f5315544b32e3a327841…

2a6ed84aa886…

I’d probably have said Colbert too.

Hillary is physically unattractive; she has a horrible voice; she has the warmth and demeanor of a crocodile; off script, she’s a grenade waiting to blow up in her own, or someone else’s face with the amazingly stupid things she says; her flip flops, lies, outright fabrications are completely ignored; she’s basically being bought and paid for by the Chinese and no one seems to think its worth investigating. She should have no support except a hardcore group of fruitcakes, and yet she seems to enjoy superiority over the two current GOP frontrunners. Whoever is selling this liberal lump to the American People, could sell matches in hell. If ever the emporer had no clothes…I mean, she sucks. She’s horrible. What is the appeal? Argh. I need to lie down.

Since only a total fool would vote for Hillary, she has zero chance of getting elected.

dogsoldier on October 24, 2007 at 12:21 PM

Which is precisely why she’ll be elected. The seeds of Socialism are illiteracy and ignorance – and I have just described the majority of the electorate in America. What has been going on in the public schools [for over a generation] – the dumbing down and the Socialist indoctrination – is by design. The illiterate and the ignorant are easily led; and, that is precisely why the most vile, political figure of my lifetime will be elected.

It doesn’t matter to me because I don’t pin my hopes good or bad on any one person. Even if it is Hillary. I just have a hard time believing that the R party, knowing that an extremely beatable Hillary ‘Tax and Baggage’ Clinton was going to be running, absolutely refused to find a conservative candidate like Jindal to oppose her.

Why did the R party insist on getting a ‘liberal lite’ candidate. All you need is the conservative base and you win by a landslide. A ‘moderate’ makes the race more difficult on a state-by-state basis. The base won’t be enthusiastic about voting for someone whose positions are similar to Hillary’s on many things. If I were Hillary I would be picking out curtains for the White House if I thought I was going to be running against either Rudy or Mitt. Rudy and Mitt would be my choice of opponent if I were Hillary.

Until the Primaries are over, I’m not going to settle for “hind teat”.

natesnake on October 24, 2007 at 11:31 AM

I would hope not, but don’t confuse pragmatism for relaxing ones personal standards. Sometimes you have to realize that winning the battle to nominate a candidate who is presumably more conservative, just to lose the war to a candidate who is better at motivating the middle, is not a good trade off.

Rudy won’t win his home state or any of the North East states. . . and Rudy won’t win all of the south. . . which is a requirement for any R to win.

Rudy is up by 2 in NJ and down by 1 in CT against Hillary. If one were this confident about small point spreads in football games they would lose quite often. Rudy will be competitive in those states and make Hillary divert campaign resources into expensive media markets. Taxes in NJ is a huge issue and Rudy plays better than Hillary on that issue.

You are right about NY and TN. NC and VA could be interesting. AR and FL are going to be very competitive, probably either way.

but when those same national polls show Rudy polls better against Hillary they are suddenly suspiciously quite about them.

Have you ever heard the phrase, “win the battle, but lose the war”? I’m not willing to relax my conservative stance just to make sure somebody has an “R” beside their name in the White House.

Until the Primaries are over, I’m not going to settle for “hind teat”.

Thompson, Huckabee et al. can not take any eastern or midwest states.

Rudy won’t win his home state or any of the North East states. . . and Rudy won’t win all of the south. . . which is a requirement for any R to win.

Thompson will win his home state. Huckabee probably won’t.

It’s hilarious to watch the Fred groupies rant and rave about national poll numbers to “prove” his viability, but when those same national polls show Rudy polls better against Hillary they are suddenly suspiciously quite about them.

Dude,

seriously…

And now we have a state poll out of TN touting his numbers in TN, but ignore all the early states he is sucking hind teat in.

ThackerAgency on October 24, 2007 at 10:19 AM

I said

actual

clowns. It used to be we voted in ones who wore suits and called themselves politicians. I didn’t think we’d reach the point where we dispose with the attempts at seeming legitimate.