Musharraf sets elections for February 15 Update: Report that Bhutto is under house arrest
posted at 6:10 pm on November 8, 2007 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | regular view
That’s a month later than was planned before Musharraf’s state of emergency.
President Gen. Pervez Musharraf yielded to pressure from the United States on Thursday and said Pakistan will hold parliamentary elections by mid-February, just a month later than originally planned.
But the military leader showed no sign of letting up on his political foes, reportedly arresting more than 800 supporters of opposition leader Benazir Bhutto before dawn in an effort to head off a major anti-government demonstration set for Friday.
The White House hailed its ally’s election pledge, but Bhutto denounced his announcement as “vague” and demanded Musharraf give up his second post as army chief within a week. She said the mass protest would go ahead despite warnings it could be targeted by suicide bombers.
It seems, to me if no one else, that no one is behaving wisely here. The state of emergency was, to put it mildly, a bad idea. As were the arrests of lawyers and others who only pose a threat to Musharraf, not to the country itself. Musharraf morphs more and more into a dictator with each arrest and each day in the state of siege. But at the same time, what is the point of street demonstrations as Bhutto is calling for? I see two things that are likely to result: Terrorists may attack the demonstrators out of their usual lust for carnage, or Musharraf may attack them out of paranoia. Hugo Chavez can order his goons to attack protesters and it barely causes a stir, but if Musharraf does that he’ll have the whole world pounding him for it. The pressure applied to Musharraf has forced his hand on elections, but that presumes that nothing happens to derail them between now and then, and that waiting until February allows for enough cooling off. Factor in the loss of Pakistani territory to pro-Taliban factions and you have the makings of a very serious mess. The mess didn’t start with Musharraf’s imposition of the state of emergency, but it certainly wasn’t made better by it.
It’s difficult to see this situation ending well, in terms of mid-term violence and long-term outcome. The Musharraf and Bhutto factions keeps pushing the other, and the radicals are probably plotting how to keep them divided and when to attack which one to make the point that Musharraf isn’t strong enough to deal with them and Bhutto won’t know how. At this point, both critiques seem to be accurate. It’s all a recipe for chaos unless and until Musharraf and Bhutto can come to some kind of understanding. And given where public opinion seems to be in Pakistan, getting Musharraf and Bhutto together is no guarantee that Pakistan won’t spiral out of control.
Update: Paranoia strikes deep.
Pakistan’s former premier Benazir Bhutto was to be put under house arrest Friday, hours before she was due to lead a rally against a state of emergency, government officials said.
“She is being placed under house arrest,” a senior government offcial told AFP on condition of anonymity.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

















Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages:
Sweet dreams America!
Theworldisnotenough on November 8, 2007 at 6:26 PM
I don’t think the jihadists are excited about an election any time. Mush better crush something or he surely will be crushed. The world is amazingly calm in the face of possibilities coming from a general collapse of the land of the pure.
BL@KBIRD on November 8, 2007 at 6:29 PM
Soooo,does that mean their nukes are safe until
February 15!
canopfor on November 8, 2007 at 6:41 PM
Am i the only one who thinks that if the mad mullahs take over Pakistan, and they wake up one day and feel the need to go Greg Stillson on somebody, their most likely target of nukes is going to be India, not the US?
Mike D. on November 8, 2007 at 7:14 PM
I might be wrong, but I’m pretty sure they can’t get a nuke here. Or Europe. Maybe Israel.
But somebody help me connect the dots: who are the protestors, and what is their issue? If I have it right, they are Bhutto supporters, who is also anti-radical Islam, like Mushy, but anti-Mushy.
So Mushy is slapping them around out of the normal kind of paranoia, not the anti-Islamo-Nazi kind? And if so, as Bryan has clearly pointed out, when does he get back to the job at hand, i.e., slaughtering Islamo-Nazi scum up in the north?
Jaibones on November 8, 2007 at 7:48 PM
Then Global Warming will be the least of anyones worries, but Global Fallout.
The difference between Hugo and Mushy is Hugo’s insane and doesn’t have nukes, but Hugo has oil and can be rationally justified doing business with because somehow a communist is less threating than a dictator in the worlds eyes.
Kini on November 8, 2007 at 7:49 PM
Here’s what everyone is missing. Musharraf is FOR the TERRORISTS. He’s been telling America what we want to hear since 9/11 to maintain power. This is NO DIFFERENT.
Sharia has grown more under Musharraf than under ANY OTHER PAKISTANI LEADER. Despite the threat of Islamization, Pakistan is a fairly modern country of 160 million people who DO NOT WANT SHARIA.
It isn’t Musharraf who is keeping sharia away from Pakistan. Musharraf is ushering it in with things like giving up the NW province – something that a ‘pro-America’ leader WOULD NOT DO.
Please understand that the US is better off without Musharraf anywhere NEAR power. Musharraf has done NOTHING to assist us on the war on terror. He has used the WOT as an excuse to get rid of people he disagrees with on more than one occassion.
It isn’t the ‘lesser of two evils’. Musharraf IS the evil that nobody in the country wants leading them. If it wasn’t for the US, he’d be gone, and Pakistan would be better.
The longer he remains NEAR power, the worse it is for the USA.
ThackerAgency on November 8, 2007 at 8:02 PM
Musharraf set up the Taliban. He recognized them in Afghanistan before 9/11. He harbors them in Pakistan. His intelligence agency (ISI) is a part of the Taliban. That’s why he says ‘if you have evidence of Bin Laden in the country, give it to us and we will act on it’.
He wants the evidence so that they can then cover their tracks and find out what we know. It is absurd that people believe such a simple and moronic lie. No wonder taqiyya works.
We said we would fight any country who aided and abetted terrorism. PAKISTAN IS IT! IF Pakistan isn’t aiding and abetting, what other country on the planet does? Oh yeah, I forgot about our other ‘friend’ Saudi Arabia.
America would be better off if Musharraf wasn’t in power – nukes or not. At least then we could see the clear enemy who needs to be defeated.
ThackerAgency on November 8, 2007 at 8:07 PM
I say we pull out and nuke em from orbit.
JayHaw Phrenzie on November 8, 2007 at 8:23 PM
Thacker, this is quite the conspiracy theory that you’re peddling. Where’d you get it, or did you make this up all by yourself?
Jaibones on November 8, 2007 at 10:42 PM
He needs the extra time to make sure his cronies rig the lection s weel enough to keep him and his cronies in power.
paulsur on November 8, 2007 at 10:45 PM
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan – Pakistani police backed by armored vehicles detained opposition leader Benazir Bhutto at her Islamabad residence Friday and reportedly rounded up 5,000 of her supporters to block a planned mass protest against emergency rule, officials said.
Authorities were adamant the rally Bhutto planned in nearby Rawalpindi would not go ahead — under the government’s emergency powers President Gen. Pervez Musharraf declared last weekend, mass gatherings are banned. Mayor Javed Akhlas also said there was a “credible report” of six or seven suicide bombers in the city.
“We condemn this government move. It shows that the government is scared of Benazir Bhutto’s popularity and it does not want her to be among masses,” said Sen. Babar Awan, Bhutto’s lawyer.
There was confusion among her aides about whether she would attempt to go to the venue in Rawalpindi, which had been sealed off by riot police backed by armored vehicles. The headquarters of Pakistan’s army Musharraf’s residence are also located in the city.
Nazir Dhoki, a spokesman for Bhutto’s Pakistan People’s Party said the former prime minister still planned to leave on schedule for Rawalpindi, but Sen. Enver Baig said party leaders were meeting to discuss whether the rally would go ahead or not.
MB4 on November 9, 2007 at 3:05 AM
Islam and democracy are incompatible.
2Brave2Bscared on November 9, 2007 at 4:12 PM
Comment pages: