As mentioned above, Rudy’s hands are dirtly with the illegal issue so he couldn’t make much of it in the campaign. Fred, on the other hand, would be the perfect foil for her insane position of giving legal rights to illegal interlopers.

GO FRED!

michellemalkin.com

If there’s one thing more nauseating than Hillary Clinton’s whirling dervish positions on the Eliot Spitzer-crafted, Bush DHS-approved illegal alien driver’s license plan, it’s the hypocritical noise from ope…

Go 20 miles in from the common junction register and vote
Drive 45 miles to the next state over register and vote
Head 75 miles in another direction to the third state register and vote.

Maybe 6 hours work even with a lunch break. Need an address, that’s what they make google earth and mapquest and phone books for.

Think they are gonna complain if you say you live at 419 Maple St as long as it is a real house there and not a Kmart. Who cares if somebody by another name lives there all you need is the address and you don’t have any burden of proof that you live there.

A simple scam that was used for a long time by people collection welfare in two or three states at the same time until the states started cross checking welfare rolls.

If either of these get through, Katie bar the door for the flood of illegals at the polls once they get their hands on a driver’s licenses.

lan astaslem on November 1, 2007 at 1:04 PM

No what you have to watch out with the same day registration is traveling caravans of voters hopping from primary to primary to vote early and vote often.

They were supposed to pitch her softballs. They should have known that she has no principled stances on the issues……

It’s been a fascinating 48 hours witnessing the Hillary Clinton campaign implode.

This vile woman hasn’t been asked a difficult question since the day she waltzed into New York and assumed the throne as the state’s junior Senator….

That’s all that is confusing people.

You just need to put on the special multiculti glasses that refract everything down to one comfortable palimsest.

And then march over the cliff in comfort.

Why isn’t this the headline?

Because it wasn’t a conservative who said it?

All that’s missing is the lip bite.

Slublog on November 1, 2007 at 12:21 PM

Somebody has got to photo shop this. That would be classic. “The Lip Bite”

[Clinton advisor Mark Penn]
“Russert made it appear that President Clinton had done something new or unusual,” Penn said, before adding that it “is, in fact, an extremely confusing situation …

“President” Clinton???

And we all know she did not do anything new or unusual, Mark. Obfuscation is her trademark.

“…an extremely confusing situation…”. Confusing? What confusing about “ILlegal”? Maybe it’s because it’s a really big word…

There’s actually a WordPress plug-in for that if you’re interested…

http://www.netconcepts.com/seo-title-tag-plugin/

I haven’t actually used it, but if you’re taking my tip to heart at all (without being pissed that I’m “chiding” you guys), take a look:

Title tags are arguably the most important of the on-page factors for search engine optimization (”SEO”). It blows my mind how post titles are also used as title tags by WordPress, considering that post titles should be catchy, pithy, and short-and-sweet; whereas title tags should incorporate synonyms and alternate phrases to capture additional search visibility.

Now, thankfully, there is a solution, allowing you to decouple post titles from title tags. Introducing… the SEO Title Tag 2.1 WordPress plugin.

There’s no need to bring anyone else into the mix on a post that I wrote. We’re both too busy to have to weigh in on what the other guy writes.

As for Drudge, I honestly don’t care what does. He goes out of his way not to link righty blogs but is more than happy to link to Politico and other sites that bend left. He and his pals have actually robbed us of traffic. He can sensationalize all he wants to. I don’t follow his leads and don’t intend to start now.

Bryan on November 1, 2007 at 2:34 PM

Again, it was intended to be a general tip for both of you guys about gaining search traffic, that was only sparked by this post. I see that I didn’t make clear a distinction between you guys in my original comment (though in my mind I thought at first I had).

When I mentioned Allah using “clever and funny headlines”, I was attempting to differentiate between your headlines which are often more direct about what the post is about. I realize that the way it’s written, it may have looked like I was speaking about Allah the whole time, but I wasn’t. Again, I only mentioned him, because my point wasn’t just about this post, it was just that this post prompted me to mention something I’ve thought of in the past.

That’s cool, take it or leave it, I just had to clarify I was only trying to help, not bash you guys for how you do things. I just know about search engine traffic, and I see searchers skimming over very general (though to the point) headlines, as well headlines that are clever and funny (but when you’re looking for something specific, might not stand out, without the accompanying picture or knowing the way Allah operates).

As for the Drudge thing, it sounds like I need to clarify that too… I’m not saying “do things for shock value like Drudge!”… I’m just saying that there’s potential for a lot of people to be searching for terms relating to the Hillary supporter wanting to shoot Russert, and having that in a headline has the potential to do wonders for search traffic, particularly since Google loves blogs and spiders the hell out of them… You can sometimes post something and within minutes be listed in regular, natural search results. Maybe you don’t want to roll like that, but it was just a tip on boosting search traffic.

Again, this was all only an attempt at throwing a tip your way.

RightWinged on November 1, 2007 at 2:06 PM

There’s no need to bring anyone else into the mix on a post that I wrote. We’re both too busy to have to weigh in on what the other guy writes.

As for Drudge, I honestly don’t care what does. He goes out of his way not to link righty blogs but is more than happy to link to Politico and other sites that bend left. He and his pals have actually robbed us of traffic. He can sensationalize all he wants to. I don’t follow his leads and don’t intend to start now.