Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


U.S. begs Iraqi government to seize the moment before it passes

posted at 6:53 pm on November 15, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly

The paradox of the surge: it began as a way to help the central Shiite government bring stability to the Sunni (and mixed) areas and it ends with an attempt to bring the stability generated by the Sunnis on the ground in Anbar to the central Shiite government. 70,000 Sunni police recruits are standing around awaiting orders and letting the disgruntlement build; the Sadrists and SCIRI are sizing each other up in the south for the possible Shiite civil war to come; and in Baghdad — jack.

Senior military commanders here now portray the intransigence of Iraq’s Shiite-dominated government as the key threat facing the U.S. effort in Iraq, rather than al-Qaeda terrorists, Sunni insurgents or Iranian-backed militias.

In more than a dozen interviews, U.S. military officials expressed growing concern over the Iraqi government’s failure to capitalize on sharp declines in attacks against U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians. A window of opportunity has opened for the government to reach out to its former foes, said Army Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the commander of day-to-day U.S. military operations in Iraq, but “it’s unclear how long that window is going to be open.”…

[An] Army officer who requested anonymity said that if the Iraqi government doesn’t reach out, then for former Sunni insurgents “it’s game on — they’re back to attacking again.”

They’re counting on two things to change the situation: Iraq’s Sunni neighbors increasing their presence in Baghdad to show support for the Maliki government, which will in theory be reciprocated with greater government funding of Iraqi Sunnis, and the holding of provincial elections to increase the Sunnis’ representation. The problem with provincial elections, though, is that they’re also likely to increase Sadr’s representation, an outcome SCIRI is trying to prevent by lobbying to postpone them. Nor is it clear that having more Sadrists and fewer SCIRI-ites in the government would be a bad thing: according to one think tank, the U.S. is strengthening Iran’s hand by backing SCIRI over Sadr’s slate.

The WaPo article about the military’s frustration with Maliki doesn’t mention any plans to remove him but those rumors have swirled for months, with the argument against doing so being that things were too unstable to try to install a new government on top of it. That excuse is less persuasive now and there are already stirrings in Congress on the Republican side to try to nudge Bush into action. The GOP can’t afford to let Maliki ride this incipient momentum down to disaster, and they certainly can’t afford to be seen as sitting by while he does so. Consider Graham’s legislation a shot across Bush’s bow, then, that if things don’t get moving in Baghdad then he might start seeing Senate defections to the Democrats’ side, and soon.

Here’s the man himself crediting Iraqis — the same ones he’s so wary of in Anbar — for having broken Al Qaeda. Click the image to watch.

maliki-aq.jpg


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages:

Democracy takes time. I don’t think advocating some strong man that we put in power is necessarily the right way to go here.

bnelson44 on November 15, 2007 at 7:11 PM

engage Maverick!!!! engage!!!!

Brian on November 15, 2007 at 7:14 PM

Islam laughs at your foolish democracy but it will accept your tribute…or aid or whatever you want to call it.

BL@KBIRD on November 15, 2007 at 7:15 PM

BL@KBIRD on November 15, 2007 at 7:15 PM

Tell that to the Turks

bnelson44 on November 15, 2007 at 7:20 PM

U.S. begs Iraqi government to seize the moment before it passes

You can’t get there from here.
- New York City cab driver

MB4 on November 15, 2007 at 7:23 PM

BL@KBIRD on November 15, 2007 at 7:15 PM

Tell that to the Turks

bnelson44 on November 15, 2007 at 7:20 PM

And then get the Turks to tell that to the Armenians and the Kurds.

MB4 on November 15, 2007 at 7:27 PM

You can’t get there from here.
- New York City cab driver Pepperidge Farms

MB4 on November 15, 2007 at 7:23 PM

Kini on November 15, 2007 at 7:30 PM

I knew it was all too good to be true.

Kini on November 15, 2007 at 7:31 PM

Okay lets start from the premise that Federalism is built from the bottom up rather than the top down.

This an opportunity for the provinces to step up appoint leaders, dare I say statesman, to leadership roles. At the same time these local leaders should be preparing for election so they can go to Baghdad and form a real government.

The U.S. should be using this time to gin up a “throw the bums out mentality” to get rid of the old school corruption, and sloth in Baghdad, then replace it with real leadership in the next elections.

I would rather the people throw them out then being placated and a corrupt tenous ally remains in Baghdad.

This is not “bad” news, just another opportunity to move forward.

But this strategy means little if we cannot get the power on. If we can the message can get out to the masses, and the people can see local leaders taking charge and providing basic services prior to elections.

Theworldisnotenough on November 15, 2007 at 7:31 PM

You can’t get there from here.
New York City cab driver Pepperidge Farms Mohammad

MB4 on November 15, 2007 at 7:23 PM

Kini on November 15, 2007 at 7:30 PM

MB4 on November 15, 2007 at 7:57 PM

US backing the wrong Shi’ite horse
By Reidar Visser

For some time, analysts have suggested that the George W Bush administration’s “troop surge” strategy may have achieved a measure of success in certain parts of Iraq. Many highlight the tendency on the part of local tribes in the Sunni-dominated areas to stand up against al-Qaeda, in that way emphasizing their own “Iraqiness” as well as their unwillingness to join in an all-out war against Western civilization.

Attacks against US forces have declined in many of these areas, and there are signs that al-Qaeda has been forced to relocate to new areas and to choose new targets.

————–

The principal aim would be to create a counterbalance against the extreme pro-Iranian factions inside, such as the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council (SIIC) and its Badr Brigades – organizations that since 2003 have obtained a disproportionate degree of formal political power in the Iraqi political system and are using their roles in the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to consolidate their positions further.

There are many groups in the south with a long record of hostility to Iran, above all the various Sadrist factions such as Fadhila and the “mainline” followers of Muqtada al-Sadr (some of whom have even served sentences in Iranian prisons). There are also independent Shi’ite tribal groups that are fiercely proud of their Arab heritage. These groups also distinguish themselves from the SIIC by maintaining that any clerical rule in Iraq should be under the principle of wilayat al-faqih (the rule of the jurisprudent) dictated by Iraqi clerics, not Iranian ones.

————–

Ironically, long-standing enemies of Iran like the Fadhila party are now feeling so isolated that they see no other recourse than to upgrade contacts with their erstwhile foes in Tehran – if only tentatively. The apparent US rationale for this is the idea that the Sadrist Mahdi Army somehow constitutes their worst enemy in Iraq, and that some Mahdi Army factions are even being supplied with arms from Tehran.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/II21Ak01.html

Speakup on November 15, 2007 at 7:58 PM

I guess the Iraqis just need another ruthless dictator.

Mojave Mark on November 15, 2007 at 8:15 PM

The WaPo article about the military’s frustration with Maliki doesn’t mention any plans to remove him but those rumors have swirled for months, with the argument against doing so being that things were too unstable to try to install a new government on top of it. That excuse is less persuasive now and there are already stirrings in Congress on the Republican side to try to nudge Bush into action. The GOP can’t afford to let Maliki ride this incipient momentum down to disaster, and they certainly can’t afford to be seen as sitting by while he does so.

Well said AP. Maliki is NOT the guy. Even if he WERE the guy, the value of a democracy is how transfer of power is done peacefully. So to test the strength of a democracy you must first have a peaceful transfer of power.

Maliki is ‘Bush’s guy’. We all know what that means ‘Brownie’. Bush is loyal, that is good. But Iraq needs new elections with greater Sunni representation. If Maliki gets elected again, so be it. If not, then a better LEADER will emerge for the Iraqi people and Bush is going to have to let ‘his guy’ go.

Iraq needs new elections to solidify the new government. Without a peaceful transfer of power (as just happened again with a yawn in the USA giving Pelosi the gavel – it is still amazing how civil our country is though we disagree vehemently), democracy means nothing.

ThackerAgency on November 15, 2007 at 8:38 PM

At least he’s not oblivious to the rumours about him being an Iranian stooge.

AlexB on November 15, 2007 at 10:27 PM

This is Complete Nonsense!

#1 – We’re not favoring SCIRI over Sadr, that’s simply fabricated from whole clothe.
#2 – The WaPo took the statements out of context and cherry-picked them to create a story. Why believe they are accurately representing anything close to reality? General Petraeus thinks the Iraqi gov’t is working hard under difficult circumstances, and they are spending billions of oil money on hundreds of reconstruction projects all across the country.

It’s frustrating to see media outlets report “It would be nice if things were better” as if it were news. The WaPo is simply pushing the false narrative that political progress is weak to avoid reporting the real progress on security, progress they said would never come. This will be swept down the memory hole once political progress – which is only becoming possible now that security is in hand – advances further.

Jason on November 16, 2007 at 2:03 AM

General Petraeus thinks the Iraqi gov’t is working hard under difficult circumstances

Jason on November 16, 2007 at 2:03 AM

lol.
If he really thinks that he needs to send that mem to Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno.

MB4 on November 16, 2007 at 5:17 AM

I’d like to get a look at the newspapers in France, after our revolution. It took us 11 years to get >our act together. France was bankrupt.

Anyone seen all that oil we were in this for?

dogsoldier on November 16, 2007 at 7:02 AM

Comment pages:


You must be logged in to post a comment.