<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British intel source on new NIE: You got suckered, Yanks; Update: NIE was a &#8220;quasi-putsch,&#8221; says Bolton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:11:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; U.S. intel wonders: Hey, maybe it&#8217;s time to revisit that NIE on Iran</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-2840986</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; U.S. intel wonders: Hey, maybe it&#8217;s time to revisit that NIE on Iran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-2840986</guid>
		<description>[...] not revisiting the key finding &#8212; disputed by all of our relevant allies since practically the day the report appeared &#8212; that Iran suspended its weapons program from 2003 to 2007. Instead, they&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not revisiting the key finding &#8212; disputed by all of our relevant allies since practically the day the report appeared &#8212; that Iran suspended its weapons program from 2003 to 2007. Instead, they&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We&#8217;re Canceling Our Order Of Fries &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-2733545</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;re Canceling Our Order Of Fries &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-2733545</guid>
		<description>[...] on a bomb. European intelligence agencies have been laughing at that claim for years, from the British back in 2007 to Nicolas Sarkozy just this morning. In fact, as I’ve mentioned a bunch of times on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on a bomb. European intelligence agencies have been laughing at that claim for years, from the British back in 2007 to Nicolas Sarkozy just this morning. In fact, as I’ve mentioned a bunch of times on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NYT: Bush nixed weapons for Israeli raid on Iran, chose covert ops instead</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-1772377</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NYT: Bush nixed weapons for Israeli raid on Iran, chose covert ops instead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-1772377</guid>
		<description>[...] wasn&#8217;t our only ally who knew the NIE was garbage, first and foremost because enrichment, not weaponization, is the hard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wasn&#8217;t our only ally who knew the NIE was garbage, first and foremost because enrichment, not weaponization, is the hard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iranian dissidents: Iran did stop its weapons program in 2003 &#8212; and restarted it in 2004</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-816019</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iranian dissidents: Iran did stop its weapons program in 2003 &#8212; and restarted it in 2004</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-816019</guid>
		<description>[...] that they really have suspended their weapons program? The crack U.S. intel community seems to be out on a limb with this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that they really have suspended their weapons program? The crack U.S. intel community seems to be out on a limb with this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gryphon202</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-815244</link>
		<dc:creator>gryphon202</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-815244</guid>
		<description>We will be woiling our collective drawers when Iran test its first functional nuclear weapon.  It&#039;s not a matter of &lt;strong&gt;if.&lt;/strong&gt;  It&#039;s only a matter of &lt;strong&gt;when&lt;/strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will be woiling our collective drawers when Iran test its first functional nuclear weapon.  It&#8217;s not a matter of <strong>if.</strong>  It&#8217;s only a matter of <strong>when</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: volsense</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814903</link>
		<dc:creator>volsense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814903</guid>
		<description>The term Intelligence should be removed from the Central Intelligence Agency.  Then everyone who has served under Clinton and/or involved with either the weapons of mass destruction fiasco or this piece of garbage should be removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term Intelligence should be removed from the Central Intelligence Agency.  Then everyone who has served under Clinton and/or involved with either the weapons of mass destruction fiasco or this piece of garbage should be removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ochlan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814852</link>
		<dc:creator>Ochlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814852</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What will it take to expose this and bring these people to justice?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Probably a whole sh!tload more dead Americans...seems to be the way of things.

Never a barn door closed with horses unbolted - the American way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What will it take to expose this and bring these people to justice?</p></blockquote>
<p>Probably a whole sh!tload more dead Americans&#8230;seems to be the way of things.</p>
<p>Never a barn door closed with horses unbolted &#8211; the American way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mustafa Hemmroid</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814807</link>
		<dc:creator>Mustafa Hemmroid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814807</guid>
		<description>Please keep in mind that the CIA is actually TWO separate agencies.  There are the spooks and operatives on one side, and the &quot;analysts&quot; on the other.  They don&#039;t interact.

These analysts are college graduates from the last 30 years of Leftist indocrination, and not smart enough to land cushy jobs in academia nor in the State department.

The democrats are more than willing to believe the Iranians suspended their program in 2003, but no one has asked the analysts why they didn&#039;t know this in 2005, when the previous assessment was done.

Any educated (by 1940s and 1950s standards) person can see the problems with the latest assessment, and recognize how it is inconsistent with the Iranian braggery about centrifuges and promises to destroy Israel.

We need to face facts.  Joe McCarthy may have brought awareness to the communist infiltration of our federal government, but he sure as heck didn&#039;t stop it.  Our State dept and CIA analysts are sabotaging the efforts of our elected leaders, and the dumbass Democrats are their prime supporters and principal beneficiaries.  What will it take to expose this and bring these people to justice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please keep in mind that the CIA is actually TWO separate agencies.  There are the spooks and operatives on one side, and the &#8220;analysts&#8221; on the other.  They don&#8217;t interact.</p>
<p>These analysts are college graduates from the last 30 years of Leftist indocrination, and not smart enough to land cushy jobs in academia nor in the State department.</p>
<p>The democrats are more than willing to believe the Iranians suspended their program in 2003, but no one has asked the analysts why they didn&#8217;t know this in 2005, when the previous assessment was done.</p>
<p>Any educated (by 1940s and 1950s standards) person can see the problems with the latest assessment, and recognize how it is inconsistent with the Iranian braggery about centrifuges and promises to destroy Israel.</p>
<p>We need to face facts.  Joe McCarthy may have brought awareness to the communist infiltration of our federal government, but he sure as heck didn&#8217;t stop it.  Our State dept and CIA analysts are sabotaging the efforts of our elected leaders, and the dumbass Democrats are their prime supporters and principal beneficiaries.  What will it take to expose this and bring these people to justice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ochlan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ochlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814542</guid>
		<description>I am Jack&#039;s gut-wrenching shock &amp; horror.

The NIE is a POS? Whodathunkit?

I am seriously going to have to reevaluate my concrete faith in our intelligence industry. Seriously.

&lt;em&gt;What planes? Flying where?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am Jack&#8217;s gut-wrenching shock &amp; horror.</p>
<p>The NIE is a POS? Whodathunkit?</p>
<p>I am seriously going to have to reevaluate my concrete faith in our intelligence industry. Seriously.</p>
<p><em>What planes? Flying where?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tzetzes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814458</link>
		<dc:creator>Tzetzes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814458</guid>
		<description>The Brits are not Europeans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Brits are not Europeans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhimwit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814451</link>
		<dc:creator>dhimwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814451</guid>
		<description>Whatever the NIE worms thought they were accomplishing, they&#039;ve actually made war more likely.  It is now the official position of the US that there is no problem, which is equivalent to letting  Israel know that it&#039;s their problem. Israel may go and solve it.  

Thanks to dirty little beltway politics,  to the games of tenured mediocrities, and not to any cleverness at all, the US has made a good move. It has given Israel a green light to do the job  and yet at the same time has distanced itself from  any prior knowledge or involvement.  Since numerous nuclear powers live near the neighborhood, Russia, China, Pakistan, India, it&#039;s best that our fingerprints not be found anywhere near the scene. 

And we have the best defense of all.  Innocence by reason of sheer incompetence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever the NIE worms thought they were accomplishing, they&#8217;ve actually made war more likely.  It is now the official position of the US that there is no problem, which is equivalent to letting  Israel know that it&#8217;s their problem. Israel may go and solve it.  </p>
<p>Thanks to dirty little beltway politics,  to the games of tenured mediocrities, and not to any cleverness at all, the US has made a good move. It has given Israel a green light to do the job  and yet at the same time has distanced itself from  any prior knowledge or involvement.  Since numerous nuclear powers live near the neighborhood, Russia, China, Pakistan, India, it&#8217;s best that our fingerprints not be found anywhere near the scene. </p>
<p>And we have the best defense of all.  Innocence by reason of sheer incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814425</link>
		<dc:creator>slp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814425</guid>
		<description>Joseph McCarthy was right.

The foot soldiers of the enemy are already in the U.S. State Department and the U.S. intelligence agencies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph McCarthy was right.</p>
<p>The foot soldiers of the enemy are already in the U.S. State Department and the U.S. intelligence agencies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814424</link>
		<dc:creator>slp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814424</guid>
		<description>Joseph McCarthy was right.

The foot soldiers of the enemy are alreay in the U.S. State Department and the U.S. intelligence agencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph McCarthy was right.</p>
<p>The foot soldiers of the enemy are alreay in the U.S. State Department and the U.S. intelligence agencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astuddis</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814401</link>
		<dc:creator>astuddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814401</guid>
		<description>Contrarian opinion:

When you plan to attack a country, in many instances it is advantageous to lead the &quot;attackee&quot; to believe there is no imminent threat.  

Bake your noodle with this one.  What if all of this is unfolding due to a well-thought out strategy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrarian opinion:</p>
<p>When you plan to attack a country, in many instances it is advantageous to lead the &#8220;attackee&#8221; to believe there is no imminent threat.  </p>
<p>Bake your noodle with this one.  What if all of this is unfolding due to a well-thought out strategy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaibones</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaibones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814399</guid>
		<description>Fire everyone in the CIA who has celebrated their 10 year anniversary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fire everyone in the CIA who has celebrated their 10 year anniversary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 91Veteran</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814337</link>
		<dc:creator>91Veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814337</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Agreed. If the info Kamel shared wasn’t worth all that much, why did Saddam make the effort to lure him and his family back to Iraq to kill him?

Wanderlust on December 9, 2007 at 11:08 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I could never figure that out. He was out and safe. I agree there was probably significant pressure put on his family. I can&#039;t think of any other reason he would have gone back. 
It&#039;s possible Saddam wanted him back so he would stop giving up secrets.
There are so many parallels between that issue and this current one. 
Over time, the intelligence and hard data from the UNSCOM inspectors was ignored in favor of the &quot;Bush Lied&quot; crap, essentially making the US intelligence credibility a laughingstock. After the whole Bush Lied clamor, any other report was met with claims by surrendercrats as Bush cooking the books on intelligence.
It is made worse by the kind of games being played by those in the intelligence agencies who care more about their hatred for Bush than they do about the security of this country.

...yet they want us to believe this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Agreed. If the info Kamel shared wasn’t worth all that much, why did Saddam make the effort to lure him and his family back to Iraq to kill him?</p>
<p>Wanderlust on December 9, 2007 at 11:08 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I could never figure that out. He was out and safe. I agree there was probably significant pressure put on his family. I can&#8217;t think of any other reason he would have gone back.<br />
It&#8217;s possible Saddam wanted him back so he would stop giving up secrets.<br />
There are so many parallels between that issue and this current one.<br />
Over time, the intelligence and hard data from the UNSCOM inspectors was ignored in favor of the &#8220;Bush Lied&#8221; crap, essentially making the US intelligence credibility a laughingstock. After the whole Bush Lied clamor, any other report was met with claims by surrendercrats as Bush cooking the books on intelligence.<br />
It is made worse by the kind of games being played by those in the intelligence agencies who care more about their hatred for Bush than they do about the security of this country.</p>
<p>&#8230;yet they want us to believe this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brits Say CIA Was Plain Fooled. Israelis Ticked. Bolton on Target : The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814336</link>
		<dc:creator>Brits Say CIA Was Plain Fooled. Israelis Ticked. Bolton on Target : The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814336</guid>
		<description>[...] in the CIA where it&#8217;s mealy-mouthed NIE gets us lectured about taking a threat too lightly by the British, for goodness sake!  British spy chiefs have grave doubts that Iran has mothballed its nuclear weapons programme, as a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the CIA where it&#8217;s mealy-mouthed NIE gets us lectured about taking a threat too lightly by the British, for goodness sake!  British spy chiefs have grave doubts that Iran has mothballed its nuclear weapons programme, as a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK intelligence: NIE is totally wrong</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814316</link>
		<dc:creator>UK intelligence: NIE is totally wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814316</guid>
		<description>[...] People are just lining up to take potshots at the CIA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] People are just lining up to take potshots at the CIA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanderlust</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814311</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanderlust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814311</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;91Veteran on December 9, 2007 at 7:12 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Agreed. If the info Kamel shared wasn&#039;t worth all that much, why did Saddam make the effort to lure him and his family back to Iraq to kill him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>91Veteran on December 9, 2007 at 7:12 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed. If the info Kamel shared wasn&#8217;t worth all that much, why did Saddam make the effort to lure him and his family back to Iraq to kill him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814303</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814303</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m inclined to believe Bolton, however, and I doubt that this is a gambit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m inclined to believe Bolton, however, and I doubt that this is a gambit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FloatingRock</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814301</link>
		<dc:creator>FloatingRock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814301</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think this is some sort of gambit as mentioned above.

gator70 on December 9, 2007 at 10:04 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
If this is really a gambit we should start hedging our rhetoric about providing a missile defense to protect Europe from Iranian nukes.  Once Europe realizes that they&#039;re on their own both in regard to preventing Iran from obtaining nukes AND their defense from those nukes once obtained, it might just light such a fire under them that they&#039;ll finally get off their @sses and take responsibility for their own safety for once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think this is some sort of gambit as mentioned above.</p>
<p>gator70 on December 9, 2007 at 10:04 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>If this is really a gambit we should start hedging our rhetoric about providing a missile defense to protect Europe from Iranian nukes.  Once Europe realizes that they&#8217;re on their own both in regard to preventing Iran from obtaining nukes AND their defense from those nukes once obtained, it might just light such a fire under them that they&#8217;ll finally get off their @sses and take responsibility for their own safety for once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814266</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814266</guid>
		<description>Reference the NIE:
&lt;blockquote&gt;“This is politics disguised as intelligence,” Bolton was quoted as saying&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My sentiments, exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reference the NIE:</p>
<blockquote><p>“This is politics disguised as intelligence,” Bolton was quoted as saying</p></blockquote>
<p>My sentiments, exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gator70</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814261</link>
		<dc:creator>gator70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814261</guid>
		<description>I think this is some sort of gambit as mentioned above.This is a good way to put the pressure on the rest of the world. As we pull back the big ol security blanket that is the United States, it will get very cold over in Europe and the Middle East. Remember, nobody thought the surge would work either, quit underestimating Pres. Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is some sort of gambit as mentioned above.This is a good way to put the pressure on the rest of the world. As we pull back the big ol security blanket that is the United States, it will get very cold over in Europe and the Middle East. Remember, nobody thought the surge would work either, quit underestimating Pres. Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herikutsu</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814251</link>
		<dc:creator>Herikutsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814251</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe it’s time we faced the truth. We’ve lost the country. Nov.08 will be the final chapter. I suggest arming yourself.

Griz on December 9, 2007 at 4:39 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
-
I can&#039;t argue with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Maybe it’s time we faced the truth. We’ve lost the country. Nov.08 will be the final chapter. I suggest arming yourself.</p>
<p>Griz on December 9, 2007 at 4:39 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>-<br />
I can&#8217;t argue with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canopfor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/comment-page-1/#comment-814245</link>
		<dc:creator>canopfor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/09/british-intel-source-on-new-nie-you-got-suckered-yanks/#comment-814245</guid>
		<description>Ummm,nuclear weapons and research,
inspect and verify,and in all of
dinnerjackets drama at the UN and
elsewhere,Russian technicians,and
Syria-Nork,sounds like a ruse,I&#039;ll
still go with that their making a 
bomb,if not in Iran maybe the Baaka
Valley!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm,nuclear weapons and research,<br />
inspect and verify,and in all of<br />
dinnerjackets drama at the UN and<br />
elsewhere,Russian technicians,and<br />
Syria-Nork,sounds like a ruse,I&#8217;ll<br />
still go with that their making a<br />
bomb,if not in Iran maybe the Baaka<br />
Valley!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
