You’re onto it, but you have it reversed. ;)

Sammy316 on November 7, 2007 at 3:51 PM

Reversed? read this (I am assuming this guy or gal wasn’t joking, although it is hard to believe):

IF this candidate was getting the answers that keep this country moving in a conservative direction, yes, I don’t care if he/she uses tarot cards.

csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 3:59 PM

The end justifies the means.

Looks like I didn’t have it reversed after all.

Your apology is accepted.

You first since you started it.
csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 3:57 PM

You forgot “neener, neener, neener!”

Oh, and before you respond, (if you respond) just remember that I’m rubber and you’re glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks on you.

:-p

right2bright on November 7, 2007 at 2:52 PM

IF this candidate was getting the answers that keep this country moving in a conservative direction, yes, I don’t care if he/she uses tarot cards.

leaving the DU.org-style behavior at the door.

MadisonConservative on November 7, 2007 at 1:55 PM

You first since you started it.

And it’s easy. Just stop attacking and fixating on little old me. Just get back on topic.

right2bright on November 7, 2007 at 2:52 PM

You’re onto it, but you have it reversed. ;)

but you have admitted you are and I will not argue with you.
csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Didn’t know you have a hard time understanding sarcasm. That is why posting to you is so dangerous. I make a sarcastic remark and you will run around for weeks taking it out of context.
You on the other hand make it plain that ones beliefs have no bearing on whether you support them or not. An honest conservative valued Wicken would be fine with you running our country. Making his decisions using Tarot cards. That’s comforting.

I admit I was playing with him last night, but I was bored and I thought the thread was dead. Slow news day I guess. But the more you answer his wailing in the crib the more he is going to do it.

That isn’t how you get back into my good graces.

csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 1:51 PM

Your mistake is in thinking I care about your good graces. I don’t. All I care about is you leaving the DU.org-style behavior at the door.

That isn’t how you get back into my good graces.

“Lie” #2 – You do post the same stuff. It’s the same sound bytes, over and over: “Scumbag lobbyist…defended terrorists…what’s a dollar…lobbied for abortion, killed babies himself…etc etc.” Same. Stuff. Over. And. Over. If I posted how many times you had said this stuff, the post along would take up more page space than this entire thread.

“Lie” #3 –

I have almost always used “$” for “S” and “8″ for “B”.

Oh really?

No. But he is an HONEST businessman. “Honest” being the key word.

csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Sorry, but you have been excused from the adult table. When you’re ready to stop lying, come back and I decide if you are worthy of my valuable time.

csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 11:31 AM

Wow. I didn’t even have to scroll up much. But, I guess those are the rare circumstances when you’re not saying something you know will get you more closely looked at by those who have the power to shut down your kind of bile, eh?

“Lie” #4 – I have no proof for that, just experience. Experience with people who have openly proclaimed that your responses drove them away from ever coming back to this site. Oh, wait, actually that is proof. I’ve seen no other member accomplish it.

“Lie” #5 – You don’t make me mad. Obviously, you’re the only mad one here, as you’ve defaulted to name calling, profanity, and personal insults. Explain that one away.

“Lie” #6 – You attack people who disagree with you all the time. I’m not even going to bother pointing out those you’ve admonished, berated, mocked, and flat-out insulted in this thread. You’ve done it in countless other threads, all relating to Fred. Somehow, you stay civil in threads of other topics, and I recognize that. This is why I believe you truly have FDS. Just like a rabid liberal, who can carry on a perfectly nice conversation with people but turn into the tasmanian devil when Bush is mentioned, you somehow transform into an absolute troll with no temper when Fred is discussed.

Seriously. It’s old, and the number of people who have just started ignoring you keeps growing. Ask yourself why you needed to include “disclaimers”. The very fact of it means you recognize the vast populace who is tired of your rhetoric. We’re all glad to have a discussion about anything. However, the level you drag it down to is revolting. You are no better than the likes of Alex Jones.

And my final word, which is not a lie, is this: I don’t even like Thompson anymore. But your spittle-flecked scorched theses are enough to make me vote for him just so I know I’m not voting the same way the lunatics are.

You stay classy saint.

Nice spin, even though it applies to 98% of members here.
MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 4:43 PM

Lie #2

We don’t have to read it to know what you post. It’s the same crap, said 500,000 times already. Your “disclaimers” just verify what it is before we even look at it.
MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 5:17 PM

That particular comment about WHY executive experience was a new comment by me.

Lie#3

Use numbers to replace letters in words to get past the moderation flag.
MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 6:00 PM

You don’t need to do that to avoid the filter. I have almost always used “$” for “S” and “8″ for “B”.

Lie#4

No one has driven away more potential posters, and shown such childish, bottom of the barrel, low behavior than this guy.
MadisonConservative on November 7, 2007 at 9:35 AM

Lie #5

You don’t make me mad.
MadisonConservative on November 7, 2007 at 10:20 AM

Yeah riiiight. You are only on a personal quest to stalk me from thread to thread because you love me. You have made precisely 10 comments in this thread and 8 of them are off topic attacking me.

Lie#6

You consider anyone who disagrees with you about Fred somehow deserving of insult and ridicule.
MadisonConservative on November 7, 2007 at 10:21 AM

I don’t ridicule anyone until they ridicule me. You are the case in point. YOU started the attacks on me and I have duly chastised and ridiculed you for it.

You could solve your little problem by growing up and resisting the inclination you have to fixate on me. Get back to the thread topic and I’ll consider allowing you back at the adult table.

MadisonConservative on November 7, 2007 at 11:38 AM

Don’t worry, his adult table consists of him and and a dozen empty seats. He is just working on becoming a god of his own planet.

Sorry, but you have been excused from the adult table. When you’re ready to stop lying, come back and I decide if you are worthy of my valuable time.

csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 11:31 AM

Show me where I’ve lied. You’ve used foul language, baselessly insulted others, and engaged in schoolyard flippancy “wahhhhh” and the like. You do keep copying and pasting everything you’ve said before as if we haven’t already read it when you explode. You also keep accusing those who don’t accept your view that Fred is from the seventh layer of hell as being “Fred shills” or “licking his boots”.

Oh, wait, I think I’ve just shown every reason why the majority of posters take one look at your diatribes and laugh.

right2bright on November 7, 2007 at 10:38 AM

I believed you were a bigot, but you disagreed. You seemed to back off of the bigoted rhetoric until this thread. I still gave you the benefit of the doubt, but you have admitted you are and I will not argue with you.

unless you think being a conservative means you have to be a “great” businessman)

No. But he is an HONEST businessman. “Honest” being the key word.

MadisonConservative on November 7, 2007 at 10:21 AM

Sorry, but you have been excused from the adult table. When you’re ready to stop lying, come back and I decide if you are worthy of my valuable time.

Even this negative Boston.Com story about the fees Romney raised makes it pretty hard to argue that he injured the little people.

These are nickel and dime increases which are hardly punitive and which certainly beat raising taxes to fix the $3 Billion dollar deficit he had to deal with when he took office.

But hey, since you’re so “bright”, what would you have done?

csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 10:09 AM

As a matter of fact you have called me a bigot in past posts. Of course you taking things out of context is your way of debate.

So if someone espouses conservative values, but his religion drives him to howl at the moon and wear emulates to protect himself from evil. You consider that presidential material? If he used tarot cards to make his decisions, but he had conservative values that is all you need? I assure you extreme Muslims can be very conservative.

I would have zero problem with them if they held fast to conservative values.

Well I guess you aren’t a bigot (by your definition)…but you don’t have much of a standard for being a president.
I think you defined what is important to you.
(ps, then why all of the touting of Mitts business acumen, if conservative values are the only important thing…unless you think being a conservative means you have to be a “great” businessman)

EricPWJohnson on November 7, 2007 at 9:46 AM

He didn’t raise taxes, sheesh, he implemented “fees”. You see you can raise fees on essential items, but that isn’t raising taxes. It is a very mysterious.
Therefore, Mitt didn’t raise taxes substantially, he just made it more difficult for the average citizens to live by raising essential fees.
Kind of like giving someone who is starving smaller portions on a big plate. They can always say, “we gave them a larger plate of food”.
“Fee and spend” doesn’t sound as good “Tax and spend”.

Bigotry has no place in debate unless it is to debate bigotry itself.

csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 10:03 AM

You consider anyone who disagrees with you about Fred somehow deserving of insult and ridicule. That’s bigotry, pal.

csdeven on November 7, 2007 at 9:58 AM

You don’t make me mad. Apparently, I make you write complete analytical dissertations on those who oppose your foul language, gutter humor, and schoolyard style of insulting those who disagree with you and your psychotic replies.

There are a few things that Ron Paul and Alex Jones say that I agree with. There are a few things you say that I agree with. You’re all still absolutely delusional cranks with severe problems communicating like normal human beings.

Get it yet? Or can you not get your points across with copy/pasting what you’ve said 879 times before and frosting it with more hatred than any member of this site?

Guess that definitely makes me a BIGOT.
right2bright on November 7, 2007 at 9:47 AM

Do you expect anyone to argue with you about your assessment of yourself? Don’t hold your breath.

EricPWJohnson on November 7, 2007 at 9:46 AM

I apologize sir, but your comment was a bit hard to understand and I don’t want to make assumptions about what you are asking. If you could re-post it I will do my best to answer your question.

right2bright on November 7, 2007 at 9:39 AM

First off, I never called you a bigot. But it appears that you have exposed yourself as a bigot. If we had a candidate that danced around a fire and howled at the moon, I would have zero problem with them if they held fast to conservative values. You need to clarify your position, because bigots are so convinced that they are thinking clearly they cannot conceive that someone else would not feel the same way. It’s called projecting.

Bigotry has no place in debate unless it is to debate bigotry itself.

What does all that have to do with “What’s a dollar?” and his pathetic attempts at obfuscating his disgusting associations with scumbags?

Here’s a list of the dredges of society he has aligned himself with:

1) Dictators.
2) Abortion clinics.
3) Terrorists.
4) Companies who poisoned their employees.
5) People who attack the first amendment.

Add to that his funneling of campaign funds to his son and his bald faced lies about always being pro-life, and it is hard to understand why you are disturbingly fixated on me instead of accepting the facts about Fred.

Fair warning. The following is a stark evaluation of you and why you act the way you do. Read it at your own risk…..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The only answer can be that you are suffering from a severe personality disorder. You seem to have a split personality. You continue to attack me for the comments I have written to defend myself from the attacks that you, and others, have initiated against me. You’re like “Dust Bunny” in the sense that you believe that your attacks exist in a vacuum.

Lets engage in a little exercise…….

I want you to give me $100.

You wont you say?

WOW! Why is it that I can MAKE you mad, but I can’t MAKE you give me $100?

In case you can’t figure it out, it is because you CHOOSE to be mad as a defense mechanism against the realization that I am smarter and more aware of my actions than you are. You are out of control and trying to compete at a higher level that you are unable to compete in. This frustrates you and that is why you go for the low hanging fruit insults when I skewer Fred for the lying terrorist supporting fake that Fred is.