SecDef Gates cowboys up against the surrendercrat Congress
posted at 5:55 pm on November 15, 2007 by Bryan
Send to a Friend |
printer-friendly
The Democrats believe that they were handed Congress in 2006 to end the war in Iraq. In nearly a year in office, they have tried and failed to end the war 40 times. These repeated failures have surely contributed to Congress’ approval rating falling below that of President Bush, but it’s not the only reason by a long shot. Congress remains corrupt, pork-laden and kindergarten in its approach to disputes to the point that most Americans have rightly concluded that it’s just plain useless. And besides that, if Congress was given to the Democrats just to end the war, why are the President’s numbers higher than theirs? That ought to make them go hmm.
Yesterday they tried to lose the war one more time, passing a defense spending bill that calls for immediate withdrawal confident that President Bush will veto it and that the Department of Defense can make up for the lost funding by fiddling with a few budget numbers.
The former is true; President Bush will veto the bill if it gets through Senate and his veto will be sustained, and we’ll be left without a Defense spending bill until Congress comes up with one that he’ll sign. But the latter may not be true.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday that unless Congress passes funding for the Iraq war within days, he will direct the Army and Marine Corps to begin developing plans to lay off employees and terminate contracts early next year…
“There is a misperception that this department can continue funding our troops in the field for an indefinite period of time through accounting maneuvers, that we can shuffle money around the department. This is a serious misconception,” Gates told reporters at the Pentagon.
As a result, he said that he is faced with the undesirable task of preparing to cease operations at Army bases by mid-February, and lay off about 100,000 defense department employees and an equal number of civilian contractors. A month later, he said, similar moves would have to be made by the Marines.
Some members of Congress believe the Pentagon can switch enough money to cover the war accounts, Gates said. But he added that he only has the flexibility to transfer about $3.7 billion — which is just one week’s worth of war expenses. Lawmakers, he said, may not understand how complicated and restrictive the situation is.
Not having the funds in place would not force a withdrawal from Iraq, yet, but it would greatly degrade the military’s readiness on the home front.
“Today’s Army is out of balance,” Casey told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Overall, we are consuming our readiness as fast as we can build it.”
Testifying alongside Casey, Army Secretary Pete Geren urged lawmakers to approve the war funds.
“A large organization such as ours cannot turn on a dime. … It would have a dramatic effect,” Geren said. The burden would “fall heavily on home-based troops and their families,” he later added.
The Clinton budget cuts during the peacetime 90s forced units to cannibalize equipment and reduce training, which contributed to deteriorating morale and readiness across the board. What would these cuts do in the middle of a two-front war? They would hollow the military out, starting with the rear echelon but before long destroying the forces in theater that the rear echelons are supposed to support and replace in rotation.
These games of budget chicken that the Democrats keep playing with the administration are dumb and dangerous, and especially harmful given all the indicators coming out of Iraq recently that the war is really turning around. But it’s telling that Congress apparently doesn’t even understand how the DoD’s budget even works. Just what exactly is this Congress good for if it doesn’t even understand its most basic Constitutional role?
If it comes down to it, and I hope it doesn’t, to the extent that he can Gates ought to make sure that the cuts and layoffs hit Democrat districts disproportionately. If they’re going to fritter with the war like children, they need to get spanked for it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Just cut some contracts to China, Feinstein will fold like a cheap suit.
right2bright on November 15, 2007 at 5:58 PM
Yes. Take ‘em to the woodshed.
Wade on November 15, 2007 at 6:00 PM
Wade beat me to my point…
Also, sense the whole world is watching this play out; what is stopping China from annexing Taiwan or north Korea from going on a food run down south?
Take away the big stick, who watches the carrots?
liquidflorian on November 15, 2007 at 6:08 PM
I had a dream that Wolf Blitzer asked Hillary about the wisdom of these actions in the debate tonight.
Buy Danish on November 15, 2007 at 6:09 PM
They don’t even have the grapes to do what they are supposedly saying they were voted into office for in ‘06 which is a crock but they just want power period. Lay off the tools in those districts and see what happens next. Thye haven’t a clue how a budget works because they have depended on our taxes to pay them year in and year out and never had to think about a REAL budget. BS to all them libs
bones47 on November 15, 2007 at 6:13 PM
Fine- shut down operations or lay off civilian employees on some bases in Democrat districts. Then let everyone know who is to blame.
Hollowpoint on November 15, 2007 at 6:14 PM
Why do the Democrats even bother pulling stunts like this? Is it because they want to throw the nutroots like Daily Kos and MoveOn a bone? Is it because they think Bush will eventually give up and do what they want? I just don’t get it.
SoulGlo on November 15, 2007 at 6:22 PM
Somebody wake the he11 up and cut the House of Representative’s pay. Oh, that’s right they control their own purse strings and sign their own checks. How screwed up is this system?
Griz on November 15, 2007 at 6:24 PM
There is a cruel irony in using the dems own strategy to toss out a bunch of civil servants whose dues fund left wing federal worker unions
GogglesPisano on November 15, 2007 at 6:25 PM
Bryan - your last paragraph was one of my first thoughts. That would get their attention. Perhaps they could start on the left coast, frisco, seattle and on. And what is with this continuing whining that the war is lost and no progress is being made? The Republicans should put Harry Weird at the top of their hit list and Daschle him.
oilbertan on November 15, 2007 at 6:29 PM
Well, to paraphrase the Waco Kid, You’ve got to remember that these are just simple Democrats. These are people of the blue districts. The common clay of the progressive left. You know- Morons!
trubble on November 15, 2007 at 6:33 PM
WOW. Ted Kennedy got smacked down big time by Army Chief of Staff General George Casey in a portion of the SASC testimony that was shown on Brit Hume tonight.
TK made the mistake of asking “why the Army was so strapped in Iraq” and was promptly told it was because of the cuts that were made in the 90s.
Woops.
Buy Danish on November 15, 2007 at 6:51 PM
Why am I not shock from the jaws of victory those who have staked their political existence on the failure of the American military will stop at nothing to achieve their goals.
Do these idiots really think they are going to hold their grip on power by surrendering???
Mojack420 on November 15, 2007 at 6:52 PM
My thought exactly. Besides, isn’t Murtha’s district feeding well out of the Dense contract trough?
Good for Gates, man.
yo on November 15, 2007 at 7:03 PM
The democrats sabotage is going to get more overt, and more blatant, until it becomes obvious to everyone on the planet.
At that point the problem becomes, ‘what are we going to do about it’?
rockhauler on November 15, 2007 at 7:03 PM
“games of budget chicken that the Democrats keep playing with the administration are dumb and dangerous,”
NO SIR,,, their actions are Sedition. Every American war time president that oversaw a successful war effort (not counting short actions) have been forced to deal with the American Left.
Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, all at varying degress imposed presidential powers to limit or outright arrest the American left during times of war.
Korea/Truman didn’t do it, and we got a stalemate. Vietnam/Nixon/Johnson/Kennedy didn’t do it and we got a outright DEFEAT. Which list will Bush put his name in, the defeated or victorious?
No where in the constitution does it have a freedom to commit mutual suicide.
C-Low on November 15, 2007 at 7:04 PM
How these loons stay in office is amazing.
Brian on November 15, 2007 at 7:10 PM
The Dems are really itching for a complete wipeout in 08.
Clark1 on November 15, 2007 at 7:25 PM
Bush should make a speech to the American people telling them we ARE winning. The Dems apparently want us to lose by pulling funding for the war.
Set up an account for any American that wants to fund the war at this critical point could send money in specifically for that purpose. I think it would smack the Dems right on the head. i believe the response would be stunning.
stenwin77 on November 15, 2007 at 7:26 PM
FYI, Gates is not exactly the Iraq war’s biggest fan.
MB4 on November 15, 2007 at 7:32 PM
lol. It would be stunning alright.
MB4 on November 15, 2007 at 7:34 PM
Why not do War Bonds? The stipulation would be, right now, it is a gift to keep the war going, when you, the American public, throw out the bums in Congress that is holding out security hostage, you will be issued a bond or a tax refund.
WoosterOh on November 15, 2007 at 7:47 PM
Fixed that for you. This dereliction of duty is just another element in their “Lose At All Costs!” strategy.
ReubenJCogburn on November 15, 2007 at 7:57 PM
The first criteria for the layoffs, of course, should be the direct importance of those possibly layed off to the war effort and national defense. After that people and companies in the home districts of pelosi, reid, kennedy, feinstein, schumer and hagel and the rest of the traitors.
peacenprosperity on November 15, 2007 at 9:27 PM
This makes me wonder if this is the reason the defeatocrats are always demanding Bush certify the readiness of troops before deployment in their never ending terms of surrender bills.
They know their readiness would be degraded since the funding to improve their readiness would be degraded.
91Veteran on November 16, 2007 at 12:10 AM
I recall this clearly. Many units that were slotted to deploy to a conflict early (the ones who always train) never had enough ammo to even qualify let alone train.
I also recall some sort of quick scandal when Bubber was first sending troops to Bosnia, without enough ammo.
Of course the drive-by media dutifully covered for him.
91Veteran on November 16, 2007 at 12:13 AM