Is it no wonder ‘Wild Bill’ wandered, having to look at that face and hear the shrill rhetoric would drive me to drink and wild women.

I really expect nothing less from the lying slut of a husband in defense of his lying b1tch of a wife.

Patrick S on January 5, 2008 at 6:05 PM

Well said Patrick !!!

There have been a lot of theories thrown out there about why George W. Bush was so intent on invading Iraq. From the left. From the right. I’ve read everything from the oil angle, to the End of Days angle, to just about every variation of “he’s an imbecile who is a puppet of the Rove/Cheney/Boogie-Man-of-the-moment to the PNAC crap where he’s an Evil Genius intent on a New World Order.

I think he did it to show up his old man. To show the world that he was a better man, and a better President, and that he could finish what his father failed to to do. Get Saddam. Some think he did it to defend his father. I think he did it because he wanted to show that he could succeed where his father “failed”.

So 8 years after the father leaves office the son takes over. And now here we are with the Clintons. Eight years after the husband leaves office, the wife will take over.

WHAT THE HELL WILL SHE DO TO TRY AND PROVE SHE’S A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN HER LYING, CHEATING, SCUMBAG HUSBAND?

No matter how much Bill and Hillary are alike character wise, she has GOT to be itching to prove something that she can do better than him. I don’t believe she’ll make it to the nomination. But if she does? I do not want to even think about what she’ll do to show him up. If we’re all lucky, she’ll just have sex with a young stud in the Oval Office. Ick.

For whatever reason, he does not want her to win.

TheBigOldDog on January 5, 2008 at 7:04 PM

The only reason – he doesn’t want to be upstaged.

It was utter submission, as I have learned after being married almost 30 years.

JiangxiDad on January 5, 2008 at 6:49 PM

I carpooled a few years ago with a savvy man (liberal btw – oh the debates in the car – but we still like each other) – and he said something like this “If I say ‘yes, dear’ to whatever my wife says, I can do whatever I want afterwards, and she goes about her own agenda. If I fight her, like I used to at first, she won’t stop arguing”. Might be different for various couples…

I’m telling you, he is doing his level best, w/o making it too obvious, to sink her. For whatever reason, he does not want her to win.

TheBigOldDog on January 5, 2008 at 7:04 PM

You are so right, methinks.

Clinton’s testimony in the matter was “factually false,” but concluded there were no grounds to prosecute her.

So much for perjury laws.

heh…I can think of many reasons. And I hope he gets his deepest desire.
Sink Hillary.

Can we settle for a bloodied and bruised, embarrassed, belittled and wounded Hill in the general?

JiangxiDad on January 5, 2008 at 6:39 PM

Bring it on!

p.s. I refrain…hard as it is…from commenting on your latter point :)

Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 6:45 PM

I didn’t have to say the thought occurred to me after taking a nap. I left myself wide open intentionally. It was utter submission, as I have learned after being married almost 30 years.

Tonight on CNN, tune in and watch Anderson Cooper and his three-hour special investigative report …….

“Hillary Clinton, Keeping it Honest”

Exclusive interviews with: George Stephanopoulus, James Carville, Paul Begala, Ann Lewis, Terry McCauliffe, Lanny Davis, Bruce Lindsay and Harold Ickes.

Can we settle for a bloodied and bruised, embarrassed, belittled and wounded Hill in the general?

JiangxiDad on January 5, 2008 at 6:39 PM

I’ll settle for any kind of Hillary in the fall. She’s a known phony, full of garbage (nice term). He’s an empty into whom they’ll project all kinds of human/superhuman traits/capabilities. Also, nothing, but nothing, rallies this side like a Clinton.

p.s. I refrain…hard as it is…from commenting on your latter point :)

Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 6:29 PM

I vacillate between preferring Clinton or Obama in the general. Your point that she is easier to beat than Obama is well taken, and Allah’s that we will have to confront Obama sooner or later, so why not when he is weakest, is also valid.

Can we settle for a bloodied and bruised, embarrassed, belittled and wounded Hill in the general?

I woke from an afternoon nap today amazed (and reluctantly impressed) that the over-60 year old woman Hillary Clinton is, is such an amazing force to be reckoned with. Bill looks to be fading fast, but Hillary endures. Women often amaze me in ways I never expect.

Did we ever conclusively figure out who did that dirty trick stuff to McCain? I know it’s always been blamed on Karl Rove, I wouldn’t put that past the Clinton Crime Syndicate either. It was all very Primary Colors.

It really would have been a brilliant strategy:

Knock out a top contender for the General election who just won NH, then taint the other likely candidate you would face by making it look like they are dirty tricksters.

/tin foil hat.

No schadenfreude, sheer freude.

JiangxiDad on January 5, 2008 at 6:25 PM

No Schadenfreude, just Freude :)

But they are both premature. Let her make it in the primaries. It will hurt this classless couple more to be beaten by their own, but it is much better for us to have them around in Nov.

Such bravado seems to deserve an answering. Alas, it’ll never happen, though. Shame that.

Additional, gratuitous sentence fragment added at no extra charge. Pride that.

and some people forgot to tell you about that,” he said, jabbing again at the press

I’m going to guess he was using his finger? That visual picture is all I needed to read, nuff said!