Ahmadinejad wants international Islamic court for war criminals
posted at 11:33 am on December 4, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly
Via Weasel Zippers. What could go wrong?
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who accuses the West of monopolising power in world bodies, proposed on Tuesday setting up an international Islamic court to try war criminals and other human rights violators.
The president gave few details about his proposal, made at a meeting of judiciary chiefs from Islamic countries. But he repeated his assertions that bodies like the UN Security Council were being manipulated by the West.
“Today it is necessary to create an international Islamic court for pursuing and following international criminals, those who violates the rights of nations, war criminals and governments …” Ahmadinejad said in a televised speech.
This is part of his campaign to delegitimize the Security Council (and by extension any nuclear sanctions that may flow from it) as a blunt instrument wielded by western powers for their own interests. Until now he’s chosen to do that in anti-western terms, not Islamic ones, so as to include the widest possible array of allies. Hence the interest in the “non-aligned movement” in 2006 and his speech at the UN this year declaring the end of the World War II era that gave the Security Council its five permanent members. Why go the Islamic route now? Probably because he’s a little worried about how worried his Sunni neighbors are about him and wants to make a show of being a good Muslim to make it harder for them to side with the U.S.
Among the charges the court would apparently be empowered to consider: “Bringing bitterness into people’s lives.” Exit question: What are the odds, do you suppose, that they’d be hearing any cases against the Janjaweed?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Of course, he and OBL will abide by such a court.( sarc full blast on)
MNDavenotPC on December 4, 2007 at 11:36 AM
…an international Islamic court.
And these bastards maintain they’re not trying to take over the world.
Can we friggin’ bomb them yet?
MadisonConservative on December 4, 2007 at 11:36 AM
International Canon law?
Yea, we can bomb them now.
Kristopher on December 4, 2007 at 11:42 AM
The American Association of University Professors will probably have a resolution in support of this by
ChristmasWinter Break.eeyore on December 4, 2007 at 11:46 AM
Of course, Bush would be the first criminal case that court would address. This would gain them the full support of the liberal left.
rockhauler on December 4, 2007 at 11:47 AM
Fine. First up: Saudi Arabia.
MadisonConservative on December 4, 2007 at 11:49 AM
This is a great idea.
Firstly, it will produce the greatest squabble between Shia & Sunni since both Mohammed’s 4th Uncle and his stepson’s third cousin’s tortoise both claimed succession.
Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, it will be a centralised Islamic authority that the world can hold accountable for any of Islam’s abuses.
Lastly, it may be the straw that breaks the back of the UN. If the Muzzies can have their international legislative body, so can the West.
uptight on December 4, 2007 at 11:51 AM
Hitler had show trials too…
DANEgerus on December 4, 2007 at 11:52 AM
Just remember, in an Islamic court Jihad is not a crime, nor is the killing on innocent civilians as long as it is done as an act of Jihad. However in that same Islamic court, failure to convert to or submit to Islam is a crime and the prescribed punishment for that crime is….DEATH…
doriangrey on December 4, 2007 at 11:54 AM
And wouldn’t Ahneedadinnerjacket be the first one on trial?
Mazztek on December 4, 2007 at 12:02 PM
Sorry, uptight, Islam has no abuses. Only those who attack, challenge, insult, stray or become apostates from Islam commit abuse. It’s Heads, I win – Tails, you lose.
eeyore on December 4, 2007 at 12:08 PM
For what? Being a good and faithful Muslim?
doriangrey on December 4, 2007 at 12:10 PM
islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, islamic, and on and on and on and on…
Griz on December 4, 2007 at 12:33 PM
So what Armageddonjad is saying is he’d like to drag every female soldier in the world off to his Sharia inspired Kangaroo Kort for the war crime of making Islamic
freedom fightersterrorists unduly horny.BKennedy on December 4, 2007 at 12:43 PM
Ahhh… his first move to create the Caliphate…
An international Sharia based Court…
For this to work, it would have to have world wide jurisdiction and authority, thus enforcing Sharia law world wide.
Its a move to give International credence to Non Western based Courts… to enforce Sharia’s view of rights… and obligations.
Stand by… this is gonna get ugly… with the moral relativism of our Leftys beleiving that all Cultures are equal… they WILL get support for this from our Leftys.
Romeo13 on December 4, 2007 at 12:54 PM
Only if you have no standards or values…in other words, only if you are a hollow, braindead, amoral drone.
The left will love this new court…diversity & tolerance & dialog, oh my!
Keep skippin’ along the yellow brick road ya ‘tards
Ochlan on December 4, 2007 at 1:33 PM
WADR, AP, Ayatollah Khamenei proposed this months ago. Websearch and ye shall find!
chsw
chsw on December 4, 2007 at 1:46 PM
If there is paperwork being done regarding Pelosi, Boxer and Clinton for painting their faces and being flogged for the offense, I might be willing to listen.
Does this include hanging homosexuals that hold office? This could be what finally gets radical libs off the bench?
Hening on December 4, 2007 at 2:13 PM
So did Stalin.
And pretty much any other totalitarian regime, too.
Next up: Hillary and her “one night stand” for violating decency laws.
Dr.Cwac.Cwac on December 4, 2007 at 4:12 PM
My first thought on reading this is wouldn’t the first cases that this court take up be issues like the Danish cartoonists. And if they have atomic weapons wouldn’t they be happy to threaten Denmark with nukes if Denmark won’t give up the cartoonist for their show trial?
We are deluding ourselves if we don’t see this as the next logical step in Islamic domination. And as Europe turns Islamic because of its insane immigration policies, we can then expect the Vatican to be burnt to the ground as its existence offends Islamic sensibilities. Or else their courts and their nukes. I think it would serve the Vatican right as it has done everything in its power to help illegal immigration, but still we are looking at a cultural catastrophe that makes Hitler’s genocide of the Jews minor by comparison. And we were lead each step of the way to our destruction by people telling us not to be racist.
thuja on December 4, 2007 at 4:57 PM
The link to the story on “bitterness” goes to the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA). Wouldn’t it have been better to have called it the Islamic Republic Agency of News?
Tzetzes on December 5, 2007 at 1:56 AM
Comment pages: