Quote of the day

posted at 10:50 pm on November 19, 2007 by Allahpundit

“The group is hoping to launch what would be only the third prosecution in more than 80 years for an offence which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.”

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

One of two things happen here. They get rid of this stupid rule, or Islamists milk it for everything they can get out of it.

Bad Candy on November 19, 2007 at 10:55 PM

This stupidity aside, how stupid of me to think there is an anti-Christian bias on this forum by some of the martinets that choose the topics. Once again HotAir sets up a thread where Christians get to attack one another for the glee of Christian hating atheists.

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:03 PM

Actually, I am assuming that they won’t sue, but rather, the Christians will follow the logic of Instapundit and others, and just blow him up. Clearly that method is gaining acceptance, and therefore logic recommends it.

Jaibones on November 19, 2007 at 11:04 PM

The God of Abraham Issac and Jacob, of whom I believe in down to the cellular level, does not need they guys defending HIM. This can only lead to folly.

debi118 on November 19, 2007 at 11:06 PM

Once again HotAir sets up a thread where Christians get to attack one another for the glee of Christian hating atheists.

You can keep on whining, you can keep on reading these threads that obviously aggrieve you so much, but it’s not going to change. I don’t hate Christians, either, so quit smearing me. This is your last warning.

Allahpundit on November 19, 2007 at 11:07 PM

Go get ‘em!!

The Jerry Springer Show is a vile piece of filth (yes I’ve watched it). Broadcast in every corner of the world, it shows the absolute worst of humanity and America.

You want to know why “they” hate us? This is one reason. There are countless others that denigrate American character.

While I am loath to suggest that the tarnished American image is one of our own making. To some degree it is true.

When people are predisposed to dehumanize Americans (the French), “shows” like this support them.

Agrippa2k on November 19, 2007 at 11:10 PM

anti-Christian bias on this forum

So Hotair shouldn’t call out rank stupidity on a group that is trying to suppress free speech simply because they are Christian?

I have found that AP’s comments on the religion threads to be very helpful in articulating how an outsider responds to the typical talk that goes on in some church groups. That kind of feedback should be highly appreciated by religous people, because AP is far from alone in having those responses. Christians should refine their thinking and be grateful for AP’s pointing out how some evangelical talking points do in fact insult the intelligence of someone to whom God has not yet given faith.

pedestrian on November 19, 2007 at 11:12 PM

The God of Abraham Issac and Jacob, of whom I believe in down to the cellular level, does not need they guys defending HIM. This can only lead to folly.

debi118

But America does. Can you imagine a suit claiming this “American” show is offensive to Americans?

Fight the good fight!

Agrippa2k on November 19, 2007 at 11:13 PM

Hmmm, there may be some godlikeness to atheism after all.

We can only wonder how another, guess which, religion would pursue something like this about their big cheese or die deity.

Kini on November 19, 2007 at 11:14 PM

I don’t hate Christians, either, so quit smearing me. This is your last warning.

Allahpundit on November 19, 2007 at 11:07 PM

With all due respect and I do realize that you have the power of arbitrarily squelching those who dare disagree with you. What was the point of this post if not to let Christians attack one another?

There IS a bias here and some of it is good because echo chambers are worthless vessels. Things need to be stirred up to keep the dialogue moving forward. That being said, why is it that HotAir is focusing on setting Christians against one another by the way Romney’s Mormonism is presented or stories like this? Why not some discussion abot the fact that Hillary has, apparently, no faith, or Obama’s radical racist Christian church?

All I’m asking is some pretense of fairness when it comes to the discussion of faith! Is that so much to ask from a forum that claims to entertain real debate. If daring to point out this obvious truth and question what I see as a disconnect is enough to, what was you thuggerist threat, “pull my ass.” So be it.

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:20 PM

You know all you “Christians” sure do get angry easily.

While AP is a paid provocateur, I doubt he is a big “fan” of the show. His point might be that this is ridiculous – but so is Oxford mulching books because a Saudi wants to keep his funding of Al-Queda on the down low.

They opened the door to something with that one. This show and scores of outrageous movies and books spread across the world bash America.

They got Capone with tax evasion. Onward Christian soldiers!

Agrippa2k on November 19, 2007 at 11:22 PM

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:20 PM

Um. Isn’t there another possibility–like Christians, and others, having a rational discussion about this event, which is actually happening? How is it that AP has magical powers to MAKE Christians “bash” each other? If there’s bashing going on, it damn sure isn’t AP’s fault.

TexasDan on November 19, 2007 at 11:22 PM

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:20 PM

It’s easier for us to turn the other cheek.

Kini on November 19, 2007 at 11:23 PM

and pass the ammo

Kini on November 19, 2007 at 11:26 PM

Here’s an interesting thought.

What if the “laws” of countries around the world offer the possibility of banning offensive “American” shows and movies.

Is that censorship? They are the ones with screwed up laws.

That would hit the movie biz hard. Imagine if half of their filth could only be shown in the US?

Agrippa2k on November 19, 2007 at 11:29 PM

Doesn’t this story point out the differences between the actions of Christians toward “blasphemy” and the actions of Muslims toward “blasphemy”? Christians want to sue. Muslims riot.

Also, it was only a matter of time before this happened. Christians are getting tired of the double standard by the mass media. Muslim groups intimidate the mass media into putting the title “Prophet” in front of Mohammed’s name whenever they write articles. The same is not done for putting “The Lord Our Savior” in front of Jesus’ name when writing articles about Christianity. So, while Muslim groups intimidate the mass media into censorship and “religious tolerance” and “respect” through the threat of violence, Christian groups are now pressing the issue and testing the “religious tolerance” and “respect” shown by the mass media to Islam and seeing if it goes both ways for Christianity.

Makes sense. And doesn’t it disprove Christopher Hitchens’ theory that Christians would start using the Muslims’ terrorist tactics to get their way? Christians are not threatening to blow up the BBC, but threatening lawsuits.

Michael in MI on November 19, 2007 at 11:31 PM

How is it that AP has magical powers to MAKE Christians “bash” each other? If there’s bashing going on, it damn sure isn’t AP’s fault.

TexasDan on November 19, 2007 at 11:22 PM

I never said that, not even close.

AP isn’t directly involved in each and every post, is he? I get the sense that some of this stuff is set up merely for the glee of self-proclaimed atheists like AP to watch Christians gang up on those that support Mormons, Christians that are not fundamentalist gang up on those that are, Comments from the Pope to set protestants against Catholics, etc.

As I just posted AP, some of this is good if it stirs debate. Nevertheless, when it comes to politics, I get a real sense of bias on this forum. No candidate who expresses strong faith will fare well in the way these issues are dealt with. Is Romney’s Mormonism an issue to be discussed- ABSOLUTELY! He belongs to a cult as far as my faith and I am concerned. Does that mean his faith should recieve far more scrutiny than Rudy’s strange version of Catholicism or the fact that neither of the frontrunning Democrats even discuss faith? NO!

All I’m looking for here is a standard level of fairness which- by my reckoning- is about to get my voice squelched because I dared speak out. Never mind all the other posts I’ve made here.

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:33 PM

The Christian angle is minor. I doubt there are many JS shows that deal with Christians issues or beliefs. Probably fake anyway.

At most they could restrict an episode or two. It is likely that a ruling will be watered down to that. Besides, would/could we deport him to serve is 80 year sentence anyway?

Agrippa2k on November 19, 2007 at 11:35 PM

Chill highhopes.

Look at the headline, and his comments. He didn’t really say anything. His “In Vain” is like “fat chance” in the anti-Christian UK.

Agrippa2k on November 19, 2007 at 11:38 PM

Good gravy! The next thing you know “Christians” will be claiming they have the only truth on the face of the earth and all other faiths are cults of the devil!!!

csdeven on November 19, 2007 at 11:51 PM

Good gravy! The next thing you know “Christians” will be claiming they have the only truth on the face of the earth and all other faiths are cults of the devil!!!

csdeven on November 19, 2007 at 11:51 PM

Doesn’t every religion say that about every other religion?
Some more direct than others….

Kini on November 19, 2007 at 11:53 PM

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:33 PM

Highhopes – My opinion is that there is a general anti-Christian bias here at HotAir with AllahPundit as well as with many of the HotAir atheist commentors. I don’t have a problem with that so much as I do the seeming glee with which AllahPundit and the atheist commentors take with bashing Christianity. The posts and comments are not done in order to understand Christianity, but rather just to take glee in the Christian-bashing that goes on.

This has been going on for quite a while here at HotAir and I have just accepted that it how it is and choose not to engage in serious discussion in these posts, because there is very rarely any respect shown to Christians and their beliefs. The posts, in my opinion, are not made in order to stir debate, but in order to take glee in the Christian-bashing.

While I find this troubling and have just lowered my standards for what I expect at HotAir anymore, AllahPundit and Bryan and Robert Spencer do a good job in posting in other areas that make coming back here to HotAir for its detailed reporting worthwhile.

But really, when I want to read about military matters, I go to military blogs. When I want to read about religious matters, I go to blogs which address religion in a serious manner. HotAir though is where I first visit when a serious breaking news story comes out, because AllahPundit is great at research and finding all the details and facts to put the story into proper context and perspective.

But I don’t expect to find serious discussion of military issues or religious issues here at HotAir. Most of the posts, in my opinion, are not really to seriously address issues, but are to ‘stir the pot’ and incite divisive discussion. And then there are also the tabloid posts. But that’s the way to bring traffic to the site. And that seems to be the goal of this website.

So be it. AllahPundit, Bryan and Michelle run this site and they have determined that they is how they want to do things here. That’s fine. We shouldn’t expect anything more. HotAir is what it is. As with anything else, if we don’t like it, there are plenty of other blogs which we can read. I have made my decision to stop coming here as often as I once did, because I did not like the posting and commenting here. Everyone else is free to do the same.

It’s just like Hollywood or the mass media or anything else. If you don’t like the product, stop buying it (or in this case, stop reading it and giving the site traffic).

While I would prefer things were different here at HotAir, AllahPundit has made it clear on a number of occassions that he is not changing, and has said that if we really have a problem with him, then talk to the boss (Michelle Malkin).

Again, HotAir is what it is. I have accepted that and adjusted my blog reading habits accordingly.

Michael in MI on November 19, 2007 at 11:57 PM

Once again HotAir sets up a thread where Christians get to attack one another for the glee of Christian hating atheists.

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:03 PM

Fellow Christians do not have to attack one another. It’s a choice. But I’d think since you are so worried about it you wouldn’t say something as giboted as this….

He belongs to a cult as far as my faith and I am concerned.

So you start by attacking a fellow Christian faith, but a short time ago you were bitching that Allah set this up to encourage those attacks.

In a very short period of time, I have read you attack Allah, Mormons, and atheists in general. Is this what you meant to do?

csdeven on November 19, 2007 at 11:58 PM

Kini on November 19, 2007 at 11:53 PM

No, not all. The LDS are very tolerant of others faiths. Other are even more so.

Their 11th article of faith.

“We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.”

They even teach that many a Mormon who THINK they will be in the presence of God will be surprised to find that they are not. They will also be surprised at the people who were never LDS that will be in the presence of God.

csdeven on November 20, 2007 at 12:04 AM

I don’t see AP as bashing Christianity. Some light-hearted poking every now and then with the comments. maybe, but I am okay with that. The endless posts about atheism and religion are getting beyond old with me, though. Just some reader feedback there. They generate a lot of comments, which is why they keep showing up, of course.

RW Wacko on November 20, 2007 at 12:10 AM

csdeven on November 20, 2007 at 12:04 AM

csdeven – How is that different than Christianity or Judaism? I believe that while Christians and Jews believe their faith to be the correct faith and the only faith which will get us to Heaven, I believe the Mormons believe the same thing, otherwise they would not go around trying to recruit people into their religion. Right?

I’m not trying to be clever here. I was recruited in college by the campus Mormons. If they believe in allowing others to worship how we may, shouldn’t they have backed off from recruiting me after I told them I was Catholic and not interested? (FYI, they didn’t back off) I didn’t take their recruitment of me to be tolerant of my Catholic upbringing.

Well, they were tolerant, but they also evangelized the same way any Christian or Jew would tolerate other religions, but also evangelize since they believe theirs to be the “correct” religion.

I’m not bashing Mormons here. They were genuinely very nice with my roommate and I when trying to recruit us. But what I take from your comment is that they are more tolerant of other religions than, say, Christians. In my experience, that is not the case. They are just as tolerant of believing others should be allowed to practice their religion, but also in believing that those other religions are wrong and Mormonism is correct.

Michael in MI on November 20, 2007 at 12:12 AM

Michael in MI on November 20, 2007 at 12:12 AM

I agree. All faiths think they have the most truth. But some faiths actively seek out to destroy the faith that others have in their own religion. I am simple pointing out that the LDS do not need to destroy any one else’s faith in order to be successful. They present their message and expect the person to study and pray to find out for themselves. You will never see a website sponsored by the LDS church that demeans or attacks another faith.

csdeven on November 20, 2007 at 12:26 AM

I can’t tell from the article. Does this law cover only Anglican theology or does this potentially cover blasphemy in relation to any religion? If any religion can claim criminal blasphemy then they are going to need more prisons.

ronsfi on November 20, 2007 at 12:26 AM

On second thought, the cameras are already in place so all they need is a chainlink fence and some concertina wire around the entire island and the prison will be complete.

ronsfi on November 20, 2007 at 12:33 AM

This stupidity aside, how stupid of me to think there is an anti-Christian bias on this forum by some of the martinets that choose the topics. Once again HotAir sets up a thread where Christians get to attack one another for the glee of Christian hating atheists.

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:03 PM

You are being more than a little paranoid. I believe most atheists of the right see Christianity as minor problem and not as the enemy. We see now as a time to join together–a time to get beyond our parochial squabbles over secularism versus Christianity. We face a brutal, savage enemy of all Western culture and we should place our anger there.

thuja on November 20, 2007 at 12:35 AM

So what does one do when you either lose, or your religion loses you, and no other religion seems worthy enough for your faith?

Yet, I still believe in a supreme pizza being.

I just can’t be serious about it.

Kini on November 20, 2007 at 12:40 AM

This stupidity aside, how stupid of me to think there is an anti-Christian bias on this forum by some of the martinets that choose the topics. Once again HotAir sets up a thread where Christians get to attack one another for the glee of Christian hating atheists.

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:03 PM

Oh, c’mon. Puh-leeze.

Has Allahpundit been guilty of what you suggest occasionally? Well, maybe. Arguably. Does he enjoy the easy Pavlovian comment response from the Christians and atheists? Obviously.

But what are you complaining about HERE, in this post? He offered two ironic words of comment (“in vain,” rather apt I thought), and then posted the money quote from the article. That’s it.

And it’s an awfully newsworthy quote from an obviously important story. If you don’t think so, you haven’t been paying attention for the last decade.

Slam him when it’s appropriate. It isn’t here. Not even close. You’re responding to your own preconceptions from earlier posts. Look at what he actually wrote here, in this post.

And in your later posts in this thread, you’re equating Allahpundit with all of HotAir. That isn’t fair. I like reading here because I never know what I’ll find. Bryan, Michelle, AP, and See-Dubya (and any others) have very different takes. Don’t lump them together. That’s no different than lumping all Christians together. You have a problem with him, direct it at him alone. They’re all different people.

And for the record, I generally agree with you about these threads. I usually roll my eyes at them, or make some snarky comment and shrug. They’re admittedly too common and too predictable. (Although much, much better than the “View” threads!)

But suggestions that this place is anti-Christian are just insane. Loony. That doesn’t even come close to reality. The truth is the exact opposite: this place is quite Christian friendly. Even when I disagree with him, I admire AP for posting what he believes – and regardless of what you may think, he is generally pretty respectful, especially in comparison to a few atheist commenters.

He offered two words and a quote. What’re you bitchin’ about?

Professor Blather on November 20, 2007 at 12:43 AM

highhopes on November 19, 2007 at 11:03 PM

I like to visit Hal Lindsey’s site pretty regularly but I would never think to complain about it’s Christian bias and this site is by no means comparable in terms of any bias. Unless you count conservative bias. Respect? Identify yourself as an Atheist and see what kind of “respect” you receive from your god fearing brethren.

ronsfi on November 20, 2007 at 12:45 AM

As a God fearing Christian I claim the right to bash any other Christian I want to. Lighten up. We get the A-Z of topics here. Sure the Christian threads pull comments…well…isn’t that the point? Can’t take the heat then stay out of the brimstone.

Limerick on November 20, 2007 at 12:48 AM

While I find this troubling and have just lowered my standards for what I expect at HotAir anymore, AllahPundit and Bryan and Robert Spencer do a good job in posting in other areas that make coming back here to HotAir for its detailed reporting worthwhile.

Michael in MI on November 19, 2007 at 11:57 PM

No offense, but this comment makes me wonder if you’ve ever even read here. Have you actually read ANY of Bryan’s commentary either on religion or on military matters?

His military posts are outstanding (and yes, I’m a former Marine, if it matters). And his infrequent religious posts are not at all like you describe them.

Go check the archives. Again – these are all different people. As far as I know, Bryan isn’t AP. Some of you seem confused on that.

Professor Blather on November 20, 2007 at 12:48 AM

How long have you been reading this blog? Have you been paying attention to the bylines or just the headlines?

Bryan has written thoughtfully and extensively about Christianity, especially the conservative Evangelical branch of the faith. Michelle lets slip her conservative Catholic upbringing every now and then. It’s hardly an anti-Christian blog.

It’s true that AllahP likes to stir the pot with his atheist posts, but you guys oblige him by responding with a blizzard of Bible quotes and then devolving into a discussion of how to properly interpret said quotes. I’ve read some insufferable comments from atheists in the discussions, but you can hardly blame AllahP for the excesses of his co-(non)religionists. He’s also a useful reminder that “conservative” and “christian” are NOT synonyms, no matter how hard the MSM likes to work that meme.

I suggest you do what I do. Just ignore any post on religion unless it has Bryan’s name on it. I read AllahP because I like his political and humor writing, which is really what I expect when I click on HotAir. For religious writing, there is always Touchstone or First Things online.

Anton on November 20, 2007 at 1:04 AM

Blockquotes didn’t work for some reason. The post above was in response to:

“Again, HotAir is what it is. I have accepted that and adjusted my blog reading habits accordingly.

Michael in MI on November 19, 2007 at 11:57 PM”

I bought a new Intel-CPU iMac running Leopard. Now I am getting weird Java errors in Firefox. Grrr….

Anton on November 20, 2007 at 1:08 AM

If only Bryan could film some of the complainers. I think you’d find it ironic, and somewhat entertaining, if you could view the whining collage from a bit of a distance.

Entelechy on November 20, 2007 at 2:42 AM

These blasphemy laws should be stricken from the books.

aengus on November 20, 2007 at 5:00 AM

“highhopes” and “Michael in MI”, you have an anti-Allah bias, and it offends me deeply. Because I have the constitutional right to not have to read whiny rants from pseudo-Christian pantywaists no matter what website I visit, I plan on filing suit against you in the 9th Circuit, just as soon as I wipe up all the tears I’ve shed reading the hateful bile you’ve spewed at my favorite fallible deity.

Stop the hate, for the love of Allah, STOP THE HATE!

Allah, forgive them, for they know not what they do nuthin’.

(If you can’t tell this is sarcasm, get stuffed.)

Splashman on November 20, 2007 at 5:29 AM

Speaking as a Christian, if all Hot Air was was a bunch of pro-Christian pundits having a ‘go us!’ circle-jerk, it would be boring and uninformative.

James on November 20, 2007 at 6:36 AM

a bunch of pro-Christian pundits having a ‘go us!’ circle-jerk

So you think Christians cheer each other on while engaging in group homosexual activities?

The Christian bashing here is out of control!!!

tlynch001 on November 20, 2007 at 7:49 AM

I bought a new Intel-CPU iMac running Leopard. Now I am getting weird Java errors in Firefox. Grrr….

Anton on November 20, 2007 at 1:08 AM

Holy smoke! It was bad enough trying to remember all the specs of the various CPU’s out there. Now the Mac geeks want me to think about the animal kingdom. What’s the next Mac going to be called, the “Ark” with a “Noah” OS?

Uh oh, I’ve committed blasphemy! Dozens of the uncertain are picking up rocks and old discs to stone me! Help me AP! Help me…..!!!!

doufree on November 20, 2007 at 7:58 AM

tlynch001 on November 20, 2007 at 7:49 AM

My sarcasm meter is pegged…I hope for your sake that it’s correct.

James on November 20, 2007 at 8:13 AM

I am an athiest of Christian heritage. I don’t comment on the Christian discussions on this site although I do scan them a bit. The exception would be the Folsom St. Fair where I found the infighting of the HA Christian commenters to be terribly counter productive, and I said so.

As far as this current issue is concerned; the Jerry Springer “opera” currently showing in the UK, I understand the thinking behind the theologian’s action to sue the producers. We are talking about a country where it is now a hate crime to make a defamatory statement about Islam and yet, the curtain goes up every night on absolute filth directed at Christianity. IMO, it is NOT TRUE that the people of the EU have free speech. Their right to express themselves has been drastically curtailed in the past decade as it pertains to various victim groups. This does not translate to Christianity however, which is free game for anyone to dump on.

Here in NY it is north of $80 bucks to get into a B’Way show. What I don’t understand is the motivation of the audience to support this filth by buying tickets.

Babs on November 20, 2007 at 9:34 AM

I see a trend in all” ISMs” Both Atheism and Theism where it is a system of belief.
Neither camp knows the answer but “believe “ they do.

As a non” ismist” I just know I don’t know. (and I know you don’t know either)

TheSitRep on November 20, 2007 at 10:13 AM

What if the “laws” of countries around the world offer the possibility of banning offensive “American” shows and movies

Have you been to Dubai?

srhoades on November 20, 2007 at 10:34 AM

Anton on November 20, 2007 at 1:04 AM

“How long have you been reading this blog? Have you been paying attention to the bylines or just the headlines?

I have been reading HotAir since it started as I was already an avid reader and fan of Michelle Malkin’s blog prior to that (and still am). I keep track of the bylines. Though by now, it is usually pretty obvious by the writing styles and tones of Bryan and AllahPundit that I can figure out who wrote the post without even looking at the byline.

“Bryan has written thoughtfully and extensively about Christianity, especially the conservative Evangelical branch of the faith. Michelle lets slip her conservative Catholic upbringing every now and then. It’s hardly an anti-Christian blog.”

I didn’t say that it was an anti-Christian blog, but I did say that there is an anti-Christian tone here among AllahPundit and many of the atheist commenters. And I also pointed out that I did not have a problem so much with the anti-Christian tone so much as I did with the fact that many of the posts and comments are not serious discussions of religion as much as they are just excuses to take pleasure is making fun of religious people, mostly Christians.

As far as Michelle and Bryan go, they do not post enough at HotAir to really represent the website. I would have to do an actual tally to verify my hunch, but I would guess that in any given week, 75%-80% of the posts are by AllahPundit. So HotAir could be generally described as AllahPundit’s site with some guest posting done here and there by Bryan Preston, Robert Spencer and See-Dubya when AllahPundit goes on vacation. But I would guess that when people thing of HotAir.com, they think of AllahPundit, since he is by far the author of the vast majority of posts on this site.

“It’s true that AllahP likes to stir the pot with his atheist posts, but you guys oblige him by responding with a blizzard of Bible quotes and then devolving into a discussion of how to properly interpret said quotes.”

That is what Robert Spencer does as well in order to properly explain Islam to HotAir readers. I see nothing wrong with a discussion and debate on the scriptures – and the proper interpretations of them – which are the basis of religions. What I don’t like seeing is disrespect from both sides of the discussion. And I believe that this lack of respect is encouraged by AllahPundit, since in many posts he comes off as very condescending and disrespectful of Christianity and Christians. While his opinion of the religion is to be expected, since he is an atheist and, as such, probably sees the belief in God along the same lines as the belief in aliens or ghosts, there is a way to discuss religion in order to learn more about it and foster intellectual debate, and then there is what I feel happens here at HotAir from most of his religion posts, which is foster an environment of a lack of respect for one another and all out flame fest. Which then the atheists take joy in, because then they can accuse Christians of not being nice people and, therefore, “un-Christian”.

“I’ve read some insufferable comments from atheists in the discussions, but you can hardly blame AllahP for the excesses of his co-(non)religionists. He’s also a useful reminder that “conservative” and “christian” are NOT synonyms, no matter how hard the MSM likes to work that meme.”

As I just noted, I do partly blame AllahPundit, because I believe he fosters that environment here at HotAir. He doesn’t tell the atheist commentors – nor the Christian commentors – to be respectful in the debate and I have seen him join in on the making fun of Christians in many of the discussions in the comments. AllahPundit could easily warn people on both sides to keep things respectful, but he doesn’t. Therefore he is absolutely partly to blame for the excesses on both sides of the debate.

“I suggest you do what I do. Just ignore any post on religion unless it has Bryan’s name on it. I read AllahP because I like his political and humor writing, which is really what I expect when I click on HotAir. For religious writing, there is always Touchstone or First Things online.”

I suggested the same thing in my previous posts in this thread. As I noted earlier, I have changed my blog reading habits based on my displeasure with the tone here of the posts and comments. I don’t read HotAir as often and when I do, I skip over many of the posts, because I know the tone will either be an unserious analysis of the subject matter or a negative or condescending tone towards the subject matter. Maybe you were talking to highhopes with this suggestion. For me, as I said, I don’t come here for serious discussions of topics anymore. I come here for the great reporting on news stories as AllahPundit is fantastic at research and doing the digging into a story that the mass media refuses to do – or is incapable of doing. I have great respect for AllahPundit’s talents and hard work in that area and recommend and pass on HotAir articles to my distribution list regularly.

And Bryan has had some great posts about religion and the military, but he doesn’t post enough here to make it worth it to come here for those types of things. And plus my standards for military writing have gone way up after spending the last few years reading military blogs such as Blackfive, Mudville Gazette, Neptunus Lex, CDR Salamander, Dadmanly, Op-For, Small Wars Journal, Michael Yon, Michael Fumento, Michael Totten, among many others, including those found at Mudville’s DAWN PATROL by Mrs. Greyhawk. So when I want military analysis, I go there. Maybe if Bryan posted more, I would come here too, but he just doesn’t. I don’t know why, because I very much enjoy his posts when he does (I especially liked his reports and analysis after coming back from Iraq). He is a great breath of fresh air most times from the negativity and defeatism that seems to permeate HotAir’s posts and comment sections the majority of the time.

Michael in MI on November 20, 2007 at 11:06 AM

Professor Blather on November 20, 2007 at 12:48 AM

“No offense, but this comment makes me wonder if you’ve ever even read here. Have you actually read ANY of Bryan’s commentary either on religion or on military matters?”

No offense taken. I don’t comment here very regularly, even though I read HotAir daily. I have read all of Bryan’s commentary on religious and military matters and have enjoyed it greatly.

“His military posts are outstanding (and yes, I’m a former Marine, if it matters). And his infrequent religious posts are not at all like you describe them.”

Yes, I agree that he has posted some great military analysis posts, but they are few and far between. And my standards for military analysis have gone up quite a bit over the last few years of reading military blogs such as Blackfive, Mudville Gazette, Neptunus Lex, CDR Salamander, Dadmanly, Op-For, Small Wars Journal, Michael Yon, Michael Fumento, Michael Totten, among many others, including those found at Mudville’s DAWN PATROL by Mrs. Greyhawk. When Bryan posts, he is right in line with them, but he rarely does. I would have to verify this with actual stats of looking at the archives, but I would guess that 75%-80% of the posts on Iraq are done by AllahPundit and they have a generally skeptical, pessimistic and negative tone about them. And he rarely references military blogs such as the ones I noted above for further analysis, even though he references every poor mass media outlet for their poor analysis. So while Bryan does post some good military analysis blogs, overall I would not consider HotAir the place to go for good military analysis, since Bryan makes up only a small fraction of that analysis.

As far as his religious posts, I don’t believe that I had anything to say about Bryan’s posts (though I may have, but I am too lazy to go back up through all the comments to check). But again, as with the military posts, the majority of religious posts are done by AllahPundit. So when the majority of religious posts at HotAir have an anti-Christian bias, with a few posts addressing Christianity and Islam in an intellectual manner, this still leaves HotAir as generally having an anti-Christian bias. I’m sure that Daily Kos has some sensible authors and posts on occasion, but since the majority of their posts are loony Leftist, they are described as a generally loony Leftist site. Same goes here. When the majority of the posts are a certain way, the entire site gets labeled that way. But I do enjoy Bryan’s religious posts as they are very insightful. Though I still bypass the comments on his posts as well, since the discussion there is usually not as intellectual as his posts.

“Go check the archives. Again – these are all different people. As far as I know, Bryan isn’t AP. Some of you seem confused on that.”

Well, others may be confused, but I am not one of them. I simply hold a different opinion of this site than you and many others. That’s just my interpretation. No harm, no foul. I simply responded to highhopes with my opinion, since he seemed to be getting attacked by those who did not share his opinion, and I wanted him to know he was not alone in his interpretation. Though I did feel he was getting a bit carried away in his criticism of this post. But I don’t blame him for going a bit overboard, since he was looking at the overall history of this site and was, I believe, acting reflexively based on that.

Michael in MI on November 20, 2007 at 11:06 AM

“conservative” and “christian” are NOT synonyms, no matter how hard the MSM likes to work that meme.”

Truer words have never been spoken.

TheSitRep on November 20, 2007 at 11:14 AM

I’m surprised that nobody has commented on the basic foundation of the lawsuit in the article – Britain has no constitutional ban on establishment of a state religion – The Church of England is the official church of England. What we in the US call “Episcopalian” is the official state religion. I’m not sure how much impact that has on current British law, but it will be interesting to see this play out, especially in light of the conflict between the British statute and the EU rule – national sovereignty anyone?

peski on November 20, 2007 at 12:33 PM