Rasmussen: Mitt now seen as most conservative Republican
posted at 6:02 pm on November 12, 2007 by Allahpundit
Share on Facebook | regular view
Which isn’t to say he’s seen as being the most conservative philosophically, merely that he’s now identified as a conservative by more Republican voters than any other candidate. Romney at 46, Fred at 40, Huck at 38. The good news for Team Romney? Mitt was at 36% only a month ago. The bad news?
Moving up fast in the competition for most conservative contender is Mike Huckabee. Thirty-eight percent (38%) now view him as politically conservative, twenty percent (20%) say moderate, and 6% liberal (see crosstabs). In July, before the Huckabee boomlet began, just 21% viewed him as conservative while 27% said moderate or liberal.
Huckabee is still less well known than the other contenders and 36% of Republican voters do not know enough to offer an opinion on his ideology.
Huck obviously can’t compete with Mitt financially so his campaign hangs on the evangelical endorsement. If Dobson et al. anoint him, it could make him competitive in Iowa and the buzz from that would carry over to New Hampshire and South Carolina. If they don’t, he’s done. And speaking of done, today’s big pro-life endorsement notwithstanding, anyone heard from Fred lately? Here’s the Boston Globe describing his campaign strategy:
Lacy said the campaign’s strategy is to do well in Iowa, which on Jan. 3 holds the first nominating contest, and to have enough resources in New Hampshire to benefit from an Iowa bump. The campaign then hopes for a strong showing in South Carolina, which votes Jan. 19 and which the campaign hopes will be a better fit for Thompson’s Southern roots and conservative stands, followed by victories in other Southern states, including those voting among more than 20 states holding primaries on Feb. 5.
Iowa’s less than two months away and he’s in fourth place in the last four polls taken — fifth place if you choose to believe ARG. It’s hard to see how he makes a dent in either Mitt or Huckabee between now and then. Meanwhile, check out South Carolina, where he was polling in the mid-20s shortly after he announced and now finds himself in the low 20s or high teens, in a virtual dead heat with Mitt and Rudy and vulnerable to Huck if Huck beats him in Iowa (which is likely). Exit question one: How do things get better for Fred? Exit question two: With Mitt having momentum, is it any wonder his staffers are telling him to ush-hay about his ormonism-May?
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Not bad for a former governer of Massachusetts.
pedestrian on November 12, 2007 at 6:08 PM
Born again conservative…say hallelujah…he has risen…(cost 20 mil, but what the hell?)
right2bright on November 12, 2007 at 6:17 PM
OT: Ron Paul calls the troops, “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and regurgitates other leftist talking points, like the 650k dead iraqi’s.
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst090207.htm
the paultards are also planning a Boston Tea Party fund raising thing.
jp on November 12, 2007 at 6:19 PM
Indeed, especially considering his competitors are the drawly Sutharn, and Manic Minister. Oh, and Judy-Ani, New York crossdresser.
BKennedy on November 12, 2007 at 6:20 PM
Also:
Welcome Back Allahpundit! Fanfare!
BKennedy on November 12, 2007 at 6:24 PM
That’s funny, I just saw a poll that said that 27% of Americans believed in alien visitations. I wonder if it is the same 27% ???
MB4 on November 12, 2007 at 6:24 PM
I still think the compressed primary schedule will be the reason behind a Guiliani win in the primaries. Independents that like him can vote in at least some of the primaries, which ones I’m not sure.
Fred is sinking like a stone. If he sticks it out till SC, where he has a chance he only helps Guiliani as the “conservative” vote is split 2-3 ways.
Bradky on November 12, 2007 at 6:25 PM
Mitt is a real super-achiever. I’m sure he could morph into the “most whatever-it-takes-to-win” for any race.
dedalus on November 12, 2007 at 6:25 PM
By securing the coveted HotAir endorsement, obviously.
Weight of Glory on November 12, 2007 at 6:47 PM
Conservative? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
How the hell is it that a nanny-stater like Huckabee can somehow manage to get 38%, and yet no one managed to break 50%?
Watcher on November 12, 2007 at 6:51 PM
Are you suggesting that the term “conservative” is being misused? Inconceivable!
Weight of Glory on November 12, 2007 at 6:55 PM
I guess in the expression “You can fool some of the people some of the time…”, “some” of the people comes out to 46%.
Hollowpoint on November 12, 2007 at 7:05 PM
heh.
Weight of Glory on November 12, 2007 at 7:06 PM
Most conservative of the Top Four? I’m kinda seeing that.
More conservative than Duncan Hunter? No.
Lawrence on November 12, 2007 at 7:30 PM
Mitt is EASILY the most conservative top-tier candidate. I’m glad some people are starting to wake up to this fact. Romney ‘08!
davenp35 on November 12, 2007 at 7:49 PM
It’s simple, really. Mitt has been emphasizing his “three legged stool” analogy of conservativeness. Those three legs are social conservatism, fiscal conservatism, and strong on defense.
He scores the best on all three taken together. Sure, some candidates might have a better position on one leg or another, but they fail miserably on other legs. Guiliani is strong on defense, but abysmal on social conserns. Huckabee is strong for the social con, but his fiscal conservatism is horrible. Fred–Fred, who the heck knows? He’s strong on social conservatism, but on smaller goverment or defense, I just don’t know his positions for the most part.
Vanceone on November 12, 2007 at 7:55 PM
Someone need to ask mitt if he is running for VP
William Amos on November 12, 2007 at 7:58 PM
A flip-flopping, big government gun grabber is the most conservative frontrunner? I think not. There’s hardly an issue that he’s been consistantly conservative on.
Hollowpoint on November 12, 2007 at 8:03 PM
He’s more conservative than Giuliani, and more viable than Thompson.
Slublog on November 12, 2007 at 8:06 PM
Even Bill Clinton is more conservative than Giuliani.
MB4 on November 12, 2007 at 8:08 PM
I love this stuff. The gloves are off and we are into some bare knuckle fist to cuffs!
csdeven on November 12, 2007 at 8:08 PM
But Bill Clinton isn’t running.
csdeven on November 12, 2007 at 8:09 PM
Yes, we get it. You hate Giuliani.
Slublog on November 12, 2007 at 8:09 PM
No, you do not get it. I do NOT hate Giuliani!!!
I am trying to save the
CheerleaderRepublican partyI think that he would make a fine nominee for the democrats, very fine.MB4 on November 12, 2007 at 8:29 PM
If Romney was a Christian he would win. But he’s not so he may not. Unless he comes up with something amazing or we come up with a plan ‘Z’ by January, we could be screwed?
PoliticallyIncorrectSandy on November 12, 2007 at 11:49 PM
Mitt has consistently NOT lobbied for dictators and other assorted scum. Nor has he given legal advice to terrorists or funneled campaign cash to his son. He did not author McCain/Feingold, and he is very open about his evolution into a very strict pro-life candidate. He has run many successful businesses, the Olympics, and a state. He does not run around town bragging he is a man whore and he doesn’t purchase red pickups in order to create the image of a Washington outsider. Mitt IS a Washington outsider and he is an honest conservative with very strong family values.
csdeven on November 13, 2007 at 12:04 AM
If this is true then it’s proof positive that people are not yet paying any attention to this race.
edgehead on November 13, 2007 at 12:09 AM
These guys are going to split enough of the primaries that nobody will have enough votes to secure the nomination outright. We’re going to have an open, brokered convention. I can smell it coming.
trigon on November 13, 2007 at 12:44 AM
Mitt may indeed be the most Conservative top-tier candidate… as long as one only counts the past year or so, anyway.
daviddunn on November 13, 2007 at 12:49 AM
If by conservative we mean a pro-abortion cum pro-life cum pro-abortion cum pro-life like Mitt then fine. He’s always going to be problematic to those of us who believe that only one God exists.
Mojave Mark on November 13, 2007 at 1:16 AM
Anyone but Ron Paul and Rudiani. Fox News Alert! Did Kurik, Americas Sanctuary City Police Chief, receive sweets from a mob run corporation?
saved on November 13, 2007 at 5:18 AM
Somehow Fred keeps polling well getting endorsements, lots of money.
He didn’t read the rules of the campaign – doing his own unscripted and unchoreagraphed thing
Go figure
EricPWJohnson on November 13, 2007 at 10:22 AM
So Ted Kennedy’s cabana boy is seen as a conservative? Tell me, you guys that think Mitt is a conservative, do you think that young women who come up to you on the street and ask you if you want a date, are doing it because they think you’re hot? The level of gullibility being displayed here is nauseating. I think Southpark needs to revist their demographic rule. It’s not 25% of Americans are retards, it’s 46% of conservatives are apparently gullible fools with the memory capicity of a lemming. Enjoy the Hillary Presidency. You’re another step closer to making it happen.
austinnelly on November 13, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Yup, Mitt is trying to buy the primaries.
$85K a day, that’s a lot of chowder.
omnipotent on November 13, 2007 at 11:17 AM
The problem here is that those conservatives you speak of aren’t really conservatives — they’re neoconservatives, which is in and of itself a from of liberal ideology. And since Romney is himself a neocon (i.e. liberal) it’s no great surprise that those people gravitate to his pseudo-conservative message.
2Brave2Bscared on November 13, 2007 at 4:12 PM
Answer: He gets a bump from the NRLC endorsement, then picks up the NRA’s endorsement as well. But he has to make a strong showing in Iowa, where I would think he would play fairly well, and try to get a come-from-behind second place finish there like Edwards did in 2004. With Romney the prohibitive favorite there for so long, the second place finisher (assuming they can get anywhere near Mitt) will be the big media story coming out of Iowa. And Fred also has to start winning in South Carolina. If he can’t win there he’s toast, and if he gets smoked in Iowa and NH, he won’t win there.
Dudley Smith on November 13, 2007 at 7:58 PM
Comment pages: