<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:00:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gerald ford and jimmy carter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-892682</link>
		<dc:creator>gerald ford and jimmy carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-892682</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;gerald ford and jimmy carter...&lt;/strong&gt;

They will have crystal-clear sounds  no small feat inside of a car  and very little distortion....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>gerald ford and jimmy carter&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>They will have crystal-clear sounds  no small feat inside of a car  and very little distortion&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christophercube</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-862426</link>
		<dc:creator>christophercube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 05:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-862426</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rush!
Go Fred!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rush!<br />
Go Fred!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanantonian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-862133</link>
		<dc:creator>sanantonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-862133</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;TexasJew on January 8, 2008 at 2:55 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is that you, Kinky? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>TexasJew on January 8, 2008 at 2:55 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Is that you, Kinky? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-861634</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-861634</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mooseman on January 8, 2008 at 6:59 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mooseman on January 8, 2008 at 6:59 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poptech</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-861526</link>
		<dc:creator>Poptech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-861526</guid>
		<description>Just send all the Evangelicals these links...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CUf37hR48U&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ann Coulter: “Huckabee is the Republican Jimmy Carter”&lt;/a&gt; (Video) (4min)
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-tx9l23B6g&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ann Coulter: &quot;Huckabee Stupid and easily led&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (Video) (2min)
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBST3GAIqFk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ann Coulter: &quot;Liberals Adore Huckabee&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (Video) (3min)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24068&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;There’s a Huckabee Born Every Minute&lt;/a&gt; (Ann Coulter, Human Events)

&quot;&lt;strong&gt;I guess Huckabee is one of those pro-sodomy, pro-gay marriage, pro-evolution evangelical Christians&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; - Ann Coulter

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oWuCQ7g8m8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mike Huckabee Roundhouse Kicked&lt;/a&gt; (Video) (1min)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/19232014.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Huckabee on Education: No to Vouchers, Let Government Fix It&lt;/a&gt; (Standard Newswire)
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59302&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Homeschoolers beware!&lt;/a&gt; (WorldNetDaily)

- &lt;strong&gt;Huckabee received the endorsement of the New Hampshire NEA&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hslda.org/courtreport/v15n3/V15N3AR.asp?PrinterFriendly=True&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HomeSchoolers Lose Ground with New Law signed by Governor Huckabee&lt;/a&gt; (Home School Legal Defense Association)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Obama_huckabee_fave/2007/08/23/27019.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama: Mike Huckabee is My Favorite GOP Candidate&lt;/a&gt; (Newsmax)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59220&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Christian conservatives: Beware of Huckabee&lt;/a&gt; (WorldNetDaily)

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNWoD2mzN04&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Huckabee: Raising Taxes OK&lt;/a&gt; (Video) (1min)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just send all the Evangelicals these links&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CUf37hR48U" rel="nofollow">Ann Coulter: “Huckabee is the Republican Jimmy Carter”</a> (Video) (4min)<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-tx9l23B6g" rel="nofollow">Ann Coulter: &#8220;Huckabee Stupid and easily led&#8221;</a> (Video) (2min)<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBST3GAIqFk" rel="nofollow">Ann Coulter: &#8220;Liberals Adore Huckabee&#8221;</a> (Video) (3min)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24068" rel="nofollow">There’s a Huckabee Born Every Minute</a> (Ann Coulter, Human Events)</p>
<p>&#8220;<strong>I guess Huckabee is one of those pro-sodomy, pro-gay marriage, pro-evolution evangelical Christians</strong>&#8221; &#8211; Ann Coulter</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oWuCQ7g8m8" rel="nofollow">Mike Huckabee Roundhouse Kicked</a> (Video) (1min)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/19232014.html" rel="nofollow">Huckabee on Education: No to Vouchers, Let Government Fix It</a> (Standard Newswire)<br />
<a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59302" rel="nofollow">Homeschoolers beware!</a> (WorldNetDaily)</p>
<p>- <strong>Huckabee received the endorsement of the New Hampshire NEA</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hslda.org/courtreport/v15n3/V15N3AR.asp?PrinterFriendly=True" rel="nofollow">HomeSchoolers Lose Ground with New Law signed by Governor Huckabee</a> (Home School Legal Defense Association)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Obama_huckabee_fave/2007/08/23/27019.html" rel="nofollow">Obama: Mike Huckabee is My Favorite GOP Candidate</a> (Newsmax)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59220" rel="nofollow">Christian conservatives: Beware of Huckabee</a> (WorldNetDaily)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNWoD2mzN04" rel="nofollow">Huckabee: Raising Taxes OK</a> (Video) (1min)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psrch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-861096</link>
		<dc:creator>psrch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-861096</guid>
		<description>I guess it&#039;s OK to flat-out lie, if The High Lord Rush states it and Hot Air repeats it.

Um Rush, you MAY want to actually read Huckabee&#039;s education page before you start making an ass of yourself.... again.

Oh, and I&#039;m a heavily three-leg conservative evangelical, and I don&#039;t know that I&#039;m voting for Huckabee, either. But dang, at least GET THE FRACKIN&#039; FACTS RIGHT!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s OK to flat-out lie, if The High Lord Rush states it and Hot Air repeats it.</p>
<p>Um Rush, you MAY want to actually read Huckabee&#8217;s education page before you start making an ass of yourself&#8230;. again.</p>
<p>Oh, and I&#8217;m a heavily three-leg conservative evangelical, and I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;m voting for Huckabee, either. But dang, at least GET THE FRACKIN&#8217; FACTS RIGHT!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mooseman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860838</link>
		<dc:creator>Mooseman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860838</guid>
		<description>More wisdom from the golden EIB microphone. I wish I could pick up AM radio at my office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More wisdom from the golden EIB microphone. I wish I could pick up AM radio at my office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakra Hammer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860613</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakra Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860613</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;    How many pro-life endorsements has Rudy landed?

    stlpatriot on January 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How about Texas Governor Rick Perry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>    How many pro-life endorsements has Rudy landed?</p>
<p>    stlpatriot on January 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>How about Texas Governor Rick Perry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860598</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860598</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Many Christians are becoming, or have become disenfranchised with conservatism. Rush is not, and has not behaved in a Christianly manor in many decades. Ann Coulter does not and has not behaved in a Christianly manor. Mitt does not give me a feel good Christian vibe when he starts talking about sending families that I have seen in my church back to Mexico. I don’t think that’s my form of conservatism. And frankly, if that is what conservatism has become, then I would suggest that it be renamed because I have not changed – politics have.

So Rush that’s your answer from at least one Christian.

Wise Golden on January 8, 2008 at 4:17 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, as one Christian to another many Christians have ceased to be Christian in anything other than name. So there is a family in your church who broke US immigration law to be here and you are ok with that? Shame on you. Have you never read the bible? &lt;blockquote&gt;Render unto Caesar?&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Do these ring any bells with you? Remember what the Apostle Paul said about casting people who refuse to adhere to Christian doctrine out of your church? 

No, its not that the conservative movement has left Christians, it&#039;s that many Christians have been seduced by liberal socialist ideology. Not knowing what the doctrines of Christianity are they fall for any feel good wishy washy mush preached at them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Many Christians are becoming, or have become disenfranchised with conservatism. Rush is not, and has not behaved in a Christianly manor in many decades. Ann Coulter does not and has not behaved in a Christianly manor. Mitt does not give me a feel good Christian vibe when he starts talking about sending families that I have seen in my church back to Mexico. I don’t think that’s my form of conservatism. And frankly, if that is what conservatism has become, then I would suggest that it be renamed because I have not changed – politics have.</p>
<p>So Rush that’s your answer from at least one Christian.</p>
<p>Wise Golden on January 8, 2008 at 4:17 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>No, as one Christian to another many Christians have ceased to be Christian in anything other than name. So there is a family in your church who broke US immigration law to be here and you are ok with that? Shame on you. Have you never read the bible?<br />
<blockquote>Render unto Caesar?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.</p></blockquote>
<p> Do these ring any bells with you? Remember what the Apostle Paul said about casting people who refuse to adhere to Christian doctrine out of your church? </p>
<p>No, its not that the conservative movement has left Christians, it&#8217;s that many Christians have been seduced by liberal socialist ideology. Not knowing what the doctrines of Christianity are they fall for any feel good wishy washy mush preached at them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakra Hammer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860581</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakra Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860581</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;How many pro-life endorsements has Rudy landed?

stlpatriot on January 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How about Tommy Thompson, Pat Robertson and Ted Olsen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How many pro-life endorsements has Rudy landed?</p>
<p>stlpatriot on January 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>How about Tommy Thompson, Pat Robertson and Ted Olsen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakra Hammer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860193</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakra Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860193</guid>
		<description>Chakra Hammer on January 8, 2008 at 3:35 AM

&lt;blockquote&gt;pandering? lol

Rudy has said many times in the past that hes pro-choice, its not a secret, don’t try to play it like Rudy has a better pro-life record than ANYONE in the republican field, much less Fred..

How many pro-life endorsements has Rudy landed?

stlpatriot on January 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Rudy STILL is Pro-Choice!

And thats WHY I TRUST HIM!!!!

He doesn&#039;t change his positions from day-to-day just to pander for votes!

He tells you the TRUTH!
(Damn that used to mean something to some people)

And since he tells the truth thats why I trust him on Strict Constructionist Judges!

Him personally being Pro-Choice, DOES NOT disqualify him from wanting to get rid of Roe v Wade. 

Rudy is a Federalist, he believes in States Rights, he wants the States to make these decisions... 

I strongly believe that he feels Roe was wrongly decided, since it oversteps the States Authority.
-----------------
From a debate

Would probably not sign federal ban on all abortions
Q: If hypothetically, Roe v. Wade was overturned, and the Congress passed a federal ban on all abortions and it came to your desk, would you sign it?

A: I probably would not sign it. I would leave it to the states to make that decision. I think that the problem with Roe against Wade is that it took the decision away from the states.

Source: 2007 GOP YouTube debate in St. Petersburg, Florida Nov 28, 2007</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chakra Hammer on January 8, 2008 at 3:35 AM</p>
<blockquote><p>pandering? lol</p>
<p>Rudy has said many times in the past that hes pro-choice, its not a secret, don’t try to play it like Rudy has a better pro-life record than ANYONE in the republican field, much less Fred..</p>
<p>How many pro-life endorsements has Rudy landed?</p>
<p>stlpatriot on January 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Rudy STILL is Pro-Choice!</p>
<p>And thats WHY I TRUST HIM!!!!</p>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t change his positions from day-to-day just to pander for votes!</p>
<p>He tells you the TRUTH!<br />
(Damn that used to mean something to some people)</p>
<p>And since he tells the truth thats why I trust him on Strict Constructionist Judges!</p>
<p>Him personally being Pro-Choice, DOES NOT disqualify him from wanting to get rid of Roe v Wade. </p>
<p>Rudy is a Federalist, he believes in States Rights, he wants the States to make these decisions&#8230; </p>
<p>I strongly believe that he feels Roe was wrongly decided, since it oversteps the States Authority.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
From a debate</p>
<p>Would probably not sign federal ban on all abortions<br />
Q: If hypothetically, Roe v. Wade was overturned, and the Congress passed a federal ban on all abortions and it came to your desk, would you sign it?</p>
<p>A: I probably would not sign it. I would leave it to the states to make that decision. I think that the problem with Roe against Wade is that it took the decision away from the states.</p>
<p>Source: 2007 GOP YouTube debate in St. Petersburg, Florida Nov 28, 2007</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chakra Hammer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860190</link>
		<dc:creator>Chakra Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860190</guid>
		<description>Chakra Hammer on January 8, 2008 at 3:35 AM

&lt;blockquote&gt;pandering? lol

Rudy has said many times in the past that hes pro-choice, its not a secret, don’t try to play it like Rudy has a better pro-life record than ANYONE in the republican field, much less Fred..

How many pro-life endorsements has Rudy landed?

stlpatriot on January 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Rudy STILL is Pro-Choice!

And thats WHY I TRUST HIM!!!!

He doesn&#039;t change his positions from day-to-day just to pander for votes!

He tells you the TRUTH!
(Damn that used to mean something to some people)

And since he tells the truth thats why I trust him on Strict Constructionist Judges!

Him personally being Pro-Choice, DOES NOT disqualify him from wanting to get rid of Roe v Wade. 

Rudy is a Federalist, he believes in States Rights, he wants the States to make these decisions... 

I strongly believe that he feels Roe was wrongly decided, since it oversteps the States Authority.

From a debate

Would probably not sign federal ban on all abortions
Q: If hypothetically, Roe v. Wade was overturned, and the Congress passed a federal ban on all abortions and it came to your desk, would you sign it?

A: I probably would not sign it. I would leave it to the states to make that decision. I think that the problem with Roe against Wade is that it took the decision away from the states.

Source: 2007 GOP YouTube debate in St. Petersburg, Florida Nov 28, 2007</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chakra Hammer on January 8, 2008 at 3:35 AM</p>
<blockquote><p>pandering? lol</p>
<p>Rudy has said many times in the past that hes pro-choice, its not a secret, don’t try to play it like Rudy has a better pro-life record than ANYONE in the republican field, much less Fred..</p>
<p>How many pro-life endorsements has Rudy landed?</p>
<p>stlpatriot on January 8, 2008 at 8:50 AM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Rudy STILL is Pro-Choice!</p>
<p>And thats WHY I TRUST HIM!!!!</p>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t change his positions from day-to-day just to pander for votes!</p>
<p>He tells you the TRUTH!<br />
(Damn that used to mean something to some people)</p>
<p>And since he tells the truth thats why I trust him on Strict Constructionist Judges!</p>
<p>Him personally being Pro-Choice, DOES NOT disqualify him from wanting to get rid of Roe v Wade. </p>
<p>Rudy is a Federalist, he believes in States Rights, he wants the States to make these decisions&#8230; </p>
<p>I strongly believe that he feels Roe was wrongly decided, since it oversteps the States Authority.</p>
<p>From a debate</p>
<p>Would probably not sign federal ban on all abortions<br />
Q: If hypothetically, Roe v. Wade was overturned, and the Congress passed a federal ban on all abortions and it came to your desk, would you sign it?</p>
<p>A: I probably would not sign it. I would leave it to the states to make that decision. I think that the problem with Roe against Wade is that it took the decision away from the states.</p>
<p>Source: 2007 GOP YouTube debate in St. Petersburg, Florida Nov 28, 2007</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MechEng5by5</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860189</link>
		<dc:creator>MechEng5by5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860189</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an evangelical and I am not fooled by Huckabee.  Look at his credentials.  A Time magazine endorsment?  Didn&#039;t Time just pick Putin as MOY?

I needs me sum FRED!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an evangelical and I am not fooled by Huckabee.  Look at his credentials.  A Time magazine endorsment?  Didn&#8217;t Time just pick Putin as MOY?</p>
<p>I needs me sum FRED!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rush trying to loose audiance?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860149</link>
		<dc:creator>Rush trying to loose audiance?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860149</guid>
		<description>[...] Hat tip to Hot Air. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hat tip to Hot Air. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wise Golden</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-860117</link>
		<dc:creator>Wise Golden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-860117</guid>
		<description>What causes Rush to believe that Christians are searching for a “true conservative?” We’re not – we’re searching for Christ.   We, Christians tend to believe that it is in fact our teachings that define what has previously been known as “true conservative”’ and I can only speak for myself, but I know a lot of Christians agree that the conservative movement has left us – not visa versa.  The fact is that our opinions are rooted and have not changed in any dramatic fashion in over 2000 years, while the American political movements changes daily, and it seems now, hourly.

Many Christians are becoming, or have become disenfranchised with conservatism.  Rush is not, and has not behaved in a Christianly manor in many decades.  Ann Coulter does not and has not behaved in a Christianly manor.  Mitt does not give me a feel good Christian vibe when he starts talking about sending families that I have seen in my church back to Mexico.  I don’t think that’s my form of conservatism.  And frankly, if that is what conservatism has become, then I would suggest that it be renamed because I have not changed – politics have.

So Rush that’s your answer from at least one Christian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What causes Rush to believe that Christians are searching for a “true conservative?” We’re not – we’re searching for Christ.   We, Christians tend to believe that it is in fact our teachings that define what has previously been known as “true conservative”’ and I can only speak for myself, but I know a lot of Christians agree that the conservative movement has left us – not visa versa.  The fact is that our opinions are rooted and have not changed in any dramatic fashion in over 2000 years, while the American political movements changes daily, and it seems now, hourly.</p>
<p>Many Christians are becoming, or have become disenfranchised with conservatism.  Rush is not, and has not behaved in a Christianly manor in many decades.  Ann Coulter does not and has not behaved in a Christianly manor.  Mitt does not give me a feel good Christian vibe when he starts talking about sending families that I have seen in my church back to Mexico.  I don’t think that’s my form of conservatism.  And frankly, if that is what conservatism has become, then I would suggest that it be renamed because I have not changed – politics have.</p>
<p>So Rush that’s your answer from at least one Christian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renwaa</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-859292</link>
		<dc:creator>Renwaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-859292</guid>
		<description>flyfisher:  Thanks for some more background info on Fred.  I knew I was making the right choice in backing him.  

It&#039;s interesting to see Rush refer to Fred so often when talking about who the conservatives are for the GOP candidates. 

I have been sending in money to the Thompson campaign and am going to do my best to get the word out on Fred to my political group here (live overseas).  Go Fred08!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flyfisher:  Thanks for some more background info on Fred.  I knew I was making the right choice in backing him.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see Rush refer to Fred so often when talking about who the conservatives are for the GOP candidates. </p>
<p>I have been sending in money to the Thompson campaign and am going to do my best to get the word out on Fred to my political group here (live overseas).  Go Fred08!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicCon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-859219</link>
		<dc:creator>ClassicCon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-859219</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why would all the old Clinton haters be needed any more?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow, this sure shows what kind of political neophytes that are on here.  So Rush&#039;s radio program started in 92?

I started listening in college in 89 and he was popular well before the Clinton came into office.  There were liberals around long before the Clintons came to the forefront.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why would all the old Clinton haters be needed any more?</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, this sure shows what kind of political neophytes that are on here.  So Rush&#8217;s radio program started in 92?</p>
<p>I started listening in college in 89 and he was popular well before the Clinton came into office.  There were liberals around long before the Clintons came to the forefront.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ.1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-859087</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-859087</guid>
		<description>Actually, allah, I thought Rush&#039;s best line was that TV debates were geared just solely toward quips and cute lines. No depth. 

Plus he linked that with an endorsement of Fred&#039;s! good social security message: The social security message that didn&#039;t float because it was too involved. Which is why TV debates reekth and always will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, allah, I thought Rush&#8217;s best line was that TV debates were geared just solely toward quips and cute lines. No depth. </p>
<p>Plus he linked that with an endorsement of Fred&#8217;s! good social security message: The social security message that didn&#8217;t float because it was too involved. Which is why TV debates reekth and always will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativegrandma</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-859045</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativegrandma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-859045</guid>
		<description>The head of our state&#039;s GOP just said he is heading Huckabee&#039;s campaign here in MN. Al Franken is running for Senate against Norm (RINO) Coleman. 
I still plan to go to my caucus, shake my fist in the air, and vote for Fred.  The republican party has been heading left, leaving the conservatives behind.  It is not the Ronald Reagan party any more.  If Huckabee wins the nomination, I think the true conservatives will bolt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The head of our state&#8217;s GOP just said he is heading Huckabee&#8217;s campaign here in MN. Al Franken is running for Senate against Norm (RINO) Coleman.<br />
I still plan to go to my caucus, shake my fist in the air, and vote for Fred.  The republican party has been heading left, leaving the conservatives behind.  It is not the Ronald Reagan party any more.  If Huckabee wins the nomination, I think the true conservatives will bolt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flyfisher</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-859009</link>
		<dc:creator>flyfisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-859009</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;  
BKennedy,

When Fred was in the Senate, he voted against the Good Samiritan Law because of his belief in federalism, and was the ONLY one in the Senate to do so. (The vote was 99-1) I’m sure it would have been much easier for him to go along with the crowd, but he chose not to. I just don’t see Fred as a person who does things in the name of political expediency, despite McCain-Feingold.

Jodella on January 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Jodella, you are spot on about Fred. The man has backbone and character. Part of his problem is that becoming President these days all-too-often seems to require a person todemean themselves act a fool (think Clinton playing the sax on Arsenio, answering questions about his underwear) Apparently Americans have become so pathetic we want people who &quot;feel our pain.&quot; It&#039;s just sad.  

By the way, I&#039;m a Tennessean who has followed Fred Thompson since he represented Marie Ragghianti in the Tennessee pardon scandal. Fred helped expose a corrupt Democrat governor, Ray Blanton, who pardoned the son of a crony and then started selling pardons. (Libs like Clinton and Huck love pardons.) For as long as I&#039;ve been paying attention to Fred, he has been his own man. He acts on his well-defined principles. When he was in the Senate, he didn&#039;t take polls before voting. If he were merely trying to satisfy his Tennessee base he would have voted Clinton guilty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
BKennedy,</p>
<p>When Fred was in the Senate, he voted against the Good Samiritan Law because of his belief in federalism, and was the ONLY one in the Senate to do so. (The vote was 99-1) I’m sure it would have been much easier for him to go along with the crowd, but he chose not to. I just don’t see Fred as a person who does things in the name of political expediency, despite McCain-Feingold.</p>
<p>Jodella on January 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Jodella, you are spot on about Fred. The man has backbone and character. Part of his problem is that becoming President these days all-too-often seems to require a person todemean themselves act a fool (think Clinton playing the sax on Arsenio, answering questions about his underwear) Apparently Americans have become so pathetic we want people who &#8220;feel our pain.&#8221; It&#8217;s just sad.  </p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;m a Tennessean who has followed Fred Thompson since he represented Marie Ragghianti in the Tennessee pardon scandal. Fred helped expose a corrupt Democrat governor, Ray Blanton, who pardoned the son of a crony and then started selling pardons. (Libs like Clinton and Huck love pardons.) For as long as I&#8217;ve been paying attention to Fred, he has been his own man. He acts on his well-defined principles. When he was in the Senate, he didn&#8217;t take polls before voting. If he were merely trying to satisfy his Tennessee base he would have voted Clinton guilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rush Is Wrong&#8230;Again! &#171; The Christ Follower Blog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-858990</link>
		<dc:creator>Rush Is Wrong&#8230;Again! &#171; The Christ Follower Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-858990</guid>
		<description>[...] instance, HotAir recently posted this clip as their &#8220;Quote of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] instance, HotAir recently posted this clip as their &#8220;Quote of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodella</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-858974</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-858974</guid>
		<description>BKennedy,

When Fred was in the Senate, he voted against the Good Samiritan Law because of his belief in federalism, and was the ONLY one in the Senate to do so.  (The vote was 99-1) I&#039;m sure it would have been much easier for him to go along with the crowd, but he chose not to. I just don&#039;t see Fred as a person who does things in the name of political expediency, despite McCain-Feingold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BKennedy,</p>
<p>When Fred was in the Senate, he voted against the Good Samiritan Law because of his belief in federalism, and was the ONLY one in the Senate to do so.  (The vote was 99-1) I&#8217;m sure it would have been much easier for him to go along with the crowd, but he chose not to. I just don&#8217;t see Fred as a person who does things in the name of political expediency, despite McCain-Feingold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-858954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-858954</guid>
		<description>Rush should rip Huckabee &lt;em&gt;a new one&lt;/em&gt; on all the &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2MyYmQ1YTRhODVlMzU1Y2ZhYTYxYjE0MGI2NmFkM2Y=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;promises of constitutional ammendments&lt;/a&gt;  - four so far:
&lt;blockquote&gt;1. the Fair Tax requires a constitutional amendment to eliminate the Sixteenth Amendment;
2. a Human Life amendment;
3. an amendment to define marriage;
and now,
4. an amendment to end birthright citizenship.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Let me play a role here and address Huckabee (and his supporters) just like I would talk to a &lt;em&gt;little&lt;/em&gt; boy:
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;You dumb little shit!&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

And that goes to you TOO faraway, &lt;strong&gt;GROW UP FOR GOD&#039;S SAKE!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush should rip Huckabee <em>a new one</em> on all the <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2MyYmQ1YTRhODVlMzU1Y2ZhYTYxYjE0MGI2NmFkM2Y=" rel="nofollow">promises of constitutional ammendments</a>  &#8211; four so far:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. the Fair Tax requires a constitutional amendment to eliminate the Sixteenth Amendment;<br />
2. a Human Life amendment;<br />
3. an amendment to define marriage;<br />
and now,<br />
4. an amendment to end birthright citizenship.</p></blockquote>
<p>Let me play a role here and address Huckabee (and his supporters) just like I would talk to a <em>little</em> boy:<br />
<strong><em>&#8220;You dumb little shit!&#8221;</em></strong></p>
<p>And that goes to you TOO faraway, <strong>GROW UP FOR GOD&#8217;S SAKE!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stlpatriot</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-858936</link>
		<dc:creator>stlpatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-858936</guid>
		<description>the NRL on why they endorsed Thompson:

http://www.nrlpac.org/Public%20statement.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the NRL on why they endorsed Thompson:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nrlpac.org/Public%20statement.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrlpac.org/Public%20statement.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/comment-page-3/#comment-858931</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-858931</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s obvious &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-858882&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;you&lt;/a&gt; haven&#039;t been here very long.  You have a lot of growing up to do.

There&#039;s a lot of commentators here that have really grown up since they came here.

&lt;strong&gt;If you don&#039;t want to grow up,  LEAVE NOW!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/07/quote-of-the-day-182/#comment-858882" rel="nofollow">you</a> haven&#8217;t been here very long.  You have a lot of growing up to do.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of commentators here that have really grown up since they came here.</p>
<p><strong>If you don&#8217;t want to grow up,  LEAVE NOW!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
