Would like to see the list of charities which got the money – I think it might be very interesting indeed….
CrazyFool on October 23, 2007 at 9:11 PM

No matter what charity it is, they’re being hypocrites by giving to it.

Aren’t the Democrats always telling us that the best use of our “extra” money is to pay it in taxes? So why don’t they just give the money to the federal government?

…because they know full well that wouldn’t increase their public image. People would just see them as saps.

Exactly!

Make the candidates and the party dig DEEP to pay the damages AND the punitive. Their lawyers will negotiate a contingency fee (typically 30-35%) and get paid out of the total award, including the punitive. A win-win-win here. Win for the people fleeced by the Democrats Ponzi scheme, a win for the lawyers who sue the Democrats and the charities, and a win for “honesty in government.”

To bad for the “charities” (those that are legitimate and not fronts for something else, like Tides, which fronts for eco-terrorists), but hey, next time they won’t accept any money from Democrats as it will most likely be very dirty and in need of a laundry and will thus serve them right.

Would like to see the list of charities which got the money – I think it might be very interesting indeed….

CrazyFool on October 23, 2007 at 9:11 PM

Exactly! I’ve said all along since this story began that somebody (how about the FBI) should investigate this matter to see where the money goes. Don’t forget the phony charity organizations Bill Clinton has set up. Don’t forget that library out in Arkansas he built. I’m sure that place is called a ‘non-profit’ and would be more than happy to accept some of this tainted money.

Nobody should forget that these Clinton scumbags don’t take a breath or do anything unless it helps them politically or financially.

How about ALL the conservative blogs keep the pressure on and demand to know what happens to ALL of these tainted campaign contributions. It is extremely important that the public gets this information before any votes are cast in the 2008 presidential election – both the primaries and the general election. This info will not come from the MSM. You will not see NBC, CNN, CBS or ABC reporting on this story.

I want to know – don’t you?

Never mind, I already know the answer………..

Money laundering is never an easy crime to catch; so it’s very safe to say that there are lots of other bundlers out there who haven’t been caught yet.

So if it gets out that all these minimum-wage bagmen have to do is blow the whistle and they’ll get that $2,000 to KEEP — Hsu will turn out to be the tip of the iceberg.

Does politics turn decent people crappy or attract crappy people?

Yes.

1 Hsu direct donations have gone to charity, also some cases of Hsu donor linked money has gone to charity , but most of that was returned to the donors.

2 Hillary is not returning money to her Senate campaign or HillPac

3 We are only getting together now the list of all the Hsu bundled donors and are looking at all the other places he bundled to besides Hillary. Looking at Gov Rendell for example

4 Hillary has not returned all the donations by Hsu bundled donors….shes short by a couple of hundred thousand

5 the Peter Paul issue is slowly working it’s way through the courts

6 Hillary now has all sorts of Chinatown issues and they are being developed by even some of the MSM and I can personally guarantee that the Army of Davids is on the case

7 Next up in the batter box we have the emerging crisis of ethics of the Dems taking money from current or ex members of the Milberg-Weiss law firm that is going to be a major scandal as it emerges. Twenty Two dem campaigns are still taking their money.

Romeo13 on October 23, 2007 at 8:49 PM

I have been wondering the same thing. What is it going to take to get the Fed’s involved?

Would like to see the list of charities which got the money – I think it might be very interesting indeed….

Where in the heck is the Federal Elections people in all of this?

Not to mention the various Attorney Generals of the various Federal districts…

Sue the campaigns. Sue fast, sue long, sue as hard as you can. There’s got to be a tort that’ll cover it. Then ask for punitive damages so they’ll do these background checks the way they’re supposed to, not by weighing the guy’s wallet first.

Well, like the fairness doctrine, this would get the Dems on board with tort reform in a hurry.

I hope the sue also….

He thinks his client “theoretically” has legal grounds to recover the money from campaigns or charities, he said, but the litigation may be too expensive to pursue.

Sue the campaigns. Sue fast, sue long, sue as hard as you can. There’s got to be a tort that’ll cover it. Then ask for punitive damages so they’ll do these background checks the way they’re supposed to, not by weighing the guy’s wallet first.

This is exactly what I was thinking when I read the headline. Where are the sharks? It would be rather interesting to see any candidate who took money from Hsu be added to any suit.

Could you imagine if a Republican who took donations from Enron or Abrahmoff gave the money to charity what hell would break loose?

Is it possible they did this to make the whole issue go away as fast as possible? After all, depending on the charity, would anyone who sued then be blamed for not caring about Cause X?

Would this investment group or other company defrauded be accountable to any type of shareholder? If so, what would the SEC say if they decide not to sue to recover money lost?

$40 million might be chump change to the Queen of Cattle Futures, but it’s some pretty good ching for many others. I cannot see all of those defrauded just walking away.

“Sue the campaigns. Sue fast, sue long, sue as hard as you can. There’s got to be a tort that’ll cover it. Then ask for punitive damages so they’ll do these background checks the way they’re supposed to, not by weighing the guy’s wallet first.”

I am surprised that no one has yet filed something like an intent to sue to recover the money. I am surprised they haven’t asked for a court order to prevent their dispersal of it, that would at least slow it down. We’re are the unscupulous class action lawyers???