<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audio: Michelle and Laura talk GOP politics, endorsements and the maturing of Pat Robertson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:07:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: revolution</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-772475</link>
		<dc:creator>revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 06:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-772475</guid>
		<description>I thought Laura souded like a self-righteous, self proclaimed Joan of Arc and Michelle was slipping into that over inflected arrogant way she can speak sometimes, also. These women need to stay off each other&#039;s shows, they reduce each other to cackling washateria gals trying to one up each other on who can denigrate the best. 

The Jesus wigs are as irrelevant as their &quot;Messiah&quot;. The Republican party is not the party of Jesus of Nazareth. If anything, the opposite is true. The Founders were significantly influenced by deists like Franklin and Jefferson, even though the J-wigs have tried as earnestly to erase that fact as the leftists have tried to erase other tenants of American history.

After all, the J-wigs had nearly 1400 years to impose the &quot;Bible&quot; on citizens through government. It is called the Dark Ages.

Sometimes Laura can be an incredibly self-righteous person, and one of the most shameless self promoters on the radio. Her radio show became a month long self indulgent non-stop commercial for her latest Ann Coulter knock off. Her show is sometimes nothing more than her and her side kicks giggling like high schoolers cutting class. 

It makes me think that even with talk radio and blogs, the Right does not have the kind of communicative power needed to achieve its goals (which by the way are not religious).

I was hoping Michelle was not a &quot;praise Jesus&quot; type, and I was under the impression that Allah Pundit was non-religious. Everyone on this site should read Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Then come back and listen to this audio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Laura souded like a self-righteous, self proclaimed Joan of Arc and Michelle was slipping into that over inflected arrogant way she can speak sometimes, also. These women need to stay off each other&#8217;s shows, they reduce each other to cackling washateria gals trying to one up each other on who can denigrate the best. </p>
<p>The Jesus wigs are as irrelevant as their &#8220;Messiah&#8221;. The Republican party is not the party of Jesus of Nazareth. If anything, the opposite is true. The Founders were significantly influenced by deists like Franklin and Jefferson, even though the J-wigs have tried as earnestly to erase that fact as the leftists have tried to erase other tenants of American history.</p>
<p>After all, the J-wigs had nearly 1400 years to impose the &#8220;Bible&#8221; on citizens through government. It is called the Dark Ages.</p>
<p>Sometimes Laura can be an incredibly self-righteous person, and one of the most shameless self promoters on the radio. Her radio show became a month long self indulgent non-stop commercial for her latest Ann Coulter knock off. Her show is sometimes nothing more than her and her side kicks giggling like high schoolers cutting class. </p>
<p>It makes me think that even with talk radio and blogs, the Right does not have the kind of communicative power needed to achieve its goals (which by the way are not religious).</p>
<p>I was hoping Michelle was not a &#8220;praise Jesus&#8221; type, and I was under the impression that Allah Pundit was non-religious. Everyone on this site should read Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Then come back and listen to this audio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2Brave2Bscared</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-772205</link>
		<dc:creator>2Brave2Bscared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 02:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-772205</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I suggest you keep an open mind and actually find out what the facts are.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m well aware of the facts, thank you.

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2006/05/mike_huckabee_is_a_liberal_a_c.php

http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/06/30/News/323746.html

http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=2829&amp;CMSCategoryID=19

Huckabee is not a conservative. Not even close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I suggest you keep an open mind and actually find out what the facts are.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m well aware of the facts, thank you.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2006/05/mike_huckabee_is_a_liberal_a_c.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2006/05/mike_huckabee_is_a_liberal_a_c.php</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/06/30/News/323746.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/06/30/News/323746.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=2829&amp;CMSCategoryID=19" rel="nofollow">http://www.conservativesbetrayed.com/gw3/articles-latestnews/articles.php?CMSArticleID=2829&amp;CMSCategoryID=19</a></p>
<p>Huckabee is not a conservative. Not even close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rugged Individual</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-772136</link>
		<dc:creator>Rugged Individual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-772136</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;

We in the conservative movement have to get over ourselves. 

......

For me, a less than perfect and desirable &lt;strong&gt; repub &lt;/strong&gt; (emphasis TRI) is far b[e]tter than anyone on the left……..

ritethinker on November 8, 2007 at 1:06 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;


You said what I&#039;ve been thinking, ever-increasingly, for twenty-plus years... We can&#039;t afford to lose to those who would give our country away wholesale and subject us to full socialism, communism, or sha&#039;ria. I&#039;m no more content with the deviant-marriage or abortion situations than Michelle, Laura, or anyone else here..., but sane, solution-oriented, sovereignty-conscious, genuinely patriotic citizens need to be, SOLIDLY and Firmly, &#039;in control&#039; before ANY real change can even be debated among such people. The Lib-Dems need to be relegated to spectator status if we&#039;re ever to return to that which our Founding Fathers created and our Forefathers, so valiantly, maintained, up to the point where our freaks on the fringes began to abuse our tolerant generosity.

On a different note...
Could we NOT refer to our guys as &#039;Repubs&#039; and call them &quot;Reps&quot; to give it a &#039;jaunty&#039; sound, as opposed to resembling the names which the Dems call us...? Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>We in the conservative movement have to get over ourselves. </p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>For me, a less than perfect and desirable <strong> repub </strong> (emphasis TRI) is far b[e]tter than anyone on the left……..</p>
<p>ritethinker on November 8, 2007 at 1:06 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>You said what I&#8217;ve been thinking, ever-increasingly, for twenty-plus years&#8230; We can&#8217;t afford to lose to those who would give our country away wholesale and subject us to full socialism, communism, or sha&#8217;ria. I&#8217;m no more content with the deviant-marriage or abortion situations than Michelle, Laura, or anyone else here&#8230;, but sane, solution-oriented, sovereignty-conscious, genuinely patriotic citizens need to be, SOLIDLY and Firmly, &#8216;in control&#8217; before ANY real change can even be debated among such people. The Lib-Dems need to be relegated to spectator status if we&#8217;re ever to return to that which our Founding Fathers created and our Forefathers, so valiantly, maintained, up to the point where our freaks on the fringes began to abuse our tolerant generosity.</p>
<p>On a different note&#8230;<br />
Could we NOT refer to our guys as &#8216;Repubs&#8217; and call them &#8220;Reps&#8221; to give it a &#8216;jaunty&#8217; sound, as opposed to resembling the names which the Dems call us&#8230;? Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dedalus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-772017</link>
		<dc:creator>dedalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-772017</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh snap! Questioning my conservatism!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wouldn&#039;t question your conservatism.  After reading through your blog, it seems like your position is well thought out and the writing is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh snap! Questioning my conservatism!</p></blockquote>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t question your conservatism.  After reading through your blog, it seems like your position is well thought out and the writing is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared White</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-772013</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-772013</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Huckabee is not a nanny-stater.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes. He. Is. Period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And why is that? You gotta give me something more concrete than workplace smoking (something that some people, like my brother, are extremely allergic to, BTW)... As for taxes, F.A.I.R. T.A.X. Check it out. BTW, the few taxes he did raise while Governor he has already clearly explained the rationale behind that. I suggest you keep an open mind and actually find out what the facts are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Huckabee is not a nanny-stater.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Yes. He. Is. Period.</p></blockquote>
<p>And why is that? You gotta give me something more concrete than workplace smoking (something that some people, like my brother, are extremely allergic to, BTW)&#8230; As for taxes, F.A.I.R. T.A.X. Check it out. BTW, the few taxes he did raise while Governor he has already clearly explained the rationale behind that. I suggest you keep an open mind and actually find out what the facts are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terryannonline</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771969</link>
		<dc:creator>terryannonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771969</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;MirCat on November 8, 2007 at 1:50 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh snap! Questioning my conservatism! Aw, that&#039;s ok. I spent a  lot of time watching MTV when a teenager so I think that automatically takes some points off my total conservative  percentage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>MirCat on November 8, 2007 at 1:50 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh snap! Questioning my conservatism! Aw, that&#8217;s ok. I spent a  lot of time watching MTV when a teenager so I think that automatically takes some points off my total conservative  percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilts</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771916</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771916</guid>
		<description>Yeah GOP Presidential nominee Mike Huckleberry - that will really scare the Dems. Bryan you better wake up and greow up and learn that the President cannot outlaw abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah GOP Presidential nominee Mike Huckleberry &#8211; that will really scare the Dems. Bryan you better wake up and greow up and learn that the President cannot outlaw abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2Brave2Bscared</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771867</link>
		<dc:creator>2Brave2Bscared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771867</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bryan, has MM been banned from Fox News? Haven’t seen her on the O Factor for a couple months.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She quit the O&#039;Reilly Factor. However, she still appears on other Fox News shows from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bryan, has MM been banned from Fox News? Haven’t seen her on the O Factor for a couple months.</p></blockquote>
<p>She quit the O&#8217;Reilly Factor. However, she still appears on other Fox News shows from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMCS_USN</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771830</link>
		<dc:creator>RMCS_USN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771830</guid>
		<description>Bryan, has MM been banned from Fox News?  Haven&#039;t seen her on the O Factor for a couple months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, has MM been banned from Fox News?  Haven&#8217;t seen her on the O Factor for a couple months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2Brave2Bscared</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771822</link>
		<dc:creator>2Brave2Bscared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771822</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Huckabee is not a nanny-stater.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes. He. Is. Period.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Laura offered that Huck was a reasonable choice. Not sure if he would be tougher on immigration than Rudy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

When it comes to immigration, Hunckabee makes Rudy look like Tom Tancredo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Huckabee is not a nanny-stater.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes. He. Is. Period.</p>
<blockquote><p>Laura offered that Huck was a reasonable choice. Not sure if he would be tougher on immigration than Rudy.</p></blockquote>
<p>When it comes to immigration, Hunckabee makes Rudy look like Tom Tancredo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771790</link>
		<dc:creator>shick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771790</guid>
		<description>ColtsFan,

Thanks for posting the link to that debate. More christians and atheists should experience debates like this to expose the light on their own presuppositions.

Oops! Did I say the presup word? I exposed a bit of myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ColtsFan,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting the link to that debate. More christians and atheists should experience debates like this to expose the light on their own presuppositions.</p>
<p>Oops! Did I say the presup word? I exposed a bit of myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omnipotent</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771746</link>
		<dc:creator>omnipotent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771746</guid>
		<description>Laura really annoys me.

Now it&#039;s Fred!s fault that the &quot;useful tool&quot; endorses Rudy.

Was Fred! supposed to badmouth Robertson?

I agree that Roberson&#039;s endorsement is a hinderance for Mayor 9-11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura really annoys me.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s Fred!s fault that the &#8220;useful tool&#8221; endorses Rudy.</p>
<p>Was Fred! supposed to badmouth Robertson?</p>
<p>I agree that Roberson&#8217;s endorsement is a hinderance for Mayor 9-11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColtsFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771680</link>
		<dc:creator>ColtsFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771680</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Joshua P. Allen on November 8, 2007 at 1:44 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Joshua,

I enjoyed taking a quick look at your neat website.  

I listened with interest to your audio clip, &quot;Tips for Christians debating Atheists.&quot;

I agree with you that Type 2 Christians are nasty, irrational, disrespectful,  (and most importantly:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Peter%203:15&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;strong&gt;unChrist-like&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;

You have articulated other helpful points as well.

One disagreement I have with your audio clip, in my humble opinion, centers on the metaphysics and epistemology of the Type 1 atheist.

This is off-topic, but I just wanted to say I enjoyed your audio clip overall, with some reservations  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bellevuechristian.org/faculty/dribera/htdocs/PDFs/Apol_Bahnsen_Stein_Debate_Transcript.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; about the correct philosophical defense of Christianity.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Joshua P. Allen on November 8, 2007 at 1:44 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Joshua,</p>
<p>I enjoyed taking a quick look at your neat website.  </p>
<p>I listened with interest to your audio clip, &#8220;Tips for Christians debating Atheists.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with you that Type 2 Christians are nasty, irrational, disrespectful,  (and most importantly:  <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Peter%203:15" rel="nofollow"> <strong>unChrist-like</strong>.</a></p>
<p>You have articulated other helpful points as well.</p>
<p>One disagreement I have with your audio clip, in my humble opinion, centers on the metaphysics and epistemology of the Type 1 atheist.</p>
<p>This is off-topic, but I just wanted to say I enjoyed your audio clip overall, with some reservations  <a href="http://www.bellevuechristian.org/faculty/dribera/htdocs/PDFs/Apol_Bahnsen_Stein_Debate_Transcript.pdf" rel="nofollow"> about the correct philosophical defense of Christianity.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MirCat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771655</link>
		<dc:creator>MirCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771655</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I must have missed the memo that all conservatives have to vote on the abortion issue.

terryannonline on November 8, 2007 at 11:24 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That memo was only for the real ones ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I must have missed the memo that all conservatives have to vote on the abortion issue.</p>
<p>terryannonline on November 8, 2007 at 11:24 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>That memo was only for the real ones ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua P. Allem</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771640</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua P. Allem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771640</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just taken for granted that the majority of the black vote goes to the Democratic Party every election.  But the black community rolls their eyes every time Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton come out of hiding to &quot;represent the black community&quot;.  I&#039;ve feared for a while that the Christian vote has been taken for granted within the Republican Party.  And it looks like we now have our own Jesse Jackson &amp; Al Sharpton.  We&#039;ve got James Dobson making us cringe as he speaks for &quot;the Christians&quot; within the Republican Party and now we have Pat Robertson.  I consider myself a hardcore Christian and neither of these people speak for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just taken for granted that the majority of the black vote goes to the Democratic Party every election.  But the black community rolls their eyes every time Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton come out of hiding to &#8220;represent the black community&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve feared for a while that the Christian vote has been taken for granted within the Republican Party.  And it looks like we now have our own Jesse Jackson &amp; Al Sharpton.  We&#8217;ve got James Dobson making us cringe as he speaks for &#8220;the Christians&#8221; within the Republican Party and now we have Pat Robertson.  I consider myself a hardcore Christian and neither of these people speak for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Candy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771622</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad Candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771622</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;right2bright on November 8, 2007 at 12:53 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Huck&#039;s a squish on border/illegal immigration issues, possibly worse than Bush, he&#039;s a tax squish and big spenda, also has abysmal ratings from the Club for Growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>right2bright on November 8, 2007 at 12:53 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Huck&#8217;s a squish on border/illegal immigration issues, possibly worse than Bush, he&#8217;s a tax squish and big spenda, also has abysmal ratings from the Club for Growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laserlawyer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771611</link>
		<dc:creator>Laserlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771611</guid>
		<description>I wonder whether, back when Pat Robertson was running for President, Giuliani would have endorsed him?  I seriously doubt it.  Strange bedfellows indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder whether, back when Pat Robertson was running for President, Giuliani would have endorsed him?  I seriously doubt it.  Strange bedfellows indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slublog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771602</link>
		<dc:creator>Slublog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771602</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Can you site something else, besides the government workplace non-smoking ban?
I hear that Huck is un-electable, then they bring up the one thing. Is there more negatives?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unfortunately, yes.  He&#039;s bad on taxes, spending and immigration.  Huckabee is a silver-tongued George W. Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Can you site something else, besides the government workplace non-smoking ban?<br />
I hear that Huck is un-electable, then they bring up the one thing. Is there more negatives?</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, yes.  He&#8217;s bad on taxes, spending and immigration.  Huckabee is a silver-tongued George W. Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ritethinker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771596</link>
		<dc:creator>ritethinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771596</guid>
		<description>We in the conservative movement have to get over ourselves.  Take just two social issues, gay marriage and abortion.  These issues will eventually be settled in the courts.  It shouldn&#039;t be the case, but welcome to 2007 America, where the spineless run for office and the whiney vote for them.  So, a presidential candidate spending large amounts of valuable stump-speech time and agenda time on these issues means little really.  Reagan ran on abortion as did Bush the elder and the current Bush.  Abortion is still the law of the land last time I checked.  We have to change hearts on this issue, which we are doing by the way.  Gay marriage became a national issue because of a state court.  It will be settled in the federal courts.  Now, having stated that, I myself prefer a candidate with strong creds on these issues.  But there is this thing out there called Islamic Fascism...sorry folks but this commands all my attention.  Right after is immigration....then tax-reform(fair-tax)SSI reform and so on.  

So here we are...there is no Reagan in the GOP field...no clear-cut conservative with the proper creds.  What are we to do?  Go third party and give the fifth column the presidency with our men and women in the combat zone and an enemy trying to annihilate us?  Vote for someone based on a few social concerns while ignoring the major issue of our time...with the result being to again hand the fifth column the victory?  There are those elections where you have to make decisions on more than just one level.  This is one of those elections.

For me, a less than perfect and desirable repub is far batter than anyone on the left........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We in the conservative movement have to get over ourselves.  Take just two social issues, gay marriage and abortion.  These issues will eventually be settled in the courts.  It shouldn&#8217;t be the case, but welcome to 2007 America, where the spineless run for office and the whiney vote for them.  So, a presidential candidate spending large amounts of valuable stump-speech time and agenda time on these issues means little really.  Reagan ran on abortion as did Bush the elder and the current Bush.  Abortion is still the law of the land last time I checked.  We have to change hearts on this issue, which we are doing by the way.  Gay marriage became a national issue because of a state court.  It will be settled in the federal courts.  Now, having stated that, I myself prefer a candidate with strong creds on these issues.  But there is this thing out there called Islamic Fascism&#8230;sorry folks but this commands all my attention.  Right after is immigration&#8230;.then tax-reform(fair-tax)SSI reform and so on.  </p>
<p>So here we are&#8230;there is no Reagan in the GOP field&#8230;no clear-cut conservative with the proper creds.  What are we to do?  Go third party and give the fifth column the presidency with our men and women in the combat zone and an enemy trying to annihilate us?  Vote for someone based on a few social concerns while ignoring the major issue of our time&#8230;with the result being to again hand the fifth column the victory?  There are those elections where you have to make decisions on more than just one level.  This is one of those elections.</p>
<p>For me, a less than perfect and desirable repub is far batter than anyone on the left&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omriceren</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771584</link>
		<dc:creator>omriceren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771584</guid>
		<description>Not surprised that Ron Paul polls well against Hillary - they&#039;re competing for the same anti-war Democrats...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprised that Ron Paul polls well against Hillary &#8211; they&#8217;re competing for the same anti-war Democrats&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771571</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771571</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Slublog on November 8, 2007 at 11:22 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Can you site something else, besides the government workplace non-smoking ban?
I hear that Huck is un-electable, then they bring up the one thing.  Is there more negatives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Slublog on November 8, 2007 at 11:22 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Can you site something else, besides the government workplace non-smoking ban?<br />
I hear that Huck is un-electable, then they bring up the one thing.  Is there more negatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacklake</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771524</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacklake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771524</guid>
		<description>Robertson seems to be, surprisingly, a political realist (in the technical sense).  I doubt that Giuliani is his dream candidate, either, but I think he truly comprehends the ruthlessness of the Clintons, and what a third term of their presidency will do to the long-term prospects of the Republican Party (and Evangelicals in particular). 

To contrast within the opposition, the primary objective of an Obama presidency would be to advance liberal policies, while the primary objective of (a third) Clinton presidency would be to legislatively, bureaucratically, and judicially tilt the national playing field such that it will be virtually impossible for Republicans to ever again achieve political power.  Period.

In other words, even if Giuliani were in political lock-step with the most leftist of Democrat candidates, he would be better for the future of Robertson and conservatives of any stripe than the Clintons, who want not just to govern liberally but to fundamentally change the nature of American politics in a way not seen since FDR.  When your very survival is at stake, it&#039;s not the time for perfectionism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robertson seems to be, surprisingly, a political realist (in the technical sense).  I doubt that Giuliani is his dream candidate, either, but I think he truly comprehends the ruthlessness of the Clintons, and what a third term of their presidency will do to the long-term prospects of the Republican Party (and Evangelicals in particular). </p>
<p>To contrast within the opposition, the primary objective of an Obama presidency would be to advance liberal policies, while the primary objective of (a third) Clinton presidency would be to legislatively, bureaucratically, and judicially tilt the national playing field such that it will be virtually impossible for Republicans to ever again achieve political power.  Period.</p>
<p>In other words, even if Giuliani were in political lock-step with the most leftist of Democrat candidates, he would be better for the future of Robertson and conservatives of any stripe than the Clintons, who want not just to govern liberally but to fundamentally change the nature of American politics in a way not seen since FDR.  When your very survival is at stake, it&#8217;s not the time for perfectionism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColtsFan</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771505</link>
		<dc:creator>ColtsFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771505</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Laura offered that Huck was a reasonable choice. Not sure if he would be tougher on immigration than Rudy
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/perkins.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; I agree with you:  Huckabee is notoriously weak, and he, just like Rudy, are &lt;strong&gt;liberal on illegal immigration&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;

Michelle was correct about questioning if Robertson&#039;s endorsement is an asset to Rudy.  Many of us Bible-believing Christians have long raised &quot;red warning flags&quot; and have expressed serious doctrinal concerns about Pat Robertson and his views on God, especially his mystical, irrational, subjective, and non-traditional views on God&#039;s Revelation, ex. &quot;God just spoke to me today...&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=84&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Whenever a professing Christian leader appeals to subjective, mystical experiences to justify their views, all of us Bible-believing Christians should be very concerned and worried.  The Bible alone is the Word of God. &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Laura offered that Huck was a reasonable choice. Not sure if he would be tougher on immigration than Rudy
</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/perkins.html" rel="nofollow"> I agree with you:  Huckabee is notoriously weak, and he, just like Rudy, are <strong>liberal on illegal immigration</strong>.</a></p>
<p>Michelle was correct about questioning if Robertson&#8217;s endorsement is an asset to Rudy.  Many of us Bible-believing Christians have long raised &#8220;red warning flags&#8221; and have expressed serious doctrinal concerns about Pat Robertson and his views on God, especially his mystical, irrational, subjective, and non-traditional views on God&#8217;s Revelation, ex. &#8220;God just spoke to me today&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=84" rel="nofollow">Whenever a professing Christian leader appeals to subjective, mystical experiences to justify their views, all of us Bible-believing Christians should be very concerned and worried.  The Bible alone is the Word of God. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dedalus</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771472</link>
		<dc:creator>dedalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771472</guid>
		<description>Laura offered that Huck was a reasonable choice.  Not sure if he would be tougher on immigration than Rudy.  The abortion issue may weigh more heavily for Laura than for most Republicans and she may be overestimating what can be changed on that one issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura offered that Huck was a reasonable choice.  Not sure if he would be tougher on immigration than Rudy.  The abortion issue may weigh more heavily for Laura than for most Republicans and she may be overestimating what can be changed on that one issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThackerAgency</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/comment-page-1/#comment-771463</link>
		<dc:creator>ThackerAgency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/08/audio-michelle-and-laura-talk-gop-politics-endorsements-and-the-maturing-of-pat-robertson/#comment-771463</guid>
		<description>That was an excellent segment of talk radio.  Laura made awesome points as usual, and Michelle was running right along side of her.  Well done all around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an excellent segment of talk radio.  Laura made awesome points as usual, and Michelle was running right along side of her.  Well done all around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
