Group offers Rudy, Mitt, McCain $10,000 to defend their criticism of medical marijuana
posted at 8:05 pm on December 5, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
The Paulnut, being on the proper federalist side of the issue, is not invited. Just as well. It’s not like he needs the money.
Although I’ll consider giving him ten grand anyway if he shows up and issues them this “warning.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
well, there’s my palate cleaned.
and…
Snort!
JazzBass on December 5, 2007 at 8:13 PM
Mmmhm.
see-dubya on December 5, 2007 at 8:13 PM
Ok…
1937…the Marihuana (federal spelling) Tax Act.
Gimme my check.
Limerick on December 5, 2007 at 8:14 PM
“What? Are you made of money?”
jaime on December 5, 2007 at 8:22 PM
The issue with medical marijuana is that as soon as you begin to prescribe it as a drug, people will start the lawsuits to try to allow them to take the drug they need so desperately anywhere, including many public areas. Pharmacologically, the synthetic cannabinoids have the same properties, and the only differences is in dosing (which is a problem that can be solved) and the placebo effect.
Big S on December 5, 2007 at 8:22 PM
legalize it and tax it to fund the SCHIP program! For the children!
lorien1973 on December 5, 2007 at 8:26 PM
It’s not habit forming yet the same people keep buying it over and over again….
Pam on December 5, 2007 at 8:30 PM
Either you own your own body or you don’t.
Murdering a baby is a choice, but smoking a plant that grows naturally is a crime?
Our founding fathers would not take long to decide this one in favor of the potheads.
JayHaw Phrenzie on December 5, 2007 at 8:32 PM
Our founding fathers would not take long to decide this one in favor of the potheads.
JayHaw Phrenzie on December 5, 2007 at 8:32 PM
I dunno…..one of their very first targets were moonshiners.
Limerick on December 5, 2007 at 8:36 PM
0.
How are you going to tax something I can grow myself very very well .
Mojack420 on December 5, 2007 at 8:36 PM
So is AP implying he’s the Towlie of the blogging world?
TheEJS on December 5, 2007 at 8:37 PM
People are abusing medical marijuana laws. Anybody can get medical marijuana by basically just saying that they have this or have that. It happens in California all the time. I would like my $10,000 in cash please.
SoulGlo on December 5, 2007 at 8:38 PM
Great idea…and then guess what the Dems would do? Ban the smoking of the reefer and any advertising that goes along with the product.
Pam on December 5, 2007 at 8:40 PM
That was great. I didn’t think I would want to see Dewey Cox, but now I do.
Ian on December 5, 2007 at 8:40 PM
I live in a country where you can’t ingest a plant or lick a frog.
infidel on December 5, 2007 at 8:40 PM
Lobotomising human conscience
aengus on December 5, 2007 at 8:41 PM
what if they really have this or that. Just because some might abuse the law dose that mean everyone must suffer.
You can have my joint when you can pry it from my cold dead fingers
Mojack420 on December 5, 2007 at 8:44 PM
your tax dollars hard at work… Alex White Plume
Kaptain Amerika on December 5, 2007 at 8:46 PM
So,this is a PSA ad!haha,
canopfor on December 5, 2007 at 8:48 PM
Very interesting and sad. Thanks for the link, I have not heard of him.
infidel on December 5, 2007 at 8:53 PM
how can we spend money to house drug offenders when pedophiles walk the streets? you wanna put the hurt on any democratic candidate? throw in legalization on the platform of the republican party. democrats will leave en masse. ok maybe not… lol
Kaptain Amerika on December 5, 2007 at 8:53 PM
yeah I guess every year the government seizes his crops. so this just keeps on happening with no resolution and no one reports it on the MSM.
Kaptain Amerika on December 5, 2007 at 8:55 PM
You can have my joint when you can pry it from my
cold dead fingers.
Mojack420 on December 5,2007 at 8:44PM.
Mojack420:Just get cremated,and take it with you.haha
canopfor on December 5, 2007 at 8:57 PM
Nah. Never used it.
Allahpundit on December 5, 2007 at 9:11 PM
Just make sure Keith Richards isn’t able to snort you.
Frozen Tex on December 5, 2007 at 9:11 PM
You’re not missing much. I prefer drinking nowadays. It being legal to get smashed in the comfort of my home helps, too.
RW Wacko on December 5, 2007 at 9:18 PM
Frozen Tex on December 5, 2007 at 9:11 PM
Dude….Lets smoke Mojack420….he’s real close to 411 man!
dmann on December 5, 2007 at 9:22 PM
Wouldn’t that be like bogarting?
Mojack420 on December 5, 2007 at 9:24 PM
If pot was as hard to grow as tobacco, it would be in stores tomorrow. But as it is, they can’t control the growing and distribution so the next best thing to do is manage it with a corrupt system. Lawyers make a ton on it under the current system.
If the federal government could put a meter on a women’s vajayjay they’d set that to up as a revenue stream.
TheSitRep on December 5, 2007 at 9:31 PM
Actually, abortion laws didn’t come until much later than the Founding Fathers, and the reason for them wasn’t the pro-life “murder” fantasy. The AMA didn’t like the competition from the midwives. It was a cynical profit driven prohibition just as the 1937 marijuana prohibition is alleged to be and probably was. I hasten to add that I’m leery to believe that cheap economic motives are the reason for politics outcomes. They get alleged too much. On the other hand, that we have hear the word “ethanol” way too often suggests that cynical economic motives do result in policy in the real world.
thuja on December 5, 2007 at 9:38 PM
Just what we need. Another way to make more stupid people. If smoking tobacco made you stupid, it would be outlawed also.
pedestrian on December 5, 2007 at 9:47 PM
hey don’t blame peoples stupidity on smoking they were stupid from birth.
Mojack420 on December 5, 2007 at 9:58 PM
First they will go pick up some doritos, then go vote Repub.
Count me on on those who support decriminalization. Putting someone in jail for having possession of a naturally growing plant, that grows over much of the US natively, is silly.
Criminalizing growing of industrial hemp is even more silly.
firepilot on December 5, 2007 at 9:59 PM
Limerick on December 5, 2007 at 8:36 PM
jdog on December 5, 2007 at 10:05 PM
I cannot understand why the government has ANY right to tell me that I cannot grow this plant in my own home and smoke it in my OWN HOME. The government has absolutely NO RIGHT to legislate what I do in my home as long as it harms NO ONE else. The instant I leave the house and start driving, FINE, you have a right to detain me as I MIGHT pose a risk to others, but in my own home, it is riduclous.
muyoso on December 5, 2007 at 10:32 PM
LOL awesome video.
ThackerAgency on December 5, 2007 at 11:21 PM
You mean like legalizing and taxing the world’s oldest occupation?
ThackerAgency on December 5, 2007 at 11:24 PM
Blind political partisanship must kill as many brain cells as pot does over a lifetime. That certainly doesn’t stop some of my best friends from indulging in it.
I don’t care if you smoke organic chickpeas rolled in toilet paper. Nanny state be damned.
The Race Card on December 6, 2007 at 4:19 AM
WooHoo, concequence free society here we come! Reefer and sub-prime mortgages for everyone!
BohicaTwentyTwo on December 6, 2007 at 8:24 AM
Comment pages: