You might be on to something. Who goes to Vegas for a day? Especially a chick in a low-paying job. I have read that during big sporting events, a lot of amateurs flock to Vegas to make some quick bucks on their backs: college girls, waitresses, teachers, bank tellers, etc. It could be true.

Let me see…. Hooters girl dresses like this and flies to Las Vegas in the afternoon and then takes the red eye home the next morning. Hmmmmmm?

I guess no one gets the obvious, SHE’S A HOOKER, people. She was already taking her clothes off for a living so playboy was a step up.

Plus, those mags are 90% airbrush these days. It’s like, er, working it to a cartoon. Sailor Moon much?

Face?….?…. OHH!

Seriously, ladies, the only goofballs who find elephantiasis of the mammaries attractive would be long haul truckers and light house keepers and sailors far out at sea. If you think you need to pump yourself up to get a man, you’re looking for the wrong kind of man. Think of all the opportunities breast enhancement opened up for Nicole Simpson.

if you think she’s blond, I have a this shiny bridge to sell you.

Professor Blather on November 16, 2007 at 3:46 PM

Bing. My Lab is a blond; this is not a blond.

As for the pneumatics, I believe what we have here is a bizarre demonstration of the current state of brazier technology.

You guys like cartoons?

this broad is ass ugly… they must have fixed her up somehow for playboy.

RightWinged on November 16, 2007 at 2:36 PM

Yup. And girls like this have completely destroyed Playboy for me. The air-brush guy and the make-up artist can make anybody look hawt.*

Now I know its all smoke and mirrors. And silicon. I miss my innocence.

* “Anybody” may not include Rosie O’Donnell, Hillary Clinton, or Madalyn Albright.

Those of you shocked that the woman above would pose nude in order to capitalize on the only fame she’ll ever have, really do need to get out more. It’s an ugly world, and silly little blondes with bad fashion sense, and worse judgment aren’t the only people doing bad things.

austinnelly on November 16, 2007 at 1:37 PM

Is someone here shocked?

It was all completely, depressingly predictable. Who could be shocked?

At most I was a bit disappointed, since I did defend her initially. If she wants to flaunt the bionic girls, fine by me. But next time somebody tells you you’re too skanky to fly their plane … admit it and get off the plane. Don’t hire a lawyer and go on TV and act the innocent.

Mostly I’m just mad at her for completely destroying what were undoubtedly perfectly fine breasts at one time or another.

I guess I’m the only one here with a weakness for young, hardbodied, pneumatic blondes.

I’ve always been a little strange.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2007 at 1:00 PM

Young? She looks 45. That pic of Ann Curry (who’s in her 50s?) the other day looked younger.

Too much tanning and plastic surgery will do that.

The hard body is likely from an eating disorder, and if you think she’s blond, I have a this shiny bridge to sell you.

The pneumatic part? Yeah. Check.

Update: Diligent research reveals that some of the photos are already posted on Playboy’s website.

I’ll likely use google blogsearch for my diligent research, but I have to say, I’m terrified at what I might find… this broad is ass ugly… they must have fixed her up somehow for playboy.

But I really defended this woman when this happened.

Let me see…. Hooters girl dresses like this and flies to Las Vegas in the afternoon and then takes the red eye home the next morning. Hmmmmmm?

Innocent college student? I think not.

What you are really arguing is that people shouldn’t object to things they consider objectionable. Good luck with that.

She wants to be looked at, people want to look, Hef gets a cut. Maybe it will help PLA on the NYSE.

Those of you shocked that the woman above would pose nude in order to capitalize on the only fame she’ll ever have, really do need to get out more. It’s an ugly world, and silly little blondes with bad fashion sense, and worse judgment aren’t the only people doing bad things.

austinnelly on November 16, 2007 at 1:37 PM

I’m not shocked, and I don’t believe the other commenters are, either. The human race has been doing a lot of disgusting stuff ever since human existence began. But if ubiquity were a valid reason not to object, we’d have no reason to object to slavery, child abuse, or “The View” posts on HotAir.

What you are really arguing is that people shouldn’t object to things they consider objectionable. Good luck with that.

I guess I’m the only one here with a weakness for young, hardbodied, pneumatic blondes.

I’ve always been a little strange.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2007 at 1:00 PM

I’m with you A/P… I’m with you…

I guess I’m the only one here with a weakness for young, hardbodied, pneumatic blondes.

No quarrel with you on that point, though Kim Kardashian in the current issue might be little bit tastier, if one likes natural curves.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2007 at 1:00 PM

I guess that leaves me out. I’m not blonde. But then again, beggars can’t be choosers.

Exit Question for the guys on AP’s case: Have you EVER seen a picture of Allahpundit?

I guess I’m the only one here with a weakness for young, hardbodied, pneumatic blondes.

I’ve always been a little strange.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2007 at 1:00 PM

The instinctive attraction is entirely normal. As I noted here, humans have been given the ability to control themselves, if they so choose. I have a sweet tooth, but because I truly believe that eating 10 pounds of candy will result in bazooka-barfing, I can control the impulse to keep eating, and stop at 4 pounds (heh).

While I am instinctively attracted to hot, young, shapely female bodies, I am able (though not 100% successful) to resist the impulse to ogle women or porn, because I truly believe it will be harmful to me. If it harms me, it harms others, because it’s impossible to live without affecting others.

BTW, I’m not posting all this to bolster my own ego. My only goal is to counter some of the destructive BS that is routinely posted. And I hope to convince a few that it is, in fact, possible to avoid the mistakes so many make, as well as their inevitable consequences.

Allahpundit on November 16, 2007 at 1:00 PM

No – not the only one.

The strange part, however…

I’ve always been a little strange.

You’d think having your skin stretch to the bursting point all day long would be painful as hell.

Professor Blather on November 16, 2007 at 11:58 AM

Makes it difficult to blink the eyes.

And sitting in the gate next a lady who kept calling her husband a “clutz” because he spilled a can of coca cola, I would have welcomed some eye candy with open arms!

Larraby on November 16, 2007 at 12:39 PM

That was no lady.

As for the person in question, it was predictable that she would go this route when she claimed to be 23.