Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Tancredo endorses Romney; Update: “You bet your life” Huckabee was a factor

posted at 3:20 pm on December 20, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

That’s the word from the Des Moines Register. It’ll be negligible in Iowa, probably, but a huge jolt of credibility nationally for Mitt among the base, needless to say. Tanc will be on Cavuto at 4 to talk about it. Stand by for updates.

Update: I thought he was polling 1 or 2 percent in Iowa. I see from the DMR story that it’s 6 percent. Maybe not so negligible.

What do you suppose Mitt offered in return? Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo? The boss will swoon.

Update: What a killer for Fred. He was obviously in the running for Tanc’s endorsement and could have used the “true conservative” buzz it would have given him even more than that six percent. It’s especially curious, as MM says, because his pal Steve King opted for Thompson. I wonder if Tanc, who’s quitting the House next year, didn’t look at the two of them and simply go with the guy with the better chance to win. Mitt’s better funded, he’s run a better campaign, ergo he’s the guy most likely to win and give Tanc a position of authority in the next administration.

Update: RW Wacko poses an alternate theory that echoes my reasoning here. Maybe Tanc is as worried as we are about Huck’s rise and went with the guy best positioned to knock him off.

Update: Here’s Tancredo’s statement. RW Wacko vindicated? Note well:

The presidential campaign has come down to less than a handful of viable candidates. Unfortunately several of them have abysmal records on immigration and can’t be trusted to do what is needed to preserve this country if they’re elected. My fear is that if I were to stay in this race my votes could be the factor in handing victory to a pro-amnesty politician. Friends, we have done too much, come too far and the stakes are too high to play that hand. And so I am ending my presidential campaign.

Update: Why Romney?

“There’s a candidate who meets several criteria from my point of view….He will secure our borders….he’ll require those who are presently here illegally to return home. He also has, by the way, a solid record that matches his rhetoric….He can go the distance. This morning I met with Governor Mitt Romney….I am withdrawing from this race and I am endorsing Governor Romney.”…

Tancredo met with Romney for “over an hour” this morning, in order to “clarify” issues.

Update: Too bad MM didn’t include Tanc as an option in her Internet poll this morning. I’m curious to see how he’d have polled vis-a-vis Fred. Certainly he’d have done no worse than second; compare that to his sixth or seventh place standing in Iowa. Proof, if any was needed, that conservative bloggers and blog readers don’t represent the base as neatly as some might think.

Update: Confirmed — blame the Huckaboom.

He also made plain that he was moved to get out of the contest because he feared the rise of Mike Huckabee, who has taken a less hard-line approach to immigration in the past.

“It was important in making this decision — you bet your life it was,” Tancredo said, speaking to a group of reporters and supporters at a press conference.

Update: The video of Tancredo on Cavuto is here.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

What!

hinduconservative on December 20, 2007 at 3:21 PM

The boss will swoon.

She’s not the only one. Trade lettuce-head for the Tanc? I’m there.

Bryan on December 20, 2007 at 3:23 PM

very interesting.

jeffshow on December 20, 2007 at 3:24 PM

Someone tell me there’s been a crazier primary then this in our past. Tell me we decided our presidential candidate one year via fisticuffs. Or who pounded the most railroad spikes in the ground!

CTDeLude on December 20, 2007 at 3:25 PM

Yep. This one’s going to go way down to the wire.

Not just boom. Kaboom. :-)

Hawkins1701 on December 20, 2007 at 3:25 PM

oh well.

amend2 on December 20, 2007 at 3:25 PM

She’s not the only one. Trade lettuce-head for the Tanc? I’m there.

Count me in.

thirteen28 on December 20, 2007 at 3:25 PM

Makes sense if he wants to have an impact on deciding the winner, esp if he is looking for a little quid pro quo when it comes to Romney appointment time. Huck, Rudy, and McCain are way off-track on immigration, and Fred looks dead in the water. Is the only logical choice for him at this point. He may be looking at the best way to keep Huck and Rudy out of office, too, esp Huck who he seems to actually dislike.

RW Wacko on December 20, 2007 at 3:25 PM

Good for Mitt, wise by Tancredo. I’m glad the race is starting to shape up.

Vizzini on December 20, 2007 at 3:27 PM

Do we say Mittmentum?

Limerick on December 20, 2007 at 3:27 PM

Can you spell lettuce boys and girls. Why yes teacher let us see you pee.

sonnyspats1 on December 20, 2007 at 3:30 PM

Ugh.

MadisonConservative on December 20, 2007 at 3:30 PM

She’s not the only one. Trade lettuce-head for the Tanc? I’m there.

What Bryan said. Except LOUDER:)

Spirit of 1776 on December 20, 2007 at 3:31 PM

Dang!! Didn’t see that coming. Makes sense, I guess. O.K., what happens to Hunter, now?

a capella on December 20, 2007 at 3:32 PM

My first choice is now Thompson, but Mitt will do, especially if Tancredo “heads” up DHS (hold the lettuce and don’t upset us), and maybe Hunter as VEEP.

Illegal immigration is a HUGE issue. We need to capitalize on it to beat Hill/Obama/whoever and then FIX THE PROBLEM when we win.

fred5678 on December 20, 2007 at 3:32 PM

I am very sad to see him leave the race. He is the only politician I have ever donated to.

He was just what this country needed, a true conservative, and now he isn’t in the race.

As for Romney, I don’t trust him on immigration. Of those left in the race, I like Paul’s position and record on immigration now that Tom is gone. Now I’d like to see a Paul/Tancredo ticket.

My main issue is illegal immigration, as it influences every domestic issue. No domestic issue can be addressed effectively without first dealing with illegal immigration from an enforcement perspective. Anyone running that says other wise is stupid or a liar or both.

Huck, Guiliani and McTraitor cannot be trusted on the issue. Romney is better but not as good as Paul and Tom. As for Fred, he doesn’t really seem that hungry for the office.

voiceofreason on December 20, 2007 at 3:33 PM

RW Wacko on December 20, 2007 at 3:25 PM

That’s how I read it. Tancredo is trying to blunt Huckabee.

Slublog on December 20, 2007 at 3:33 PM

there’s probably alot of illegals in Iowa, with all the corn farmers

jp on December 20, 2007 at 3:34 PM

Well, the plot thickens, I guess. I’d hoped he’d throw his support to Thompson, but oh well.

CP on December 20, 2007 at 3:35 PM

Something just went off like a shotgun blast of somethings in someone’s pants.

Cuffy Meigs on December 20, 2007 at 3:35 PM

He’s endorsing Romney and not Fred??? What the what??

Darksean on December 20, 2007 at 3:35 PM

CP on December 20, 2007 at 3:35 PM

Ditto….but it ain’t over yet.

Limerick on December 20, 2007 at 3:35 PM

Dang!! This could have been a nuclear pic.

Tanc’s endorsement is huge. Not just the shift in Tanc voters to Romney, but Huck and Mitt are dueling on who was weaker on immigration. The people that had to choose between two candidates supect on the issue get the benefit of going with Romney with a clear concscious.

Theworldisnotenough on December 20, 2007 at 3:35 PM

What do you suppose Mitt offered in return? Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo? The boss will swoon.

If Mitt came out and said that he could probably lock up the nomination.

bj1126 on December 20, 2007 at 3:36 PM

Update: What a killer for Fred.

Agreed.

bnelson44 on December 20, 2007 at 3:37 PM

Wasting no time on giving an endorsement, that’s for sure. And it’s an endorsement that carries a lot more weight than his national poll numbers show. Everybody that believes in actually having a border knows that Tanc’s been doing the yeoman’s work on that issue for years.

What do you suppose Mitt offered in return? Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo?

That would a level of brilliance on par with someone making John Bolton Secretary of State.

ReubenJCogburn on December 20, 2007 at 3:38 PM

Very solid “get” for Mitt.

Tancredo’s cred on immigration is second to none in the GOP field and having him endorse Mitt is a big gain for Mitt’s own cred on this crucial issue.

Always Right on December 20, 2007 at 3:39 PM

I didn’t think Tanc would be a sell-out, but there you have it. I’m certain that Romney was not the best choice on Tanc’s number one issue, immigration. I’m very surprised. I agree with others that this was probably more of an anti-Huck decision than a pro-Romney one.

aero on December 20, 2007 at 3:40 PM

He’s endorsing Romney and not Fred??? What the what??

Darksean on December 20, 2007 at 3:35 PM

That is exactly what I thought. Fred needs the Jeff Sessions endorsement.

Theworldisnotenough on December 20, 2007 at 3:40 PM

Update: Here’s Tancredo’s statement. RW Wacko vindicated? Note well:

He must have felt that Fred didn’t have a chance and the race would come down to Rudy v Mitt v Huck

bnelson44 on December 20, 2007 at 3:41 PM

What do you suppose Mitt offered in return? Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo? The boss will swoon.

I already am….Oh my stars!

conservnut on December 20, 2007 at 3:44 PM

She’s not the only one. Trade lettuce-head for the Tanc? I’m there.

Bryan on December 20, 2007 at 3:23 PM

I was disappointed for FRED! until I read that…

That would a level of brilliance on par with someone making John Bolton Secretary of State.

ReubenJCogburn on December 20, 2007 at 3:38 PM

Even better!

Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 3:44 PM

Fred has never been strong on anything but talk. Tanc is a man of action that Fred quite frankly doesn’t hold a candle to. Fred is the Republican who sits back while all the others do the hard work, then comes in to steal some of the glory with a line like “I supported them all the way.”

Mitt is a man of action, and the Tanc sees that.

BKennedy on December 20, 2007 at 3:44 PM

Is the tide breaking for Romney here at HA on the mere speculation that he might perhaps possibly maybe appoint Tanc to Homeland Security? Wow. Tanc is much more influential than I thought.

aero on December 20, 2007 at 3:46 PM

President Mitt Romney.

Yeah. I like the sound of that.

madmonkphotog on December 20, 2007 at 3:46 PM

HA cracks me up everytime I see Tanc’s pic.

JVelez on December 20, 2007 at 3:48 PM

“There’s a candidate who meets several criteria from my point of view….He will secure our borders….he’ll require those who are presently here illegally to return home.

Oh, man. This will be bad for Romney, since he’ll now have to answer for everything Tancredo believes, including shipping out all of the illegal aliens. While that may be a popular position on this blog, there’s a reason why guys like Tancredo and Hunter never caught on.

Big S on December 20, 2007 at 3:48 PM

Is the tide breaking for Romney here at HA on the mere speculation that he might perhaps possibly maybe appoint Tanc to Homeland Security? Wow. Tanc is much more influential than I thought.

aero on December 20, 2007 at 3:46 PM

On the entire spectrum of conservative issues Tancredo isn’t a big player.

When it comes to Immigration though, Tanc is the kingpin and everybody knows it. Putting Tanc in the place of that idiot Chertoff would possibly be the greatest thing to ever happen.

BKennedy on December 20, 2007 at 3:49 PM

I tell ya- Tanc going to be seriously PO’d when Mitt flip-flops again and goes back to his 2005-2006 pro-amnesty stance.

Hollowpoint on December 20, 2007 at 3:49 PM

President Mitt Romney.

Yeah. I like the sound of that.

madmonkphotog on December 20, 2007 at 3:46 PM

Provided it’s followed up by:

Secretary of State John Bolton
Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo
Secretary of Defense… David Petraeus…? Any better suggestions?

Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Oh, man. This will be bad for Romney, since he’ll now have to answer for everything Tancredo believes, including shipping out all of the illegal aliens. While that may be a popular position on this blog, there’s a reason why guys like Tancredo and Hunter never caught on.

Big S on December 20, 2007 at 3:48 PM

I don’t think Mitt has to address Tancredos positions at all. He can just say thank you and repeat his own position.

bnelson44 on December 20, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Big S on December 20, 2007 at 3:48 PM

I don’t know about that. Giuliani didn’t have to answer to everything that Pat Robertson has ever said.

terryannonline on December 20, 2007 at 3:51 PM

Secretary of Defense… David Petraeus…? Any better suggestions?

Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Yea, Keep Petraeus in the field where he is doing the job well and Gates in as SDEF where he is doing the job well.

bnelson44 on December 20, 2007 at 3:51 PM

People are saying there is no frontrunner in the GOP race, but I think it’s quickly becoming clear that Mitt Romney has positioned himself very well to get the nomination. I have liked Rudy from day one but his unconventional campaign strategy might haunt his chances; Fred is great on the issues but has fizzled and can’t get up; the real Huckabee is finally starting to be exposed to voters and he will (hopefully) continue to fade; and crazy enough McCain is rebounding and may be Mitt’s toughest obstacle when the voting starts. I do not think it will be enough, however, and the only thing realistically I see derailing a Romney nomination is if the evangelicals succeed in hijacking the process.

But if they do not then it is good news for conservatives, really, because despite some flips (on social issues mind you, hardly the defining issues of this election) IMO Romney is our best candidate and is solid across the board. The entire conservative establishment seems to be endorsing him, I think that says something, doesn’t it? And FYI I’d happily support Rudy or Fred as well, or even McCain if it stops Huckabee, but Mitt’s proven to me to be the best we have–on the issues and on campaign formidability.

Patriot33 on December 20, 2007 at 3:51 PM

aero on December 20, 2007 at 3:46 PM

I’d be lying if I said that it didn’t effect my thinking. I don’t think Tanc was ready for the big chair, but he knows the ins and outs of one of, if not the, most important issue. His endorsement is the only one I’ve seen/heard so far to effect my own thinking.

Spirit of 1776 on December 20, 2007 at 3:52 PM

Just listened to Tanc’s message on his website.

He did not say he wanted to prevent A pro-amnesty candidate from winning, he used the PLURAL.. he wants to prevent ONE of the pro-Amnesty CANDIDATES from winning…

so that could mean preventing Huck or McCain, or Rudy in his view, not simply Huck alone.

Small point but worth making.

Always Right on December 20, 2007 at 3:52 PM

I tell ya- Tanc going to be seriously PO’d when Mitt flip-flops again and goes back to his 2005-2006 pro-amnesty stance.

Hollowpoint on December 20, 2007 at 3:49 PM

Exactly what I was thinking. I’m stunned that Tanc put his reputation and immigration-issue-based following on the line for Romney. Tanc won’t be the only one who’s ticked off if Mitt caves on immigration again. And Tanc’s followers won’t forget who pointed them at Romney.

aero on December 20, 2007 at 3:52 PM

So now, how about Duncan Hunter ‘08…for Fred Thompson ‘08!

CP on December 20, 2007 at 3:52 PM

Too bad … that conservative bloggers and blog readers don’t represent the base as neatly as some might think.

Pardon the Dowdification of the above.

Re-iterating the point about the prospect of Romney naming Tanc head of DHS, can you imagine the fight in the senate over that one? But it would be a worthy fight, and one well worth picking for Mitt in the early stages of his presidency. It would be a tough fight that he could win while rallying most of the base around him, and probably a lot of hawkish-on-illegal-immigration independents as well. A great way to establish himself.

thirteen28 on December 20, 2007 at 3:53 PM

I don’t see how anyone who supported Tanc could ever support Romney and be true to the cause! It’s a total sellout!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on December 20, 2007 at 3:53 PM

I don’t think Mitt has to address Tancredos positions at all. He can just say thank you and repeat his own position.

bnelson44 on December 20, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Oh, come on. Somebody will bring this up in a question at some point, and Mitt will flail around like he always does. If Tancredo had left it at a simple endorsement, and an assertion Mitt is “strong on immigration” Romney would have nothing to worry about. However, Tancredo worded his endorsement more as an endorsement of his own policy positions by Romney, which will be sure to bring out the inquisitors. Bad move.

Big S on December 20, 2007 at 3:53 PM

Yea, Keep Petraeus in the field where he is doing the job well and Gates in as SDEF where he is doing the job well.

Pace SDEF

Spirit of 1776 on December 20, 2007 at 3:53 PM

Tanc as head of DHS, never happen in a MILLION YEARS! Now that’s he’s backed Romney he’ll be lucky to even get an endorcement to run for the senate!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on December 20, 2007 at 3:55 PM

Then again, Tanc just told Politico that Huck’s rise was mainly what he had in mind by his pro-Amnesty politician fear.

So as Emily Litella used to say…. NEVER MIND!

Always Right on December 20, 2007 at 3:55 PM

even though Im bummed he didnt endorse Fred, it does make sense.

JVelez on December 20, 2007 at 3:56 PM

The race is still going. My man Fred not getting Tanc’s endorsement is a big disappointment but it isn’t the end game by any means.

Limerick on December 20, 2007 at 3:57 PM

Secretary of Defense… David Petraeus…? Any better suggestions?
Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Duncan Hunter?

Slublog on December 20, 2007 at 3:58 PM

Three other candidates–Duncan Hunter, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul– rank higher than Thompson in Numbers USA’s assessment of the candidates’ proven records on immigration and border security (as opposed to their election-year promises).

Michelle wrote the above. Perhaps that’s why Mitt not Fred, aside from the electability concerns.

Spirit of 1776 on December 20, 2007 at 3:59 PM

Duncan would be great as Commerce Secy under the new GOP administration — just wind him up and send him to China to negotiate a new trade deal !! Snort.

Always Right on December 20, 2007 at 4:00 PM

Pace SDEF

Spirit of 1776 on December 20, 2007 at 3:53 PM

Yes, I like the sound of that.

Secretary of Defense Peter Pace.

Likely wouldn’t fly, though, for the same reason he was hounded by the left while Chairman of the Joint Chiefs.

Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 4:00 PM

Secretary of State John Bolton
Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo
Secretary of Defense… David Petraeus…? Any better suggestions?

Director of Homeland Security Michelle Malkin.

Top that.

pistolero on December 20, 2007 at 4:00 PM

So now, how about Duncan Hunter ‘08…for Fred Thompson ‘08!

CP on December 20, 2007 at 3:52 PM

Hard to say, but Hunter is in the catbird seat right now, IMO. Whichever way he jumps is gonna have impact. He’s pretty solid across the board and should be able to parlay that into something major.

a capella on December 20, 2007 at 4:00 PM

I really wish Tancredo would’ve endorsed Fred, but instead he’s just playing the anti-Huck. I think if Fred starts surging, Tanc might start regretting not making the better decision. Allah, who do you support?

JustinHiggins on December 20, 2007 at 4:01 PM

After all this hoopla I ready to just go ahead and dig up Nixon.

Limerick on December 20, 2007 at 4:03 PM

Tanc as head of DHS, never happen in a MILLION YEARS! Now that’s he’s backed Romney he’ll be lucky to even get an endorcement to run for the senate!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on December 20, 2007 at 3:55 PM

Why not? As far as I’m aware the Senate only has say in approving appointees to the supreme court, and have absolutely zero influence on cabinet picks. Secretary of Homeland Security is a cabinet position. What are they going to do, sign a non-binding resolution condemning a Romney cabinet pick? While I wouldn’t put it past San Fran Nan, hopefully she won’t be speaker in 2009.

I’m not exactly sure how long Senate Majority Leader lasts, but if Republicans win back the Senate (only 3 seats) Harry won’t be majority leader either.

BKennedy on December 20, 2007 at 4:03 PM

As far as I’m aware the Senate only has say in approving appointees to the supreme court, and have absolutely zero influence on cabinet picks.

No, the Senate has to confirm cabinet picks, too. Remember Mukasey’s hearing a few weeks ago?

They’d never get him through a Democratic Senate.

Allahpundit on December 20, 2007 at 4:05 PM

I don’t see how anyone who supported Tanc could ever support Romney and be true to the cause! It’s a total sellout!

Dread Pirate Roberts VI on December 20, 2007 at 3:53 PM

They’re just makin’ sausage. It isn’t pretty, but that’s what compromise is all about.

a capella on December 20, 2007 at 4:05 PM

Yay.

I think Mitt would prefer a Senator Tancredo. We need conservative Republicans in the Senate to get his agenda through, including the inevitable appointment of Supreme Court Justices.

Bolton and Petreus would be fantastic choices in the Cabinet though.

Buy Danish on December 20, 2007 at 4:06 PM

OK, Tancredo’s recommendation breaks the tie between Mitt and Fred for me.

Although Tancredo was only polling about 4% in Iowa, he could theoretically add more than that to Romney, as many of his supporters would have answered the pollsters with someone other than Tancredo as they did not think he had a chance to win, or even do well, and so choose someone else and could now go with Tancredo’s recommendation of Romney, who does have a fair chance.

MB4 on December 20, 2007 at 4:06 PM

Mitt is now the clear anti-illlegal immigrant candidate! What conservative can bring ALL types of other conservatives on board…fiscal, defense, and social? Mitt’s the man!

davenp35 on December 20, 2007 at 4:09 PM

The mormon doesn’t stand a chance, sorry Hugh.

Feel free to quote this post in early January after the smoke clears.

omnipotent on December 20, 2007 at 4:10 PM

No, the Senate has to confirm cabinet picks, too. Remember Mukasey’s hearing a few weeks ago?

They’d never get him through a Democratic Senate.

Allahpundit on December 20, 2007 at 4:05 PM

That just means the Reps have to pick up 3 Senate seats though AP. And then it won’t matter as said Democratic Senate won’t exist. Given the utter incompetence of Harry Reid and San Fran Nan with sub Bush/2 numbers, I don’t think 3 Senate seats is too much to ask.

BKennedy on December 20, 2007 at 4:11 PM

Now we just need Huckabee to chime in with some red meat.

Limerick on December 20, 2007 at 4:11 PM

Ahhhh the stars are begining to align. Lets eliminate this pro-illegal immigrant Huckabee once and for all.

Zetterson on December 20, 2007 at 4:12 PM

Now we just need Huckabee to chime in with some red meat.

Limerick on December 20, 2007 at 4:11 PM

Huckabee campaign: TOM TANCREDO SUPPORTS HERESY!

BKennedy on December 20, 2007 at 4:12 PM

Secretary of State John Bolton
Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo
Secretary of Defense… David Petraeus…? Any better suggestions?

Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Secretary of State Diana West
Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo
Secretary of Defense… Tommy Franks

MB4 on December 20, 2007 at 4:13 PM

Director of Homeland Security Michelle Malkin.

Top that.

pistolero on December 20, 2007 at 4:00 PM

Good, but I think Michelle’d be more suitable for White House Press Secretary. I’d love to see her against Helen Thomas, assuming that Helen will still have continued to avoid sunlight by 2009.

Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 4:17 PM

Huckabee campaign: TOM TANCREDO SUPPORTS HERESY NEEDS AN ENEMA NEEDS AN EXORCISM!

BKennedy on December 20, 2007 at 4:12 PM

MB4 on December 20, 2007 at 4:21 PM

Does one have to be a judge to become a Supreme Court Justice? Or just have a law degree/ be practicing? Does Tancredo have a law degree? I think since you people dress him in armor already I think he would look good in the Black regal Robe………….

Joey1974 on December 20, 2007 at 4:25 PM

Good, but I think Michelle’d be more suitable for White House Press Secretary. I’d love to see her against Helen Thomas, assuming that Helen will still have continued to avoid sunlight by 2009.

Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 4:17 PM

So…turned on…

MadisonConservative on December 20, 2007 at 4:26 PM

Scrap my earlier thought, he only has a Bachelor’s in

Joey1974 on December 20, 2007 at 4:29 PM

Poly Sci

Joey1974 on December 20, 2007 at 4:30 PM

Does one have to be a judge to become a Supreme Court Justice? Or just have a law degree/ be practicing? Does Tancredo have a law degree? I think since you people dress him in armor already I think he would look good in the Black regal Robe………….

Joey1974 on December 20, 2007 at 4:25 PM

You aren’t even required to be a lawyer to sit on the Supreme Court. You just have to get confirmed.

ReubenJCogburn on December 20, 2007 at 4:32 PM

On Cavuto, Tanc just said he endorsed Romney because he has the best chance of winning.

Sorry to see Tanc go, but he really did accomplish his mission of raising the visibility of the illegal immigration issue.

Thanks Tanc!

techno_barbarian on December 20, 2007 at 4:37 PM

Ok, Tanc just moved me a little further into the Mitt! camp.

conservnut on December 20, 2007 at 4:43 PM

techno_barbarian on December 20, 2007 at 4:37 PM

Slight correction. Tanc said he endorsed Romney because of all the anti-illegal immigrant candidates he had the best chance of winning. If he was just going for the guy with the best chance of winning he’d be a member of the Huckadoodles.

Zetterson on December 20, 2007 at 4:44 PM

Malkin readers seem to like Thompson.

You can see the HindenPaul brought in some Paul supporters in a last ditch effort to “Freep” the poll.

I’m still a Thompson supporter.

gabriel sutherland on December 20, 2007 at 4:46 PM

The mormon doesn’t stand a chance, sorry Hugh.

Feel free to quote this post in early January after the smoke clears.

omnipotent on December 20, 2007 at 4:10 PM

Zetterson,

If you’re around -

Should impotent, er, omnipotent post anything in the future that is anti-Mitt on any topic, I think it would be fair for me use his animus towards Mormons as more than a hunch, but a fact in evidence as to what guides him.

Buy Danish on December 20, 2007 at 4:56 PM

Zetterson on December 20, 2007 at 4:44 PM

Gotta love the DVR. I went back and played that segment over again and what he actually said was this: “I had an interesting and enlightening discussion with him this morning about his plan. I believe that it is, uh, it’s viable. I believe he’ll stick with it, and he’s got the best shot!”

Maybe AP will put the video segment from Cavuto’s show up so you can hear it for yourself.

Nothing anywhere in there about ‘of all the anti-illegal immigration candidates…’

So, no correction on my part needed. ;)

techno_barbarian on December 20, 2007 at 4:58 PM

It’s official; this campaign season is the looniest I’ve ever seen.

steveegg on December 20, 2007 at 5:04 PM

gabriel sutherland on December 20, 2007 at 4:46 PM

yep…he was running a solid 3-5% for hours then WHAM!

Limerick on December 20, 2007 at 5:10 PM

Secretary of State John Bolton
Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo

Secretary of Defense… David Petraeus…? Any better suggestions?

Frozen Tex on December 20, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Secretary of State Diana West
Director of Homeland Security Tom Tancredo
Secretary of Defense… Tommy Franks

MB4 on December 20, 2007 at 4:13 PM

Add to that Vice President Michael steele
and you would have an unbeatable ticket.

leanright on December 20, 2007 at 5:13 PM

Should impotent, er, omnipotent post anything in the future that is anti-Mitt on any topic, I think it would be fair for me use his animus towards Mormons as more than a hunch, but a fact in evidence as to what guides him.

Buy Danish on December 20, 2007 at 4:56 PM

Not necessarily. I don’t know if omnipotent is anti-Mormon or not, but it’s a logical fallacy to assume that he is based on what he wrote. One can have a positive opinion of Mormons (as I do) and at the same time acknowledge objectively that there is significant enough anti-Mormon sentiment among our fellow Republican voters to call into question Mitt’s viability in the general election. It only takes a few hundred votes in a swing state like Florida or Ohio to change the outcome of a election these days. Do you want to gamble on whether or not there are a few hundred fundamentalists in Florida who are bigoted enough to stay home on election day rather than vote for a Mormon?

aero on December 20, 2007 at 5:13 PM

Comment pages: 1 2


You must be logged in to post a comment.