Quote of the day
posted at 10:40 pm on January 4, 2008 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
“Nobody would be happier to see all this go away than us.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »
Aw crap I just clicked and found out it was a P_____o link.
Now I have to bleach my wacom.
RushBaby on January 4, 2008 at 10:42 PM
AP, I know you and the Fredheads have made up, but haven’t you learned not to link to that rag, yet? Boingboing got knocked out for snark…shouldn’t Politico get knocked out for clear bias causing inaccurate reporting?
MadisonConservative on January 4, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Hey check this site out!
Stick It To Politico.Com
Jay on January 4, 2008 at 10:52 PM
MadisonC, my friend, most of it is quotes from Mr. Wiener/Whiner, or cigarman, as my friend Danno calls him. Where are you Danno? Come back here – we need you.
In the eight years, and all which followed, I haven’t heard this much snivelling.
I so wish for her to be the nominee so we could put her in her proper place. Should she ever win (so help us) it w/b 8 more years of this. Seeing/hearing this scummy couple, and to put up with their unaccountable utterances would provide much for the media/blogs, but would nauseate our country non-stop.
Entelechy on January 4, 2008 at 10:55 PM
☺That’s more like it.
RushBaby on January 4, 2008 at 10:57 PM
That picture of him, up front, where does it originate? It says “If you have daughters, hide them”, as just one interpretation.
Entelechy on January 4, 2008 at 11:00 PM
If you think AP is done sticking it to the Fredheads, well I would like some of what you are smoking….
doriangrey on January 4, 2008 at 11:00 PM
Heh. And once you all have taken a good drag, I have bridges to sell.
Spirit of 1776 on January 4, 2008 at 11:01 PM
What, they only got 95% favorable press?????? The 8astards!!!!!!
conservnut on January 4, 2008 at 11:02 PM
What ever happened to Giuliani? Is McCain going to take NH, which will pretty much end Romney, and Huck (hopefully) is dead in the water just about everywhere now…. but wasn’t McCain pretty much dead too? He’s always had some weird base in NH, but other than that, does he stand a chance going forward even if he does take NH? I’m thinking there is an opportunity to watch everyone kill each other off and, assuming the Clinton machine steps up like you know they will, could we get back to a Rudy vs. Hillary race soon?
RightWinged on January 4, 2008 at 11:06 PM
It does, doesn’t it?
In their defense, that’s probably less than their used to. :-)
amerpundit on January 4, 2008 at 11:07 PM
Boo Frickin Hoo
Your administration tried to destroy Limbaugh
You lied and were impeached
You have mysterious deaths of scrupulous friends
You never met a skirt you didn’t try to lift
Oh and people enjoy cigars to smoke.
Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:07 PM
Quite a diatribe-Bubba sees the sun setting on him and that’s probably fueling the anger.
He says Hillary “is perceived by voters as divisive through, he said, no fault of her own” (Ha!) and manages to even throw in a slam against Rush, before claiming that Hillary’s “totally exonerated of every single charge ever leveled against [her].”
INC on January 4, 2008 at 11:10 PM
If you have cigars hide them also.
csdeven on January 4, 2008 at 11:11 PM
Ah, Bill Clinton. Always the martyr.
Slublog on January 4, 2008 at 11:15 PM
The fool on the hill sees his sun going down and the eyes in his head sees the world not revolving around him. Anymore.
Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Get ready Obama. They’re desperate and are sharpening her claws.
I’d have paid a million dollars to have been a fly on the wall in their room last night as the results were coming in. How many of her Iowa staff are now missing, noone will ever know.
BacaDog on January 4, 2008 at 11:18 PM
Isn’t he out of money by now? Or is that just Guiliani? Either way, Iowa is a one-off. Let’s see who wins in NH then we can start talking about a front-runner. I don’t think the Shuckster is as big a deal as the media seems to be making him out to be right now.
thedecider on January 4, 2008 at 11:18 PM
Yup. Must have been a hard night for lamps.
Slublog on January 4, 2008 at 11:19 PM
Har! The party of bleeding hearts and astronomical race pimp projection reacting positively to a white superior complex woman and her white narcissist, womanizing husband attacking a young, fresh faced, articulate black man and his black family.
Bill knows that attacking Obama has already had the effect of enraging Democrat party voters, does he really think blaming the media will change that?
Too funny Jefferson.
The entire US prison population of 2.2 million thinks that exact thing every day, you’re in good company Bill..and Hill.
Crooks, liberals love’em don’t they? Unless they dare to attack Obama and family.
Speakup on January 4, 2008 at 11:21 PM
I expect Bill will be the one to come out swinging at Obama. That way for a while anyway Cankles can keep her hands clean.
He just gave the heads up! It’s coming!!!!!!
conservnut on January 4, 2008 at 11:21 PM
I’m sure Grand Dragon Robert Byrd could help advise the Hill on what to do about her Obama problem.
Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:23 PM
Boy don’t you know it!!!!
I bet nobody at that hotel got any sleep last night. Her screeches probably broke windows.
conservnut on January 4, 2008 at 11:24 PM
The ones I can get are too valuable for his purposes. Btw, I don’t smoke them, or anything else.
Entelechy on January 4, 2008 at 11:26 PM
Ouch! That’ll leave a mark. In all reality, Billy Jeff is the one that will come out in full-negative-attack mode against Hussein Obama.
thedecider on January 4, 2008 at 11:26 PM
Always playing the victim. The Clintons do it so well. /sob
docdave on January 4, 2008 at 11:31 PM
It’s all in the family my friend, all in the family. Don Billy Jeff Clintone’.
But momentum maybe in Osama Obama favor.
Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:32 PM
Slublog, thanks for the smiles.
Speakup, I was about to comment on the same idea. You did a fantastic job with this impressive summation. Oh, the hilarity!
Entelechy on January 4, 2008 at 11:38 PM
I rather see her making change at the Garden State Toll booths.
Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:39 PM
“Nobody would be happier to see us all
thisgo away.than us.”Fixed it for you, Billy.
BacaDog on January 4, 2008 at 11:39 PM
True, but he’s the “first Black American president” – the hilarity, indeed. The Clintons are constipated and no remedy is appropriate.
Entelechy on January 4, 2008 at 11:40 PM
Don’t forget, Clean.
Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:41 PM
My only hope is that my humble attempts make you laugh.
Speakup on January 4, 2008 at 11:41 PM
This all should be interesting. Clinton’s going for the throat of a black man…huh. Guess they’ll blame it all on Rove somehow, but it will be entertaining to watch.
RJS2 on January 4, 2008 at 11:46 PM
Oh, Speakup, yes, you make me laugh sometimes, but there is so much substance and irony in your comment. In fact, when I like something this much, I save it. Must do that right now. Thank you – very intelligently and insightfully done! No need to be humble on this.
- – The American People
But hopefully in Nov. ‘08 – - Entelechy
Entelechy on January 4, 2008 at 11:47 PM
Head On: Apply Directly to
Forehead– oh you fill in the blanks.Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:47 PM
Me thinks thou doest protesteth too much.
J/K
Sorry if that was inappropriate, but I couldn’t resist…..
csdeven on January 4, 2008 at 11:48 PM
Oh no, thats Joe Bidenfraud’s shtick.
Speakup on January 4, 2008 at 11:48 PM
LOL!!! Great Barny Frank impression.
Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:51 PM
LOL, Yeah, I’m very shy.
Speakup on January 4, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Ok, that’s it for me. I turn into a pumpkin at 10pm.
csdeven on January 4, 2008 at 11:55 PM
If the Hill wins, a cabinet position is in his future.
Kini on January 4, 2008 at 11:56 PM
csdeven, you kid away. I have vices, smoking/drinking are not them. But, seriously now, I collect empty cigar boxes. They smell/look good and the sources are interesting. Plus, I’m kind of unique :) Sleep well.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:01 AM
Kini, thank you for that link. More hilarity, just from the bolded areas, the second, after having just yammered about “change”:
Speakup, you’re kidding about being shy.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:04 AM
If I kept up a pretense of modesty very long, I’d probably be banned.
Speakup on January 5, 2008 at 12:15 AM
Can you imagine Joe Biden as security adviser or Sec. of State?
Speakup on January 5, 2008 at 12:18 AM
Sorry, but that seems like such an Edwardsian reaction to that..
Reaps on January 5, 2008 at 12:21 AM
The masters know you well then :) I’m a dichotomy. I’m not shy, but sensitive, because I blush often. The product of a great love, by two very different parents (father not shy, mother very sensible/sensitive).
How does this relate to the Clintons? Maybe they have sensitivities too.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:22 AM
Sorry, that was in response to Speakup.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:22 AM
I posted this on the previous thread, but since that one seems to be dead, I will add thishere:
Does anyone else notice that the GOP has gone from trying to nominate the “anti-Hillary” candidate to now trying to nominate the anti-Huckabee candidate? So much for the GOP standing FOR something.
Michael in MI on January 5, 2008 at 12:25 AM
I think this would be a more appropriate censor of Politico, if you are going to do that, RushBaby:
Po_____o.
Very appropriate description of the analysis that comes out of that place, huh? :)
Michael in MI on January 5, 2008 at 12:27 AM
Michael in MI, I don’t think the GOP has a candidate who stands for too much. It’s a slim field this year. Iowa is just the beginning. It will probably be a zig-zagging for a while. At this point I’m not very hopeful but much can happen.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:29 AM
Entelechy, most of these candidates are running on change.
Change in direction
Change in policy
Change in taxes
Change in sock and underwear.
Eh, you got change fo a dalla?
I can expect the next Stephanopoulos interview to ask, “Why? We all want to see Bill back in the White House.”
And Hill just – either coldly staring or cackling.
I sense cigars won’t be passed around if she does win.
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 12:35 AM
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:29 AM
I disagree. All the candidates have things they stand for, but there are not many who stand for conservatism. Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter are the only two I see who come close. But the so-called conservative base never rallied around Fred Thompson. Instead, they have been running back and forth rallying around whoever is the choice of the day to defeat Hillary or Mike Huckabee. I’m surprised the rotation of the earth has not changed based on all the running around Republican voters are doing, going back and forth, back and forth from RINO to RINO, based on the story or poll of the day.
I keep going back to that analogy of the guy finding out that girls don’t actually go after what they say they want in a guy. I’m beginning to believe that conservatives are just like that girl. They complained about Rudy, McCain, President Bush and RINOs in Congress for the past 7 years and yet, when someone comes along expressing Conservatism, they don’t get behind him.
That tells me that they really did not mean what they were saying all these years.
Michael in MI on January 5, 2008 at 12:36 AM
Maybe it should be called the Biaslitico.
Hill’s new campaign song should be “Poor poor pitiful me.”
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 12:43 AM
That may be partially due to BDS and our disappointment with some of Bush’s immigration and spending policies. People have forgotten what real conservatism is about. This new crop of candidates seems more willing to appease rather than lead. With the exceptions of Thompson, Hunter and Brownback.
What will it take? Another Jimmy Carter malaise to wake us up?
A mushroom cloud over an American city?
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 12:49 AM
Michael in MI on January 5, 2008 at 12:36 AM
Michael, yes, it was implied about “standing for conservative values”. I appreciate your idealism and I don’t want to give up mine completely. However, I agree with your last sentence. The party is not serious. It also is leaderless, and as all entities in this condition, is flailing. Also, the voters are not informed and not serious.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:55 AM
Indeed, Kini. May she win the nomination.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:57 AM
I’m entertained by the fact that the Clinton campaign hasn’t figured out that Bill is hurting them
Opinionnation on January 5, 2008 at 12:58 AM
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 12:49 AM
What I don’t get is why people are even considering John McCain to stop Mike Huckabee. McCain is as bad or worse on an issue that is supposed to be the issue: illegal immigration. And McCain is not only wrong on the issue, he is downright mean and insulting to anyone who disagrees with him on the issue, calling people nativists and racists, etc. Based on that, I eliminated John McCain from consideration long ago.
I would have thought others would have as well. But for some reason, he is gaining traction again.
Maybe I am just completely illogical in my treatment of this primary campaign, but my rationality is that I know what I want in a President and then I look at all the candidates and what they stand for. If they are wrong on the issues most important to me, I eliminate them from consideration. I then settle on a candidate and am now waiting for my primary to vote for him. If he does not win the primary, THEN I will reassess to see if I can, in good conscience, vote for the GOP nominee, whom I don’t support whatsoever.
But I don’t see others doing this. I see people who say they are conservatives who do not like RINOs, running back and forth between this RINO candidate to that RINO candidate, instead of eliminating the RINOs and putting their support behind a conservative candidate. I just don’t understand this.
The only thing I can rationalize is that, like the female analogy, all this talk from conservatives these last few years about not liking RINOs and not voting for them and wanting to get conservatives in office was just all talk.
Michael in MI on January 5, 2008 at 12:58 AM
A, they don’t need sensitivities they have entitlement.
B, they may have sensitivities, but even half of their own party doesn’t care, anymore.
C, I’ll bet their sensitivities have a Psychiatrist riding around in the Hillabus with them.
D, people always laugh when I tell them I’m shy, I haven’t figured that out.
Speakup on January 5, 2008 at 1:00 AM
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 12:55 AM
Entelechy – I believe the GOP is going to be hit with a tough reality come the general election if they nominate a RINO. Because GOP campaigners will have to try to convince people to come out to vote based on fear of the Democrat opponent. That message will not resonate with many independents, moderates and then idealists such as me. People want to vote FOR something, not against things or people.
I already know that I can’t campaign for Huckabee, Rudy, Mitt or McCain, because I don’t support them. If I were to encourage someone to vote for them in the general (if one of them is the nominee), and the person came back and listed off all their deficiences, I would only be able to shrug and say “yeah, I know, but they’re better than (the Democrat nominee) at least.”
That is not inspiring.
Michael in MI on January 5, 2008 at 1:03 AM
Bill and Hill are whining,media made her do it,
guess what,surprise the media have dumped Hillary
for Obama.
Just look at all the ear to ear smirks from the Liberal
achors and anchorettes,from yesterday!
And I guess ConHillary thought she had the media nicely
tucked away in her back pantsuit pocket.
canopfor on January 5, 2008 at 1:04 AM
They have, but what is she without him? And what is his legacy, if she loses? There’s no continuity of their Bravo Sierra.
ABC very good. They must know you well, if they say what’s in D :) You’ve got it figured out alright!
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 1:05 AM
I believe he’ll win NH and then that’s it. I wouldn’t be surprised if we’d see a different candidate win different states in the first few.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 1:09 AM
The redefinition of conservatism is what the we are seeing from Romney and Huckabee. McCain is a RINO, with out a doubt.
The closest I’ve seen to real conservative values, and still in the race, is Thompson, but like you say, the base has not rallied to him and I don’t understand that at all either. Except, perhaps the war has people shelled shocked into passivism.
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 1:15 AM
Channeling Bill’s first bombshell….
Obama…Farakhan (sp?)…..boat ……. coast of …..Morocco?….meeting ……secret……non moderate……………..
Thats all I could pick up.
BL@KBIRD on January 5, 2008 at 1:17 AM
Michael, Bryan wrote this on the “Video: Chris Matthews Beholds His Messiah” thread:
This will hurt both parties, as none can win on its own, unless we have a 3rd party in there…
I thought this was a very insightful statement.
Entelechy on January 5, 2008 at 1:19 AM
Bravo Sierra indeed. She’s running to be President and so is he.
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 1:21 AM
It’s like Ross Perot all over again, but it’s our turn this time.
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 1:30 AM
Always. With Bill, actual events and myths are irreversibly merged in my nightmares. Did he really lament that nothing like 9-11 occurred on his watch, denying him the greatness he dreams of? Or did Rush make that up?
Jaibones on January 5, 2008 at 1:38 AM
WTF? Bullet to the brain? Heh Heh What a strange choice of words. Clenis must really be pissed. Hey Bill you look cutsey when your mad.
sonnyspats1 on January 5, 2008 at 1:48 AM
Nothing with the Clinton’s is coincidence
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 2:02 AM
Without him, she is nothing. No experience, no appeal. They are going to bring him out for a Hail Mary pass because that’s all they’ve got.
Media isn’t being nice to the Clintons. Snort.
pedestrian on January 5, 2008 at 2:30 AM
Don Clintone’ make you a deal you cannot refuse.
Kini on January 5, 2008 at 2:53 AM
I’ve lost count now. How many times has this couple gone crying to the press about being misunderstood and targeted by those who don’t like them? It must seem like a lot because they never lack for anyone to listen and print/air it!
…except maybe, ummm, Satan. Or Judas Iscariot. Yup. That’d be about it.
Nice complex you’ve got going there, Mr. Ex-President.
Captain Scarlet on January 5, 2008 at 3:50 AM
Whenever I hear Hillary speak my balls start to ache!
sabbott on January 5, 2008 at 4:43 AM
Isn’t absolute shamelessness the sign of a psychopath?
TheSitRep on January 5, 2008 at 5:20 AM
SECOND LOOK AT THIRD PARTY!!!
soundingboard on January 5, 2008 at 5:44 AM
Quadruple Entendre!
fogw on January 5, 2008 at 7:44 AM
This is why the GOP is likely to lose. You don’t have respect fellow members of the party enough to go with who the majority pics as the representative, yet you expect their vote if the candidate is your pick.
There are many moderates/independents like me who are tired of this attitude and are seriously considering sitting out the election or going with the Dems this time if Obama is the nominee.
Maybe that’s what the party of Reagan needs to in order to go back to his principles of mutual respect and a unified party.
Bradky on January 5, 2008 at 7:47 AM
Boy, arkansas sure produces woosey crybabies. huckster cries “negative!” when another candidate points out his record, clinton cries when he’s not treated like a god.
peacenprosperity on January 5, 2008 at 7:54 AM
Wild Bill at his worst.
He even lies to himself by making claims such as- “even if you’ve been totally exonerated of every single charge ever leveled against you, which Hillary was”.
He and his wife have never allowed many questions and allegations leveled against them to be answered. Will we ever get the documents that show Hitlerys experience? Show us the bank records that show the funds from her Hsu dealings were actually returned.
Self centered and delusional that they are owed everything because in their make believe world they are the personification of the Tzars of Russia of old.
Also, listening to Huckabee I think it is time to test the water in Arkansas because there is something that does not allow its leaders to be able to face reality in a real manner.
MSGTAS on January 5, 2008 at 7:55 AM
From the genius husband of the genius wife, poor grammar.
“Nobody would be happier to see all this go away than us.”
“Us” would be happier to see all this go away than nobody?!
we-we-we, all the way home.
maverick muse on January 5, 2008 at 8:09 AM
Don’t congratulate yourself so much for being a so-called “moderate” or independent. The current Dem’s are marxists. That you can’t see that, or think that moderate, says it all.
JiangxiDad on January 5, 2008 at 8:16 AM
Hill and Bubba are a facade surrounded by protectors . . . when the the facade crumbles (and it will), they will become nothing more than the weak, sterile little man that manipulated the Wizard of Oz.
rplat on January 5, 2008 at 8:18 AM
Nice one. LOL.
Captain Scarlet on January 5, 2008 at 8:18 AM
Komrade Klinton is such a low life. He wasn’t the first black president, he was just a weak, miserable lecher and should be shunned.
Zorro on January 5, 2008 at 8:21 AM
I always figured you for the kind of voter that likes Obama, Bradky. Care to list his Presidential qualifications and qualities for me?
Jaibones on January 5, 2008 at 8:31 AM
Mussolinini! What about Mussolini? They really vilified him a lot, too.
Jaibones on January 5, 2008 at 8:35 AM
I think the Clintons have been lying for so long and reaping rewards through their lies, that they have become incapable of speaking truth.
Having been dubbed the King of all Liars under the guise of being the politician extraordinaire by the MSM, Billy Jeff feels he has not only been given a free reign to lie, but honestly believes the public adores him all the more each time a whopper leaves his lips.
The Clintons haven’t changed the political landscape and reporting thereof in this country, they have vaporized it beyond recognition.
And they get the ultimate high off their own vapor trail.
fogw on January 5, 2008 at 8:39 AM
Jaibones,
Always challenging but never quite getting the point. You will enjoy the “Home of President Obama” signs as you drive into Illinois and Chicago….
Let me get this straight. You say Democrat=marxist? When the left calls the GOP Neocons and Nazis is it true?
No more so than your sweeping characterization of 60-70 million of your fellow citizens who are registered as Democrats.
but I do thank you for proving my point in regards to the current state of the GOP.
Bradky on January 5, 2008 at 8:40 AM
Dude.
He won in Iowa.
Stir your tea leaves again.
fogw on January 5, 2008 at 8:51 AM
Dude. you missed the comments leading to that sarcastic remark. Share some of your leaves with the rest of us.
Bradky on January 5, 2008 at 8:54 AM
Nope, he was wrong. The present democrat party and their leaders resemble germany and austria in the 1930’s. Looking for boogeymen everywhere (Neocons/Jews) to blame for the state of things. Wanting the government to step in and control the golden goose so they can reap the benefits instead of those who worked for it. The democrats are fascists, they want to control the means of production and seize the profits (see hilary on the oil companies and edwards on everything else) without doing any of the work. The rank and file go along blindly and when everything falls apart will claim innocence/ignorance of what was going on. The leadership of the democrat party are hard, cold fascists and the rank and file are a class of self pitiing victims.
peacenprosperity on January 5, 2008 at 9:06 AM
Didn’t miss a thing.
Dude.
fogw on January 5, 2008 at 9:08 AM
I said the candidates, not the followers. The followers are Schmucks, traitors, ignorant, feeble-minded, and yes, some are fellow-travelers.
That just about covers the 60-70 million you were referring to.
JiangxiDad on January 5, 2008 at 9:10 AM
There are two kinds of grass roots liberals
1)Those who consider themselves victims and think they deserve what hardworking Americans have without having to work for it.
2)Those whose political views are shaped by how they want the world to perceive them. They believe liberals are enlightened and compassionate and that’s how they want people to think of them. They think in slogans. Their perceptions are not based in logic, reason or reality.
peacenprosperity on January 5, 2008 at 9:19 AM
Yes, well said. I have lived among both types my entire life, and they comprise all of my family members. So I am particularly sensitive to any notion that either group is to be respected because they are “my fellow citizens.”
JiangxiDad on January 5, 2008 at 9:21 AM
Bwahahahaha!!!
I just seen a clip on Fox with Hillary asking…
“those who support me, those that are undecided, and those who THINK they support someone else”
Good gravy! The woman has no shame! And this quote gets even better (if you can even imagine that!).
Over the next 5 days, she wants to know from those folks what they want to know about them. THEM?! Does she have a friggen mouse in her pocket? No she doesn’t. It’s a rat, and his name is Bill.
And it gets BETTER!!!
Well, since I THINK I support republicans, I want to know about Hsu, Vince, Rose law firm, cattle futures, sock documents, and a myriad of other unexplained events.
But I have the feeling that what will happen is that they will decide what we all want to know and answer it the way they want us to know it.
csdeven on January 5, 2008 at 9:25 AM
Comment pages: 1 2 Next »