<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Al Jazeera: U.S., not Israel, destroyed Syrian reactor &#8212; with tactical nuclear weapons; Update: Source was Islamic message board?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/</link>
	<description>The worldâ€™s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:53:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uav gps</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-952243</link>
		<dc:creator>uav gps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-952243</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;uav gps...&lt;/strong&gt;

yes indeed......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>uav gps&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>yes indeed&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cop The Truth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-766663</link>
		<dc:creator>Cop The Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 05:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-766663</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reports: US, NOT Israel, Bombed Syria...&lt;/strong&gt;

Curiouser and curiouser. The JP reports that the September 6 raid was carried out by U.S. aircraft - not the Israelis, as has been preivously reported. Oh, and we used tactical nukes.The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reports: US, NOT Israel, Bombed Syria&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Curiouser and curiouser. The JP reports that the September 6 raid was carried out by U.S. aircraft &#8211; not the Israelis, as has been preivously reported. Oh, and we used tactical nukes.The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 'USAF struck Syrian nuclear site' - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764756</link>
		<dc:creator>'USAF struck Syrian nuclear site' - TeakDoor.com - The Thailand Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764756</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Al Jazeera: U.S., not Israel, destroyed Syrian reactor — with tactical nuclear weapons;  Update: Source was Islamic message board?  posted at 9:25 am on November 2, 2007  by Allahpundit     Too good bad freaky deaky to check.The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out by the US Air Force, the Al-Jazeera Web site reported Friday. The Web site quoted Israeli and Arab sources as saying that two strategic US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction.The sources were quoted as saying that Israeli F-15 and F-16 jets provided cover for the US planes.The sources added that each US plane carried one tactical nuclear weapon and that the site was hit by one bomb and was totally destroyed.I can’t even find the story on AJ’s website; we’ll have to take JPost’s word that it was there. Is there any reason to believe this is something other than pure, undistilled anti-American shinola being peddled by jihadis’ favorite news source? Two that I can think of. If you’re making a daring raid into enemy territory that might very well trigger war you’ll want to make sure you at least destroy the target you came for, including any underground structures. That means using the heaviest club you’ve got. What it doesn’t explain is why U.S. jets would be needed to deliver the goods given that Israel also has nuclear weapons. Conceivably they didn’t have one big enough to take out the building but small enough not to alert the world of the detonation when it went off, and the U.S. did. Would Bush be willing to lend a nuclear hand to take out a reactor that was years away from being usable? Even to scare Iran? Doubtful.  The other reason is this report from Britain’s Spectator that Bryan blogged about a few weeks ago. I’ve wondered about it ever since I read it. The language always seemed a bit too dire for the facts as we know, or think we know, them:Even more curious is that far from pushing the Syrians and Israelis to war, both seem determined to put a lid on the affair. One month after the event, the absence of hard information leads inexorably to the conclusion that the implications must have been enormous.That was confirmed to The Spectator by a very senior British ministerial source: ‘If people had known how close we came to world war three that day there’d have been mass panic. Never mind the floods or foot-and-mouth — Gordon really would have been dealing with the bloody Book of Revelation and Armageddon.’Israel and Syria have been flirting with war for most of the year, to the point where IDF officers were publicly predicting it would happen this summer. There’s potential for that conflict to become a world war if Iran jumps in and either it or Syria drags the U.S. in by attacking Iraq. But no one seemed terribly worried about that prospect and Iran, after all, tends to do its fighting through its proxies. So what would explain that hair-raising “world war three”/massive public freakout imagined by the unnamed British minister? Well … a nuclear attack on a Middle Eastern country certainly would. Or maybe the minister’s just a typical British dove soiling himself at the thought of any type of “aggression.” Here’s a side-by-side before and after of the site for the benefit of any military readers who might have a better sense of what a landscape looks like after a tactical nuke detonates. I think the story’s 99 and 44/100ths crap, but you tell me. Update: Follow the comments below. People who’d know better than I are saying that it makes no sense to do this with jets, if in fact the U.S. was involved. The aircraft of choice would have been a B2 stealth bomber. Update: Rusty says he got a tip about this yesterday from an Islamic message board, which may explain where AJ got its info. Or maybe the message board poster had already seen it on AJ and cribbed it from there. Hard to say.  hotair.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSitRep</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764513</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSitRep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764513</guid>
		<description>I like tacticles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like tacticles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sundries Shack</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764455</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sundries Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764455</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Nuke on Syria? Oh, You have Got to be Kidding Me....&lt;/strong&gt;

	I can&#8217;t believe this story made it past an editor.
	
The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out by the US Air Force, the Al-Jazeera Web site reported Friday. The Web site quoted Israeli and Arab sources as saying that two US jets armed with...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Nuke on Syria? Oh, You have Got to be Kidding Me&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>	I can&#8217;t believe this story made it past an editor.</p>
<p>The September 6 raid over Syria was carried out by the US Air Force, the Al-Jazeera Web site reported Friday. The Web site quoted Israeli and Arab sources as saying that two US jets armed with&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockhauler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764281</link>
		<dc:creator>rockhauler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764281</guid>
		<description>OldNuke brings up a good point.

What ever it was, biological, chemical, nuclear, the Syrians &lt;strong&gt;buried&lt;/strong&gt; it. Like Chernobyl, they didn&#039;t try to repair, rebuild, they just buried it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OldNuke brings up a good point.</p>
<p>What ever it was, biological, chemical, nuclear, the Syrians <strong>buried</strong> it. Like Chernobyl, they didn&#8217;t try to repair, rebuild, they just buried it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764227</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764227</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oldnuke on November 2, 2007 at 4:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Cr@p...I hate it when I misremember stuff I really do know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oldnuke on November 2, 2007 at 4:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Cr@p&#8230;I hate it when I misremember stuff I really do know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baldilocks</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764209</link>
		<dc:creator>baldilocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764209</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The question remains however, why have Syria and Iran been completely silent ever since this attack?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Embarrassment maybe?  Remember Osama&#039;s Strong Horse theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The question remains however, why have Syria and Iran been completely silent ever since this attack?</p></blockquote>
<p>Embarrassment maybe?  Remember Osama&#8217;s Strong Horse theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reports: U.S. Air Force NUKED Syria</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764166</link>
		<dc:creator>Reports: U.S. Air Force NUKED Syria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764166</guid>
		<description>[...] ABC News has before and after photographs here, H/T to Hot Air&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ABC News has before and after photographs here, H/T to Hot Air&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldnuke</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764159</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldnuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764159</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While neutron radiation is extremely lethal because (ionizing radiation) of the high electron charge of the neutron itâ€™s low mass means it pretty much passes right through nearly everything. In other words practically no residual radioactive signature.
doriangrey on November 2, 2007 at 12:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uhhh sorry neutrons don&#039;t have any charge...they&#039;re uh...neutral.  They also don&#039;t pass pretty much through everything. Everything has what&#039;s termed a neutron cross section, that&#039;s the probability of any given neutron colliding with the nucleus of that material.  Some things have high cross sections some low.  Humans, being mostly water have a high cross sections, especially with thermal neutrons.Residual radiation?  Materials get activated by neutron radiation, that&#039;s how neutrons are attenuated, by bouncing off the nuclei of other &#039;stuff&#039;.  This causes a rather high increase in background due to the interaction of neutrons with other materials such as iron and cobalt.  In a few days or weeks or whatever after a neutron zapping when the activated materials have had a chance to decay it&#039;d probably be safe to enter but my guess is that right after the thing went off the area would be pretty Hot.

Sorry my inner geek got out for a moment...he&#039;s back in the cage now....I think I spelled most of that stuff right..maybe next time I&#039;ll talk about start up rate or rod control...ya just never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While neutron radiation is extremely lethal because (ionizing radiation) of the high electron charge of the neutron itâ€™s low mass means it pretty much passes right through nearly everything. In other words practically no residual radioactive signature.<br />
doriangrey on November 2, 2007 at 12:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Uhhh sorry neutrons don&#8217;t have any charge&#8230;they&#8217;re uh&#8230;neutral.  They also don&#8217;t pass pretty much through everything. Everything has what&#8217;s termed a neutron cross section, that&#8217;s the probability of any given neutron colliding with the nucleus of that material.  Some things have high cross sections some low.  Humans, being mostly water have a high cross sections, especially with thermal neutrons.Residual radiation?  Materials get activated by neutron radiation, that&#8217;s how neutrons are attenuated, by bouncing off the nuclei of other &#8217;stuff&#8217;.  This causes a rather high increase in background due to the interaction of neutrons with other materials such as iron and cobalt.  In a few days or weeks or whatever after a neutron zapping when the activated materials have had a chance to decay it&#8217;d probably be safe to enter but my guess is that right after the thing went off the area would be pretty Hot.</p>
<p>Sorry my inner geek got out for a moment&#8230;he&#8217;s back in the cage now&#8230;.I think I spelled most of that stuff right..maybe next time I&#8217;ll talk about start up rate or rod control&#8230;ya just never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockhauler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764137</link>
		<dc:creator>rockhauler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764137</guid>
		<description>Doriangrey:
RE: tape on the glasses

heh.. I&#039;d forgotten that. Thanks for the memories!

Wasn&#039;t it an AOL commercial on the difference between geeks and nerds?

&quot;A geek gets it done, a nerd doesn&#039;t&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doriangrey:<br />
RE: tape on the glasses</p>
<p>heh.. I&#8217;d forgotten that. Thanks for the memories!</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t it an AOL commercial on the difference between geeks and nerds?</p>
<p>&#8220;A geek gets it done, a nerd doesn&#8217;t&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764113</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764113</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;rockhauler on November 2, 2007 at 3:58 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

those werent geeks, they were Nerds...(quickly removes tape from glasses)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>rockhauler on November 2, 2007 at 3:58 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>those werent geeks, they were Nerds&#8230;(quickly removes tape from glasses)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gandy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764104</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764104</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Of course its just toys
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well.  Now I know what to pick up for Christmas for those on my list who are into radio controlled planes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Of course its just toys
</p></blockquote>
<p>Well.  Now I know what to pick up for Christmas for those on my list who are into radio controlled planes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockhauler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764066</link>
		<dc:creator>rockhauler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764066</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Geek speak? Geekâ€™s are into nuclear physics? I thought geeks were into computer stuff, an pron and silly role playing fantasy games an sci-fi convention an speaking Vulcan or Klingoneseâ€¦â€¦ :o

doriangrey on November 2, 2007 at 3:28 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From the days of the slide rule, and log tables. . .
and short hair. . . 
very short hair.

Pocket protectors. . .

Mechanical pencils. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Geek speak? Geekâ€™s are into nuclear physics? I thought geeks were into computer stuff, an pron and silly role playing fantasy games an sci-fi convention an speaking Vulcan or Klingoneseâ€¦â€¦ :o</p>
<p>doriangrey on November 2, 2007 at 3:28 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>From the days of the slide rule, and log tables. . .<br />
and short hair. . .<br />
very short hair.</p>
<p>Pocket protectors. . .</p>
<p>Mechanical pencils. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764062</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764062</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ryan Gandy on November 2, 2007 at 3:44 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course its just toys, every body knows that we dont really have any of those aircraft. Bushitler/Darth Cheney/Haliburton secretly stashed all the money that was supposed to spent on them in their Swiss bank accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ryan Gandy on November 2, 2007 at 3:44 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course its just toys, every body knows that we dont really have any of those aircraft. Bushitler/Darth Cheney/Haliburton secretly stashed all the money that was supposed to spent on them in their Swiss bank accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gandy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764033</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764033</guid>
		<description>PS does the picture in the JPost link look to anyone like 4 toys arranged on a blue table?  Its just weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS does the picture in the JPost link look to anyone like 4 toys arranged on a blue table?  Its just weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gandy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-764023</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-764023</guid>
		<description>This is Al-Jazeera TV with breaking news.

We have just learned a giant Star of David dropped from the sky to crush the men, women and children on the ground at the time of the attack.  Red, white, and blue smoke streams were spotted coming out of the backs of the US planes, but we have learned from a &quot;reliable source&quot; that the streams are instead coming out of the filthy Western butts of the pilots themselves.

==============

(Hey, you know they&#039;d say this if given the chance.)

Personally, I don&#039;t buy it for a second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Al-Jazeera TV with breaking news.</p>
<p>We have just learned a giant Star of David dropped from the sky to crush the men, women and children on the ground at the time of the attack.  Red, white, and blue smoke streams were spotted coming out of the backs of the US planes, but we have learned from a &#8220;reliable source&#8221; that the streams are instead coming out of the filthy Western butts of the pilots themselves.</p>
<p>==============</p>
<p>(Hey, you know they&#8217;d say this if given the chance.)</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t buy it for a second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-763981</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-763981</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I love â€˜geek speakâ€™ ROFLMAO

rockhauler on November 2, 2007 at 3:18 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Geek speak? Geek&#039;s are into nuclear physics? I thought geeks were into computer stuff, an pron and silly role playing fantasy games an sci-fi convention an speaking Vulcan or Klingonese...... :o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I love â€˜geek speakâ€™ ROFLMAO</p>
<p>rockhauler on November 2, 2007 at 3:18 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Geek speak? Geek&#8217;s are into nuclear physics? I thought geeks were into computer stuff, an pron and silly role playing fantasy games an sci-fi convention an speaking Vulcan or Klingonese&#8230;&#8230; :o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockhauler</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-763945</link>
		<dc:creator>rockhauler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-763945</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While neutron radiation is extremely lethal because (ionizing radiation) of the &lt;strong&gt;high electron charge&lt;/strong&gt; of the neutron itâ€™s &lt;strong&gt;low mass &lt;/strong&gt;means it pretty much passes right through nearly everything. In other words practically no residual radioactive signature.

doriangrey on November 2, 2007 at 12:45 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I love &#039;geek speak&#039; ROFLMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While neutron radiation is extremely lethal because (ionizing radiation) of the <strong>high electron charge</strong> of the neutron itâ€™s <strong>low mass </strong>means it pretty much passes right through nearly everything. In other words practically no residual radioactive signature.</p>
<p>doriangrey on November 2, 2007 at 12:45 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>I love &#8216;geek speak&#8217; ROFLMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphabet city</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-763835</link>
		<dc:creator>alphabet city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-763835</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Variation on a Theme...&lt;/strong&gt;

Regarding AllahPundit&#039;s post about rumors that the US, not Israel, destroyed the Syrian N-facility....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Variation on a Theme&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Regarding AllahPundit&#8217;s post about rumors that the US, not Israel, destroyed the Syrian N-facility&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-763790</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-763790</guid>
		<description>The CIA invented crack cocaine!

Aliens crashed in Roswell!

Global warming is caused by man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CIA invented crack cocaine!</p>
<p>Aliens crashed in Roswell!</p>
<p>Global warming is caused by man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin M</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-763785</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-763785</guid>
		<description>&quot;US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction.&quot;

In other news, 9/11 was an inside job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;US jets armed with tactical nuclear weapons carried out an attack on a nuclear site under construction.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other news, 9/11 was an inside job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-763781</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-763781</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Suck it up, sissies. Youâ€™ll know when we hit you as hard as we can.

Professor Blather on November 2, 2007 at 1:48 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hah hah hah, no actually they wont, if and when we should find it necessary to hit them as hard as we can, they wont ever know anything again. Right now we are actually subscribing to Edward Nigma&#039;s philosophy &lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Don&#039;t kill him! If you kill him, he won&#039;t learn nothin&#039;!&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt; But you can bet that isnt going to last forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Suck it up, sissies. Youâ€™ll know when we hit you as hard as we can.</p>
<p>Professor Blather on November 2, 2007 at 1:48 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Hah hah hah, no actually they wont, if and when we should find it necessary to hit them as hard as we can, they wont ever know anything again. Right now we are actually subscribing to Edward Nigma&#8217;s philosophy<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;Don&#8217;t kill him! If you kill him, he won&#8217;t learn nothin&#8217;!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p> But you can bet that isnt going to last forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Blather</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-763744</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Blather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-763744</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that the only real message here ... is that the Syrians were *really* impressed by what a few Israeli aircraft could do ...

I take it as a compliment. Like barely tapping somebody in a fight ... then having them call you a bully for punching so hard.

Suck it up, sissies. You&#039;ll know when we hit you as hard as we can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that the only real message here &#8230; is that the Syrians were *really* impressed by what a few Israeli aircraft could do &#8230;</p>
<p>I take it as a compliment. Like barely tapping somebody in a fight &#8230; then having them call you a bully for punching so hard.</p>
<p>Suck it up, sissies. You&#8217;ll know when we hit you as hard as we can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doriangrey</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-763687</link>
		<dc:creator>doriangrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/02/al-jazeera-us-not-israel-destroyed-syrian-reactor-with-tactical-nuclear-weapons/#comment-763687</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Romeo13 on November 2, 2007 at 1:03 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yup, and it wouldn&#039;t matter what kind or size of device was used, the EM pulse would have left a very tell-tale signature. The EM pulse would have at the minimum disrupted for several minutes any satellite overhead along with sending out a burst of white noise over the entire Ham and shortwave radio frequencies worldwide. Plus with so much of the Ham and shortwave going digital the effect of that white noise would be very pronounced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Romeo13 on November 2, 2007 at 1:03 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yup, and it wouldn&#8217;t matter what kind or size of device was used, the EM pulse would have left a very tell-tale signature. The EM pulse would have at the minimum disrupted for several minutes any satellite overhead along with sending out a burst of white noise over the entire Ham and shortwave radio frequencies worldwide. Plus with so much of the Ham and shortwave going digital the effect of that white noise would be very pronounced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
