Hey give Charlie a break. He is so consumed with increasing your taxes how can he be expected to make rational comments on other subjects. The man is focused on his priorities.

Along with building his “Monument to Me.”

Rightwingsparkle on October 22, 2007 at 12:09 PM

Kind of like

I mean, from an academic standpoint, someone could have been victimized and still be a good President, but that would be in spite of it, not because of it. Why would you frame your candidacy for President around people feeling sorry for you?

Perhaps the only thing that matters in cheating to them is that you stay with your spouse. Then it’s ok.

- The Cat

Exit question: Is the Clinton camp actually preparing to play Hillary’s status as a wronged woman against the GOP? Feel the pain of a woman betrayed by the man she loves, America — and blame Rudy Giuliani for it.

Of course! All it requires is shamelessness, and the Left has that in spades.

You angling for a PR job with him?

JammieWearingFool on October 22, 2007 at 11:04 AM

Yes, yes I am. And perhaps just an out loud questioning of why he is the way he is. Angry and bitter, it doesn’t seem to match his life. You would think after all he has done, the result would not be what we see today. O’ well.

Asked Saturday afternoon outside Oak Park Elementary School in Des Moines, Iowa, if she had any comment on Rangel’s remarks, Clinton tersely said, “I don’t.”

What, no cackling laughter?

That would require some big balls, and I don’t think they got em. Of course, they could just quitely ask MoveOn or Media Matters to do it for them.

BadgerHawk on October 22, 2007 at 10:38 AM

You don’t know Hiliary or S(l)ick Willie very well, do you?

Spread the word of what you did and how you did it Chuck.

You angling for a PR job with him?

I could care less what his life story is. He’s an angry, bitter, nasty old hack.

This woman cannot possibly believe we’d buy her as a ‘victim’. As a female, this woman makes me physically ill.

Peggy Noonan had an interesting piece in the Wall Street Journal: “she doesn’t have to prove she is a man, she has to prove she is a woman.”

I thought the MSM in the ’90s made it clear that lying and infidelity were actually good things that showed just how much couples love and care for each other.

Rangel is a bitter old man; probably still pissed Rudy made Dinkins look so hopelessly inept when he actually cleaned up NYC.

JammieWearingFool on October 22, 2007 at 10:41 AM

He may be bitter about that whole dinkins thing, and he has some views and says some things that absolutely shock me. It is difficult to disrespect the man himself however. I often wonder why he is a democrat.

His life is an absolute story of success and perserverence. That usually guides people to view the world in a light that everyone and anyone can succeed. But Charlie seems to think he was/is one in a million. I would like to see him talk more like Cosby…Rangel didn’t make excuses in his life, he just got it done.

Spread the word of what you did and how you did it Chuck. Inspire people instead of trying to do everything for them.

So much nuance…

So much Spin…

Weeewhheeee!!!! I’m getting dizzy.

Is the Clinton camp actually preparing to play Hillary’s status as a wronged woman against the GOP?

Are you freakin’ joking? Gee, if she’s “wronged”, all she needs to do is visit a battered women’s shelter and listen to a story or two – that’s all it’d take to adjust her definition.

This woman cannot possibly believe we’d buy her as a ‘victim’. As a female, this woman makes me physically ill.

lol wut?

Yeah……..if you’re a Clinton supporter, marital infidelity isn’t really the sort of topic that you should be using to mud-sling against Rudy. That old cliche about glass houses & all.