<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Politico in the tank for Hillary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-748298</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-748298</guid>
		<description>My initial impression of POLITICO was that it was Liberal, a mostly pro-Democrat site.  My conclusion&#039;s not set (yet), however, but the vast majority of comments there are from Liberals and the inevitable Paul people, to a point of exhaustion.  

One can read there the same Liberal naysaying (mostly, the equivalent of &quot;Republicans are evil,&quot; and &quot;Bush is bad&quot; along with the word, &quot;nazi&quot; thrown in with predictable frequency) that can be read in comments sections associated with all political so-called &quot;reporting&quot; &quot;news&quot; sites.  They DO display a persistent Liberal bias, with critical reports limited and always directed to and about Republicans and complaints by Conservatives.  

That is, the only &quot;news&quot; on POLITICO is when a Republican doesn&#039;t express enthusiasm about Reid, Pelosi, Hillary or their politics.  BUT, there are a congregation of Conservative and Republican commentors there, so it keeps me reading.

The Paul people, inevitably, go for ruin about any and all Republicans.  Cross them and you get accused of being &quot;a Democrat&quot; and &quot;for Hillary&quot; and other nonsense.  I honestly don&#039;t understand why POLITICO doesn&#039;t ban the most offensive of those on that site -- all of them are supporters of Paul or Obama -- but, they do tend to indulge them, unfortunately.

So, looks possible, at least, that they&#039;re operating &quot;for Hillary&quot; -- in other words, another Liberal site posing as &quot;news.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial impression of POLITICO was that it was Liberal, a mostly pro-Democrat site.  My conclusion&#8217;s not set (yet), however, but the vast majority of comments there are from Liberals and the inevitable Paul people, to a point of exhaustion.  </p>
<p>One can read there the same Liberal naysaying (mostly, the equivalent of &#8220;Republicans are evil,&#8221; and &#8220;Bush is bad&#8221; along with the word, &#8220;nazi&#8221; thrown in with predictable frequency) that can be read in comments sections associated with all political so-called &#8220;reporting&#8221; &#8220;news&#8221; sites.  They DO display a persistent Liberal bias, with critical reports limited and always directed to and about Republicans and complaints by Conservatives.  </p>
<p>That is, the only &#8220;news&#8221; on POLITICO is when a Republican doesn&#8217;t express enthusiasm about Reid, Pelosi, Hillary or their politics.  BUT, there are a congregation of Conservative and Republican commentors there, so it keeps me reading.</p>
<p>The Paul people, inevitably, go for ruin about any and all Republicans.  Cross them and you get accused of being &#8220;a Democrat&#8221; and &#8220;for Hillary&#8221; and other nonsense.  I honestly don&#8217;t understand why POLITICO doesn&#8217;t ban the most offensive of those on that site &#8212; all of them are supporters of Paul or Obama &#8212; but, they do tend to indulge them, unfortunately.</p>
<p>So, looks possible, at least, that they&#8217;re operating &#8220;for Hillary&#8221; &#8212; in other words, another Liberal site posing as &#8220;news.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theworldisnotenough</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-748295</link>
		<dc:creator>Theworldisnotenough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-748295</guid>
		<description>Of course media organazations/individuals have their favorites. And Politico does, very subtly, lean left. I noticed it myself. That they lean, very subtly, towards Hillary is no supprise.

I do not think Laura Ingraham has come out for Rudy but her softball interview spoke for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course media organazations/individuals have their favorites. And Politico does, very subtly, lean left. I noticed it myself. That they lean, very subtly, towards Hillary is no supprise.</p>
<p>I do not think Laura Ingraham has come out for Rudy but her softball interview spoke for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-748268</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-748268</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Since when is “others” a “sharp shot?”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe they mean it like this: &quot;How dare he lump her in with the rest of the candidates? She&#039;s not one of the others, she&#039;s in a class by herself, and Obama is the one who is one of the &#039;others!&#039;&quot;

Yeah, I know, not likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Since when is “others” a “sharp shot?”</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe they mean it like this: &#8220;How dare he lump her in with the rest of the candidates? She&#8217;s not one of the others, she&#8217;s in a class by herself, and Obama is the one who is one of the &#8216;others!&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I know, not likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kralizec</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-748171</link>
		<dc:creator>Kralizec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-748171</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In the photo on the card Obama looks like a muppet.

BJ* on October 23, 2007 at 8:03 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Obama looks like he&#039;s about a quart low on testosterone.  Years ago, Maureen Dowd said that Al Gore was &quot;so feminized,&quot; he was &quot;practically lactating,&quot; but Gore strikes me as being unusually masculine for a Democrat Presidential candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In the photo on the card Obama looks like a muppet.</p>
<p>BJ* on October 23, 2007 at 8:03 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Obama looks like he&#8217;s about a quart low on testosterone.  Years ago, Maureen Dowd said that Al Gore was &#8220;so feminized,&#8221; he was &#8220;practically lactating,&#8221; but Gore strikes me as being unusually masculine for a Democrat Presidential candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-748064</link>
		<dc:creator>Missy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-748064</guid>
		<description>The Politico is lame all around.  Some of the movement conservatives seem to like it, but I think that&#039;s becuase it&#039;s essentially a DC gossip rag.  Or because their journo friends write for it.  At any rate, I&#039;ve yet to see any writing of substance there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Politico is lame all around.  Some of the movement conservatives seem to like it, but I think that&#8217;s becuase it&#8217;s essentially a DC gossip rag.  Or because their journo friends write for it.  At any rate, I&#8217;ve yet to see any writing of substance there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ*</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-748045</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-748045</guid>
		<description>In the photo on the card Obama looks like a muppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the photo on the card Obama looks like a muppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right2bright</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747940</link>
		<dc:creator>right2bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747940</guid>
		<description>And while we are on the subject...notice how Bill OR is kissing up to Hillary?  Tell me he isn&#039;t begging for a chance to interview her.  Never mentioning in any real way her campaign money issues, starting to say how many people thought Bill was a good president, how she is being mis-represented, how smart she is...he is starting his campaign to interview, sending signals to her camp that he is willing to bargain.
He used Sharpton to get Jackson, now he is setting the stage for Hillary.
Just an observation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And while we are on the subject&#8230;notice how Bill OR is kissing up to Hillary?  Tell me he isn&#8217;t begging for a chance to interview her.  Never mentioning in any real way her campaign money issues, starting to say how many people thought Bill was a good president, how she is being mis-represented, how smart she is&#8230;he is starting his campaign to interview, sending signals to her camp that he is willing to bargain.<br />
He used Sharpton to get Jackson, now he is setting the stage for Hillary.<br />
Just an observation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Amos</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747891</link>
		<dc:creator>William Amos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747891</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/20071023/2007_10_23t134308_450x386_us_usa_politics_iran.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What you talking bout Willis ?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/20071023/2007_10_23t134308_450x386_us_usa_politics_iran.jpg" rel="nofollow">What you talking bout Willis ?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Driscoll</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747851</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Driscoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747851</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Anyway, I’ve been dubious about Politico since the outset. Who coined that theory that any organization which is not overtly conservative will inevitably, inexorably become leftist? Maybe it was Derbyshire.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That&#039;s the second of Robert Conquest&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eternityroad.info/index.php/weblog/screeds/14/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Three Laws of Politics&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Anyway, I’ve been dubious about Politico since the outset. Who coined that theory that any organization which is not overtly conservative will inevitably, inexorably become leftist? Maybe it was Derbyshire.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s the second of Robert Conquest&#8217;s <a href="http://www.eternityroad.info/index.php/weblog/screeds/14/" rel="nofollow">Three Laws of Politics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarpon</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747799</link>
		<dc:creator>tarpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747799</guid>
		<description>What do you think the straw man candidates are for? In the tank for Hillary Matters and media, not even a valid question. Why has no one asked Hillary Matters what she would do about illegal immigration -- Because she doesn&#039;t want you to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think the straw man candidates are for? In the tank for Hillary Matters and media, not even a valid question. Why has no one asked Hillary Matters what she would do about illegal immigration &#8212; Because she doesn&#8217;t want you to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSitRep</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747770</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSitRep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747770</guid>
		<description>Not being in the tank for hillary might &lt;strong&gt;gitcha ya hurt or even kilt!&lt;/strong&gt;
Besides tons of ill-gotten cash she has a network of goons (including judges) that can put pressure where it is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being in the tank for hillary might <strong>gitcha ya hurt or even kilt!</strong><br />
Besides tons of ill-gotten cash she has a network of goons (including judges) that can put pressure where it is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valiant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747767</link>
		<dc:creator>Valiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747767</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Obama is in the tank for Hillary too.  Candidates on both sides need to start mixing it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Obama is in the tank for Hillary too.  Candidates on both sides need to start mixing it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attila (Pillage Idiot)</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747765</link>
		<dc:creator>Attila (Pillage Idiot)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747765</guid>
		<description>Wait till the general election.  Every single mild effort of the Republican to criticize her positions will be billed as a harsh personal attack.  Remember Rick Lazio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait till the general election.  Every single mild effort of the Republican to criticize her positions will be billed as a harsh personal attack.  Remember Rick Lazio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RushBaby</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747759</link>
		<dc:creator>RushBaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747759</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s a Politico?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s a Politico?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topsecretk9</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747722</link>
		<dc:creator>Topsecretk9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747722</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s hilarious when Politico gets annoyed when the Democrats make an undeniable stupid mistake. Politico deems itself as the Dems pesonal Dear Abby  and the politico bloggers start pumping out advice posts rather than you know, blog about news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s hilarious when Politico gets annoyed when the Democrats make an undeniable stupid mistake. Politico deems itself as the Dems pesonal Dear Abby  and the politico bloggers start pumping out advice posts rather than you know, blog about news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rational Thought</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747712</link>
		<dc:creator>Rational Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747712</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, a political website run by 2 former WaPo reporters? Nah, they couldn&#039;t be Clinton democrats, could they? That would be so…obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, a political website run by 2 former WaPo reporters? Nah, they couldn&#8217;t be Clinton democrats, could they? That would be so…obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tikvah</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747691</link>
		<dc:creator>tikvah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747691</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s so vague it could be a reference to Lost&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now that&#039;s a Lost conspiracy theory I haven&#039;t heard yet. Hmmm.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That’s so vague it could be a reference to Lost</p></blockquote>
<p>Now that&#8217;s a Lost conspiracy theory I haven&#8217;t heard yet. Hmmm&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReubenJCogburn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747685</link>
		<dc:creator>ReubenJCogburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747685</guid>
		<description>Indeed, Politico&#039;s climbing Mount Douchebaggery on this one. How about using the same strike zone for each team? (And yes, I did feel like totally mixing metaphors there.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Politico&#8217;s climbing Mount Douchebaggery on this one. How about using the same strike zone for each team? (And yes, I did feel like totally mixing metaphors there.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bj1126</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747683</link>
		<dc:creator>bj1126</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747683</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling it is more than Politico in the tank for Hillary.  The entire Democratic field seems to be just letting her coast along with no real opposition.  It&#039;s almost like her and then a competition to be her VP pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling it is more than Politico in the tank for Hillary.  The entire Democratic field seems to be just letting her coast along with no real opposition.  It&#8217;s almost like her and then a competition to be her VP pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kensington</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747679</link>
		<dc:creator>Kensington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747679</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He doesn’t name her or call her something ugly, like “Cankles” or “Hilldebeast.” &lt;/blockquote&gt;
He didn&#039;t even call her anything like &quot;Her Thighness, Hillary Rotten&quot;.

Anyway, I&#039;ve been dubious about Politico since the outset.  Who coined that theory that any organization which is not overtly conservative will inevitably, inexorably become leftist?  Maybe it was Derbyshire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He doesn’t name her or call her something ugly, like “Cankles” or “Hilldebeast.” </p></blockquote>
<p>He didn&#8217;t even call her anything like &#8220;Her Thighness, Hillary Rotten&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve been dubious about Politico since the outset.  Who coined that theory that any organization which is not overtly conservative will inevitably, inexorably become leftist?  Maybe it was Derbyshire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zetterson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747676</link>
		<dc:creator>Zetterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747676</guid>
		<description>As for the Politico&#039;s choice of words... Unsurprising. The amount of ammo that the MSM has to use against Hillary is infinite. The rug they are using to sweep all of it under has got to be freekin&#039; enormous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the Politico&#8217;s choice of words&#8230; Unsurprising. The amount of ammo that the MSM has to use against Hillary is infinite. The rug they are using to sweep all of it under has got to be freekin&#8217; enormous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zetterson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-747668</link>
		<dc:creator>Zetterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/is-politico-in-the-tank-for-hillary/#comment-747668</guid>
		<description>That Obama &quot;attack&quot; on Hillary is so vague and so mild that he&#039;s acting like someone who&#039;s running for the number 2 spot on the ticket, or at least attempting to leave that option open. He&#039;s trying to promote the fact that he was against the war from the start &lt;em&gt;without&lt;/em&gt; resorting to going negative against Hillary. He has basically conceded already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Obama &#8220;attack&#8221; on Hillary is so vague and so mild that he&#8217;s acting like someone who&#8217;s running for the number 2 spot on the ticket, or at least attempting to leave that option open. He&#8217;s trying to promote the fact that he was against the war from the start <em>without</em> resorting to going negative against Hillary. He has basically conceded already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
