8, 2008 at 11:21 PM

HaraldHardrada on January 8, 2008 at 10:59 PM

I don’t know much about coal to oil production, but I do know something about farming having grown up around it.

I don’t consider biomass a practical solution. First of all, the biomass is used in no-till to preserve the soil and moisture content after harvest. For excess biomass that comes off corn, a lot of farmers already use it as silage to feed cattle through the winter.

But the biggest problem is that it ends up being an energy sink, in other words… by the time you figure in all the energy it takes for recovery, transport and processing… it takes more energy to produce than it delivers. And you can’t start dictating production without screwing up crop rotation and degrading soil nutrients.

Quite simply, biomass from crops just doesn’t have the ROI needed to make it viable… which is why people keep advocating government intervention.

dominigan on January 8, 2008 at 11:51 PM

What happened to my post?

fabrexe on January 9, 2008 at 12:10 AM

dominigan on January 8, 2008 at 11:51 PM

What I mainly mean by biomass is industrial waste: landfill waste, forestry products waste etc. in addition to non food energy crops such as algae and/or miscanthus.

HaraldHardrada on January 9, 2008 at 12:19 AM

The race is still wide open… the future of our nation is at stake (any Democrat elected means quicker conversion to socialism/ruin/terrorist attack, most other Republicans will have same net effect but at slower pace) thus I’m still insisting on a “true conservative”: Fred Thompson!

Click to make a donation for Fred’s stand in South Carolina and beyond!

electric-rascal on January 9, 2008 at 2:43 AM

Fred lost my vote after his statements at the last debate…

HaraldHardrada on January 8, 2008 at 6:16 PM

Let’s be honest, Fred never had your vote. Being a realist shouldn’t have scared you off, guess you prefer empty promises.

Buttercup on January 9, 2008 at 4:19 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3


You must be logged in to post a comment.