Perhaps csdeven is Fred’s internet campaign strategy, LOL.

BKennedy on December 27, 2007 at 1:45 PM

hahaha….a campaign strategy designed to motivate the weak minded to send money to a guy who has little or no chance to get nominated.

I guess Fred is pretty smart. It worked with the red pickup and now it works with little old csdeven.

:-)

Hmmm…feel the strange urge to send another $100 to Fred.

Looky there, just did.

MadisonConservative on December 27, 2007 at 12:46 PM

Perhaps csdeven is Fred’s internet campaign strategy, LOL.

Looky there, just did.

MadisonConservative on December 27, 2007 at 11:24 AM

Hey dopey, do you like being my main 8itch? Do you like the tune I play for you? Are you tired of dancing to it yet?

Grow up and wise up.

I support csdeven, but I do wish he’d not personally attack the folks here.

Not so much because it may hurt some ones feelings but because it makes this blog [hotair] look like huffpo or kos.

I have been called a troll myself, but I step on peoples isms not them personally.
TheSitRep on December 27, 2007 at 10:35 AM

Bwahahaha!!!

He incites people to support Fred. And that aint no sh|t!
TheSitRep on December 27, 2007 at 7:47 AM

It is that comment that started you down the path of the personal attack. If you’ll bother to re-read, you’ll find that I don’t start the personal attacks. I blast Fred for the scum bag he is, and the Fred loons can’t defend his disgusting behavior, so they attack little old csdeven.

Be the bigger person.

tickleddragon on December 27, 2007 at 10:55 AM

He cannot. I have the ultimate power over him. Soon he will find himself inexplicably mailing me $100. AND LOVING IT.

Glad to hear the leg is healing. And you’re right, I remember a few of our bouts, but honestly, you were completely intellectually honest and I don’t remember any personal insults.

Peace and cheers! :-)

He is also fourth in Iowa, fifth nationally, and sixth in New Hampshire with only have the support of Ron Paul.

tommylotto on December 27, 2007 at 9:50 AM

Oh, but tommy you are misguided. This is part of Fred’s plan to “wait in the weeds to pounce” when the perfect time has come! At his rate, that’ll be sometime in February 2009.

Good gravy!! These Fred loons are as bad as the RP crazies.

tickleddragon on December 27, 2007 at 10:55 AM

I do try. It’s when occasionally someone mistakes him for a legitimate poster that I try to ensure they’re not swept up in his mania. Slippery slope from there.

Flame wars are a waist of time and easy to spot. A kind of blog spam, like dog poop, you just have to step around.

Nyog_of_the_Bog on December 27, 2007 at 10:47 AM

So true!
Note the bold type, this signifies truth.

MadisonConservative on December 27, 2007 at 10:22 AM

If you know he’s baiting, why let him get you? Yes, it is annoying and inappropriate to talk the way he does. But obviously HA doesn’t think it’s to the extent calling for banning. Respect their judgement, and ignore the people you think are trolls.

Be the bigger person.

MadisonConservative on December 27, 2007 at 10:22 AM

I support csdeven, but I do wish he’d not personally attack the folks here.

Not so much because it may hurt some ones feelings but because it makes this blog [hotair] look like huffpo or kos.

I have been called a troll myself, but I step on peoples isms not them personally.

Fred says “that dog don’t hunt.”

BKennedy on December 27, 2007 at 10:18 AM

And it makes me smile.

Even on HA, we don’t have the right NOT to be offended.

tickleddragon on December 27, 2007 at 10:15 AM

So if someone comes on with the following as a rebuttal:

“Waaahhhhhh you crybaby oh my god you should have your rights taken away bwaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaha that guy’s wife looks like a dog kicked in the face”

…it should be accepted as part of common and civil discourse? Ann Coulter makes actual arguments. As you said, all FDSeven does is bait people. If that’s all he’s here to do (as he has admitted) then why is he allowed to do so, contributing nothing to the discussion, and essentially attempting to sabotage all efforts to have a proper talk about a topic? How can you defend that? He has personally insulted numerous people as well as their families, questioned their sexuality, and god knows what else that I have been fortunate enough NOT to see.

If someone comes onto any site with only the intent of being annoying, what SHOULD be done?

And last, just take a moment and PICTURE a one-on-one debate between FRED and HILLARY. Folks DON’T LIKE Hillary.
Folks LOVE FRED!

Ex-tex on December 26, 2007 at 3:41 PM

Hillary cackles, Fred guffaws.

Hillary talks about channeling her husband’s experience, Fred takes a nap.

Hillary attacks Fred for being lazy, Fred says “that dog don’t hunt.”

MadisonConservative on December 27, 2007 at 10:08 AM

MadisonConservative, you’ve got it all wrong.
CS is simply here to bait the Fredfolks. You’re taking the bait, and making his day/evening/week/month etc.

Suggesting that he be banned is akin to Liberals saying Ann Coulter should be banned from college campuses. Simply because he’s, in your opinion, insulting.

Even on HA, we don’t have the right NOT to be offended.

I’m on your side about Fred, but you guys are just feeding CS’s enjoyment at baiting. If you want to waste your time, go ahead, but don’t be suggesting that someone be banned for being annoying.

You know you take all the fun out of this when you don’t get all irrational and insulting like these dopey Fred supporters do. ;-)

You’re the kind of Fred supporter that deserves respect. You have your head on straight and can see the obvious reasons behind my Fred bashing. And if I remember correctly, you figured it out immediately.

csdeven on December 27, 2007 at 1:49 AM

Thanks for the compliment, CS, but you give me too much credit. It took me several bouts with you to figure out your angle. It’s just been soooooooo long ago, it seems immediate in retrospect. :)

I just don’t see the point in arguing about the same subject in finitum, when you can simply make a bet and wait to be paid off in drinks. :)

Stay happy!

csdeven

I’ve gotten to the point where I realize a few things:

He doesn’t listen to valid arguments.
He doesn’t admit to being wrong.
He ignores when he is wrong and tries to justify being wrong by altering definitions of words(hmmm…just like Mitt).
He insults people constantly.
He hasn’t been banned.

Why is the last one true?

Hey dopey…..we all know what the constitution says.

Obviously you don’t, or you would have called it the right that it is. I guess you and John Edwards agree: Rights are privileges (such as gun ownership) and privileges are rights (such as health care and college education).

You were wrong. You can’t admit it. You’re a troll.

Luntz says Fred’s poor poll numbers are due to one thing. No, not his late entry. No, not the laziness myth. And no, not his age or “trophy wife.”

The reason Fred is behind in Iowa is because he went on Jay Leno’s show rather than appear at a New Hampshire debate on……FOX NEWS CHANNEL.

How petty of Fox.

Now shut the hell up and get the hell out, you troll.
MadisonConservative on December 27, 2007 at 9:42 AM

Awwwwww. Somebody got their wittle feelings hurt. Look crybaby, the entire group can see how you view the responsibility of voting. You think it is due you and you treat it as a child treats things that are given to him. You don’t care what the ramifications of your actions are because it’s “due you”, and that’s good enough for you. Also, we can all see that you think if you yell something loud enough that it makes it more forceful. More childish behavior on your part.
Hey dopey…..we all know what the constitution says. The issue is your penchant for taking it for granted and ignoring your responsibility to be responsible for that power.

We adults treat it as a privilege that requires a serious commitment. We do not make decisions based on the words or actions of those persons who are not the candidate because we don’t like the person.

Grow up and wise up.

The lefties are trying to dump on Fred because they know he is a bad ass Reaganesq Conservative.