<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beauchamp update: When are leaks baaaad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 13:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6661f11c0bc3</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-1118649</link>
		<dc:creator>6661f11c0bc3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-1118649</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;6661f11c0bc3...&lt;/strong&gt;

6661f11c0bc3ac606327...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>6661f11c0bc3&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>6661f11c0bc3ac606327&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freelancer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-752419</link>
		<dc:creator>Freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-752419</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, guess what — the Army may not be willing to reveal its docs to TNR, the target of its investigation, but it has just acknowledged that someone internally has willingly leaked them to Matt Drudge.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The military investigate these stories because, if true, they indicated severe lapses in military discipline. How can anybody with an ounce of sense think that the Army was targeting TNR by actually attempting to seek the truth regarding horrible allegations of misconduct? Arrogance overflowing.

&lt;blockquote&gt;This again calls into question the Army’s handling of this affair in a big way. It’s bad enough that the Army hasn’t been willing to show any transparency with regard to its probe into this.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Army never had a mandate to investigate, except it&#039;s own internal integrity. And TNR would have loved for them to NOT investigate. It is only idiots like Sargent that are &quot;questioning&quot; the Army&#039;s handling of &quot;this affair&quot;. They are seeking the truth. Oops, the truth is, STB lied, TNR printed the lies.

As for transparency, since when is a military investigation up for public scrutiny, especially by the media outlet that blindly published the fabrications?

Sargent, get a clue, you aren&#039;t worthy of your own name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, guess what — the Army may not be willing to reveal its docs to TNR, the target of its investigation, but it has just acknowledged that someone internally has willingly leaked them to Matt Drudge.</p></blockquote>
<p>The military investigate these stories because, if true, they indicated severe lapses in military discipline. How can anybody with an ounce of sense think that the Army was targeting TNR by actually attempting to seek the truth regarding horrible allegations of misconduct? Arrogance overflowing.</p>
<blockquote><p>This again calls into question the Army’s handling of this affair in a big way. It’s bad enough that the Army hasn’t been willing to show any transparency with regard to its probe into this.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Army never had a mandate to investigate, except it&#8217;s own internal integrity. And TNR would have loved for them to NOT investigate. It is only idiots like Sargent that are &#8220;questioning&#8221; the Army&#8217;s handling of &#8220;this affair&#8221;. They are seeking the truth. Oops, the truth is, STB lied, TNR printed the lies.</p>
<p>As for transparency, since when is a military investigation up for public scrutiny, especially by the media outlet that blindly published the fabrications?</p>
<p>Sargent, get a clue, you aren&#8217;t worthy of your own name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EEprom</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751687</link>
		<dc:creator>EEprom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751687</guid>
		<description>Note of interest:

The author has disabled comments in his page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note of interest:</p>
<p>The author has disabled comments in his page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; The Atonement of Beauchamp-Updated</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751575</link>
		<dc:creator>A Second Hand Conjecture &#187; The Atonement of Beauchamp-Updated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751575</guid>
		<description>[...] Bryan at Hot Air [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bryan at Hot Air [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Greenwald Hates the Sound of the Truth : 186 kpersecond</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751301</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Greenwald Hates the Sound of the Truth : 186 kpersecond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751301</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air has much more on the TNR tumble.. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air has much more on the TNR tumble.. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rallying to TNR&#8217;s Defense &#187; The American Mind</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751252</link>
		<dc:creator>Rallying to TNR&#8217;s Defense &#187; The American Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751252</guid>
		<description>[...] that last question Bryan Preston writes, What the leak actually did was torpedo the raft of lies that Franklin Foer et al have been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that last question Bryan Preston writes, What the leak actually did was torpedo the raft of lies that Franklin Foer et al have been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MamaAJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751171</link>
		<dc:creator>MamaAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751171</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; the Army may not be willing to reveal its docs to TNR, the target of its investigation, but it has just acknowledged that someone internally has willingly leaked them to Matt Drudge.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Did that actually happen? When did the Army admit they were the source of the leak? Or is this a big leap from the fact that these are Army documents, so golly gee, who else could have leaked &#039;em?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> the Army may not be willing to reveal its docs to TNR, the target of its investigation, but it has just acknowledged that someone internally has willingly leaked them to Matt Drudge.</p></blockquote>
<p>Did that actually happen? When did the Army admit they were the source of the leak? Or is this a big leap from the fact that these are Army documents, so golly gee, who else could have leaked &#8216;em?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigOldDog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751168</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigOldDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751168</guid>
		<description>This is why a business (yes, it&#039;s a business) like TNR is able to survive repeated major blows to its credibility. It&#039;s customers don;t care about the truth or reality. They want to read things that confirm their biases even if they are completely fictional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why a business (yes, it&#8217;s a business) like TNR is able to survive repeated major blows to its credibility. It&#8217;s customers don;t care about the truth or reality. They want to read things that confirm their biases even if they are completely fictional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751164</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751164</guid>
		<description>Its the same as the Rather memos.

Who cares if the facts aren&#039;t actually facts, and the story never really happened. What matters is that it strokes their fantasies about how rotten things are with people they hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its the same as the Rather memos.</p>
<p>Who cares if the facts aren&#8217;t actually facts, and the story never really happened. What matters is that it strokes their fantasies about how rotten things are with people they hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neocon News » Michael Yon on Scotty's Second Chance</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751128</link>
		<dc:creator>Neocon News » Michael Yon on Scotty's Second Chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751128</guid>
		<description>[...] at Hot Air feels like I do about the end of Yon&#8217;s piece, which is what prompted me to say that I felt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Hot Air feels like I do about the end of Yon&#8217;s piece, which is what prompted me to say that I felt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751121</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751121</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Don’t you mean, “make up stories”? “Sex up” implies some level of truth not present here.

calbear on October 25, 2007 at 2:36 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, it is true that a country named Iraq exists, and that Bradleys are vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Don’t you mean, “make up stories”? “Sex up” implies some level of truth not present here.</p>
<p>calbear on October 25, 2007 at 2:36 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, it is true that a country named Iraq exists, and that Bradleys are vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751118</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751118</guid>
		<description>Oh, and by the way - is it in bad taste to suggest that in all likelihood at least one person at TNR is actually hoping that something happens to Beauchamp in the line of duty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and by the way &#8211; is it in bad taste to suggest that in all likelihood at least one person at TNR is actually hoping that something happens to Beauchamp in the line of duty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calbear</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751117</link>
		<dc:creator>calbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751117</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just as I said from the beginning, Beauchamp is just a bum who’s been set up by TNR and his own wife to sex up stories.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Don&#039;t you mean, &quot;make up stories&quot;?  &quot;Sex up&quot; implies some level of truth not present here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Just as I said from the beginning, Beauchamp is just a bum who’s been set up by TNR and his own wife to sex up stories.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t you mean, &#8220;make up stories&#8221;?  &#8220;Sex up&#8221; implies some level of truth not present here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayHaw Phrenzie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751116</link>
		<dc:creator>JayHaw Phrenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751116</guid>
		<description>I got to agree with Yon.  I made a lot of dumbass mistakes when I was in my 20s that I would hate to have had held up my entire life.  This guy messed up, but appears to be trying to get his head on straight.

He deserves another chance.

As for TNR?  Bury them.  No credibility at that Glass House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got to agree with Yon.  I made a lot of dumbass mistakes when I was in my 20s that I would hate to have had held up my entire life.  This guy messed up, but appears to be trying to get his head on straight.</p>
<p>He deserves another chance.</p>
<p>As for TNR?  Bury them.  No credibility at that Glass House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niko</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751109</link>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751109</guid>
		<description>Just as I said from the beginning, Beauchamp is just a bum who&#039;s been set up by TNR and his own wife to sex up stories.

Even if Beauchamp wasn&#039;t there, TNR would have found another pawn to stick the story to. Beauchamp is interchangable, but the liberal narrative is what remains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as I said from the beginning, Beauchamp is just a bum who&#8217;s been set up by TNR and his own wife to sex up stories.</p>
<p>Even if Beauchamp wasn&#8217;t there, TNR would have found another pawn to stick the story to. Beauchamp is interchangable, but the liberal narrative is what remains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Swift</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751103</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Scott Thomas Beauchamp All But Recants...&lt;/strong&gt;

Although all-but-recanting is not exactly the same as actually recanting, it&#039;s the next best thing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scott Thomas Beauchamp All But Recants&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Although all-but-recanting is not exactly the same as actually recanting, it&#8217;s the next best thing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calbear</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751098</link>
		<dc:creator>calbear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751098</guid>
		<description>There is a difference between leaking done (often by non-leaders) to expose the activities of leaders (Bush, Cheney, Clinton) and leaking done (often by leaders) to expose non-leaders (Wilson, Foer, etc.).  I agree that it&#039;s good to get to the bottom of the Beauchamp affair, but I don&#039;t think this is the double standard it seems to be at first blush.  When the weak expose the powerful, it&#039;s a lot different than when the powerful expose the weak.  And, in spite of its self-aggrandizement, &lt;em&gt;TNR&lt;/em&gt; is weak (and getting weaker by the day).  Foer may have deserved this, but it&#039;s not hypocrisy to claim he didn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a difference between leaking done (often by non-leaders) to expose the activities of leaders (Bush, Cheney, Clinton) and leaking done (often by leaders) to expose non-leaders (Wilson, Foer, etc.).  I agree that it&#8217;s good to get to the bottom of the Beauchamp affair, but I don&#8217;t think this is the double standard it seems to be at first blush.  When the weak expose the powerful, it&#8217;s a lot different than when the powerful expose the weak.  And, in spite of its self-aggrandizement, <em>TNR</em> is weak (and getting weaker by the day).  Foer may have deserved this, but it&#8217;s not hypocrisy to claim he didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751092</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751092</guid>
		<description>It hasn&#039;t been established - except in Greg Sargent&#039;s mind - that the military has acknowledged any such thing.  He bases that conclusion on Kurtz&#039;s article which reads, 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Foer said the Army has refused to turn over supporting documents in the case, despite a Freedom of Information Act request, and then &quot;selectively leaked&quot; material to Drudge. In an e-mail to the magazine yesterday, Army spokesman Maj. Kirk Luedeke said he was &quot;surprised and appalled that this information was leaked&quot; and that the military would investigate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How does that &lt;em&gt;admit &lt;/em&gt;that &quot;someone internally&quot; (in the Army) was the leaker?  The admission - if one is required - will come &lt;em&gt;after &lt;/em&gt;the investigation.  I&#039;d like to see the entire quote from Luedeke; I suspect that he didn&#039;t make any such admission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It hasn&#8217;t been established &#8211; except in Greg Sargent&#8217;s mind &#8211; that the military has acknowledged any such thing.  He bases that conclusion on Kurtz&#8217;s article which reads, </p>
<blockquote><p>Foer said the Army has refused to turn over supporting documents in the case, despite a Freedom of Information Act request, and then &#8220;selectively leaked&#8221; material to Drudge. In an e-mail to the magazine yesterday, Army spokesman Maj. Kirk Luedeke said he was &#8220;surprised and appalled that this information was leaked&#8221; and that the military would investigate.</p></blockquote>
<p>How does that <em>admit </em>that &#8220;someone internally&#8221; (in the Army) was the leaker?  The admission &#8211; if one is required &#8211; will come <em>after </em>the investigation.  I&#8217;d like to see the entire quote from Luedeke; I suspect that he didn&#8217;t make any such admission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751072</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751072</guid>
		<description>Yon reports that Beauchamp is trying to atone for his actions by choosing to remain in Iraq and by choosing to serve with the men he defamed. Maybe that&#039;s true. And maybe Beauchamp is very, very lucky to have the CO that he has.

We haven&#039;t talked about it, but his CO *could* have preferred charges against him for conduct detremental to good order and disclipline, and had him court martialed.

I can&#039;t say if Beauchamp has been &quot;punished enough&quot;, but Foer, clearly HAS NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yon reports that Beauchamp is trying to atone for his actions by choosing to remain in Iraq and by choosing to serve with the men he defamed. Maybe that&#8217;s true. And maybe Beauchamp is very, very lucky to have the CO that he has.</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t talked about it, but his CO *could* have preferred charges against him for conduct detremental to good order and disclipline, and had him court martialed.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say if Beauchamp has been &#8220;punished enough&#8221;, but Foer, clearly HAS NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751067</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751067</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, guess what — the Army may not be willing to reveal its docs to TNR, the target of its investigation, but it has just acknowledged that someone internally has willingly leaked them to Matt Drudge.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Excuse me, but just when and where did the Army investigate , charge and punish TNR?  Did I miss something here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well, guess what — the Army may not be willing to reveal its docs to TNR, the target of its investigation, but it has just acknowledged that someone internally has willingly leaked them to Matt Drudge.</p></blockquote>
<p>Excuse me, but just when and where did the Army investigate , charge and punish TNR?  Did I miss something here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751065</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751065</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;KelliD on October 25, 2007 at 2:03 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yon&#039;s article is great.  That is how I felt when reading the transcript.  If it was genuine or not, he is there doing the job.  A kid can get a second chance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>KelliD on October 25, 2007 at 2:03 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yon&#8217;s article is great.  That is how I felt when reading the transcript.  If it was genuine or not, he is there doing the job.  A kid can get a second chance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JiangxiDad</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751060</link>
		<dc:creator>JiangxiDad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751060</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=27686_Michael_Yon_on_The_Baghdad_Diarist&amp;only&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yon on Beauchamp at LGF&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=27686_Michael_Yon_on_The_Baghdad_Diarist&amp;only" rel="nofollow">Yon on Beauchamp at LGF</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751056</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751056</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Your reality-based community in action, folks.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh, what reality-based community is that?  Bizarro community?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Your reality-based community in action, folks.</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh, what reality-based community is that?  Bizarro community?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgej</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751050</link>
		<dc:creator>georgej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751050</guid>
		<description>Screw Greg Sargent with a baseball bat.

He&#039;s a pig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw Greg Sargent with a baseball bat.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a pig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KelliD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/comment-page-1/#comment-751045</link>
		<dc:creator>KelliD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/25/beauchamp-update-when-are-leaks-baaaad/#comment-751045</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Scott Thomas Beauchamp, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/015430.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Capt. Ed&lt;/a&gt; highlights something from Michael Yon on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Scott Thomas Beauchamp, <a href="http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/015430.php" rel="nofollow">Capt. Ed</a> highlights something from Michael Yon on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
