<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NIE: Iran halted its nuke program in 2003 Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 01:52:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bombshell: Iran nuke plan revealed in NYC indictment</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-2070133</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bombshell: Iran nuke plan revealed in NYC indictment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-2070133</guid>
		<description>[...] of nuclear weapons to be mistaken.  After the publication of the National Intelligence Estimate in December 2007, the Democrats rebuked George Bush with the finding, which kneecapped his efforts to get Iran to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of nuclear weapons to be mistaken.  After the publication of the National Intelligence Estimate in December 2007, the Democrats rebuked George Bush with the finding, which kneecapped his efforts to get Iran to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Just a reminder: Obama doesn&#8217;t believe the sham NIE on Iran either</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1871325</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Just a reminder: Obama doesn&#8217;t believe the sham NIE on Iran either</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-1871325</guid>
		<description>[...] that? The one that assured us, preposterously, that Iran gave up its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and was instantly celebrated by idiot liberals as proof that there&#8217;s no threat and therefore [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that? The one that assured us, preposterously, that Iran gave up its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and was instantly celebrated by idiot liberals as proof that there&#8217;s no threat and therefore [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Obama Not Ready For Coming International Crisis. Are You? &#171; Start Thinking Right</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-1628994</link>
		<dc:creator>President Obama Not Ready For Coming International Crisis. Are You? &#171; Start Thinking Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-1628994</guid>
		<description>[...] develop nuclear weapons despite its international obligations and international pressure.&#8221;  In fact Iran has only blinked once: in 2003, immediately after the United States invaded Iraq over that country&#8217;s alleged WMD arsenal.  Bottom line: Iran didn&#8217;t want to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] develop nuclear weapons despite its international obligations and international pressure.&#8221;  In fact Iran has only blinked once: in 2003, immediately after the United States invaded Iraq over that country&#8217;s alleged WMD arsenal.  Bottom line: Iran didn&#8217;t want to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iran&#8217;s establishment turns on Ahmadinejad &#8212; thanks to the NIE?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-857257</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iran&#8217;s establishment turns on Ahmadinejad &#8212; thanks to the NIE?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-857257</guid>
		<description>[...] NIE came out in December; the regime&#8217;s &#8220;contradictions&#8221; have been in plain view for at least a year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NIE came out in December; the regime&#8217;s &#8220;contradictions&#8221; have been in plain view for at least a year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shimshon 9</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-808132</link>
		<dc:creator>Shimshon 9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-808132</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;There must be more to the US backflip on Iran...&lt;/strong&gt;

The new US National Intelligence Estimate on Iran,  realistically ends any possibility of military action against the Islamist nation and also undermines the movement for tough sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program&#8230;.
In effect Washington has...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>There must be more to the US backflip on Iran&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The new US National Intelligence Estimate on Iran,  realistically ends any possibility of military action against the Islamist nation and also undermines the movement for tough sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program&#8230;.<br />
In effect Washington has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cop The Truth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-808084</link>
		<dc:creator>Cop The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-808084</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iran is Still a Threat...&lt;/strong&gt;

It amazes me that the Liberals, who have been saying for years that our intelligence sources can&#039;t be trusted in the aftermath of the Iraq invasion, have now seized the new Iran NIE as absolute gospel. It also seems strange...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iran is Still a Threat&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It amazes me that the Liberals, who have been saying for years that our intelligence sources can&#8217;t be trusted in the aftermath of the Iraq invasion, have now seized the new Iran NIE as absolute gospel. It also seems strange&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spitfire9</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-806714</link>
		<dc:creator>Spitfire9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-806714</guid>
		<description>It would be good to remember that our intelligence services are staffed by Liberals.  This is exactly what they want to hear: Iran stopped developing the bomb and Bush is warmonger for wanting to stop them. PLEASE. Berlin Wall, 9/11 -- I wouldn&#039;t believe these folks if they told me the sky was blue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be good to remember that our intelligence services are staffed by Liberals.  This is exactly what they want to hear: Iran stopped developing the bomb and Bush is warmonger for wanting to stop them. PLEASE. Berlin Wall, 9/11 &#8212; I wouldn&#8217;t believe these folks if they told me the sky was blue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iran and Nukes &#171; The Autopsy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-806487</link>
		<dc:creator>Iran and Nukes &#171; The Autopsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-806487</guid>
		<description>[...] and&#160;Nukes  The declassified estimate of Iran&#8217;s nuclear potential was a relief and disconcerting at the same time.  Iran won&#8217;t have a bomb until 2015.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and&nbsp;Nukes  The declassified estimate of Iran&#8217;s nuclear potential was a relief and disconcerting at the same time.  Iran won&#8217;t have a bomb until 2015.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-806336</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-806336</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Can anyone point me to a pdf of the NIE itself.

davod on December 4, 2007 at 5:15 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
If I could, I would have been killed (I&#039;m not in a position to be on the killing end of that equation).  However, I can point you to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.odni.gov/press_releases/20071203_release.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the executive summary&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Can anyone point me to a pdf of the NIE itself.</p>
<p>davod on December 4, 2007 at 5:15 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>If I could, I would have been killed (I&#8217;m not in a position to be on the killing end of that equation).  However, I can point you to <a href="http://www.odni.gov/press_releases/20071203_release.pdf" rel="nofollow">the executive summary</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobJones-77</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-806284</link>
		<dc:creator>BobJones-77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-806284</guid>
		<description>This is what the left wants to hear.  I don&#039;t believe the report as there are loads of intelligence operatives suffering from BDS.  The left will continue to stick their collective heads in the sand till the mushroom clouds go up over their very populated cities.  I guess it could be viewed a a different kind of welfare reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what the left wants to hear.  I don&#8217;t believe the report as there are loads of intelligence operatives suffering from BDS.  The left will continue to stick their collective heads in the sand till the mushroom clouds go up over their very populated cities.  I guess it could be viewed a a different kind of welfare reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davod</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-806229</link>
		<dc:creator>davod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-806229</guid>
		<description>Can anyone point me to a pdf of the NIE itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone point me to a pdf of the NIE itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-806201</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-806201</guid>
		<description>Translation:

&quot;We don&#039;t know anything about what Iran is doing. Iran is opaque to us. We are deaf, dumb, blind AND stupid when it comes to Iran, the way we were to the nuclear programs of Pakistan, India, North Korea, and Iraq. In every case, we were taken completely by surprise. And that&#039;s the only thing you can &#039;take to the bank&#039; about his report&quot;

The dilemma: We accept as truth the claim that Iran is not building nukes. Then we&#039;re proven wrong and Israel, NYC and DC disappear in a big KA-BOOM.

No matter what the CIA or the &quot;consensus opinion&quot; says, the President must assume that the CIA, et. al., has it wrong, and that Iran is continuing to develop nukes.

Any other posture risks a nuclear Pearl Harbor or nuclear 9/11 scenario. There are millions of lives at stake. and it is beyond irresponsible to not prepare as if Iran is, in fact, arming itself with nuclear weapons, unless we can prove beyond a shadow of doubt tht they have finally and totally given up nuclear weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation:</p>
<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t know anything about what Iran is doing. Iran is opaque to us. We are deaf, dumb, blind AND stupid when it comes to Iran, the way we were to the nuclear programs of Pakistan, India, North Korea, and Iraq. In every case, we were taken completely by surprise. And that&#8217;s the only thing you can &#8216;take to the bank&#8217; about his report&#8221;</p>
<p>The dilemma: We accept as truth the claim that Iran is not building nukes. Then we&#8217;re proven wrong and Israel, NYC and DC disappear in a big KA-BOOM.</p>
<p>No matter what the CIA or the &#8220;consensus opinion&#8221; says, the President must assume that the CIA, et. al., has it wrong, and that Iran is continuing to develop nukes.</p>
<p>Any other posture risks a nuclear Pearl Harbor or nuclear 9/11 scenario. There are millions of lives at stake. and it is beyond irresponsible to not prepare as if Iran is, in fact, arming itself with nuclear weapons, unless we can prove beyond a shadow of doubt tht they have finally and totally given up nuclear weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB4</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-806200</link>
		<dc:creator>MB4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-806200</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-report-on-iranian-nukes-qualified-good-news/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;From Rick Moran at Rigtwing Nuthouse&lt;/a&gt; 

&lt;i&gt;For those disposed to disbelieve or reject this NIE, it would be well to remember that if a consensus about something this vital to our security was found among such a fractious, quarrelling, multi-agenda driven group of spooks, you can bet the information it’s based on is pretty solid.

Now we come to the distasteful question of what in God’s name the Bush Administration has been doing sitting on this damn thing for year? And beyond that, is there any Bush supporter out there who believes anything this president says about national security anymore?

We have been treated to the most bombastic rhetoric emanating from this White House for the last year especially – all the while they were sitting on this NIE and its conclusions about the Iranian bomb program. How do you square Bush’s “World War III” comment with what’s in the NIE? Or any other dire warning we’ve heard coming from the White House?

I understand the need for regime change in Iran. I am not naive enough to believe that the Iranian government doesn’t represent a threat to our friends, allies, and interests in the region – nukes or no nukes. But this Administration has made a nasty habit for 7 years now of employing rhetoric on national security matters that doesn’t match what the situation actually is.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-report-on-iranian-nukes-qualified-good-news/" rel="nofollow">From Rick Moran at Rigtwing Nuthouse</a> </p>
<p><i>For those disposed to disbelieve or reject this NIE, it would be well to remember that if a consensus about something this vital to our security was found among such a fractious, quarrelling, multi-agenda driven group of spooks, you can bet the information it’s based on is pretty solid.</p>
<p>Now we come to the distasteful question of what in God’s name the Bush Administration has been doing sitting on this damn thing for year? And beyond that, is there any Bush supporter out there who believes anything this president says about national security anymore?</p>
<p>We have been treated to the most bombastic rhetoric emanating from this White House for the last year especially – all the while they were sitting on this NIE and its conclusions about the Iranian bomb program. How do you square Bush’s “World War III” comment with what’s in the NIE? Or any other dire warning we’ve heard coming from the White House?</p>
<p>I understand the need for regime change in Iran. I am not naive enough to believe that the Iranian government doesn’t represent a threat to our friends, allies, and interests in the region – nukes or no nukes. But this Administration has made a nasty habit for 7 years now of employing rhetoric on national security matters that doesn’t match what the situation actually is.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Star Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-806185</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Star Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-806185</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Iran Has Shelved Nuke Program...&lt;/strong&gt;







How incredible! How incredibly convenient! It seems the National Intelligence Estimate has been declassified and guess what - NIE Report: Iran Halted Nuclear Weapons Program Years Ago.

    ABC News’ Martha Raddatz, Jonathan Karl, Luis Ma...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iran Has Shelved Nuke Program&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>How incredible! How incredibly convenient! It seems the National Intelligence Estimate has been declassified and guess what &#8211; NIE Report: Iran Halted Nuclear Weapons Program Years Ago.</p>
<p>    ABC News’ Martha Raddatz, Jonathan Karl, Luis Ma&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chsw</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805734</link>
		<dc:creator>chsw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805734</guid>
		<description>There are a few things to point out about this new NIE.

First, the NIE cites new intel. The only intel that might be available could have been from documents Israelis spirited out of the Syrian target site.

Second, that target site may have been an assembly site for nuclear weapons.  Iran&#039;s program is currently geared toward weapons-fuel production.  There was an obvious synergy here.  Moreover, if Iran does develop enough fissionable uranium (rather than plutonium), then assembling a fission bomb is a comparatively low-tech operation.

Third, this NIE could have been written for domestic consumption.  The brief may simply be another way of saying that Bush will leave Iran for his successor to deal with.

chsw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few things to point out about this new NIE.</p>
<p>First, the NIE cites new intel. The only intel that might be available could have been from documents Israelis spirited out of the Syrian target site.</p>
<p>Second, that target site may have been an assembly site for nuclear weapons.  Iran&#8217;s program is currently geared toward weapons-fuel production.  There was an obvious synergy here.  Moreover, if Iran does develop enough fissionable uranium (rather than plutonium), then assembling a fission bomb is a comparatively low-tech operation.</p>
<p>Third, this NIE could have been written for domestic consumption.  The brief may simply be another way of saying that Bush will leave Iran for his successor to deal with.</p>
<p>chsw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Iran and the NIE</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805662</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Iran and the NIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805662</guid>
		<description>[...] Bryan Preston&#8217;s measured read: My take is that we’re in a state of dangerous uncertainty all around: We can’t trust the IAEA, we don’t trust the Iranians (both with good reason), but there’s just enough doubt in the NIE to keep the B2s grounded and the Iranians on the loose because the Bush administration cannot base an attack or even another round of sanctions on this estimate, not after the intel failures in Iraq. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bryan Preston&#8217;s measured read: My take is that we’re in a state of dangerous uncertainty all around: We can’t trust the IAEA, we don’t trust the Iranians (both with good reason), but there’s just enough doubt in the NIE to keep the B2s grounded and the Iranians on the loose because the Bush administration cannot base an attack or even another round of sanctions on this estimate, not after the intel failures in Iraq. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helloyawl</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805642</link>
		<dc:creator>Helloyawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805642</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this NIE, along with the previous track record of American Intelligence, is making the Israeli government feel all &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;warm and comfy&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this NIE, along with the previous track record of American Intelligence, is making the Israeli government feel all <strong><em>warm and comfy</em></strong> tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockhauler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805556</link>
		<dc:creator>rockhauler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805556</guid>
		<description>I would echo what Dusty hints at in his post
&lt;blockquote&gt;Dusty on December 3, 2007 at 4:32 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

by making the point that any development program eventually reaches the stage where your next step is to actually build whatever it is you are developing. In other words, you work on your bomb design, and if you reach the point where the next step is building one, and you don&#039;t have the &#039;stuff&#039; to build it with, then your development waits until you have the stuff you need to continue. 

Once Iran has the weapons grade enriched uranium, there isn&#039;t anything that prevents them from restarting their bomb development. 

This NIE also points out that Iran &lt;strong&gt;really did have&lt;/strong&gt; a bomb development program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would echo what Dusty hints at in his post</p>
<blockquote><p>Dusty on December 3, 2007 at 4:32 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>by making the point that any development program eventually reaches the stage where your next step is to actually build whatever it is you are developing. In other words, you work on your bomb design, and if you reach the point where the next step is building one, and you don&#8217;t have the &#8216;stuff&#8217; to build it with, then your development waits until you have the stuff you need to continue. </p>
<p>Once Iran has the weapons grade enriched uranium, there isn&#8217;t anything that prevents them from restarting their bomb development. </p>
<p>This NIE also points out that Iran <strong>really did have</strong> a bomb development program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Did Iran Halt Their Nuclear Weapons Program?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805542</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Voices &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Did Iran Halt Their Nuclear Weapons Program?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805542</guid>
		<description>[...] NIE: Iran halted its nuke program in 2003 Updates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NIE: Iran halted its nuke program in 2003 Updates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805497</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805497</guid>
		<description>Sooo...

IF they stopped their Nuke program in 2003... then why do we keep getting reports of more and more centrifuges?

Didn&#039;t they just announce they had 3000 working full time now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooo&#8230;</p>
<p>IF they stopped their Nuke program in 2003&#8230; then why do we keep getting reports of more and more centrifuges?</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t they just announce they had 3000 working full time now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oakpack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805464</link>
		<dc:creator>oakpack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805464</guid>
		<description>So basically, what the NIE knows is that Iran halted weapons program progress in 2003. Nothing more - nothing less. They can judge all they want but that is all they know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically, what the NIE knows is that Iran halted weapons program progress in 2003. Nothing more &#8211; nothing less. They can judge all they want but that is all they know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805461</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805461</guid>
		<description>My own take is that the Iranians have decided to switch from a full-out &quot;Manhattan Project&quot; program to a &quot;turn-key&quot; one that barely passes international muster.  The method Iran chose to conduct its &quot;declared civil work related to uranium conversion and enrichment&quot; (from the footnote noting what the NIE does not cover) is indistinguishable from in both methodology and scope that required for highly-enriched uranium.

Also of note, the pooh-poohing of current covert efforts, when past covert efforts were acknowledged, sure smells like what was said about North Korea between 1994 and 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My own take is that the Iranians have decided to switch from a full-out &#8220;Manhattan Project&#8221; program to a &#8220;turn-key&#8221; one that barely passes international muster.  The method Iran chose to conduct its &#8220;declared civil work related to uranium conversion and enrichment&#8221; (from the footnote noting what the NIE does not cover) is indistinguishable from in both methodology and scope that required for highly-enriched uranium.</p>
<p>Also of note, the pooh-poohing of current covert efforts, when past covert efforts were acknowledged, sure smells like what was said about North Korea between 1994 and 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iran stopped its nuclear program?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805451</link>
		<dc:creator>No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iran stopped its nuclear program?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805451</guid>
		<description>[...] (4:48 pm 12/3/2007) - There&#8217;s a lot more linkage to the Right half&#8217;s react over at Hot Air.     &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (4:48 pm 12/3/2007) &#8211; There&#8217;s a lot more linkage to the Right half&#8217;s react over at Hot Air.     &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightWinged</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805449</link>
		<dc:creator>RightWinged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805449</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s how the MSM is choosing to cover this... The top headline from Yahoo!

&lt;blockquote&gt;U.S. intelligence report contradicts Bush on Iran nuclear program&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It links to this Reuters story
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071203/ts_nm/iran_usa_dc

Which has a slightly different, but basically still the same headline:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Report contradicts Bush on Iran nuclear program&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how the MSM is choosing to cover this&#8230; The top headline from Yahoo!</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. intelligence report contradicts Bush on Iran nuclear program</p></blockquote>
<p>It links to this Reuters story<br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071203/ts_nm/iran_usa_dc" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071203/ts_nm/iran_usa_dc</a></p>
<p>Which has a slightly different, but basically still the same headline:</p>
<blockquote><p>Report contradicts Bush on Iran nuclear program</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-805447</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/nie-iran-halted-its-nuke-program-in-2003/#comment-805447</guid>
		<description>Quite amazing actualy...

America built its first two Atomic bombs in FOUR YEARS with 1940s technology... without knowing how to do it, or even if it was possible...

I think we are blinded by our own technology.

They don&#039;t have to build a small nuke... they could build somthing large and build it INTO an Aircraft... or ship... it does NOT have to be missle delivered.  Crap... build it into a 747... or a merchent ship...

Because of the cold war we think in terms of massive strikes with a quick total destruction of entire countries... but it would only take a couple of nukes to flatten Israel... or one of our cities...

Remember, these folks are NOT reasonable... MAD will not work with people who WANT to end the world so the next Prophet will come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite amazing actualy&#8230;</p>
<p>America built its first two Atomic bombs in FOUR YEARS with 1940s technology&#8230; without knowing how to do it, or even if it was possible&#8230;</p>
<p>I think we are blinded by our own technology.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t have to build a small nuke&#8230; they could build somthing large and build it INTO an Aircraft&#8230; or ship&#8230; it does NOT have to be missle delivered.  Crap&#8230; build it into a 747&#8230; or a merchent ship&#8230;</p>
<p>Because of the cold war we think in terms of massive strikes with a quick total destruction of entire countries&#8230; but it would only take a couple of nukes to flatten Israel&#8230; or one of our cities&#8230;</p>
<p>Remember, these folks are NOT reasonable&#8230; MAD will not work with people who WANT to end the world so the next Prophet will come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
