Hot Air Mobile
Home The Vault Gear About
Hot Air -- get your fill


Fred’s new ad

posted at 4:10 pm on November 6, 2007 by Bryan
Share on Facebook | regular view

Everyone’s posting this new ad so I guess I will too. It starts its broadcast run tomorrow. It’s a solid ad, nothing to jump up and down about, though you see a little bit of Fred’s Hollywood chops in it. Folksy Fred is fine but I prefer the cigar-chomping Fred who talks smack to Michael Moore.


Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2 3

I like Fred – but I still say we need a butt kicking SOB – I like Rudy.

jake-the-goose on November 6, 2007 at 4:13 PM

Folksy Fred is fine but I prefer the cigar-chomping Fred who talks smack to Michael Moore.

Ditto.

amerpundit on November 6, 2007 at 4:15 PM

Yeah ditto smack-talking Fred.

His next ad should end with ‘Protect the borders. Kill the terrorists. Punch the hippies.’

Right Frank? :P

apollyonbob on November 6, 2007 at 4:16 PM

I’m not a “Fredder” but that is a good ad. Nice touch with the Reagan pic and *gasp* he uses the “G” word!

Brat on November 6, 2007 at 4:16 PM

Huh. My rights come from government.

nosliwelyk on November 6, 2007 at 4:22 PM

I like Fred – but I still say we need a butt kicking SOB – I like Rudy.

jake-the-goose on November 6, 2007 at 4:13 PM

If only it weren’t for the likelyhood that Rudy would use his “butt kicking SOB” skills to give amesty to illegals and to fight against other conservative ideals, you might be right.

Hollowpoint on November 6, 2007 at 4:25 PM

A bobble head Fred doll is redundant. Can’t he keep his head from jerking around?
Folksy just doesn’t do it for me, but better then the Mitt’s backyard.

right2bright on November 6, 2007 at 4:26 PM

Wrong nos. The Constitution is written so that the government is not allowed to TAKE AWAY your God given rights to ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’.

It’s a common misconception that the government’s job is to ‘give you rights’. When we are free without government. Government’s main purpose is to limit freedoms. Our founding fathers knew that so they set up the Constitution to keep the government from taking FREEDOM away from the people.

Anyway, Fred isn’t playing the game right. I saw him at a town hall meeting in NH yesterday and he did fine. The problem is that he never once mentioned ‘New Hampshire’, or the city that he was in.

Rule #1 for a politician on the campaign trail is always pepper every speech you say with the town and state that you are in. He did a lot of talking about Tennessee, but no talking about New Hampshire.

It’s a simple game but there isn’t really a rule book so to speak. He needs to get over talking about Tennessee so much and talk about the state and town that he is in when he campaigns.

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 4:27 PM


Huh. My rights come from government.

nosliwelyk on November 6, 2007 at 4:22 PM

So you’re the fool? Man, it takes all kinds. Ever find yourself awake in a history class? Ever wondered how Pelosi and her kind could have created such a great country? I didn’t think so.

Nice ad Fred. Using the ‘G’ word will warrant a NYT’s piece for sure.

Griz on November 6, 2007 at 4:29 PM

Huh. My rights come from government.

nosliwelyk on November 6, 2007 at 4:22 PM

No, they don’t. Try reading the Bill of Rights sometime.

The US government doesn’t grant rights; the Constitution serves to prevent government from infringing on your rights, not to grant them.

If you don’t believe in God, think of them as natural rights in the context that natural disasters are often referred to as an “act of God”.

Hollowpoint on November 6, 2007 at 4:29 PM

I’m sure the guy was kidding. Lighten up.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) on November 6, 2007 at 4:32 PM

It’s a simple game but there isn’t really a rule book so to speak. He needs to get over talking about Tennessee so much and talk about the state and town that he is in when he campaigns.

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 4:27 PM

I believe I read elsewhere that there are similar but seperate ads that play nationally and in Iowa.

Hollowpoint on November 6, 2007 at 4:32 PM

That’s good Hollowpoint, but I wasn’t so much talking about this campaign spot as much as the town hall speech I saw him give on CSPAN yesterday in NH.

Bill Clinton was a master at that. That type of campaigning works especially well in NH. Talk about how wonderful it is there and poll numbers will rise.

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 4:34 PM

OT: But very funny!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMqTKA8BxvE

Andy in Agoura Hills on November 6, 2007 at 4:38 PM

Pretty good spot. Though, the set combined with his folksiness still made it seem like a Cracker Barrel commercial.

I still like him, but I wish he’d get a script for his stump speeches already.

CP on November 6, 2007 at 4:39 PM

There was some head bobbing going on, but for the most part it was a good ad.

Now I have some criticisms of Fred so this is fair warning to those with csdeven derangement syndrome NOT to read from this point forward.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
What stuck out for me was his remark that if you play by the rules you have a fair chance to live the American dream. That’s true unless you happen to be the victim of asbestos poisoning and Fred is lobbying your representatives to take away your right to be represented by an attorney. OR, if you are trying to get the terrorists who murdered your family over Lockerbie and Fred is giving legal advice to their lawyer to help them avoid prosecution for 11 years.

I think this is about all he can say for his candidacy. He pretty much laid out the only experience he has. It’d be nice if he had actually ran something. Like a state, a city, a business, or even a corner store. I wonder why he doesn’t tell everyone he is a pro-choice federalist? Would people get the wrong idea and assume he was pro-choice?

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 4:40 PM

*prepares for the inevitable venomous and vitriolic trolling to start*

Not a bad ad, but I’d like a little more of the gumption and straight talk he used to give in his radio spots.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 4:42 PM

IT’S TOO LATE!

Fred had me like many and then it dragged out and then he said he was in but he wasn’t, then he was ready to get in, but didn’t, then it was time to get in, but Fred said no hurry, then we waited again and then maybe and then HE FINALLY DECIDES AND WE HAVE WAITED SO LONG and the we get the folksy sleepy Fred.

I just can’t take it. We really do need the “Cigar Chomping Fred Thompson” Action Figure!

I may end up voting for Rudy.

Scoreboard44 on November 6, 2007 at 4:42 PM

csdeven derangement syndrome

Nice spin, even though it applies to 98% of members here.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 4:43 PM

The Ad….sucks.

I don’t need to see senior citizens waving flags.

I need Fred Thompson wielding a bat. If he’s gonna play the part of Bufurd T. Pusser, then by GOD START TAKING SOME SWINGS!!!

I need what John Edwards has done to Hillary in that ad he just put out after the debate.

Scoreboard44 on November 6, 2007 at 4:46 PM

I liked the ad. It seems from things that are posted here that the people of New Hampshire are a little self absorbed. Maybe not, but he is running for national office, not state office. But then we’re stuck with Arnold, there isn’t much hope for our state. I have to look for hope at the national level.

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 4:51 PM

As Allahpundit warned months ago, Fred’s folksy shtick, however sincere it may be, gets old really fast.

Move along; nothing to see here.

Splashman on November 6, 2007 at 4:53 PM

As Allahpundit warned months ago, Fred’s folksy shtick, however sincere it may be, gets old really fast.

With that, I do definitely agree. It sure as hell won’t last the year.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 4:54 PM

nothing to jump up and down about

kind of like how his candidacy has turned out.

its vintage duh on November 6, 2007 at 4:55 PM

csdeven, would you rather he run a city as a sanctuary city, boast about violating his citizens’ 2nd amendment rights and sue gun manufacturors making a legal product, and then expand the socialized medicine program in the city by 3x, hire a priest accused of sexual misconduct and removed from the priesthood for his lawfirm, and then stand by his corrupt city police chief while everyone says he shouldn’t?

Did I mention anything about abortion rights or gay rights?

What’s good for the goose. . . I don’t really think you want to start going down this road csdeven because I know you like Rudy.

I could get into how his kids feel about him, how the NYPD feels about him, his questionable decisions about the security of NYC before and after 9/11. . .

You want to go there?

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 4:57 PM

OT: But very funny!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMqTKA8BxvE

Andy in Agoura Hills on November 6, 2007 at 4:38 PM

Wow!

If this guy “Remy” is for real, then Bryan and Michelle should seek him out for a HotAir.com video segment. That’d be a good interview.

ScottMcC on November 6, 2007 at 4:59 PM

That’s good Hollowpoint, but I wasn’t so much talking about this campaign spot as much as the town hall speech I saw him give on CSPAN yesterday in NH.

Bill Clinton was a master at that. That type of campaigning works especially well in NH. Talk about how wonderful it is there and poll numbers will rise.

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 4:34 PM

You’re probably right, but that kind of meaningless pandering drives me up the wall, even if it works and is somewhat necessary. Especially in IA and NH, where their entire state identity seems to revolve around their self-declared kingmaker status. They seem to go to whomever spends enough time kissing their collective self-important butts rather than actually considering the issues or candidate.

I really wish they’d just move to a one day, national primary- just like how we have a one day, national election. Then I’d never have to hear the words “New Hampshire (or Iowa) primary” more than once a year, nor would we have to have the silly pissing contest between states, moving the primaries earlier and earlier.

Hollowpoint on November 6, 2007 at 5:01 PM

I find Fred’s “folksiness” a lot less annoying than Hillary’s “shrillness.”

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 5:01 PM

Good ad … have to see what he has in store next. December should be hopping.

tarpon on November 6, 2007 at 5:01 PM

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 4:57 PM

I haven’t decided on any candidate yet. Rudy and Mitt are in the lead with Huck close behind (but losing ground very fast).

Criticisms of Fred following. Fair warning.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The reason why executive experience is important is to see how the candidate performs as an executive. We can see how Rudy, Huck, and Mitt have done. With Fred we have to extrapolate from his words and more importantly from his past behavior. You know what activities and people he has been involved in his entire life and there is every reason to believe he would continue to associate with those types. This is why he would never win the general election against any dem. People who are inclined to vote for conservatives will not vote for a lobbyist who dealt with dictators, gave advice to terrorists, and funnels campaign cash to his family. And he doesn’t have enough positives to mitigate those actions.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:04 PM

And what positives do Hillary have that would make her a better choice for people than Fred? For every thing that can be pointed to that Fred may have done wrong, there are an abundance of things that Hillary has done that are far worse.

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 5:07 PM

Huh. My rights come from government.

To loosely quote The Great One: every day that Congress is in session you lose a little more of your rights.

As others have pointed out, government only takes away rights it does not bestow any.

jdpaz on November 6, 2007 at 5:08 PM


People who are inclined to vote for conservatives will not vote for a lobbyist who dealt with dictators, gave advice to terrorists, and funnels campaign cash to his family.

That’s good. Then we shouldn’t lose any voters to Hillary.

Griz on November 6, 2007 at 5:09 PM

I really wish they’d just move to a one day, national primary-

The problem with that is that the candidates will all spend all their time in the big states leaving the other states to just accept whatever the big states wanted to give them. This is why we have a Republic.

I don’t want California, New York, Illinois, Florida deciding who runs the country. I’m happy that Iowa gets attention and New Hampshire and South Carolina.

It’s not so much pandering as it is recognizing where you are. It’s like a rock star who always says ‘Hello Rochester’, or ‘How are you HOUSTON’ and everybody screams. Still talk about the issues, but say how happy you are to be in Podunk, Iowa and people will like you even more even if they agree with you. . . . Pandering is what politicians do.

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 5:11 PM

Corny. Very corny ad.

Here is MY exit question for the Fred campaign:

In Fred’s America, does anyone, I mean ANYONE AT ALL, live in a city???

Does anyone NOT live on a small town farm???

Is Fred just going to write off all the people who live in cities and suburbs in favor of the Mayberry RFD vote???

I mean it.

Always Right on November 6, 2007 at 5:11 PM

People who are inclined to vote for conservatives will not vote for a lobbyist who dealt with dictators, gave advice to terrorists, and funnels campaign cash to his family. And he doesn’t have enough positives to mitigate those actions.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:04 PM

And people that get their fill of your BS go somewhere else to read the news.

bye

News2Use on November 6, 2007 at 5:11 PM

Civil rights come from God.

Civil liberties come from gov’t.

PoliSci 101

Sammy316 on November 6, 2007 at 5:12 PM

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 5:07 PM

I believe it is the lesser of two evils. Fred has helped terrorists and dictators and all Hillary has done is cheat campaign finance rules and murdered other dems.

No contest.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:13 PM

News2Use on November 6, 2007 at 5:11 PM

I told you not to read it. Your whining falls on deaf ears.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:14 PM

WTF is up with all the white faces in these political ads?

I’m no PCer but for gawds sake, would it kill ‘em to put in a few minorities?

The Ugly American on November 6, 2007 at 5:15 PM

I think it is an excellent ad. I like the fact that he did all the talking.

bnelson44 on November 6, 2007 at 5:15 PM

That’s good. Then we shouldn’t lose any voters to Hillary.

Griz on November 6, 2007 at 5:09 PM

That’s right, in a sense. They just stay home and give Hillary the win.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:15 PM

I told you not to read it. Your whining falls on deaf ears.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:14 PM

And just who in hell put you in a position to tell me what to read and not??

News2Use on November 6, 2007 at 5:16 PM

AR, I would much rather the Mayberry RFD types choose our president than the big city types. I trust their judgment a lot more.

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 5:16 PM

told you not to read it. Your whining falls on deaf ears.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:14 PM

We don’t have to read it to know what you post. It’s the same crap, said 500,000 times already. Your “disclaimers” just verify what it is before we even look at it.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 5:17 PM

Conservatives aren’t going to stay home if the choice is Fred. Rudy is the one giving conservatives problems.

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 5:18 PM

…but Fred doesn’t really want to be president…

Entelechy on November 6, 2007 at 5:19 PM

He sure seems like a likeable guy. I just wonder what’s really in there. He seems smart enough, but whether he is a man with a mission or not remains to be seen by me. Also, all of his closet baggage hasn’t come out yet either. He must have had an active personal life that may have produced some activities that nick him. We shall see.

saiga on November 6, 2007 at 5:19 PM

I’m no PCer but for gawds sake, would it kill ‘em to put in a few minorities?

The Ugly American on November 6, 2007 at 5:15 PM

Ditto.

ScottMcC on November 6, 2007 at 5:22 PM

News2Use on November 6, 2007 at 5:16 PM

It was a warning dumbass. Idiots like you choose to read things you know will piss you off and you want to attack the person who wrote it.

You are a little 8itch who 8itches for the sake of it because you love it. You are pathetic.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:23 PM

It was a warning dumbass. Idiots like you choose to read things you know will piss you off and you want to attack the person who wrote it.

You are a little 8itch who 8itches for the sake of it because you love it. You are pathetic.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:23 PM

You should be banned for that kind of discourse. It doesn’t belong here.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 5:26 PM

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:23 PM

Very good. At least now there is no doubt what caliber of patrons HOTAIR management supports. Like I said.. see ya around.

News2Use on November 6, 2007 at 5:26 PM

Always Right on November 6, 2007 at 5:11 PM

Just don’t get it do you. America’s root’s are small town. At least half the people living in the big cities came either from the burbs or from small towns. It’s those small town values that Fred is speaking to. It’s those small town values that America still cherishes.

doriangrey on November 6, 2007 at 5:26 PM

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 5:18 PM

That’s what you would do.

Fair warning. Criticisms of Fred follow.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Regular CONSERVATIVE folks will not vote for a guy who associates with terrorists, dictators, and other assorted scum. The will recoil at his lobbying and his funneling of funds to his son. You are misguided if you think otherwise.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:26 PM

LOL

Sammy316 on November 6, 2007 at 5:27 PM

Dare I say it?

Fred.

Pablo on November 6, 2007 at 5:29 PM

God doesn’t preserve our rights. WE preserve our rights. The 2nd amendment ensures that we have the capability to do so when peaceful means have failed. Where the 2nd amendment goes the rest of our rights will follow.

If it makes people feel better to believe that our rights are actually granted to us by God, that’s fine, so long as they don’t pretend that this absolves us of our own responsibility to preserve our rights through the blood, sweat and tears.

FloatingRock on November 6, 2007 at 5:31 PM

Remind you of anyone?

MB4 on November 6, 2007 at 5:32 PM

Very good. At least now there is no doubt what caliber of patrons HOTAIR management supports. Like I said.. see ya around.
News2Use on November 6, 2007 at 5:26 PM

Yep. This type……

And people that get their fill of your BS go somewhere else to read the news.
bye
News2Use on November 6, 2007 at 5:11 PM

People who refuse to heed warnings that what they are about to read will piss them off and then want to cry like a baby about it.

No one is listening to you.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 5:26 PM

Cry us a river. Maybe you and news2use should go get a room or something. His only comment is an attack on me and you have fallen back into your old ways.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:33 PM

…BTW, my comment above isn’t a criticism of Fred’s commercial but is in response to some of the comments above. I thought the commercial was good other than the bobblehead thing.

FloatingRock on November 6, 2007 at 5:34 PM

doriangrey on November 6, 2007 at 5:26 PM

Exactly. All the candidates would be well served to try to distance themselves from behavior that would turn off regular conservative folks.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:34 PM

I think that Fred is someone conservatives can get behind. They just need assurance that he really wants to win and can go the distance. I see him as the only real choice, not to say he is the perfect choice, but I don’t see anyone else. (Accept Hunter, but he doesn’t seem to be catching on).

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 5:39 PM

I like Fred – but I still say we need a butt kicking SOB – I like Rudy.

jake-the-goose on November 6, 2007 at 4:13 PM

But then again, when is the last time Rudy told someone off?

Any video of Fred running from Truthers?

- The Cat

MirCat on November 6, 2007 at 5:39 PM

The more I look into Spencer Abraham’s past record, the more the caution flags go up when considering to vote for Fred Thompson. The Republican top tier candidates all have questionable conservative bona fides, so FT could still be getting my vote. I think FT has made points by outlining a specific immigration plan also at his debut at the Republican debate FT did not shy away from the spotlight when he was confronted with his previous trash talking on Rudy and Mitt. Granted the other candidates did hold office as Governor’s and Mayor but I think that is exactly why more caution should be used when making a decision on who to vote for. What you see is what you get. For me whoever passes the smell test on the second ammendment, immigration and taxes has a strong chance to garner my vote. Abortion and gay marriage are not on my radar because a conservative president should nominate conservative judges to the bench.

sonnyspats1 on November 6, 2007 at 5:42 PM

Too little too late. It’s either Mitt or Rudy, and I’m tilting hard toward Rudy. I’m betting Rudy’s a strong winner.

petefrt on November 6, 2007 at 5:43 PM

Regular CONSERVATIVE folks

No one is listening to you.

Cry us a river.

Behold, the voice of ALL conservatives and ALL commenter’s on hotair.

I guess we can just let ole whats his name comment for all of us. We are just to damn dumb and to do it ourselves. Must be hell to be blessed with omnipotent intelligence and be surrounded by whiny little b*tches.

LOL

Sammy316 on November 6, 2007 at 5:43 PM

WTF is up with all the white faces in these political ads?

I’m no PCer but for gawds sake, would it kill ‘em to put in a few minorities?

The Ugly American on November 6, 2007 at 5:15 PM

Fair enough, but assuming that this is geared towards Republican primary voters- especially those in Iowa- it’s fairly representative of his target audience who tend to be older and whiter than the general population.

Hollowpoint on November 6, 2007 at 5:44 PM

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 4:27 PM

I was at the last stop of the day for Fred yesterday in Dover, NH, and he said “Neu Hampsher” 6, 7, 8 times or so. So I gather someone got him the message to say where he is. Anyways, this ad was better than the five or so minutes he gave to the crowd gathered there.

rslancer14 on November 6, 2007 at 5:46 PM

What an ass. No, not Fred.

Cuffy Meigs on November 6, 2007 at 5:46 PM

Abortion and gay marriage are not on my radar because a conservative president should nominate conservative judges to the bench.

sonnyspats1 on November 6, 2007 at 5:42 PM

Exactly, what else can a President do about these issues.

The War.
Our Borders.
The SCOTUS.

These are the important issues…at least IMHO.

Sammy316 on November 6, 2007 at 5:46 PM

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 4:40 PM

Funny how some people can forgive decade old transgressions of a candidate they love, but remember (and greatly elaborate) every decade old transgression of someone they despise.

right2bright on November 6, 2007 at 5:49 PM

Side

By Side

MB4 on November 6, 2007 at 5:51 PM

So, csdeven gives us a “warning” that we might not like his comments – people don’t like his comments – and then he gets pissed off at people who disagree with him, telling them that they should have heeded his warning. The only people who are to read his comments are those who will agree with him? Is that about right? I’m just trying to keep up.

And, “csdeven derangement syndrome”? Seriously?

Maybe I wandered in here a little late.

nailinmyeye on November 6, 2007 at 5:51 PM

You want to go there?

ThackerAgency on November 6, 2007 at 4:57 PM

Rudy has been a whirlwind his entire life. As US Attorney he was a zealous advocate for the US going after the mafia or junk bond traders or what ever he put his mind to. As the chief executive of a city with 8 million souls he was once again a crusader trying to make NYC a better place, reduce crime, promote business, cut welfare, get more money back from the federal government. He was always brainstorming coming up with ideas to make the city a better place and aggressively attempted to put those ideas into practice. He has done many things in his history. Some things were amazingly successful and improve the lives of millions of people. Some were inspiring and enable a nation to pick after getting knock down and carry on. Some things were too aggressive. Some things were not well though out. He made some mistakes. But at the end of the day, after you added all the pluses and all the minuses and consider the results that he achieved, he has been an overwhelming success. Should he have vetted Kerick and the priest — sure. Does that take away from his turn around in NYC — no way.

Fred’s lists of achievements are very, very, very very small. As a US Attorney for three years he choose to used the resources of the US government that was put at his disposal to chase toothless banjo playing moonshiners. Then he was a mole for Nixon, who though Fred was stupid. Then he posed for a photo with Reagan, acted in Hollywood, lobbied for a dictator, an abortion group and against asbestos victims. He gave legal advice to the legal team defending the Libyan terrorist that killed 270 people in Lockerbie enabling them to avoid justice for 11 years. He was a Senator for 8 years (about the same level of experience as Hillary) during which time his notable accomplishments were botching the campaign finance investigation of Clinton, helping draft CFR, voting to keep a perjurer and an obstructor of justice in the oval office, and voting time and again to support his buddy Spencer Abraham’s open borders agenda. Then he decided he was too lazy to continue to serve his country as a Senator and decided to take the money he raised for he reelection campaign and funnel it to his son for “consulting” that never took place.

Given the above, I can understand why Fred choose to truncate his life experiences in this ad to the photo of him with Reagan, a shot of him in the Senate and a bunch of shots of country folk.

tommylotto on November 6, 2007 at 5:54 PM

I’m going to vote for ’scumbag lobbyists’ until the sun burns cold, just to eternally jam a barb up csdeven’s ass ;-)

I’ll buy Fred the finest cigar if he’ll do some chompin’

Ochlan on November 6, 2007 at 5:56 PM

I don’t like New York City and I don’t like Rudy. But I will vote against Hillary.

Rose on November 6, 2007 at 5:57 PM

The will recoil at his lobbying and his funneling of funds to his son.
csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:26 PM

I would watch what I write if I were you. Just because Mitt had one of his best friends hire his son as a “consultant”, and he has “hired” his sons to work in his campaign, doesn’t make Mitt a bad guy. Family is family and supporting your sons (like helping his son get a job, something passed down from generation to generation)I think is admirable. I wouldn’t call bringing in campaign money, then using it to support your kids to travel around the country campaigning for you “funneling funds”. Mitt has his faults, but this isn’t one of them. Besides, this is a post about Fred, leave Mitt and his wishy washy attitude out of it.

right2bright on November 6, 2007 at 5:57 PM

But I will vote against Hillary.

How about a constitutional amendment to select presidents by having candidates play the biscuit game live on CSPAN?

Ochlan on November 6, 2007 at 5:59 PM

Remind you of anyone?

MB4 on November 6, 2007 at 5:32 PM

LOL That’s a good one, but I don’t doubt Rudy was doing a little Benito impression for laughs. He has been known to break out the Godfather impression.

tommylotto on November 6, 2007 at 6:00 PM

Cry us a river. Maybe you and news2use should go get a room or something. His only comment is an attack on me and you have fallen back into your old ways.

csdeven on November 6, 2007 at 5:33 PM

Maybe you should not:

Use profanity needlessly in your posts.
Call others names.
Insult others.
Use numbers to replace letters in words to get past the moderation flag.

Take your attitude out of the place where civilized discourse is valued.

MadisonConservative on November 6, 2007 at 6:00 PM

tommylotto on November 6, 2007 at 6:00 PM

What else does he have in his lame wop repertoire?

Ochlan on November 6, 2007 at 6:01 PM

Oh sure everyone knows Rudolph Giuliani was the mayor of New York when the worst terrorist attack in American memory killed thousands and destroyed the twin towers of the World Trade Center.

Granted, many more cops, medics and firefighters died than would have, had they proper communications equipment rather than the slipshod radios that were supplied to the city by Rudy’s cronies. And of course his close pal and former police commissioner Bernard Kerik is a mobbed-up felon, who is now headed back to court to face more criminal charges. But believe it or not, some people are still unsure about Giulian’s qualifications to be president.
- Barry Crimmins

MB4 on November 6, 2007 at 6:02 PM

Given the above, I can understand why Fred choose to truncate his life experiences in this ad to the photo of him with Reagan, a shot of him in the Senate and a bunch of shots of country folk.

tommylotto on November 6, 2007 at 5:54 PM

Given the above, I am pretty sure that you are not a historian.

Then he posed for a photo with Reagan

That was my favorite quote, that is the best you can do. You forgot about driving around in a rented red truck. That is the one all of you guys harp about. I am really disappointed, no mention of his evil lobbying, you guys are slipping.
My second favorite quote:

…the chief executive of a city with 8 million souls he was once again a crusader…

Was that a caped crusader, or just a generic run of mill super duper crusader? And did you spill something on your lap when you wrote that or did you…

right2bright on November 6, 2007 at 6:08 PM

MB4 on November 6, 2007 at 6:02 PM

If Rudy wins the nomination I will still vote for him. Hell, if Mitt wins I will vote for him too. Even though both candidates have the policy of pandering either one is still better than the Clinton-borg.

I would like to see either a Thompson/Steele ticket, but like they say, crap in one hand…..

Sammy316 on November 6, 2007 at 6:09 PM

I’m going to vote for ’scumbag lobbyists’ until the sun burns cold, just to eternally jam a barb up csdeven’s ass ;-)

I’ll buy Fred the finest cigar if he’ll do some chompin’

Ochlan on November 6, 2007 at 5:56 PM

Maybe he actually works for Fred and not Mitt after all. Think about it, you’re known by your enemies more so than your friends, so they create the most annoying creature ever talking about Fred’s faults so much that when you hear them you subconsciously turn them off. So when there is a breaking news story about something you think, “Meh.”

- The Cat

P.S. Creating something more annoying than me . . . now that’s an accomplishment.

MirCat on November 6, 2007 at 6:10 PM

I don’t agree with csdeven on his anti-Fred rants but he’s become a tolerable annoyance on them. Most of his comments I just skip. On most other topics he’s pretty sanguine. Also, he’s a good guy all around, for so many reason.

However, dude/buddy/friend, drop the victimhood card. It’s so unbecoming. Most of what you get, you asked for. Still lovin’ ya,

Entelechy on November 6, 2007 at 6:11 PM

Actually thought it was a very good ad but I hope he’ll chomp some cigars and kick some butt in others to come. The fact is that Fred has already come out with a policy for illegal immigration that says “no amnesty” and “enforce existing laws” and now he actually comes out and says that “God” is the source of our rights. I guess that federalism is just the icing on the cake.

I said long ago that the candidate that would promise to deport illegal aliens would have my vote. Hardly fair though because I wouldn’t believe Rudy if he carved it in stone (any more than I’d believe Hillary) and Mitt just leaves it up to your imagination while he triangulates himself on the subject.

Buzzy on November 6, 2007 at 6:12 PM

for so many reasons, alas, csdeven

Entelechy on November 6, 2007 at 6:13 PM

Funny how some people can forgive decade old transgressions of a candidate they love, but remember (and greatly elaborate) every decade old transgression of someone they despise.

right2bright on November 6, 2007 at 5:49 PM

Funny how some people can forgive decade old transgressions of a candidate who has a lot of great accomplishments, but remember (and greatly elaborate) every decade old transgression of someone who has done nothing since but act.

pedestrian on November 6, 2007 at 6:15 PM

I try to like Fred, but then I hear him whining that Romney is spending his “personal fortune” in South Carolina and says “you can’t buy South Carolina”.

Ugh.

Buy Danish on November 6, 2007 at 6:20 PM

I’ve said it before… I’ll say it again…

Fred is inevitable.

VolMagic on November 6, 2007 at 6:20 PM

Commissoner Fred Thompson was appointed to the Commission by Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist for a two-year term expiring December 31, 2006. Sentor Thompson’s service in the United States Senate (1994-2002) was a continuation of a distinguished career across both the public and private arenas. In his first campaign for public office, Thompson was elected by the people of Tennessee in 1994 to the remaining two years of an unexpired Senate term. When he was returned for a full term in 1996, he received more votes than any previous candidate for any office in Tennessee history. In 1997, Thompson was elected Chairman of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, making him among the most junior senators in history to serve as Chairman of a major Senate Committee. He was also a member of the Finance Committee and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Thompson chose not to run for re-election in 2002. He resumed his legal and consulting work; is a frequent speaker; and is a regular on the long-running TV drama, Law & Order. Thompson is a former President of the Federal City Council in Washington and a current member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is also a Visiting Fellow with the American Enterprise Institute.

Prior to his election to the U. S. Senate, Thompson maintained law offices in Nashville and Washington and served as Special Counsel to both the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. He is also the author of the Watergate memoir, “At That Point In Time.” Having grown up in Lawrenceburg, Tennessee, Thompson attended Memphis State University, where he earned an undergraduate degree in philosophy and political science. He went on to receive a law degree from Vanderbilt University. Two years later, Thompson was named an Assistant United States Attorney and, at the age of 30, was appointed Minority Counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee, where he served in 1973 and 1974.

Thompson has appeared in 18 motion pictures, including feature roles in “ Cape Fear”, “In the Line of Fire, “Die Hard II,” and “The Hunt for Red October.” He has also appeared is numerous television series and movies.

Senator Thompson lives in Nashville, Tennessee and Washington, D.C. He has two sons, Tony and Daniel, and five grandchildren. In June of 2002, Thompson married Jeri Kehn, a political and media consultant. They have a daughter, Hayden, who was born in 2003.

444 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 602 · Washington, DC 20001

It seeems FT does have a little experience besides lobbying and lawyering.

sonnyspats1 on November 6, 2007 at 6:21 PM

Funny how some people can forgive decade old transgressions of a candidate who has a lot of great accomplishments, but remember (and greatly elaborate) every decade old transgression of someone who has done nothing since but act.

pedestrian on November 6, 2007 at 6:15 PM

perfect

tommylotto on November 6, 2007 at 6:22 PM

Carp all you want Fred-haters, as long as you’re willing to pull the lever when the time comes in the general election for my man Fred.

VolMagic on November 6, 2007 at 6:23 PM

Fred is improving, if he continues to improve he’ll be tough to beat.
Likable is OK, its the opposite of Hillcabal.

Speakup on November 6, 2007 at 6:24 PM

sonnyspats1 on November 6, 2007 at 6:21 PM

…and then

tommylotto on November 6, 2007 at 6:22 PM

whoops :)

Sammy316 on November 6, 2007 at 6:26 PM

What else does he have in his lame wop Rudy revealed repertoire?

Ochlan on November 6, 2007 at 6:01 PM

A lot. Be patient and stay tuned and more will gradually be revealed as I have just begun to fight peel Rudy’s onion.

MB4 on November 6, 2007 at 6:28 PM

Folksy Fred is fine but I prefer the cigar-chomping Fred who talks smack to Michael Moore.

Talking smack to Michael Moore? That’s a pretty low bar to set Bryan.

Ex:

“Michael Moore? Who? I think I saw his autobiography once, “Fat White Angry Men,” or “Sicko,” or somethin’.”

Maybe if Fred weren’t absolutely radioactive and a total Johnny-come-lately conservative I’d care about his ad, but Folksy ‘Ol Fred is par for the course.

Call me when he says something that can’t be either A: traced back to another conservative who has actually done things for conservatism other then hem and haw and write articles, or B: proven contradictory to his record as a lobbyist.

Sorry Bryan, this Yank doesn’t give a whit about the Drawl factor. Being from the South doesn’t play in the North, and Fred has nothing to recommend him over anyone else. He’s just another Bubba Clinton Bumpkin with no ethical principles who wants to ride in on charm.

At least Bubba was a governor, Fred has less experience than Hillary.

BKennedy on November 6, 2007 at 6:28 PM

Comment pages: 1 2 3


You must be logged in to post a comment.