Video: Confidence-inspiring security detail of the day! Update: “[I]ncreasingly Congress is being run by Code Pink”

posted at 3:24 pm on October 24, 2007 by Allahpundit

A little something to cleanse the palate. It’s a good thing Code Pink’s embraced nonviolence because the loon at the beginning here is well within arm’s length of Condi Rice for two or three seconds before the men behind her realize that might not be such a good idea.

Look on the bright side, though. Between the DREAM Act going down and the Beauchamp scoop, it’s been a tough day for the left. This’ll lighten their spirits.

Update: Dana Perino goes for the throat.

Breaking on Hot Air

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Delightful!

Mojave Mark on October 24, 2007 at 8:29 PM

I think this is a great pick. Condi look her right in the eye and stared her down

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20071024/i/r3939241175.jpg

William Amos on October 24, 2007 at 3:50 PM

Imagine what this must be like for her (and the President). Long days year after year trying to keep Islamic maniacs at bay, and meanwhile a significant portion of your own people, the very people you’re trying to protect, are raving lunatics in their own right who think you’re the bad guy and that shoving their blood stained hands in your face is appropriate.

Kensington on October 24, 2007 at 8:31 PM

Security is far too nice… how ’bout some good old fashioned ‘68 Chicago head cracking?

T J Green on October 24, 2007 at 3:45 PM

While I agree with the sentiment, there would be too many lawsuits and too much fodder for the Leftists to use via their propaganda machine…

eanax on October 24, 2007 at 9:10 PM

inviolet on October 24, 2007 at 8:18 PM

Don’t understand your point. Where is the moral virtue in involuntary celibacy?

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 9:45 PM

Don’t understand your point. Where is the moral virtue in involuntary celibacy?

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 9:45 PM

Hmm, sorry, don’t recall mentioning moral virtue re: involuntary celibacy.

Since you say you don’t understand, though, guess I’ll clarify. What was offensive was the clear meaining of your post: that those who don’t “get laid” (and before being called on your statement, you didn’t make any distinction about choice in the matter) are so “frustrated” that they will become, at minimum, bitter, angry and/or batty, and at worst terrorists. Of course no other human explanation on earth could suffice to explain idiocy, excessive anger, moonbattiness or terrorism but “aha! They must be FRUSTRATED VIRGINS!” Right? That’s pretty darn funny, I gotta say.

Sexual desire is a real thing but trust me, not giving in to all your desires does not ensure you’ll become a terrorist, n’est c’est pas? ;)

I did laugh when I saw your post, cause it is amusing to see how quickly some people jump to the “good hard banging” suggestion for whatever they feel is wrong w/ someone, except a bit annoying too, since an unbelievable number of people really do think like that, unfortunately. How common is the statement about someone unhappy, “He/She just really needs to get laid!” No other explanation for unhappiness will suffice, you see. The face that a happy virgin could possibly exist is so foreign to this culture, apparently, that some people can’t imagine it. :)

Hope that helps. Have a nice evening.

inviolet on October 24, 2007 at 10:48 PM

face = fact

inviolet on October 24, 2007 at 10:50 PM

Ugly Fascist friendly hags attack black woman.

RobCon on October 24, 2007 at 3:33 PM

Where are all the indignant leftards complaining about her being attacked?

This was a bit more threatening than what Lazio did with the Seahag during their debate.

As for Condi’s security, geez did the old guy get to her with a walker? I think she needs a meeting to determine if she needs more nimble security guards.

Blackwater might need the work.

91Veteran on October 25, 2007 at 12:38 AM

jihadwatcher on October 24, 2007 at 7:03 PM

Problem is…you won’t be able to find any volunteers for that job.

dont taze me bro on October 24, 2007 at 7:11 PM

The ‘Crats outta pony up for that duty since they created the mess.

91Veteran on October 25, 2007 at 12:53 AM

1) Message to Code Pink and the “Recreate ’68″ nutroots who will be coming to defile my city next year at the DNC: “The whole world is yawning! The whole world is yawning! The whole world is yawning!”

2) Love the look of revulsion on Condi’s face when the woman gets all up in her grill. Not fear, just, “…whatever.”

3) my new election mantra: “Dana Perino for Wonder Woman”

Captain Scarlet on October 25, 2007 at 5:52 AM

Well they could not have had a weapon and been there. I guess that’s why the lax security. These people should not have been disrupting the proceedings. This wasn’t an ‘audience participation’ event.

ThackerAgency on October 24, 2007 at 3:37 PM

Based on your comments on the “Tase me Bro” thread you should be appalled. Those other Code Pinkos didn’t do anything or say anything but the Capitol Police just manhandled them. “Since when are the police judge, jury and executioner?” Sound familiar?

srhoades on October 25, 2007 at 9:15 AM

At least it was Code Pink and NOT Boobs Not Bombs

Q: If Boobs not Bombs protest by showing their boobs, what do Code Pink show?

uptight on October 25, 2007 at 10:26 AM

Comment pages: 1 2