Read the “Worst One-on-One” write-up here, and tell me you don’t want to buy the non-cooperative subject of the report an iPhone or something…

The more I hear about this the more it actually reminds me of Mao’s attempts at starting a “Cultural Revolution”. We all know how that went.

Maybe I read too fast. What happens if they refuse to participate? Tell the RA to shove it. What happens if they give the “wrong” answer? Do they end up going to re-education camps, or put in a mental ward? (thinking of what happened under the Commies). If the “wrong views”, do a bunch of moon-bats start harassing the student of opposition views? Hidden cameras and mikes are needed to document all this stuff.

I know how I have always been. I get bloody angry if people have always told me how to think, no shame about screaming loudly in public or calling people I don’t like names to their face. I admit, I can feel like an idiot sometimes after, but always stood for my rights. Perhaps kids are not raised to stand up for themselves, be quiet and not make a scene. I grew up in Brooklyn and learned not to take sh*t from anyone. I wish I were young enough to sit through all that to make someone’s life miserable for telling me how to think and mind my deep personal life.

The Minutemen are an example of an approach that works. My apologies for three messages. I dont understand why I got clipped twice.

This lefty scum can only succeed when there is no adult supervision. The minute a light is put on them, they flee like the roaches they are.

We have Jihad watch, now we need Campus watch, with pages for each campus and the socialists working there.

If that solution doesn’t appeal, assume there >is

Liberal academic socialists are vindictive sons of bi*ches.

The professors who are there were surprised at the full extent of the program. I said in the interview, half in jest, that it sounds like a Soviet political officer program. By the end of the interview the jesting half had been routed.

Bryan on November 2, 2007 at 2:23 PM

Is legal action of any kind being brought against the Soviet commandants who instituted this forced reeducation campaign?

The law has been broken, extortion is a criminal offense. The FBI should be called in to investigate and verify the money trail. The only way this isn’t extortion is if the program was ran with private funds and I’m betting it was not. Even if private funds were used this program involved a kind of false imprisonment.

The rights of students have been trampled, privacy has been invaded, interrogations have been conducted without warrant or cause. This is very serious stuff and somebody is in very big trouble. It’s time for law enforcement to get involved and get to the bottom of this. At the very least it sounds like a lot of people need to be dismissed from their jobs and criminal charges could very well apply to some.

Once a criminal investigation is conducted, no matter what the outcome, lawsuits should filed by the dozens.

Litigation is the only way we’ll ever reign in this crap, in both government schools and public universities. Where the cause of action isn’t a proven winner, we need creative attorneys (like Jay Sekulow) who can recast the issues into a winning framework.

I sense a major backlash coming down the pike, and these Leftist scum are going to be very shocked when the tipping point is crossed.

This article details programs of thought reform and compelled speech at colleges and universities across the nation;at Michigan State University,Columbia University,Washington State University,and Rhode Island College.

Then there is this article, The Delaware Approach: Coming Soon to a Campus Near You?

“on UD’s efforts to use a curricular approach to residential education as a replacement for the traditional programming model.” (Those following this case may remember that the quaint and outmoded “programming model” differs from the curricular approach in that it “relies on voluntary attendance.”) Representatives from more than 35 schools across North America registered to attend the Institute.”

What is encourouging is that FIRE may have found the silver bullet in fighting these programs. They are violating Federal Law governing research on human subjects.

Is the University of Delaware Violating the Federal Law on Human Subject Research?

“the University’s residential life program requires its students to undergo experimental thought-reform “treatments.” The University assesses and tracks the efficacy of their various “treatments” through pre- and post-treatment surveys, one-on-one interviews and behavioral observation. Unfortunately, it conducts this research without informing its students that they are being used as subjects in a massive reeducation experiment.”

Sieg Heil, your papers please.