Positive Trends in Anbar Permanent, Coalition Commander Says
posted at 9:30 pm on December 11, 2007 by Bryan
Yes, you read that right. It’s the title that DoD put on the press release. “Permanent” is an awfully big word.
Iraqi security forces in the province are shouldering the security burden, and they are 19 months away from assuming full control in what was once the al Qaeda stronghold in Iraq, Marine Maj. Gen. Walter E. Gaskin, commander of Multinational Force West, told Pentagon reporters.
Violence in the Sunni-dominated province has dropped precipitously. November was the 10th month in a row of declining violence, Gaskin said during a video-teleconference from Baghdad. Put another way, this time last year, there were 460 enemy incidents each week. In the past week, there were 40, he said.
“The Anbaris … have seen the brutal way in which al Qaeda operated,” Gaskin said. “They don’t want to return to that. In fact, they have what’s known as ‘blood feuds’ with al Qaeda, meaning it takes about six generations to eliminate that type of strife. The Anbaris are tired of violence.”
Gaskin said Anbaris want a normal life. “They want to have their kids go to school. They like to have employment,” he said. “And so I think that part is permanent.”
The security umbrella is allowing Anbaris to develop, he said. The Iraqi security forces in the province are relatively new, he said, yet they are taking on more and more of the security burden.
“What we have done is given them the opportunity to do that by training along with them, by providing an example for them: mentorship, leadership,” the general said. “And I see this as we improve their capacity, and we, meaning the coalition forces, are able to withdraw back into overwatch. We can see now that these forces will be capable of doing and operating on their own. Independence, self-reliance, all is coming.”
The Iraqi forces, both army and police, are evolving to be self-sufficient logistically, tactically and operationally, he said.
Key to success in Anbar has been the development of Iraqi security forces. Overall, 40,000 Iraqis serve in the army or police in the province. “The Iraqi security forces are acquitting themselves magnificently,” Gaskin said. “They just need time to gain the experience required. You cannot buy experience; it has to be earned, and it takes time to do that.”
He said embedded transition teams, consisting of about 1,700 U.S. soldiers, Marines and sailors, have been crucial to the Iraqi progress. Servicemembers partner with Iraqi units, and live and work side by side with their Iraqi counterparts. “They share the same trials and hardships, and the satisfaction of being there when the units perform in the field,” Gaskin said. “They are trainers, mentors and facilitators. I believe in the importance of their mission, so much so that we have increased the number of personnel that we assign to these transition teams by 40 percent.”
Anbaris are making progress from the governance and economic standpoints, as well, the general said. The security situation has improved to the extent that Anbar’s provincial council finally is able to meet and operate in the province. “They were basically in exile because of murder and intimidation,” Gaskin said.
Provincial leaders are dealing with town and city councils and with federal-level officials. They have learned about budgets and are requesting funds from the central government. “This is new,” Gaskin said. Under Saddam Hussein, “the money was force-fed. Now it’s requested through budgetary requirements.”
This is an astounding statement. Ten months ago, around the time we went to Iraq, Anbar province was regarded as the most dangerous part of the country and Ramadi might have been the most dangerous city in the world, up alongside Mogadishu, Somalia in terms of daily carnage. We’ve been seeing the evidence of progress for months, and now, the MFN-I says attacks are all but gone and the progress that has been made there is permanent. That’s astounding and extremely welcome news. How come it hasn’t been reported anywhere?










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Why no reports?
Think like a Lib
Because 1) who trusts anything the US military says? We all know it’s lies anyway.
2)If this is true, we’d be wrong about McChimpy. And we are NEVER WRONG. NOR do we throw tantrums.
3)Because then Republicans would have defeated terrorism. Waahhhh!
4)This means less dead US soldiers–and we like dead US soldiers.
5)In essence, this doesn’t help Dems. So bury it. And it’s pro-America. We hate that, too.
Whew
It’s hard to imagine thinking that way, right? I need a bath.
Vanceone on December 11, 2007 at 9:35 PM
More good news the MSM will never cover. I’m going to take some credit for this given I served a year working in Anbar during OIF III with LRSC that laid the groundwork (along with some Marines) for what is happening right now. :)
davenp35 on December 11, 2007 at 9:35 PM
Noting is permanent.
Not the Roman empire, not the Thousand Year Reich, not the U.S.S.R, not a womans looks, zip, nada, zilch.
MB4 on December 11, 2007 at 9:41 PM
It is. History proves there is no such thing a permanence.
I’m not downplaying the situation on the ground, this is precisely what we’ve been fighting for from the beginning despite the efforts of America’s enemies- insurgents in Iraq and Democrats in DC. IMO, we are beginning to see the fruits of that effort as the both the insurgents and Democrats begin to realize they’ve lost.
The very worst thing that could happen at this juncture is for America to elect a spineless coward like Obama, Clinton, or Edwards. If the sentiment is that it is the “rats” turn to lead, for God’s sake let’s look at the ones with legitimate credentials for a change!
highhopes on December 11, 2007 at 9:52 PM
Good news,but when does Harry Reid
go back on the Pull out the Troops
bandwagon!
canopfor on December 11, 2007 at 9:57 PM
Merry Christmas to our troops. They’ve worked dam hard for this. It’s all theirs. Permanent is a good enough word for me. Now build that 10,000 man base for us to rotate in and out of and come home. Right away.
Griz on December 11, 2007 at 10:00 PM
Magnificently?
-insert visual of spinning head here-
Iraqi security forces includes the Iraqi police as well as the Iraqi Army.
-insert visual of spinning head with smoke coming out here-
But almost 5 years already?
And still 19 months to go?
And wasn’t it about 18 months to go about, well, about 18 months ago?
At the start of WWII the U.S had virtually no Army (including Army Air Force) or Marine Corps, and not much of a Navy after Pearl Harbor, yet less than 4 years later mighty Nazi Germany and mighty Imperialist Japan were both crushed.
MB4 on December 11, 2007 at 10:01 PM
Here comes the 08 ‘mission accomplished’ sign for the MSM to beat everyone over the head with.
Limerick on December 11, 2007 at 10:08 PM
This is great news, but everyone remember, al-Anbar is only part of Iraq. This job isn’t done.
bnelson44 on December 11, 2007 at 10:14 PM
It’s like deja vu all over again.
- Yogi Berra
MB4 on December 11, 2007 at 10:17 PM
Put this into ’08 ads.
Tzetzes on December 11, 2007 at 10:31 PM
MB4,
I can assure you it’s been no easy task training Iraqi police and army over there. Unlike us, we get to go home, they never get to leave. Many have lost family and homes along the way. Until recently, an Iraqi male joining the army or police was basically putting his and his family’s life on the line. Therefore the turnover rate was very high as Iraqis would leave to go take care of their family or move their family to another location. Success in Al Anbar is a culmination of working COIN over the past five years, something has that been done by the Marines long before Gen. Patreus showed up in theatre. The more little victories we have over time, the more it all comes together.
It is true that it is harder to teach American style discipline to Iraqi males or Afghanis for that matter. The Arab/tribal mindet is very hard to overcome, and they do not completely understand nationalism.
But I will say this, I’ve sweated and bled with these guys and unless you have done that, than don’t presume anything. They frusterate me at time, make me want to run screaming sometimes, have angered me many times, but I will tell you this, I would fight side by side with these guys before I would fight side by side with any puke liberal American.
gator70 on December 11, 2007 at 11:05 PM
Oh, they understand nationalism alright, they just see themselves primarily as Shiites, Sunnis or Kurds.
They saw themselves that way before you got there and they will see themselves that way after you leave.
MB4 on December 11, 2007 at 11:24 PM
During this time, we were not re-building our country from scratch after a dictator was removed, with terrorists suicide bombing recruits as they waited in line to join the military. Instead, most of us had the safety of being located an ocean away from our enemies. That included our factories, which could turn out planes, ships, tanks, bombs and everything else, with little chance of being bombed by our Axis enemies, or by domestic saboteurs. Iraq, on the other hand, has been under constant attack from terrorists aided and abetted by Iran, Syria and others. To compare today’s Iraq with WW2 U.S. hardly makes any sense at all.
Bigfoot on December 11, 2007 at 11:31 PM
So you think that “terrorists aided and abetted by Iran, Syria Iran and others” are more powerful than WWII Germany and Japan?
Wow.
MB4 on December 11, 2007 at 11:57 PM
Germany and Japan attacked us with actual uniformed armies and navies. Both of them had a mindset that their men were expendable. Terrorists are a cowardly lot who hide behind the skirts of women and use children as human shields, the only one’s who don’t value their skins more than the cause are suicide bombers. If Iran or any other ME cesspool were to declare an official war on us, they know they would be reduced to rubble in 14 days or less.
BKennedy on December 12, 2007 at 5:17 AM
MB4 -
I don’t want to be antagonistic, but I need to point out as another person who has been there (along with gator70), that you are just consistently wrong on these issues. In some senses you are wrong subjectively, and as such the points are debatable. In another sense, your assumptions are wrong, so your analysis is objectively flawed. (and no, I’m not using the words in Hewittian context).
First is flawed analysis based on misleading/incorrect assumptions:
bad assumption #1:
The linked article refers to Anbar. the police in Anbar are not the same police everyone reads about that suck compared to the Iraqi Army and are riddled with militias. The police in Anbar perform as good or better than the Iraqi Army in many cases at this point. It’s a different animal from the national police or the police in baghdad.
bad assumption #2:
The Iraqi security forces running Anbar, specifically the local police, have not been in constant training over 5 years, they have been stood up, massacred, stood up, massacred, and stood up again, with unbelievable turnover the whole way. Just within the past year to year-and-a-half or so have local police forces been freshly constituted and actually held momentum, thus gaining the mentioned experience.
And if you want to lay the blame for why al Qaeda had the power to destroy local security forces with impunity, some of that falls on American strategy for the last 5 years, not the guys who have their family attacked for working as a cop and quit.
Subjective point:
Some do. Most, a surprising number, do not. But don’t take my word for it, hop a flight to Baghdad and start talking to people or read Michael Yon, rather than accepting the spoonfulls of fundamental Islamic sectarianism fed to you by the media. Tabling the Kurds, religious sectarianism among average Iraqis is vastly overplayed, and to the extent it exists it is vastly more cultural than a dispute over the lineage of Mohommed. Don’t get me wrong, there are super-religious Shia who really dislike Sunni in Southern Iraq, but there are also intermixed security forces in baghdad and mixed marriaged all over Iraq.
BillINDC on December 12, 2007 at 9:55 AM
So, 10 months from now, when the daily rate of violent incidents in Anbar has been reduced by another order of magnitude, from 40 to 4, what will the Democratic presidential candidate be saying about the surge?
Laserlawyer on December 12, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Correction: the WEEKLY rate.
Laserlawyer on December 12, 2007 at 11:55 AM