<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return of the big LA Times sex scandal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:21:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RW Wacko</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-797147</link>
		<dc:creator>RW Wacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-797147</guid>
		<description>I said it in the Headlines, and I&#039;ll say it here: if Hillary is really having a lez affair with her top aide Huma Abedin as rumored, I pledge to vote for her.  That chick is smoking hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said it in the Headlines, and I&#8217;ll say it here: if Hillary is really having a lez affair with her top aide Huma Abedin as rumored, I pledge to vote for her.  That chick is smoking hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-797014</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-797014</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, like the Writers Guild strike, I blame the whole thing on Ronald Reagan de-regulating everything, but that&#039;s another blog.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bill Robinson had to find someone to blame all of this on - I guess he thought Bush had been blamed enough, so why not Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course, like the Writers Guild strike, I blame the whole thing on Ronald Reagan de-regulating everything, but that&#8217;s another blog.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bill Robinson had to find someone to blame all of this on &#8211; I guess he thought Bush had been blamed enough, so why not Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796920</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796920</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Johnny Appleseed of adultery.

Hening on November 28, 2007 at 12:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unbidden &#039;seed-spreading&#039; mental image noted with much disgust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Johnny Appleseed of adultery.</p>
<p>Hening on November 28, 2007 at 12:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Unbidden &#8217;seed-spreading&#8217; mental image noted with much disgust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigOldDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796876</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigOldDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796876</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Spirit of 1776 on November 28, 2007 at 12:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He may not want to play second fiddle to her.

He may like his life right now and not want to climb back into the fishbowl.

Could be any number of reasons. It seems like he;s trying to undermine her to me. Say what you will, but he is no fool so I have to believe he knows exactly what he&#039;s doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Spirit of 1776 on November 28, 2007 at 12:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>He may not want to play second fiddle to her.</p>
<p>He may like his life right now and not want to climb back into the fishbowl.</p>
<p>Could be any number of reasons. It seems like he;s trying to undermine her to me. Say what you will, but he is no fool so I have to believe he knows exactly what he&#8217;s doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegreatbeast</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796865</link>
		<dc:creator>thegreatbeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796865</guid>
		<description>Ron Fournier via Drudge. Funny stuff.
&lt;blockquote&gt;In the next 10 minutes, he used the word &quot;I&quot; a total of 94 times and mentioned &quot;Hillary&quot; just seven times in an address that was as much about his legacy as it was about his wife&#039;s candidacy.

He told the crowd where he bought coffee that morning and where he ate breakfast.

He detailed his Thanksgiving Day guest list, and menu.

He defended his record as president, rewriting history along the way.

And he explained why his endorsement of a certain senator from New York should matter to people.

&quot;I know what it takes to be president,&quot; he said, &quot;and because of the life I&#039;ve led since I&#039;ve left office.&quot;

I, me and my. Oh, my.&lt;/blockquote&gt;




http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071128/ap_po/on_deadline_bill_clinton_1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Fournier via Drudge. Funny stuff.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the next 10 minutes, he used the word &#8220;I&#8221; a total of 94 times and mentioned &#8220;Hillary&#8221; just seven times in an address that was as much about his legacy as it was about his wife&#8217;s candidacy.</p>
<p>He told the crowd where he bought coffee that morning and where he ate breakfast.</p>
<p>He detailed his Thanksgiving Day guest list, and menu.</p>
<p>He defended his record as president, rewriting history along the way.</p>
<p>And he explained why his endorsement of a certain senator from New York should matter to people.</p>
<p>&#8220;I know what it takes to be president,&#8221; he said, &#8220;and because of the life I&#8217;ve led since I&#8217;ve left office.&#8221;</p>
<p>I, me and my. Oh, my.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071128/ap_po/on_deadline_bill_clinton_1" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071128/ap_po/on_deadline_bill_clinton_1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peski</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796863</link>
		<dc:creator>peski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796863</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What concerns me is that this story has nothing to do with Hillary, her policy positions, her record, or her presidential potential. The &quot;big story&quot; everyone is sitting on apparently has to do with the many current affairs of Bill Clinton, whom, they will allege, has a gal in every port.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She has no policy positions or record or presidential potential.  How would it be possible for any story to have anything to do with these non-existent fatasms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What concerns me is that this story has nothing to do with Hillary, her policy positions, her record, or her presidential potential. The &#8220;big story&#8221; everyone is sitting on apparently has to do with the many current affairs of Bill Clinton, whom, they will allege, has a gal in every port.</p></blockquote>
<p>She has no policy positions or record or presidential potential.  How would it be possible for any story to have anything to do with these non-existent fatasms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austinnelly</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796845</link>
		<dc:creator>austinnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796845</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;aero on November 28, 2007 at 1:08 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Interesting.  He&#039;s certainly upstaging her on the campaign trail; whether or not that&#039;s what she intended for him to do is not yet clear.  Maybe she&#039;s hoping for a shadow presidency; she is president in name, and she puts this grinning baboon out to baby talk her horrible policies into terms that won&#039;t send the masses screaming into the night.
He&#039;s always been the better liked of the two; if she didn&#039;t have his name, she wouldn&#039;t even be in the race.  Ugly marxists with horrible personalities only become famous when they kill a bunch of people in the name of revolutions; they get put on t-shirts, not elected President.  Maybe she wants to fool the electorate by putting him out front; ignore the dumpy woman in the pantsuit that looks like she swallowed a horseapple sandwich; just watch the happy old guy groping the secretary in the front row.  He&#039;s your leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>aero on November 28, 2007 at 1:08 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting.  He&#8217;s certainly upstaging her on the campaign trail; whether or not that&#8217;s what she intended for him to do is not yet clear.  Maybe she&#8217;s hoping for a shadow presidency; she is president in name, and she puts this grinning baboon out to baby talk her horrible policies into terms that won&#8217;t send the masses screaming into the night.<br />
He&#8217;s always been the better liked of the two; if she didn&#8217;t have his name, she wouldn&#8217;t even be in the race.  Ugly marxists with horrible personalities only become famous when they kill a bunch of people in the name of revolutions; they get put on t-shirts, not elected President.  Maybe she wants to fool the electorate by putting him out front; ignore the dumpy woman in the pantsuit that looks like she swallowed a horseapple sandwich; just watch the happy old guy groping the secretary in the front row.  He&#8217;s your leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796840</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796840</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll bite. Why?

Spirit of 1776 on November 28, 2007 at 12:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because at heart he is a competitive politician who would really rather not share the glory of having once been POTUS with his wife...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ll bite. Why?</p>
<p>Spirit of 1776 on November 28, 2007 at 12:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Because at heart he is a competitive politician who would really rather not share the glory of having once been POTUS with his wife&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMR</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796837</link>
		<dc:creator>RMR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796837</guid>
		<description>This Bill Robinson piece is an attempt at the old &quot;move along nothing to see here&quot; tripe. 
It&#039;s not Mr. Robinson place to decide what is or isn&#039;t relevant. Give the voters the information and let them decide. His fear is that most will conclude that 8 years of the Bill and Hilary freak show is quite enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Bill Robinson piece is an attempt at the old &#8220;move along nothing to see here&#8221; tripe.<br />
It&#8217;s not Mr. Robinson place to decide what is or isn&#8217;t relevant. Give the voters the information and let them decide. His fear is that most will conclude that 8 years of the Bill and Hilary freak show is quite enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aero</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796831</link>
		<dc:creator>aero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796831</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
    I wonder if he is intentionally trying to submarine her…

    TheBigOldDog on November 28, 2007 at 12:49 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll bite. Why?

Spirit of 1776 on November 28, 2007 at 12:53 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because she might upstage him in the history books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
    I wonder if he is intentionally trying to submarine her…</p>
<p>    TheBigOldDog on November 28, 2007 at 12:49 PM</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>I’ll bite. Why?</p>
<p>Spirit of 1776 on November 28, 2007 at 12:53 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Because she might upstage him in the history books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nethicus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796827</link>
		<dc:creator>Nethicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796827</guid>
		<description>I thought the Clintoon was cured of his addiction to sex.

I think it needs to be appended.  He was cured of his addiction to sex &lt;em&gt;with Hillary&lt;/em&gt;.  About 20 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Clintoon was cured of his addiction to sex.</p>
<p>I think it needs to be appended.  He was cured of his addiction to sex <em>with Hillary</em>.  About 20 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BacaDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796808</link>
		<dc:creator>BacaDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796808</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;....Clinton fatigue&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The gift that keeps on giving.

I agree with AP.  Obama should be playing the &quot;Do we really want another 4 years of this&quot; card to the hilt.  What surprises me is he hasn&#039;t done it in a big way yet.

Everytime Hillary attacks him he should be screaming &quot;So much for the politics of kindness&quot;, or whatever tag line Hill&#039;s camp uses when she gets attacked.

Alot of folks I talk to, even most Democrats, are just tired of the same old, same old and are afraid Hill and Bill will renew the 90&#039;s bickering all over again.

As such, the fatigue factor could possibly play a big part in Hillary&#039;s support or lack thereof.  Especially if Billy-Boy keeps himself front and center the next few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;.Clinton fatigue</p></blockquote>
<p>The gift that keeps on giving.</p>
<p>I agree with AP.  Obama should be playing the &#8220;Do we really want another 4 years of this&#8221; card to the hilt.  What surprises me is he hasn&#8217;t done it in a big way yet.</p>
<p>Everytime Hillary attacks him he should be screaming &#8220;So much for the politics of kindness&#8221;, or whatever tag line Hill&#8217;s camp uses when she gets attacked.</p>
<p>Alot of folks I talk to, even most Democrats, are just tired of the same old, same old and are afraid Hill and Bill will renew the 90&#8217;s bickering all over again.</p>
<p>As such, the fatigue factor could possibly play a big part in Hillary&#8217;s support or lack thereof.  Especially if Billy-Boy keeps himself front and center the next few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796799</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796799</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder if he is intentionally trying to submarine her…

TheBigOldDog on November 28, 2007 at 12:49 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;ll bite.  Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I wonder if he is intentionally trying to submarine her…</p>
<p>TheBigOldDog on November 28, 2007 at 12:49 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll bite.  Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sulla</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796792</link>
		<dc:creator>sulla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796792</guid>
		<description>one concern I have is that the shenanigans of the American Caligula is something many Americans MISS. (oh, hey, not me.)  Lies, corruption, deviance both proven and hinted at...they&#039;re like our own Royal Family.

It throws us back to a simpler time, the Holiday from History where we were endlessly entertained by our slick-talking, pants-dropping, intern-shtupping, finger-wagging, &quot;sin&quot;-confessing Drama Queens in Chief.

Unserious leaders for an unserious party, the perfect executive branch complements to Nancy Reid and Harry Pelosi.  Building a bridge to the 17th century of palace intrigue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one concern I have is that the shenanigans of the American Caligula is something many Americans MISS. (oh, hey, not me.)  Lies, corruption, deviance both proven and hinted at&#8230;they&#8217;re like our own Royal Family.</p>
<p>It throws us back to a simpler time, the Holiday from History where we were endlessly entertained by our slick-talking, pants-dropping, intern-shtupping, finger-wagging, &#8220;sin&#8221;-confessing Drama Queens in Chief.</p>
<p>Unserious leaders for an unserious party, the perfect executive branch complements to Nancy Reid and Harry Pelosi.  Building a bridge to the 17th century of palace intrigue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo13</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796781</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796781</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it interesting, that back when the Clintons were in the White House... Whitehouse.com was a Porno site?

Now its about politics...

If Bill&#039;s back in... will it revert?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it interesting, that back when the Clintons were in the White House&#8230; Whitehouse.com was a Porno site?</p>
<p>Now its about politics&#8230;</p>
<p>If Bill&#8217;s back in&#8230; will it revert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigOldDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796780</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigOldDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796780</guid>
		<description>I wonder if he is intentionally trying to submarine her...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if he is intentionally trying to submarine her&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aero</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796778</link>
		<dc:creator>aero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796778</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;austinnelly on November 28, 2007 at 12:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep. Watching American politics during a Hillary presidency will be like daytime TV on steroids. People love that juicy scandalous crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>austinnelly on November 28, 2007 at 12:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep. Watching American politics during a Hillary presidency will be like daytime TV on steroids. People love that juicy scandalous crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796772</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796772</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Simple: The Hsu and Paul scandals are too complicated for people to follow day to day. What was it that got Billy Jeff impeached?

People don’t want another round of Clinton drama circa 1998. To the extent that it looks they’re in store for it, Obama benefits.

Allahpundit on November 28, 2007 at 12:30 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

ROTFLMAO..........Yer killing me AP...The democrats still havent forgiven the entire rest of the country for being offended that Clenis was a serial rapist who abused his power as POTUS to cloak himself from criminal prosecution for multiple acts of sexual misconduct and for committing perjury jury tampering and obstruction of justice. 

The only people who will be affected by Clenis&#039; indiscretions are those who already have no intention of voting for the Anti-Christ herself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Simple: The Hsu and Paul scandals are too complicated for people to follow day to day. What was it that got Billy Jeff impeached?</p>
<p>People don’t want another round of Clinton drama circa 1998. To the extent that it looks they’re in store for it, Obama benefits.</p>
<p>Allahpundit on November 28, 2007 at 12:30 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>ROTFLMAO&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Yer killing me AP&#8230;The democrats still havent forgiven the entire rest of the country for being offended that Clenis was a serial rapist who abused his power as POTUS to cloak himself from criminal prosecution for multiple acts of sexual misconduct and for committing perjury jury tampering and obstruction of justice. </p>
<p>The only people who will be affected by Clenis&#8217; indiscretions are those who already have no intention of voting for the Anti-Christ herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limerick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796771</link>
		<dc:creator>Limerick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796771</guid>
		<description>Return of the big LA Times sex scandal?

Quote of the day: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

The country WON&#039;T care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Return of the big LA Times sex scandal?</p>
<p>Quote of the day: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ</p>
<p>The country WON&#8217;T care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hening</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796769</link>
		<dc:creator>Hening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796769</guid>
		<description>The Johnny Appleseed of adultery.

This makes his wife look like a big loser as far as relationships, and reminds his following that he&#039;s a man-whore.

Nothing new here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Johnny Appleseed of adultery.</p>
<p>This makes his wife look like a big loser as far as relationships, and reminds his following that he&#8217;s a man-whore.</p>
<p>Nothing new here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austinnelly</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796767</link>
		<dc:creator>austinnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796767</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll believe the “Clinton fatigue” crap when I see it. Heads she wins, tails we lose.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Amen.  To add my bleak 2 cents, I think there is a sizeable portion of the electorate that enjoys these little drama&#039;s between Glacier and the Clenis; I think a lot of women want to be one of his groupies and a lot of the men wish they could live their lives like him, ie. screw anything that moves and your wife stays with you.  We&#039;re going to be stuck with this pair and it&#039;s going to be 10 times worse than when he was President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ll believe the “Clinton fatigue” crap when I see it. Heads she wins, tails we lose.</p></blockquote>
<p>Amen.  To add my bleak 2 cents, I think there is a sizeable portion of the electorate that enjoys these little drama&#8217;s between Glacier and the Clenis; I think a lot of women want to be one of his groupies and a lot of the men wish they could live their lives like him, ie. screw anything that moves and your wife stays with you.  We&#8217;re going to be stuck with this pair and it&#8217;s going to be 10 times worse than when he was President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kini</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796764</link>
		<dc:creator>Kini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796764</guid>
		<description>What would Oprah say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would Oprah say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spirit of 1776</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796763</link>
		<dc:creator>Spirit of 1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796763</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But it seems that ugly rumors only git ignored if they’re about the Democrats.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You didn&#039;t see the Trent Lott-man love story here either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But it seems that ugly rumors only git ignored if they’re about the Democrats.</p></blockquote>
<p>You didn&#8217;t see the Trent Lott-man love story here either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allahpundit</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796759</link>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796759</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But it seems that ugly rumors only git ignored if they’re about the Democrats.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You mean the one about Lott?  Yeah, the left loves itself a good sex smear.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But it seems that ugly rumors only git ignored if they’re about the Democrats.</p></blockquote>
<p>You mean the one about Lott?  Yeah, the left loves itself a good sex smear.  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canopfor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-796757</link>
		<dc:creator>canopfor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/return-of-the-big-la-times-sex-scandal/#comment-796757</guid>
		<description>Oh great,so when I&#039;m surfing the news channel&#039;s,
the Liberal babe achorette&#039;s will have that little
smirk on their faces!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh great,so when I&#8217;m surfing the news channel&#8217;s,<br />
the Liberal babe achorette&#8217;s will have that little<br />
smirk on their faces!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
