At least it was Code Pink and NOT Boobs Not Bombs

Q: If Boobs not Bombs protest by showing their boobs, what do Code Pink show?

Well they could not have had a weapon and been there. I guess that’s why the lax security. These people should not have been disrupting the proceedings. This wasn’t an ‘audience participation’ event.

ThackerAgency on October 24, 2007 at 3:37 PM

Based on your comments on the “Tase me Bro” thread you should be appalled. Those other Code Pinkos didn’t do anything or say anything but the Capitol Police just manhandled them. “Since when are the police judge, jury and executioner?” Sound familiar?

2) Love the look of revulsion on Condi’s face when the woman gets all up in her grill. Not fear, just, “…whatever.”

3) my new election mantra: “Dana Perino for Wonder Woman”

I first heard about a Code Pink member “confronting” (that is, unsuccessfully trying to intimidate) Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, as the latter entered a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on the Israel-Palestinian Authority “road map.”…

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 7:03 PM

Problem is…you won’t be able to find any volunteers for that job.

dont taze me bro on October 24, 2007 at 7:11 PM

The ‘Crats outta pony up for that duty since they created the mess.

Ugly Fascist friendly hags attack black woman.

RobCon on October 24, 2007 at 3:33 PM

Where are all the indignant leftards complaining about her being attacked?

This was a bit more threatening than what Lazio did with the Seahag during their debate.

As for Condi’s security, geez did the old guy get to her with a walker? I think she needs a meeting to determine if she needs more nimble security guards.

Blackwater might need the work.

Don’t understand your point. Where is the moral virtue in involuntary celibacy?

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 9:45 PM

Hmm, sorry, don’t recall mentioning moral virtue re: involuntary celibacy.

Since you say you don’t understand, though, guess I’ll clarify. What was offensive was the clear meaining of your post: that those who don’t “get laid” (and before being called on your statement, you didn’t make any distinction about choice in the matter) are so “frustrated” that they will become, at minimum, bitter, angry and/or batty, and at worst terrorists. Of course no other human explanation on earth could suffice to explain idiocy, excessive anger, moonbattiness or terrorism but “aha! They must be FRUSTRATED VIRGINS!” Right? That’s pretty darn funny, I gotta say.

Sexual desire is a real thing but trust me, not giving in to all your desires does not ensure you’ll become a terrorist, n’est c’est pas? ;)

I did laugh when I saw your post, cause it is amusing to see how quickly some people jump to the “good hard banging” suggestion for whatever they feel is wrong w/ someone, except a bit annoying too, since an unbelievable number of people really do think like that, unfortunately. How common is the statement about someone unhappy, “He/She just really needs to get laid!” No other explanation for unhappiness will suffice, you see. The face that a happy virgin could possibly exist is so foreign to this culture, apparently, that some people can’t imagine it. :)

Hope that helps. Have a nice evening.

inviolet on October 24, 2007 at 8:18 PM

Don’t understand your point. Where is the moral virtue in involuntary celibacy?

Security is far too nice… how ’bout some good old fashioned ‘68 Chicago head cracking?

T J Green on October 24, 2007 at 3:45 PM

While I agree with the sentiment, there would be too many lawsuits and too much fodder for the Leftists to use via their propaganda machine…

I think this is a great pick. Condi look her right in the eye and stared her down

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20071024/i/r3939241175.jpg

William Amos on October 24, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Imagine what this must be like for her (and the President). Long days year after year trying to keep Islamic maniacs at bay, and meanwhile a significant portion of your own people, the very people you’re trying to protect, are raving lunatics in their own right who think you’re the bad guy and that shoving their blood stained hands in your face is appropriate.

We do thank Chairman Lantos for trying to restore order to that hearing.

Mentos Lantos, the congressman from the outta voild.

Do you ever get the feeling that these people are perilously close to being capable of assassination?

OhEssYouCowboys on October 24, 2007 at 3:38 PM

Of course! And if one of these numbnuts gets lucky, look for the Left to rejoice more overtly than those certain Islamists did on 9/11.

By the end of the day, Bush will be deemed ultimately responsible since he promised to be a uniter, not a divider.

In the weeks that follow, there will be no reflection or cooldown to be found anywhere in the nutroots blogosphere. The comments sections of Kos and DU will overflow with hope that more will follow.

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 7:38 PM

LOL, “Please lay me Bro!”

At least it was Code Pink and NOT Boobs Not Bombs

Some body from the Dem side of the aisle had to give Code Pink the tickets to access the room. You don’t just stroll in on a first come first served basis.

Look for somebody in the Out of Iraq Now caucus.

Really, all that is needed to stop Code Pink is for these women to get laid. Good and hard…Extremism is the vice of those that never get laid. Most terrorists are frustrated virgins…[they need] at least a good banging.

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 7:03 PM

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 7:39 PM

Voluntary celibate here, and despite the nice-try disclaimer, the post is still rawtha offensive. Especially since too many people these days think “frustrated virgin” is a redundant phrase.

Let me be the first to defend celibacy on this website. Many celibates lead perfectly normal lives…Also, if we accept your beliefs about terribleness of celibacy, how can we tell teenagers to keep their sexuality to themselves? Your position is anti-family as they say around here.

thuja on October 24, 2007 at 7:30 PM

Thanks for saving me some typing, thuja.
Off to thoroughly enjoy my evening. Night all
–Happy Virgin

Okay, maybe we will have to pay them more for this type of duty, but it’s worth it. And besides, you can’t see their faces from behind anyway.

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 7:16 PM

Combat pay. And make sure they have all their shots first.

Extremism is the vice of those that never get laid. Most terrorists are frustrated virgins. Most protesters are frustrated in that department, too. It affects the mind. Makes you a bit on edge. And a bit angry and bitter. Angry and bitter people assume strong political views. And assuming non-conformist views is the natural choice when you are angry.

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 7:03 PM

Let me be the first to defend celibacy on this website. Many celibates lead perfectly normal lives. And we should remember that despite all the hysteria, only a small number of Catholic priest engaged in sexual misconduct.

Also, if we accept your beliefs about terribleness of celibacy, how can we tell teenagers to keep their sexuality to themselves? Your position is anti-family as they say around here.

And for the record, I’m not being sarcastic at all and only my last sentence is meant to have any humor value.

Passive resistance is not readily detectable to the non-law-enforcement eye, but it’s just as physically compelling as fighting sometimes. That’s why they do that for the cameras so the average Joe will say “hey, why did they man-handle them?… they were being peaceful!” Bullsh**! Try to drag 125 lbs. of dead weight out of a room while the “weight” is grabbing on to passing objects out of the camera’s view.

That being said, I think Condi should have punched her. I know, I know, it’s not a Christian thing to do, and it would be a PR nightmare, but for JUST ONE SECOND if the camera could go out.. MAN OH, MAN, the satisfaction that would bring me!

St. Cindy’s fave city should be called San FranPinko.

Re-instituting the draft would be the only way.
“4F” designation would be re-defined, though.