“Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?! No! And it’s not over now!”

Germans?

Forget it, he’s rolling…

Obama gets a has little testyies and can’t responding to a reasonable question from an actual (elderly) voter

there i just had to fix it

Liberals are also totally incapable of connecting something they support with something they don’t. Liberals believe in multiculturalism, diversity, and the all-ideas-are-equal philosophy. They are pro-immigration, period. They don’t care if it’s legal or not. And since they are for immigration, in their minds there can be no connection between immigration and terrorism. So, of course, Obama’s first thought when asked about terrorism was OBL, because he wasn’t an immigrant. Not sure why he mentioned Hussein other than to get a dig in about the Iraq war and the Bush administration.

I’d like to see a transcript of the whole exchange. You can make out her first question clearly, but everything she said after that is not audible on the video. I didn’t think she came across as rude, but liberals tend to think anyone who disagrees with them is spewing “hate”, so I’d love to know what she said to him after that first question.

Somehow, CNN looks more like Clinton News Network.
Obama no longer holier than thou?

No Plants in the office?

A: George Bush is wrong, and “HOW DARE YOU INSULT MY PATRIOTISM!”

This is the exact same answer that ALL Democrat candidates give to the question. The problem was that Obama said it too bluntly. There should have been about 500 more words in there.

B. Hussein Obama is no more of a moonbat than any other Democrat nominee; he’s just not nearly as good at covering it up the rest. He’s the Democrat Party’s worst nightmare: an honest liberal.

How can he convince the elderly voters he cares about them when he’s yelling at them like a frustrated home nurse?

…he is talking to the eldery women like an equal and not like a precious old lady.

Really? So if you ask a question about terrorism and border security, then a non sequitur about Saddam not having brought down the World Trade center is talking as equals? Heck, how is that even an answer related to the question?

How would Saddam’s involvement or non-involvement with 9/11 have anything to do with border security?

“This is a part of the world I’ve studied deeply” really is an implication that you haven’t and is a simple appeal to authority. There was no information there, except an claim that he’s studied more than you, therefore he’s right.

By “equal” do you mean he also thinks he isn’t smart enough to see an obvious avoidance of the question, he also doesn’t think he’s smart enough to realize the border security question was never answered, or that he also isn’t clever enough to see through a simple logical fallacy?

Somehow I suspect he doesn’t think any of these three things about himself, but he obviously does think them about the people listening to him speak. I’m going to have to go with that not being something you’d try with an equal.

Unless of course you think your equals are stupid.

Where do they dig up these jerks. Is this country really in so much trouble that this is the best we can field? If so, the Republic is in serious trouble

Must have been quite a nap you had.

Afaik, either the people who peddled it to Drudge or MSNBC did the editing. Probably MSNBC, but if not…hmmm.

Bryan on November 19, 2007 at 5:04 PM

Yeah, my guess was MSNBC, I certainly didn’t mean to imply you did it (if it came off that way). But like taznar said, the jump from border security to Iraq/9/11 doesn’t make sense.

New Iowa poll….

Obama 30%
Hildebeast 26%

OUCH! I guess the shills in the audience at the debate didn’t fool anyone except the media.

Democrats cannot answer questions from real voters. When they get asked a tough question they all return to their nutroots: they become screeming shills. If you can’t answer the question, shout them down!

Obama is a propagandist, nothing more, all he is missing is the Che button.

Despite showing expertise as a prosecutor far beyond her years and bringing a new kind of racial harmony to the office of US Attorney in Minnesota, 34-year-old Rachel Paulose will be leaving that post after only seven months or……

That video was heavily edited, I’d like to see the whole sequence of events.

Me too. From what I see, it goes from her asking about border security to him going off about the World Trade Center and Iraq. A pretty big disconnect there because he doesn’t seem to be addressing her questions. Especially not with any “specificity” as requested.

RightWinged on November 19, 2007 at 5:01 PM

Afaik, either the people who peddled it to Drudge or MSNBC did the editing. Probably MSNBC, but if not…hmmm.