Teddy bear teacher pardoned

posted at 8:27 am on December 3, 2007 by Bryan

Gillian Gibbons is free and presumably on her way back to the UK.

A British school teacher jailed in Sudan for two weeks after allowing her students to name a teddy bear Muhammad was freed Monday following a pardon by the Sudanese president.

President Omar al-Bahir’s pardon of Gillian Gibbons allowed her to leave prison before the end of her 15-day sentence, and ended a diplomatic tangle with what British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called a victory for “common sense.”

Bashir pardoned Gibbons, 54, of Liverpool, after meeting with two Muslim members of Britain’s House of Lords, Nazir Ahmed and Sayeeda Warsi, who had traveled to the predominantly Muslim African nation to lobby for her release…

British Muslim groups spoke out strongly in favor of Gibbons and said the Sudanese government’s actions in the case have created greater misunderstandings about Islam.

“This has certainly given ammunition to those who never miss an opportunity to portray Muslims as intolerant,” Bunglawala said. “We only hope that the actions of Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi and the whole British Muslim community can mitigate against the damage done by the Sudanese authorities.”

This is obviously great news, but leave it to me to find the dark cloud behind it. Sudan mainly responded as it did after it heard from British Muslims. Sudan didn’t listen to the British Prime Minister or to common sense or even, really, to the international outrage that accompanied its decision to jail a woman for no legitimate reason. And even now, she was pardoned and had to leave, not exonerated and her many dangerous accusers told to stand down.

Point two, and we’ll have to wait and see on this, but I’d be surprised if threats to Gibbons’ life don’t follow her from that jail house in Khartoum all the way back to Britain. And, as this clip from The View shows, there are plenty of idiots outside Sudan who more or less sided with convicting Gibbons over this.

Update: And I’d be remiss not to mention that the Gibbons case has already sent Mohammed the Mole to the dustbin of history.

A British children’s author who called one of his characters Mohammed the Mole to promote multiculturalism has renamed him Morgan so as not to offend Muslims.

Kes Gray said the case of British teacher Gillian Gibbons, who has been jailed in Sudan for allowing her class of primary school children to name a teddy bear Mohammed, had prompted him to postpone a reprint of his book, Who’s Poorly Too, and change the name.

“I had no idea at all of the sensitivities of the name Mohammed until seeing this case in Sudan,” Gray told The Sunday Times.

“As soon as I saw the news I thought, ‘Oh gosh, I’ve got a mole called Mohammed – this is not good’.”

Update: Exit question: What will the Islam is Peace campaign have to say about this?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

There may be some hope for Islam yet.

No, not really.

MB4 on December 3, 2007 at 8:32 AM

She will required protection if she stays in Britain, but it’s still good news.

forest on December 3, 2007 at 8:35 AM

“This has certainly given ammunition to those who never miss an opportunity to portray Muslims as intolerant”

Yeah, we had no ammunition at all before this incident…

Kevin M on December 3, 2007 at 8:45 AM

Yeah, we had no ammunition at all before this incident…

Kevin M on December 3, 2007 at 8:45 AM

All the NRA members in the U.S.A. don’t have that much ammunition.

MB4 on December 3, 2007 at 8:49 AM

This has little to do with Sharia and much to do with PR. I also suspect a quid pro quo.

I expect Gibbons will be rushed out of the country, never to return.

Meryl Yourish on December 3, 2007 at 8:59 AM

Hmm, cartoons and teddy bears, what will drive them into a murderous rage next? sunshine and rainbows? lollipops?

trubble on December 3, 2007 at 9:07 AM

How long before the kids who actually named the bear end up dead? Will we ever hear about it when it does happen because I have no doubt that it will.

zerodamage on December 3, 2007 at 9:08 AM

I am just hope she sticks to naming teddies and not wearing them.

TheSitRep on December 3, 2007 at 9:09 AM

President Omar al-Bahir’s pardon of Gillian Gibbons allowed her to leave prison before the end of her 15-day sentence

Wow. We have all got to chip in and send this great man a fruit basket. Um, which fruits are offensive to Muslims again?

But seriously folks: will more people be injured in the riots over the initial “offense” or in the riots over her pardon?

saint kansas on December 3, 2007 at 9:09 AM

A British children’s author who called one of his characters Mohammed the Mole to promote multiculturalism has renamed him Morgan so as not to offend Muslims.

This puts an exclamation point on the state of affairs of the once great British Empire.

What the hell would possess a “British children’s” author to name a mole, or any other fairy tale character for that matter, Mohammed in the first place. Whatever happened to Nigel?

Color England in big trouble.

And now the author changes the name so as NOT to offend any Muslims?

Color England gone.

fogw on December 3, 2007 at 9:10 AM

How many days till she renounces Christianity, says it’s our fault and says we don’t understand islam?

20 bucks a square?

LtE126 on December 3, 2007 at 9:12 AM

Um, which fruits are offensive to Muslims again?

Two apples and a banana….

ScottG on December 3, 2007 at 9:13 AM

Hmm, cartoons and teddy bears, what will drive them into a murderous rage next? sunshine and rainbows? lollipops?

trubble on December 3, 2007 at 9:07 AM

Baywatch
Dancing with the Stars
French Roast coffee
P.G. Wodehouse
Quadrophonic sound systems
The 1995 Ford Escort
Aikido
Carmine red lipstick (hi-gloss)
windshield wiper wind deflectors
#2 lead pencils
The Wonder bra
The LL Bean catalog

The list goes on and on…

thejackal on December 3, 2007 at 9:14 AM

And even now, she was pardoned and had to leave, not exonerated and her many dangerous accusers told to stand down.

Pardoning suggests that a crime was committed. Some of it may be diplospeak so that everybody saves face but this does nothing to change the reality of the situation. Ms. Gibbons was freed because her case was so absurd that it brought international attention on Sudan- and not in the Hollywood supports Darfur way. Had she done a more pedestrian “crime” like backtalking to a man she would still be in jail and the international spotlight would be elsewhere.

highhopes on December 3, 2007 at 9:16 AM

She will now have to live like Salman Rushdie. It won’t be long until her headless corpse winds up in the streets of the UK. This pardon was nothing more than a death sentence. Savages will be savages. Their brains are infected by the religion of pieces, not peace.

roninacreage on December 3, 2007 at 9:19 AM

British Muslim groups spoke out strongly in favor of Gibbons and said the Sudanese government’s actions in the case have created greater misunderstandings about Islam.

In other news, the “God gates Fags” signs held at military funerals by Fred Phelps may have caused greater misunderstandings about Fred Phelps’ church.

We wouldn’t want to misunderstand the religion of pea(ie)ce(s), you see.

BKennedy on December 3, 2007 at 9:20 AM

When will the riots start?

forest on December 3, 2007 at 9:21 AM

In Judaism we have such an atipathy to writing/speaking the name of God that we’ve forgotten how it is pronounce. The closest thing we have is the Germanically influenced “Jehovah.” [The J sound at the beginning would actually be a Y sound, for example, as Jacob is Yakov in Hebrew.] I still think it’s weird when I hear the name Jesus attached to a person, unless he’s a shortstop. But if you want to call somebody Moses? Nooo problem.

smellthecoffee on December 3, 2007 at 9:28 AM

Notice that the British Muslim contingent seems far more worried about their reputations (Sudan made all Muslims look bad) than they are about the patent injustice and sheer idiocy of the case.

…the Sudanese government’s actions in the case have created greater misunderstandings about Islam.

Oh, there are no misunderstandings. Except by those who mistakenly think that this incident is not in fact representative of Islam.

aero on December 3, 2007 at 9:35 AM

Um, which fruits are offensive to Muslims again?

All of them, I’m sure.

aero on December 3, 2007 at 9:36 AM

Um, which fruits are offensive to Muslims again?

Not………………… THE DREADED GRAPES OF WRATH!!!

Shy Guy on December 3, 2007 at 9:44 AM

No doubt her life will be in danger now, but it’s her own fault dontcha know for not properly educating herself about the easily offended Sudanese culture barbarians.

What the hell would possess a “British children’s” author to name a mole, or any other fairy tale character for that matter, Mohammed in the first place. Whatever happened to Nigel?
fogw on December 3, 2007 at 9:10 AM

Bingo.

Buy Danish on December 3, 2007 at 10:13 AM

Can those women on the View be any more idiotic on this one?

Metro on December 3, 2007 at 10:14 AM

Um, which fruits are offensive to Muslims again?

saint kansas on December 3, 2007 at 9:09 AM

Horse apples. A big steaming bucket of them.

rockbend on December 3, 2007 at 10:20 AM

Wow. We have all got to chip in and send this great man a fruit basket. Um, which fruits are offensive to Muslims again?

Any of them that remind them of the Jooos. So all of them, since fruit is just a great Zionist conspiracy since the Garden of Eden.

mjk on December 3, 2007 at 10:25 AM

This smells like Mahmoud Ahmadenijad (did I spell that right? forget it, he doesn’t deserve it) “pardoning” those British sailors who “invaded” Iranian waters. They get to look aggrieved, insulted and “magnanimious” and “merciful”–from their high horse–all at the same time.

Their pride–sorry, “honor”–is all that matters to them. Human rights? Free speech? The honor of their supposed “Allah most merciful?” Forget it.

inviolet on December 3, 2007 at 10:32 AM

Can those women on the View be any more idiotic on this one?

Metro on December 3, 2007 at 10:14 AM

Sure they can, just have faith.

Oldnuke on December 3, 2007 at 10:44 AM

“This has certainly given ammunition to those who never miss an opportunity to portray Muslims as intolerant,” Bunglawala said. “We only hope that the actions of Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi and the whole British Muslim community can mitigate against the damage done by the Sudanese authorities.”

How about the 30% of british muslims who think suicide bombings in England are justified?

peacenprosperity on December 3, 2007 at 10:48 AM

but I’d be surprised if threats to Gibbons’ life don’t follow her from that jail house in Khartoum all the way back to Britain

I’ve been worried about this as well.

And I’m extremely concerned about the fate of the children who named the bear in the first place. The bloodthirsty mob didn’t get its blood from Gibbons, I’m afraid they’ll try to get it elsewhere

Keli on December 3, 2007 at 10:52 AM

Pardoning suggests that a crime was committed.

A good point, and an important one. Pardon, schmardon.

On the UK message boards, a lot of people threw up their rhetorical shoulders and said, “That’s the law, she should have known better.”

To which I replied: (1) what sort of precedent is there to suggest this would be an “insult” to Islam, and (2) how exactly would you as prosecutor establish any sort of intent to “incite hatred” (one of the initial charges)? She thought she’d give children a cuddly teddy bear named Mo to incite hatred?

/I’m not a lawyer, but I play one in this post.

saint kansas on December 3, 2007 at 10:57 AM

Wow. We have all got to chip in and send this great man a fruit basket. Um, which fruits are offensive to Muslims again?

The ones the jews infected with the aids virus.

tlynch001 on December 3, 2007 at 11:06 AM

A British children’s author who called one of his characters Mohammed the Mole

Suppose for a second that this children’s book in Pakistan came out and one of the characters was called Jesus the Monkey. I personally would shrug it off, but don’t you think it would raise a few eyebrows in the Bible Belt?

factoid on December 3, 2007 at 11:20 AM

I was hoping for at least 10 lashes, oh well.

She should have known better.

Theworldisnotenough on December 3, 2007 at 11:37 AM

How many days till she renounces Christianity, says it’s our fault and says we don’t understand islam?

20 bucks a square?

LtE126 on December 3, 2007 at 9:12 AM

Seriously! To hear her speak it sure doesn’t sound like she’s learned one thing. She’d stay there if it was at all possible! Maybe she’s just trying not to rock the boat any more than she has, but I’m not so sure.

4shoes on December 3, 2007 at 11:50 AM

I name my cockroaches Mohammed before I kill them.

thuja on December 3, 2007 at 11:52 AM

Can those women on the View be any more idiotic on this one?

Metro on December 3, 2007 at 10:14 AM
Sure they can, just have faith.

Oldnuke on December 3, 2007 at 10:44 AM

I have faith. In their world, fire can’t melt steel and the earth may be flat. The View is an artesean well of dumbness.

forest on December 3, 2007 at 11:54 AM

She wants to stay and I for one say “let her”. But I am done with imbeciles. I love her “I am well fed” line so maybe that’s more important than her head! Forget her!

sharinlite on December 3, 2007 at 11:55 AM

I personally would shrug it off, but don’t you think it would raise a few eyebrows in the Bible Belt?

I honestly don’t know how ruffled folks would get if Jesus the Monkey were at least cute and friendly. But I’d go so far as to suggest that some folks go above and beyond trying to be offensive. (Semi-stern content warning; no nudity)

saint kansas on December 3, 2007 at 11:59 AM

Thank god Britains mucky muck muslims were able to have her pardoned of her crime. Finally Britain has found an effective voice for dealing with Islam. Britain should put muslims in charge of their war on terror, make them responsible for foreign affairs as well and appoint one as Archbishop of Canterbury. Then there would be peace and progress and oodles of Jizya.

BL@KBIRD on December 3, 2007 at 12:04 PM

In Judaism we have such an atipathy to writing/speaking the name of God that we’ve forgotten how it is pronounce.

smellthecoffee on December 3, 2007 at 9:28 AM

Well, maybe if you had followed the Religion of Peace’s example and shouted God’s name every time you cut off the head of a Gentile you wouldn’t have that problem.

pedestrian on December 3, 2007 at 12:09 PM

Thejackal:
The 1995 Ford Escort

I take it you have never owner one?

Kristopher on December 3, 2007 at 12:21 PM

(Semi-stern content warning; no nudity)

saint kansas on December 3, 2007 at 11:59 AM

oh, no thanks then….

ScottG on December 3, 2007 at 12:37 PM

Suppose for a second that this children’s book in Pakistan came out and one of the characters was called Jesus the Monkey. I personally would shrug it off, but don’t you think it would raise a few eyebrows in the Bible Belt?

factoid on December 3, 2007 at 11:20 AM

Yes, probably would.

There’s is a big difference between ‘raised eyebrows’ and huge riotous mobs in the streets calling for someone’s execution.

rockbend on December 3, 2007 at 1:23 PM

I am just hope she sticks to naming teddies and not wearing them.

TheSitRep on December 3, 2007 at 9:09 AM

The best comment ever…too fabulous and funny!

AprilOrit on December 3, 2007 at 2:45 PM

They always intended to let her go, once they made their point.

“I had no idea at all of the sensitivities of the name Mohammed until seeing this case in Sudan,” Gray told The Sunday Times.

“As soon as I saw the news I thought, ‘Oh gosh, I’ve got a mole called Mohammed – this is not good’.”

Point taken. Remember that artist, the one either Hot Air or Michelle Malkin reported? The one whose art mocked Christianity and Jesus, but who said he’d never mock Mohammed because he didn’t want his head cut off?

Muslims are a lot like a town bully who acts like a loose cannon and has everyone afraid to challenge him or even look at him the wrong way.

Um, which fruits are offensive to Muslims again?
saint kansas

Just send him a ham. Stamped “my name is Mohammed.”

NoSquids on December 3, 2007 at 3:00 PM

I wouldn’t be surprised if Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi explained to Omar al-Bahir that the best way to conquer Britain was through a slow, demographic jihad and that if he would just tone it down a little they could get on with it.

aengus on December 3, 2007 at 3:48 PM

And even now, she was pardoned and had to leave, not exonerated and her many dangerous accusers told to stand down.

Yep; my thoughts exactly.

Also: the CIA world fact book lists Sudan’s literacy rate as 61.1% (male: 71.8%, female: 50.5%). It’s not like they can afford to lose teachers, and I’m sure Gibbons won’t be the last to leave.

JackOfClubs on December 3, 2007 at 5:20 PM

How many days till she renounces Christianity, says it’s our fault and says we don’t understand islam?

20 bucks a square?

LtE126 on December 3, 2007 at 9:12 AM

Or claims that they are tolerant for letting her go? I’m sure the PC crowd the world over will use this as an example of the utmost tolerance, and move on.

Entelechy on December 3, 2007 at 5:33 PM

There’s probably some Muslims and their Western appeaser/enablers who now think she AND WE should be grateful for her release.
.
Not me. The genocide-committing Sudanese Islamofascist dictatorship simply realized the international costs where higher than the domestic benefits of martyring that woman.
.
This just reinforces my opinion of Islam and Arab cultures in general.

DavePa on December 3, 2007 at 6:11 PM

Good on ya, Sudan. You can carry on with that genocide now…

sandberg on December 3, 2007 at 6:53 PM

Looks like the Sudanese were going through the
Hot Air comments and wisened up!

canopfor on December 3, 2007 at 8:31 PM