<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread: Raucous caucus!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:49:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nihaody</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-852642</link>
		<dc:creator>Nihaody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-852642</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/05/open-thread-hey-how-does-three-and-a-half-hours-of-debate-on-a-saturday-night-sound/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spirit - not anymore&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/05/open-thread-hey-how-does-three-and-a-half-hours-of-debate-on-a-saturday-night-sound/" rel="nofollow">Spirit &#8211; not anymore</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-849588</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 01:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-849588</guid>
		<description>Nihaody - &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2007/06/28/1030-am-cloture-2-something-wicked-this-way-comes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;answer is here&lt;/a&gt; - 1132.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nihaody &#8211; <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/06/28/1030-am-cloture-2-something-wicked-this-way-comes/" rel="nofollow">answer is here</a> &#8211; 1132.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nihaody</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-849449</link>
		<dc:creator>Nihaody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-849449</guid>
		<description>What is the most comments any one thread has gotten before? This is the most I have seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the most comments any one thread has gotten before? This is the most I have seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-848460</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-848460</guid>
		<description>Also, Mojave Mark, the consequences, if we don&#039;t wake up, will be dire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Mojave Mark, the consequences, if we don&#8217;t wake up, will be dire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-848458</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-848458</guid>
		<description>Mojave Mark, surely this was a useful prediction. The lottery was the insignificant one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mojave Mark, surely this was a useful prediction. The lottery was the insignificant one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-848102</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-848102</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Mojave Mark, yes Sir, you can! Now, the lottery numbers for Saturday… :) Entelechy on January 4, 2008 at 1:39 A&lt;/blockquote&gt;I can&#039;t predict anything useful. 

That&#039;s what Miss Cleo&#039;s for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Mojave Mark, yes Sir, you can! Now, the lottery numbers for Saturday… :) Entelechy on January 4, 2008 at 1:39 A</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t predict anything useful. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Miss Cleo&#8217;s for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Iowa Speaks &#187; Leaning Straight Up &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-848071</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Iowa Speaks &#187; Leaning Straight Up &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-848071</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JunkYardBlog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-848063</link>
		<dc:creator>JunkYardBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-848063</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Seriously, though, go listen to my Funk Hill song...&lt;/strong&gt;

I mentioned this in an update below, but I spent a lot of time on it and I think it&#039;s pretty funny. Go to this Hot Air thread, and scroll down to the first update, by Bryan, right past the......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Seriously, though, go listen to my Funk Hill song&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I mentioned this in an update below, but I spent a lot of time on it and I think it&#8217;s pretty funny. Go to this Hot Air thread, and scroll down to the first update, by Bryan, right past the&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nottakingsides</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-848060</link>
		<dc:creator>nottakingsides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-848060</guid>
		<description>Which poll was the closest to being correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which poll was the closest to being correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelechy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-848012</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelechy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-848012</guid>
		<description>Mojave Mark, yes Sir, you can! Now, the lottery numbers for Saturday... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mojave Mark, yes Sir, you can! Now, the lottery numbers for Saturday&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-847990</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847990</guid>
		<description>This was my prediction before the voting started:&lt;blockquote&gt;In order:
Obama, Edwards, Clinton
Huckabee, Romney, Thompson, McCandidate, Paul, and Giuliani

Mojave Mark on January 3, 2008 at 5:16 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Can I call &#039;em or can I call &#039;em. All deniers please check the &quot;prediction&quot; thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was my prediction before the voting started:<br />
<blockquote>In order:<br />
Obama, Edwards, Clinton<br />
Huckabee, Romney, Thompson, McCandidate, Paul, and Giuliani</p>
<p>Mojave Mark on January 3, 2008 at 5:16 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Can I call &#8216;em or can I call &#8216;em. All deniers please check the &#8220;prediction&#8221; thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: major john</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-847989</link>
		<dc:creator>major john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847989</guid>
		<description>GOP
1,702 of 1,781 precincts - 96 percent

Mike Huckabee 39,814 - 34 percent
Mitt Romney 29,405 - 25 percent
Fred Thompson 15,521 - 13 percent
John McCain 15,248 - 13 percent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP<br />
1,702 of 1,781 precincts &#8211; 96 percent</p>
<p>Mike Huckabee 39,814 &#8211; 34 percent<br />
Mitt Romney 29,405 &#8211; 25 percent<br />
Fred Thompson 15,521 &#8211; 13 percent<br />
John McCain 15,248 &#8211; 13 percent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-847979</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847979</guid>
		<description>With 95% counted Fred is still up by 273 votes. Go Fred!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With 95% counted Fred is still up by 273 votes. Go Fred!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonnyspats1</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-847959</link>
		<dc:creator>sonnyspats1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847959</guid>
		<description>Map data ©2008 Tele Atlas - Terms of Use  
 Republican Caucus Results
&lt;strong&gt;Mahaska County&lt;/strong&gt;
 555 Huckabee 
 112 Thompson 
 91 Romney 
 57 Paul 
 52 McCain 
 9 Giuliani 
 8 Hunter 
 &lt;strong&gt;Sac County&lt;/strong&gt;
 165 Huckabee 
 102 Thompson 
 87 Romney 
 52 McCain 
 34 Paul 
 4 Giuliani 
 1 Hunter 
&lt;strong&gt;Monroe County&lt;/strong&gt;
 142 Huckabee 
 37 Thompson 
 35 Romney 
 29 Paul 
 14 McCain 
 4 Giuliani 
&lt;strong&gt;Adair County&lt;/strong&gt;
 93 Huckabee 
 76 Thompson 
 46 Romney 
 39 McCain 
 14 Paul 
 7 Giuliani 

 &lt;strong&gt;Buena Vista County&lt;/strong&gt;
 204 Huckabee 
 131 Thompson 
 130 Romney 
 76 McCain 
 55 Paul 
 4 Giuliani 
 2 Hunter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Map data ©2008 Tele Atlas &#8211; Terms of Use<br />
 Republican Caucus Results<br />
<strong>Mahaska County</strong><br />
 555 Huckabee<br />
 112 Thompson<br />
 91 Romney<br />
 57 Paul<br />
 52 McCain<br />
 9 Giuliani<br />
 8 Hunter<br />
 <strong>Sac County</strong><br />
 165 Huckabee<br />
 102 Thompson<br />
 87 Romney<br />
 52 McCain<br />
 34 Paul<br />
 4 Giuliani<br />
 1 Hunter<br />
<strong>Monroe County</strong><br />
 142 Huckabee<br />
 37 Thompson<br />
 35 Romney<br />
 29 Paul<br />
 14 McCain<br />
 4 Giuliani<br />
<strong>Adair County</strong><br />
 93 Huckabee<br />
 76 Thompson<br />
 46 Romney<br />
 39 McCain<br />
 14 Paul<br />
 7 Giuliani </p>
<p> <strong>Buena Vista County</strong><br />
 204 Huckabee<br />
 131 Thompson<br />
 130 Romney<br />
 76 McCain<br />
 55 Paul<br />
 4 Giuliani<br />
 2 Hunter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickTx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-847953</link>
		<dc:creator>NickTx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847953</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to bed knowing Fred is staying. I&#039;ll be dreaming of ways to teach evangicals that Huckster is bad, and The Fred is good.

ONWARD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to bed knowing Fred is staying. I&#8217;ll be dreaming of ways to teach evangicals that Huckster is bad, and The Fred is good.</p>
<p>ONWARD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: major john</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-847922</link>
		<dc:creator>major john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847922</guid>
		<description>GOP
1,661 of 1,781 precincts - 93 percent

Mike Huckabee 38,605 - 34 percent
Mitt Romney 28,367 - 25 percent
Fred Thompson 15,044 - 13 percent
John McCain 14,749 - 13 percent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP<br />
1,661 of 1,781 precincts &#8211; 93 percent</p>
<p>Mike Huckabee 38,605 &#8211; 34 percent<br />
Mitt Romney 28,367 &#8211; 25 percent<br />
Fred Thompson 15,044 &#8211; 13 percent<br />
John McCain 14,749 &#8211; 13 percent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojave Mark</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-847917</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojave Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847917</guid>
		<description>It looks like Fred is going to keep his 300 vote lead. With just 7% left to count I doubt anything will change.

Question: Fred slips into fourth?
Answer: No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Fred is going to keep his 300 vote lead. With just 7% left to count I doubt anything will change.</p>
<p>Question: Fred slips into fourth?<br />
Answer: No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wccawa</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-9/#comment-847916</link>
		<dc:creator>wccawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847916</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No former trend is going to be true this election cycle.

NONE.

Mcguyver on January 4, 2008 at 12:30 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can not disagree with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No former trend is going to be true this election cycle.</p>
<p>NONE.</p>
<p>Mcguyver on January 4, 2008 at 12:30 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I can not disagree with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mcguyver</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-8/#comment-847910</link>
		<dc:creator>Mcguyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847910</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Since 1980, no candidate has won the Republican nomination for president without winning South Carolina’s Republican primary. We pick presidents.
wccawa on January 4, 2008 at 12:25 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No former trend is going to be true this election cycle.

NONE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Since 1980, no candidate has won the Republican nomination for president without winning South Carolina’s Republican primary. We pick presidents.<br />
wccawa on January 4, 2008 at 12:25 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>No former trend is going to be true this election cycle.</p>
<p>NONE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-8/#comment-847908</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847908</guid>
		<description>From AP via Politico: 
93% precincts reporting

Rudy 3.43%
Huck 34.36%
Hunter .44%
McCain 13.13%
Paul 10%
Romney 25.25%
Fred 13.39%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From AP via Politico:<br />
93% precincts reporting</p>
<p>Rudy 3.43%<br />
Huck 34.36%<br />
Hunter .44%<br />
McCain 13.13%<br />
Paul 10%<br />
Romney 25.25%<br />
Fred 13.39%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wccawa</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-8/#comment-847892</link>
		<dc:creator>wccawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847892</guid>
		<description>Interesting quote from the South Carolina head Repub guy:

&lt;em&gt;Dawson: The South Carolina Republican party’s First-In-The-South presidential primary has grown in significance over time. Since 1980, no candidate has won the Republican nomination for president without winning South Carolina’s Republican primary. We pick presidents. &lt;/em&gt;

As O&#039;Reilly would barf; &lt;strong&gt;WHAT SAY YOU???? &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting quote from the South Carolina head Repub guy:</p>
<p><em>Dawson: The South Carolina Republican party’s First-In-The-South presidential primary has grown in significance over time. Since 1980, no candidate has won the Republican nomination for president without winning South Carolina’s Republican primary. We pick presidents. </em></p>
<p>As O&#8217;Reilly would barf; <strong>WHAT SAY YOU???? </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickTx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-8/#comment-847891</link>
		<dc:creator>NickTx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847891</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m tired. My technical wizardry is slipping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m tired. My technical wizardry is slipping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickTx</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-8/#comment-847885</link>
		<dc:creator>NickTx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847885</guid>
		<description>Slublog’s update over at AoS encouraged me some. He’s been on the fence, but he saw this as the right time to jump on the Thompson truck.

steveegg on January 4, 2008 at 12:14 AM

&lt;blockquote&gt;

Cool, glad to have you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slublog’s update over at AoS encouraged me some. He’s been on the fence, but he saw this as the right time to jump on the Thompson truck.</p>
<p>steveegg on January 4, 2008 at 12:14 AM</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Cool, glad to have you.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wccawa</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-8/#comment-847876</link>
		<dc:creator>wccawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847876</guid>
		<description>These are hard numbers:

&lt;blockquote&gt;From AP via Politico:
87% precincts reporting

Rudy 3.47%
Huck 34.24%
Hunter .44%
McCain 13.16%
Paul 9.79%
Romney 25.5%
Fred 13.39%

bnelson44 on January 4, 2008 at 12:14 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Anything, and I mean &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt;, from Politico, goes through my magnifying glass numerous times from now on. 

No offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are hard numbers:</p>
<blockquote><p>From AP via Politico:<br />
87% precincts reporting</p>
<p>Rudy 3.47%<br />
Huck 34.24%<br />
Hunter .44%<br />
McCain 13.16%<br />
Paul 9.79%<br />
Romney 25.5%<br />
Fred 13.39%</p>
<p>bnelson44 on January 4, 2008 at 12:14 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Anything, and I mean <em>anything</em>, from Politico, goes through my magnifying glass numerous times from now on. </p>
<p>No offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bnelson44</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/comment-page-8/#comment-847874</link>
		<dc:creator>bnelson44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/03/open-thread-raucous-caucus/#comment-847874</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The networks are reporting ENTRANCE polls. The actual election results may change the close race between McCain and Thompson.

sonnyspats1 on January 4, 2008 at 12:04 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

These are hard numbers:

From AP via Politico: 
87% precincts reporting

Rudy 3.47%
Huck 34.24%
Hunter .44%
McCain 13.16%
Paul 9.79%
Romney 25.5%
Fred 13.39%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The networks are reporting ENTRANCE polls. The actual election results may change the close race between McCain and Thompson.</p>
<p>sonnyspats1 on January 4, 2008 at 12:04 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>These are hard numbers:</p>
<p>From AP via Politico:<br />
87% precincts reporting</p>
<p>Rudy 3.47%<br />
Huck 34.24%<br />
Hunter .44%<br />
McCain 13.16%<br />
Paul 9.79%<br />
Romney 25.5%<br />
Fred 13.39%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
