<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blue on blue: Sen. Webb says Congress won&#8217;t cut funding for the troops in Iraq Transcript added</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:56:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-805285</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-805285</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Things were actually getting better when Pelosi and co. were saying they were hopelessly lost?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Past tense???  The &quot;rats&quot; are still stuck on quagmire-


&lt;em&gt;Democrats are increasingly bailing on their previously held view that the troop surge in Iraq has been a &quot;failure,&quot; but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid isn&#039;t ready to jump on the bandwagon with other Democrats who say the surge has worked.

The Senate re-opened for business on Monday after a two-week Thanksgiving break, during which key Democrats traveled to Iraq and declared that the surge is working, at least from a security and military perspective. Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), one the top war critics, stunned fellow Democrats late last week with his statement that &quot;the surge is working,&quot; even though he added that political reconciliation has been lagging. Murtha&#039;s view was backed by Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), who also said the surge worked after he returned from Iraq.

But Reid, in a Monday press conference, ceded no ground.

&quot;The surge hasn&#039;t accomplished its goals,&quot; Reid said. &quot;... We&#039;re involved, still, in an intractable civil war.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/1207/Reid_pushes_back_on_Iraq_optimism.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Things were actually getting better when Pelosi and co. were saying they were hopelessly lost?</p></blockquote>
<p>Past tense???  The &#8220;rats&#8221; are still stuck on quagmire-</p>
<p><em>Democrats are increasingly bailing on their previously held view that the troop surge in Iraq has been a &#8220;failure,&#8221; but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid isn&#8217;t ready to jump on the bandwagon with other Democrats who say the surge has worked.</p>
<p>The Senate re-opened for business on Monday after a two-week Thanksgiving break, during which key Democrats traveled to Iraq and declared that the surge is working, at least from a security and military perspective. Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), one the top war critics, stunned fellow Democrats late last week with his statement that &#8220;the surge is working,&#8221; even though he added that political reconciliation has been lagging. Murtha&#8217;s view was backed by Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), who also said the surge worked after he returned from Iraq.</p>
<p>But Reid, in a Monday press conference, ceded no ground.</p>
<p>&#8220;The surge hasn&#8217;t accomplished its goals,&#8221; Reid said. &#8220;&#8230; We&#8217;re involved, still, in an intractable civil war.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/1207/Reid_pushes_back_on_Iraq_optimism.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/1207/Reid_pushes_back_on_Iraq_optimism.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-805259</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-805259</guid>
		<description>Bryan,
 I think you missed one of the most remarkable admissions of the interview:
&lt;blockquote&gt;MR. RUSSERT:  Iraq, is the military surge working?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;SEN. WEBB:  ...The first element is al-Anbar.  And this is a—this is a piece—the awakening, the Sunni awakening, which has been used by the administration as evidence of the fact that the surge is working.  &lt;strong&gt;This was happening before the surge began, &lt;em&gt;well before&lt;/em&gt; the surge began,&lt;/strong&gt; and it would have been happening even if there wasn’t a surge.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;
So..the entire &quot;Iraq is on the brink of a civil war&quot; and the &quot;botched&quot; administration policy in Iraq, Rethuglicans-have-ruined-America-forever campaign that the Dems ran last year was actually a lie?
Things were actually getting better when Pelosi and co. were saying they were hopelessly lost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,<br />
 I think you missed one of the most remarkable admissions of the interview:</p>
<blockquote><p>MR. RUSSERT:  Iraq, is the military surge working?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>SEN. WEBB:  &#8230;The first element is al-Anbar.  And this is a—this is a piece—the awakening, the Sunni awakening, which has been used by the administration as evidence of the fact that the surge is working.  <strong>This was happening before the surge began, <em>well before</em> the surge began,</strong> and it would have been happening even if there wasn’t a surge.  </p></blockquote>
<p>So..the entire &#8220;Iraq is on the brink of a civil war&#8221; and the &#8220;botched&#8221; administration policy in Iraq, Rethuglicans-have-ruined-America-forever campaign that the Dems ran last year was actually a lie?<br />
Things were actually getting better when Pelosi and co. were saying they were hopelessly lost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-805117</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-805117</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That would mean that we’d have to have end strength at least twice as large as is needed to fulfil our current wartime needs. Senator Webb, are you willing to sponsor legislation increasing end strength to those numbers?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s precisely the Democrat reason for pushing for a draft.  The &quot;rats&quot; know that a draft isn&#039;t going to occur for a variety of reasons not the least of which is the expense, public opinion, and the full-throttled objections from the professional military leadership.  By pushing such ideas which, on the surface seem benign,  Congress is essentially seeking to stage a coup where CINC powers become the responsiblity of Congress.  

Webb is as big a coward as the rest of his party members.  They are unwilling to come off the defeatist bandwagon but they are also unwilling to see these operations through to the point where the stated goals can be met.  In short, they are willing to sacrifice strategic long-term interests for short-term political gain.  Jim Webb, Jack Murtha, and the rest of these people disgust me to no end.  They should all be brought up on treason charges for the way they use the military as pawns in their quest for poltical power and contributions from their special interest groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That would mean that we’d have to have end strength at least twice as large as is needed to fulfil our current wartime needs. Senator Webb, are you willing to sponsor legislation increasing end strength to those numbers?</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s precisely the Democrat reason for pushing for a draft.  The &#8220;rats&#8221; know that a draft isn&#8217;t going to occur for a variety of reasons not the least of which is the expense, public opinion, and the full-throttled objections from the professional military leadership.  By pushing such ideas which, on the surface seem benign,  Congress is essentially seeking to stage a coup where CINC powers become the responsiblity of Congress.  </p>
<p>Webb is as big a coward as the rest of his party members.  They are unwilling to come off the defeatist bandwagon but they are also unwilling to see these operations through to the point where the stated goals can be met.  In short, they are willing to sacrifice strategic long-term interests for short-term political gain.  Jim Webb, Jack Murtha, and the rest of these people disgust me to no end.  They should all be brought up on treason charges for the way they use the military as pawns in their quest for poltical power and contributions from their special interest groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon News » Wrap ignorance in an authoritative voice and it&#8217;s still ignorance.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-805000</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon News » Wrap ignorance in an authoritative voice and it&#8217;s still ignorance.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-805000</guid>
		<description>[...] time just phone it in, Mr. Webb, and save us all some time. (h/t: Hot Air) Related PostsAnother CAIR lieOut of the Mouth of BabesLogan Airport incident exemplifies the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time just phone it in, Mr. Webb, and save us all some time. (h/t: Hot Air) Related PostsAnother CAIR lieOut of the Mouth of BabesLogan Airport incident exemplifies the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunyan8315</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804970</link>
		<dc:creator>drunyan8315</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804970</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;By “winning,” Webb isn’t referring to Iraq but to the politics of withdrawal and benefiting Democrats.&lt;/em&gt;

And he isn&#039;t referring to American troops being the winners either, is he?!

It&#039;s pretty simple: if you want America to win, &lt;strong&gt;you don&#039;t vote for people whose election strategy depends on the other guys winning!&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s bad enough we aren&#039;t allowed to shoot these traitors, but we sure as hell should never vote for them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By “winning,” Webb isn’t referring to Iraq but to the politics of withdrawal and benefiting Democrats.</em></p>
<p>And he isn&#8217;t referring to American troops being the winners either, is he?!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty simple: if you want America to win, <strong>you don&#8217;t vote for people whose election strategy depends on the other guys winning!</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s bad enough we aren&#8217;t allowed to shoot these traitors, but we sure as hell should never vote for them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spec_ops_mateo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804969</link>
		<dc:creator>spec_ops_mateo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804969</guid>
		<description>I go back in January.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go back in January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804930</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804930</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;SEN. WEBB: Or you can, you can develop a rotational policy after, after five years of doing this that’s going to ensure people the same amount of time at home before they go.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, let me do a little bit of simple math here: time at home = time over there, so troops over there + troops at home = 2X troops over there. That would mean that we&#039;d have to have end strength at least twice as large as is needed to fulfil our current wartime needs. Senator Webb, are you willing to sponsor legislation increasing end strength to those numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>SEN. WEBB: Or you can, you can develop a rotational policy after, after five years of doing this that’s going to ensure people the same amount of time at home before they go.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, let me do a little bit of simple math here: time at home = time over there, so troops over there + troops at home = 2X troops over there. That would mean that we&#8217;d have to have end strength at least twice as large as is needed to fulfil our current wartime needs. Senator Webb, are you willing to sponsor legislation increasing end strength to those numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804851</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804851</guid>
		<description>the la times says immigration is a non issue, but Iraq &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt;. hmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the la times says immigration is a non issue, but Iraq <em>is</em>. hmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804849</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804849</guid>
		<description>Peter Beinart has a column today pointing out how Iraq is the biggest non-issue of this campaign......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Beinart has a column today pointing out how Iraq is the biggest non-issue of this campaign&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804842</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804842</guid>
		<description>Politically, I think the Dems would do well to consider Webb as a VP candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politically, I think the Dems would do well to consider Webb as a VP candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vizzini</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804841</link>
		<dc:creator>Vizzini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804841</guid>
		<description>I believe the son&#039;s out, but I doubt Webb would have voted one way or another based on that. If you watch the whole interview, though, I don&#039;t know how often Tim Russert gives his legislative guests as much uninterrupted latitude as he did to Webb. Pretty deferential for not a lot new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the son&#8217;s out, but I doubt Webb would have voted one way or another based on that. If you watch the whole interview, though, I don&#8217;t know how often Tim Russert gives his legislative guests as much uninterrupted latitude as he did to Webb. Pretty deferential for not a lot new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amerpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804839</link>
		<dc:creator>amerpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804839</guid>
		<description>Wrong clip, Bryan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong clip, Bryan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frozen Tex</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804833</link>
		<dc:creator>Frozen Tex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804833</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t Webb have a son in the Army? Won&#039;t he be affected by cuts? Or is is son out now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Webb have a son in the Army? Won&#8217;t he be affected by cuts? Or is is son out now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highhopes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804832</link>
		<dc:creator>highhopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804832</guid>
		<description>Of course, cutting the funds off for the troops is a &quot;bad idea.&quot;  No politician is going to sit there and openly state the Democrat position that the troops need to be punished because they are doing a good enough job that it makes the Democrat Party look bad since they have bet on defeat since 2003!

What is going to happen here is that the Democrat party will make lots of noise but do nothing except run out the clock with this administration.  After the first of the year the &quot;rats&quot; will appease their supporters by refusing to pass a supplemental and play a quick game of chicken where the DOD shuts down operations to fund the war the Democrats refuse to fund- but that won&#039;t last long considering this is an election year.  In the end the &quot;rats&quot; will pass continuing resolution after continuing resolution so that they never have to submit a budget funding the war but never being put in the position of defunding the war either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, cutting the funds off for the troops is a &#8220;bad idea.&#8221;  No politician is going to sit there and openly state the Democrat position that the troops need to be punished because they are doing a good enough job that it makes the Democrat Party look bad since they have bet on defeat since 2003!</p>
<p>What is going to happen here is that the Democrat party will make lots of noise but do nothing except run out the clock with this administration.  After the first of the year the &#8220;rats&#8221; will appease their supporters by refusing to pass a supplemental and play a quick game of chicken where the DOD shuts down operations to fund the war the Democrats refuse to fund- but that won&#8217;t last long considering this is an election year.  In the end the &#8220;rats&#8221; will pass continuing resolution after continuing resolution so that they never have to submit a budget funding the war but never being put in the position of defunding the war either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Amos</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804828</link>
		<dc:creator>William Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804828</guid>
		<description>Ah well the nutroots have been disappointed alot lately.

And for them I offer &lt;a href=&quot;http://willamos.myblogsite.com/entry240.html#track&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Murtha on Video saying the Surge is working&lt;/a&gt;

Its never been about the war its been about electing democrats to power. The democrats had no problem with Clinton bombing Iraq, Sudan, Afganistan and Serbia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah well the nutroots have been disappointed alot lately.</p>
<p>And for them I offer <a href="http://willamos.myblogsite.com/entry240.html#track" rel="nofollow">Murtha on Video saying the Surge is working</a></p>
<p>Its never been about the war its been about electing democrats to power. The democrats had no problem with Clinton bombing Iraq, Sudan, Afganistan and Serbia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804826</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804826</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the clinton clip...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the clinton clip&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matticus Finch</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-804821</link>
		<dc:creator>Matticus Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/12/03/blue-on-blue-sen-webb-says-congress-wont-cut-funding-for-the-troops-in-iraq/#comment-804821</guid>
		<description>Last election cycle&#039;s overused term:  gravitas

This election cycle&#039;s overused term: too (interject adjective here) by half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last election cycle&#8217;s overused term:  gravitas</p>
<p>This election cycle&#8217;s overused term: too (interject adjective here) by half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
