Comments on: Mr. Clean gets dirty

By: Tzetzes

Tzetzes — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:26:26 +0000

PLS TELL BOB HELLO BOB

By: Tzetzes

Tzetzes — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:25:09 +0000

When accusing someone of supporting a right-to-work law is considered slinging mud…well, it says something about you.

By: RightWinged

RightWinged — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:57:43 +0000

Why would they go after Edwards… he’s not even a threat, is he?

RightWinged on December 11, 2007 at 12:51 PM

Because to go after Hillary would ruin his chance at VP should things no go his way. The Clinton’s have a long memory and are not known for forgiveness.

Suburbandad on December 11, 2007 at 1:01 PM

Look at it this way. What Obama needs is the win in Iowa. Hillary is dropping, meaning the margin on non-core supporters is taking the biggest hit and the pickins aren’t as good. A large number in the Obama-Edwards group is “Anybody but Hillary”, so Obama is already on their “possible” list. He just needs to peel a few away to get the win. Edwards is the best source for the numbers needed.

Dusty on December 11, 2007 at 1:33 PM

Excellent theories, both.

By: The Race Card

The Race Card — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:49:44 +0000

Why would they go after Edwards… he’s not even a threat, is he?

RightWinged on December 11, 2007 at 12:51 PM

I think that the Obama sees Edwards’ supporters as votes against Hillary. This may be his play to steal some voters from Edwards. Edwards voters are closer to Obama in spirit than they are to Hillary. Edwards’ 15-20% could give Obama a solid lead.

Also, I do not see any real chances of Clinton Obama ticket. I think once the Clinton camp released the hounds on Obama, their friendship and future amicability have been dashed.

By: Right Voices » Blog Archive » Edwards:”There are two Americas, you see, and one of them is a big tax shelter in the Caymans.”

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:01:12 +0000

[...] quote belongs to Bryan who provided this link: Circulating among Iowa labor circles, I am told, is this leaflet, which [...]

By: Hening

Hening — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:54:38 +0000

Barry should be trying to win over the Edward’s clan. Dumping on Edwards is not the way. He needs some down time with Oprah and Dr. Phil.

We already what he needs to do to win over the Clinton followers, which is to start spending the night with more Black women.

By: Dusty

Dusty — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:33:16 +0000

Why would they go after Edwards… he’s not even a threat, is he?

RightWinged on December 11, 2007 at 12:51 PM

Look at it this way. What Obama needs is the win in Iowa. Hillary is dropping, meaning the margin on non-core supporters is taking the biggest hit and the pickins aren’t as good. A large number in the Obama-Edwards group is “Anybody but Hillary”, so Obama is already on their “possible” list. He just needs to peel a few away to get the win. Edwards is the best source for the numbers needed.

By: Hollowpoint

Hollowpoint — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:14:58 +0000

Why would they go after Edwards… he’s not even a threat, is he?

RightWinged on December 11, 2007 at 12:51 PM

He’s pretty strong in Iowa… don’t ask me why, because I’m no longer able to figure out what the heck is going through our own voter’s heads much less those of the Dems.

By: Suburbandad

Suburbandad — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:04:32 +0000

no go = not go

By: Suburbandad

Suburbandad — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:01:47 +0000

RightWinged on December 11, 2007 at 12:51 PM

Because to go after Hillary would ruin his chance at VP should things no go his way. The Clinton’s have a long memory and are not known for forgiveness.

By: right2bright

right2bright — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:57:38 +0000

Campaigns have learned that once people make up their minds, they won’t change.
You can see it on these posts. The Mitt-wits will die with a ballot in their hand. They consider Mitt a God, that has done no wrong, has never flip-flopped, and they cast disdain at any other candidate (the most vicious personal statements come from his supporters…bigots, liars, bigots, liars, more bigots…)
Paul’s supporters, they will go Democrat if he doesn’t get the nom.
McCain, a war hero, any thing else any you are unpatriotic.

Fred, with not a strong leadership background, you would think he told Moses what to do.
Rudy, why he saved NYC, what more do you want?
Huck, talks to God, what more do youuu want?
Tancredo, just get the Mexicans out…that’s all his supporters care about.
I am missing one, and he may be one of the best, but where is he?
So Obama can go back on his word to catch the ones he has not “endeared” his faithful will forget his mud-slinging, and he is trying to catch the weak.

By: Frozen Tex

Frozen Tex — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:52:46 +0000

If it’s accurate, it’s more evidence that Silky is a ginormous hypocrite.

A lawyer ( a friend’s daughter used to pronounce it liar, much do his delight, being a cop and all) doing shady things? Say it ain’t so!!!

Im apppallleddwithall thee infiting wth the democrrts.

By: RightWinged

RightWinged — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:51:17 +0000

Why would they go after Edwards… he’s not even a threat, is he?

By: Jared_MA

Jared_MA — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:50:17 +0000

I heard from a very credible source that Silky puts from the rough.

By: peski

peski — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:49:14 +0000

Silky is a ginormous hypocrite.

I wonder if he learned this technique from the Goracle, and his purchase of carbon credits from a company that he owns?

By: amerpundit

amerpundit — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:47:16 +0000

I do remember reading elsewhere that Fortress was off-shore.