Drug smugglers and coyotes targeting law enforcement along US-Mexican border

posted at 9:40 am on November 15, 2007 by Bryan

Lawlessness begets lawlessness. All you have to do is Google “Nuevo Laredo” to see that. That city, just across the Rio Grande from Laredo, TX, is more or less run by drug cartels. Jerry Seper’s story in today’s Washington Times reports that smugglers and drug runners are starting to target US Border Patrol and local law enforcement officers.

Alien and drug smugglers along the U.S.-Mexico border have spawned a rise in violence against federal, state and local law-enforcement authorities, who say they are outmanned and outgunned.

“They’ve got weapons, high-tech radios, computers, cell phones, Global Positioning Systems, spotters and can react faster than we are able to,” said Shawn P. Moran, a 10-year U.S. Border Patrol veteran who serves as vice president of the National Border Patrol Council Local 1613 in San Diego.

“And they have no hesitancy to attack the agents on the line, with anything from assault rifles and improvised Molotov cocktails to rocks, concrete slabs and bottles,” he said. “There are so many agent ‘rockings’ that few are even reported anymore. If we wrote them all up, that’s all we would be doing.”

Assaults against Border Patrol agents have more than doubled over the past two years, many by Mexico-based alien and drug gangs more inclined than ever to use violence as a means of ensuring success in the smuggling of people and contraband.

It’s at this point that a lot of folks will bring up the Compean/Ramos trial, and there’s probably a there there: Prosecuting BP officers on the word of a drug smuggler can have unintended consequences. Among those might be a new perception on the part of smugglers and criminals that law enforcement officers will be more hesitant to draw their weapon in the wake of that case. And, the officers themselves might factor that case into their own actions as they make split second decisions.

But that case probably accounts for a tiny fraction of the increase in violence. It looks like the drug gangs are learning tactics from terrorists, which might be an unintended consequence of video sharing sites allowing jihadists to posts their training videos online. Or the increase in violence and firepower might suggest connections to military or police of a state or states in the region.

Several agents noted that many of the alien- and drug-smuggling gangs targeting law-enforcement authorities are doing so with sophisticated weaponry. They noted that in February, an ICE-led task force seized two completed improvised explosive devices, materials for making 33 more devices, 300 primers, 1,280 rounds of ammunition, five grenades, nine pipes with end caps, 26 grenade triggers, 31 grenade spoons, 40 grenade pins, 19 black powder casings, a silencer and cash during raids in Laredo, Texas.

Where are they getting that stuff?

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Where are they getting that stuff?

Chavez? Probably an out there guess, but he’s been pretty hostile lately.

Slublog on November 15, 2007 at 9:48 AM

Criminals with that kind of cash flow can get almost anything they want. Plenty of vendors out there, but if finding Iranian weaponry in the hands of terrorists in Iraq does not sway people, why would any of this?

bbz123 on November 15, 2007 at 9:55 AM

Dude. Really?

Jaibones on November 15, 2007 at 9:58 AM

Washington Times quote :

Mr. Moran noted that many agents are being assigned to “non-border activities,” including jobs at Border Patrol headquarters in Washington. He said the agency’s headquarters soon may be the largest regional office in the entire Border Patrol, “assigned the task of telling the public what a good job we’re doing.”

Peachy.

captivated_dem on November 15, 2007 at 10:00 AM

Criminals with that kind of cash flow can get almost anything they want. Plenty of vendors out there, but if finding Iranian weaponry in the hands of terrorists in Iraq does not sway people, why would any of this?

bbz123 on November 15, 2007 at 9:55 AM

No doubt. Our lack of reaction to this kind of thing boggles my mind. Terror tactics against our Border Patrol and we can barely get a “yawn” out of our administration? If you’ve been watching Glenn Beck, the local authorities won’t even acknowledge there is a problem. Not enough of them, anyway. Not sure what it’s going to take to wake us up.

Ordinary1 on November 15, 2007 at 10:05 AM

This wouldn’t happen if we’d allow the National Guard to SHOOT BACK!

Tony737 on November 15, 2007 at 10:15 AM

This wouldn’t happen if we’d allow the National Guard to SHOOT BACK!

Tony737 on November 15, 2007 at 10:15 AM

Racist!

Wade on November 15, 2007 at 10:18 AM

My friend and I were JUST talking about this scenario this morning. This is not good. And good question…where are they getting all these materials?

DakRoland on November 15, 2007 at 10:18 AM

Never fear, Cherthoff is working hard to bring more knives to the gun fight.

Dusty on November 15, 2007 at 10:39 AM

They’re getting the stuff from the Mexican ARMY.

Kai on November 15, 2007 at 10:48 AM

And all this time I thought it was the job of the Justice Department to target law enforcement officers for imprisonment for doing their job…

Who knew?

CrazyFool on November 15, 2007 at 10:48 AM

Never fear, Cherthoff is working hard to bring more knives very small rocks to the gun fight.

Dusty on November 15, 2007 at 10:39 AM

Fixed that for you. Even knives to the gunfight would be an improvment.

darury on November 15, 2007 at 10:57 AM

Weak government resolve can kill and often does. Sit back and watch, boys and girls, as the downward slide of the USA continues.

Like a computer, garbage in, garbage out.

saiga on November 15, 2007 at 10:59 AM

Wade, ya spelled it wrong, it’s “Raaaaaacist”. hehe

Tony737 on November 15, 2007 at 11:08 AM

we don’t need more border security. we need well-trained, armed military along the whole border to shoot these people.

this is a national security issue, yet Bush does nothing about it.

madmonkphotog on November 15, 2007 at 11:13 AM

We should protect the border with claymores. Let that be our invisible fence.

Wade on November 15, 2007 at 11:26 AM

As mentioned above, Glenn Beck has been hammering away for several days on Laredo/Nuevo Laredo and the murders and kidnapping going on there.

Something like 70 murders/kidnappings, mostly by drug dealers, and local officials know nothing, see nothing, do nothing…

rockbend on November 15, 2007 at 11:26 AM

It’s refreshing to have the truth said in so simple terms.
It is a Border War and it has been & is going to be a long hard slog.

Christine on November 15, 2007 at 11:29 AM

Criminals with that kind of cash flow can get almost anything they want.

bbz123 on November 15, 2007 at 9:55 AM

If we want to cut off their cash flow we can start by legalizing marijuana and then taxing it like tobacco. Potheads will pay more for legal and safe gov’t approved dope than they will for smuggled pot. High prices will keep too many new users from trying it and drug smugglers will dry up like bootleggers after the end of prohibition. Also, no smuggled drugs means no dope pushing scum trying to get kids to sample their product.

Bill C on November 15, 2007 at 11:57 AM

Remember that “money trumps national security” these days. I hope that in the future that isn’t the case but since none of the Democrats and most of the Republicans are more interested in leaving the border open I’m not holding my breath.

Buzzy on November 15, 2007 at 12:11 PM

If we want to cut off their cash flow we can start by legalizing marijuana and then taxing it like tobacco.

Why stop at marijuana? Black markets immediately create fabulously huge incentives for smugglers. Always has, always will.

How huge, do you ask? I know an ex-con, an ex-meth dealer, who made $10,000 per day. He never did laundry. He would throw clothes away after they got dirty and buy new ones. Yay, war on (some) drugs.

This economic argument is, unfortunately, way beyond the thinking ability of many very militantly stupid conservatives.

Loundry on November 15, 2007 at 12:43 PM

I often wondered why wouldn’t this be a bigger issue with the Bush Admin. Yes, as commenter Buzzy points out, “money trumps national security”, so where’s the money? Ranchers?

Don’t fence me in

Kini on November 15, 2007 at 12:44 PM

It’s at this point that a lot of folks will bring up the Compean/Ramos trial, and there’s probably a there there: Prosecuting BP officers on the word of a drug smuggler can have unintended consequences. Among those might be a new perception on the part of smugglers and criminals that law enforcement officers will be more hesitant to draw their weapon in the wake of that case. And, the officers themselves might factor that case into their own actions as they make split second decisions.

I’m glad at least one blogger here gets it. We screamed this very point at the top of our lungs, but so many people here and elsewhere in the conservative blogosphere rushed to defend Johnny Sutton and is aggressive prosecution of these guys on the “law and order” pretense that they completely missed the bigger picture – i.e. the very damage that such an aggressive, malicious prosecution of our border patrol agents did to the very “law and order” idea they were resting their case on in the first place.

thirteen28 on November 15, 2007 at 12:47 PM

If we want to cut off their cash flow we can start by legalizing marijuana and then taxing it like tobacco. Potheads will pay more for legal and safe gov’t approved dope than they will for smuggled pot. High prices will keep too many new users from trying it and drug smugglers will dry up like bootleggers after the end of prohibition. Also, no smuggled drugs means no dope pushing scum trying to get kids to sample their product.

Bill C on November 15, 2007 at 11:57 AM

California’s medical marijuana laws have essentially decriminalized marijuana by proxy. Guess what happened to the market. It’s been flooded with high-potency pot. The black market has not dried up at all. There’s just better pot available; the market has created competition among growers to produce the best and most celebrated strains.

In refutation of your argument I will remind you that marijuana is a plant. If it’s legalized, people will grow their own.

Furthermore, are you demonizing pot-dealers as evil and preying upon children? If so, then why would you be willing to put the government in the same role as marketer of an illicit substance?

I personally believe that you or any adult should have the right to consume marijuana. I detest the arbitrary sanctions applied by our government to this utilitarian textile because of its intoxicating properties. But I don’t see your argument as helping.

The Race Card on November 15, 2007 at 12:52 PM

Gee

This article is a total fabrication by the same Union that gave the bad advice to Ramos and Compean to not take the sweetheart plea deal they were offered and instead it was

5 border patrol agents who witnessed the whole thing that convicted them NOT THE WORD OF A DRUG DEALER

If you have any doubt read the transcripts

The Trial Transcripts are an eye opener and thats why congress finally dropped it becuase these guys were not going to be the poster children for more enforcement

EricPWJohnson on November 15, 2007 at 1:20 PM

Why did this turn into an argument over drug legalization?

Ali-Bubba on November 15, 2007 at 1:32 PM

so how is this not considered and act of war and can we now shoot back with out being arrested ???

Mojack420 on November 15, 2007 at 1:37 PM

Never fear, Cherthoff is working hard to bring more knives very small rocksspit wads to the gun fight.

Dusty on November 15, 2007 at 10:39 AM

Fixed that for you. Even knives to the gunfight would be an improvment.

darury on November 15, 2007 at 10:57 AM

there fix it for you , cant take any chances of hurting a armed criminal drug smuggling alien with a rock now could we , that would be racist .

Mojack420 on November 15, 2007 at 1:42 PM

Black Jack Pershing woulda burnt NV to the ground, shot a few of the town leaders, and pulled back to Texas to watch the fun over dinner.

mojo on November 15, 2007 at 5:20 PM

Yes, this has been going on for quite some time.

Anecdotal, to be sure, but an acquaintance of mine who happens to be a National Guardsman served along the border last spring when Guardsmen were initially deployed to assist the Border Patrol.

His description of the restrictive rules of engagement was not at all heartening.

Nor were his tales of nights out at isolated observation posts, as they were probed from across the border, and sometimes even closer in – and always, always coming right up to the edge, but not crossing into a situation where they could respond without ending up being crucified for their actions.

He also mentioned that there was not a lot of confusion (to use a term nada) about who were the nasties (coyote affiliates, drug guys) and the plain run of the mill illegal looking probably hoping for a job pushing a lawn mower.

Loosening the rules to allow the Border Patrol/Guardsmen to take out the nasties with as little second thought as taking out tangos in Iraq/Afghanistan would, of course bring howls of indignation and wailing about lost moral authority, and most likely angry words from Mexican officialdom, but, it would probably put an end to a lot of the happy horsecrap hijinks that have been going on for so long.

And it would probably be a pretty good deterrent to Juan and Juanita, the meat packing plant hopefuls, if it wasn’t exactly clear to them wether or not they not only had to worry about crossing rough terrain on foot, but being potential ‘red-dot’ magnets, as well.

Anyway, hey, if we can justify going after (as in applying sufficient military grade kinetic actions so as to render them …um, dead) ‘non-state actors’ i.e. the Taliban, halfway around the world, what’s keeping even some of the more mediocre noggins at the DHS et al from coming up with a viable reason to take on the ‘non-state actors’, i.e the drug gangs, at our own back door?

Bueller?

Wind Rider on November 15, 2007 at 5:48 PM

It’s time to call in air support. Then some artillery shells into Nuevo Laredo. That would get some attention.

boomer on November 15, 2007 at 7:34 PM

Do you think congress would designate them as terrorists? Oh ya right…nevermind

boomer on November 15, 2007 at 7:38 PM

I’m all for a “dead line” on the border. It would quickly solve numerous problems. When did we become a nation of wussies unwilling to even defend our own borders from armed attack?

deepdiver on November 15, 2007 at 8:43 PM