Comments on: Obama’s insane line on the Bhutto assassination

By: Griz

Griz — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 02:50:27 +0000

It may be in our favor that the world is past due to explode into turmoil in ‘08. Of course the average democrat will believe every word O’BamBam and the networks tell them. Or rather, not tell them.

By: johnnyU

johnnyU — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:07:30 +0000

Give them time and they look like idiots. I’m glad they decided to throw the hat in early on campaining. Its giving us all time to see who really can lead and who can’t.

By: entagor

entagor — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:15:29 +0000

On the surface Obama is Edwards with short hair

Underneath are two possibilities

the intellect is hidden

Calling him naive is misleading. He is a 40+ year old man, and you can’t be intentionally stupid. You might as well say Hillary is naive. To believe that he has no clue is buying into his schtick – Rode Werk on December 28, 2007 at 5:33 PM

the intellect is missing

I could be wrong, but I don’t see Obama as the cold, calculating type like Hillary. I see someone who is completely out of his depth on foreign policy, similar to Huckabee but worse – Bryan on December 28, 2007 at 5:49 PM

He makes Biden and Schumer look like geniuses which they may be in comparison.

The real question, do we want someone with the problem solving abilities of Oprah in the White House? And mark my words, Oprah will be in the White House a lot if Obama is elected. Not to say Oprah cannot solve problems, but it usually involves Dr Phil and a lot of free gifts

By: Jaibones

Jaibones — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:54:21 +0000

Rode Werk on December 28, 2007 at 5:33 PM

Correction: first term Senator

By: Nonfactor

Nonfactor — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:06:12 +0000

Is it time to be glad that we helped Pakistan get nuclear weapons?

By: profitsbeard

profitsbeard — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:33:44 +0000

He has ears like a gull-wing Delorean, and yet cannot hear.

It’s the jihad, Barry.

By: jdsmith0021

jdsmith0021 — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:12:31 +0000

Good Lord, I knew this guy was a dim bulb, but this just takes the cake.

By: Mojave Mark

Mojave Mark — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 02:32:28 +0000

I’m excited about an Obama primary win. He would be such a little boy out there in the cold cruel world of a presidential campaign. Bring him on.

By: canopfor

canopfor — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:37:13 +0000

Someone needs to access Obama’s schooling records
and check out his history marks,wait better yet,
check out the teachers daily plan to see even if
he was taught any history to begin with,there we
cut to the chase,and that’s if they will release them!

By: crr6

crr6 — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:28:15 +0000

The world doesn’t work according to the rules of the local community activist group, or the Illinois State Senate, or even the US Senate. Outside the US and especially in the region Obama is addressing here, there are a lot of very bad people, and many of them hold a great deal of power, and sometimes events and circumstances force us to work with them. We have no choice. It’s either work with them, or do absolutely nothing. The former was our only option when it came time to beat down the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The latter, though, seems to be closer to what a President Obama would do. That’s not acceptable.

But by god Pelosi is a traitor for going to Syria!

By: tickleddragon

tickleddragon — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:50:46 +0000

One word: Moron.

By: tarpon

tarpon — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:50:01 +0000

The most telling thing about the whole Bhutto assasination is the exposure of the Democrats as weak on defense, or knowledge thereof, and the Republicans who are pretenders.

Out of the smoke, fire, posturing and commotion, Fred stand alone.

The differences are stark …

By: Rode Werk

Rode Werk — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:08:00 +0000

I don’t intend to belabor our differences, but Obama went through school the same time I did, and we were taught the history of Pakistan (fairly unrevised). We both were around for Benezair’s rise and subsequent fall from power. I mean this is fairly recent history that played out during our adulthood. He would have to of buried his head in the sand for 30 years to be that ignorant. I don’t think he can be that ignorant, which translates to me that he is spinning it to tie Bush to Iraq to Her assassination, which is typical of the liberal elites. Fact is disregarded for political gain.

By: Merovign

Merovign — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:49:23 +0000

Naive, idealistic, developmentally disabled; call it whatever you want, Obama just ain’t Presidential material.

Sadly, as creatures of extremes, we tend to swing like a pendulum between naive and cynical, and thus an almost endless swing between the likes of Kennedy-Nixon-Carter-Clinton, with occasional stops inbetween. Bad habit, that.

Oh, well, back to the inane campaign season.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:49:09 +0000

Rode Werk on December 28, 2007 at 5:33 PM

I could be wrong, but I don’t see Obama as the cold, calculating type like Hillary. I see someone who is completely out of his depth on foreign policy, similar to Huckabee but worse. He’s probably in fourth in the Dimwit Sweepstakes, behind Gravel, Kucinich and Paul. Remember, it wasn’t too long ago that Obama talked up invading Pakistan if Musharraf didn’t help us get al Qaeda terrorists. He got pushed back and shut the heck up about that. He’ll probably find this current line of attack going in the same direction. Hillary will knock his block off in the next day or two. Edwards already has — he called Obama’s line “ridiculous” earlier today. So I guess at bottom I don’t see him as evil, just naive and not terribly bright on foreign policy.

By: Rode Werk

Rode Werk — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:33:35 +0000

Calling him naive is misleading. He is a 40+ year old man, and you can’t be intentionally stupid. You might as well say Hillary is naive. To believe that he has no clue is buying into his schtick. He is a racist (listen to what his pastor has to say), Marxist, with backing from the MSM. To try to say he has no grasp of Pakistan, nor Iraq is equally deceptive. He has a purpose, and goal to spread the liberal propaganda, primarily to appease those in the liberal party, and the MSM. He is spreading the liberal elite agenda and trying to tie any disaster with the Bush administration.

He has a college education, and is serving his second term as a senator. Willfully negligent, or a propagandist would more accurate. He despises freedom every bit as much as the rest of the liberal elites.

Do you actually believe that Obama believes in Global Warming? It is the get rich quick political expedient of the decade, and he knows it.

By: N. O'Brain

N. O'Brain — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:32:38 +0000

I wish the President had had a bit more of Obama’s “naivete.”

Yoosaion on December 28, 2007 at 4:56 PM

Thank God he doesn’t.

By: N. O'Brain

N. O'Brain — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:31:53 +0000

A black Jimmy Carter.

Naivite knows no bounderies.

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:04:16 +0000

I should also add that the enemy knows about/exploits idealism and PC to the utmost perfection. This is our Achilles’ heel. Wake up masses who’re still free!

By: Labamigo

Labamigo — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:02:43 +0000

“toleration” ???

By: Entelechy

Entelechy — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:01:59 +0000

Blind idealism and political correctness will destroy our freedoms, and kill us, faster than anything else.

By: Yoosaion

Yoosaion — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:56:21 +0000

“But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of Al Qaeda. I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.” – Barack Obama, 2002… just before the invasion of Iraq.

I wish the President had had a bit more of Obama’s “naivete.”

By: Seixon

Seixon — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:49:15 +0000

What I’m left with is asking Obama just how in the hell he’d bring about democracy in Pakistan. It would be a natural follow-up to this statement from his spokesperson:

“Whereas Obama feels that democracy and human rights in the context of Pakistan are essential to our security.”

OK. So… How would Obama accomplish that exactly? Invade Pakistan à la Iraq? A country that has demonstrated it has nuclear weapons? In the most populous region in the world? Oki!

By: thejackal

thejackal — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:35:31 +0000

Team Obama is hopelessly naive about the world

Preeeeeeeeeecisely.

By: aengus

aengus — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:35:08 +0000

He’s an opportunist. No other word for it.