Attention, ladies: Democracy needs your panties
posted at 11:42 am on October 19, 2007 by Allahpundit
Now more than ever. Take ‘em off, won’t you? It’s … for the monks.
Activists exasperated at the failure of diplomacy to apply pressure on Burma’s military regime are resorting to a new means of protest against the regime’s recent crackdown: sending female underwear to Burmese embassies.
Embassies in the UK, Thailand, Australia and Singapore have all been targeted by the “Panties for Peace” campaign, co-ordinated by an activist group based in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
The manoeuvre is a calculated insult to the junta and its leader, General Than Shwe. Superstitious junta members believe that any contact with female undergarments – clean or dirty – will sap them of their power, said Jackie Pollack, a member of the Lanna Action for Burma Committee…
So far, hundreds of pairs of pants have been posted, according to another campaigner, Liz Hilton. “One group sent 140 pairs to the Burmese embassy in Geneva,” she said.
Exit question: Will Sullivan and the rest of the anti-”torture” hysterics wring their hands over this the way they did at reports of Gitmo interrogators using femcooties in the form of fake menstrual blood to threaten Muslim detainees? The panty platoon is also targeting its enemies’ beliefs, after all, and the fact that that enemy practices terrorism obviously doesn’t mitigate the heart-achiness of the tactic.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Heh. They really are afraid of women, aren’t they?
ReubenJCogburn on October 19, 2007 at 11:45 AM
To me this looks like a benefit for the bad guys.
Psy-Ops at it’s dainty things finest.
bbz123 on October 19, 2007 at 11:45 AM
One pair of Rosie’s undies should cover it.
Thought it may violate several treaties.
saint kansas on October 19, 2007 at 11:46 AM
I throw the good panties at that sexy, sexy man Tom Jones. I might be able to find some granny-panties to donate to the cause.
KelliD on October 19, 2007 at 11:46 AM
In other words, they can’t find someone to marry them, and have found a convenient excuse.
amerpundit on October 19, 2007 at 11:49 AM
Don’t send G-strings. They might try to floss with them.
csdeven on October 19, 2007 at 11:49 AM
And with that, ladies and gentlemen, Limerick nearly choked on the corn chips.
Limerick on October 19, 2007 at 11:51 AM
Why the United States is the MOST POWERFUL NATION in the WORLD!!
Mazztek on October 19, 2007 at 11:52 AM
OKKK… just too good…
Brittany wants to do somthing to help the world… she said she is turning over a new leaf…
And she doesn’t like underwear…
Soooo…
Romeo13 on October 19, 2007 at 11:53 AM
I ain’t afraid of no panties.
I’m one of those smarmy pundits in Bush’s pocket–those who bathe in the moisture of his soiled and blood-soaked underwear.
In other undergarment news, Great Britain can’t get enough of The Ladies’ Bras.
saint kansas on October 19, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Is this another shrinking member story?
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on October 19, 2007 at 11:58 AM
I see where we are going wrong.
Our guys should be wearing panties on THEIR heads when going after the jihadis.
bbz123 on October 19, 2007 at 12:00 PM
The issue or the embassy?
highhopes on October 19, 2007 at 12:01 PM
This is delicious! Thanks for the laughs! :)
Pam on October 19, 2007 at 12:05 PM
I think it’s a trick.
Somewhere there is a Japanese vending machine businessman rubbing in hands in glee over this clever scheme.
see-dubya on October 19, 2007 at 12:06 PM
The Kyoto Accord, for example.
CliffHanger on October 19, 2007 at 12:07 PM
Tom Jones for Ambassador!!!
right2bright on October 19, 2007 at 12:08 PM
The Animal House Brigade!
And wouldn’t Rosie’s panties be considered WMD?
conservnut on October 19, 2007 at 12:09 PM
They don’t avoid women…but they do deny them their essense.
(And on no account will a Burmese drink water…)
James on October 19, 2007 at 12:09 PM
“Activist not wearing panties, film at 11:00″
TheSitRep on October 19, 2007 at 12:11 PM
Junta members have no ba**s if they are afraid of panties.
volsense on October 19, 2007 at 12:12 PM
The Burmese superstition might have some merit- I find that when I come in contact with women’s panties that strange things happen, including blood flow being diverted from my brain. Only seems to work when they’re being worn by a woman or immediately after they’re removed though.
Hollowpoint on October 19, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Do these count? Link
thesheesh on October 19, 2007 at 12:25 PM
Aghhhhhhhhhhhh,
Warning please, I was just fixing to go to lunch.
conservnut on October 19, 2007 at 12:27 PM
I thought there was a Bill Clinton joke in this thread after that headline…after all, he did save the Constitution through his ‘activities’ with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.
austinnelly on October 19, 2007 at 12:40 PM
Andrew Sullivan thanks you for that link. He’s been looking for those everywhere.
KelliD on October 19, 2007 at 12:45 PM
FYI, “Democracy” is my new name as of this morning.
RightWinged on October 19, 2007 at 1:52 PM
Does the curse still work if Chris Crocker’s been wearing them?
angryoldfatman on October 19, 2007 at 1:56 PM
Hillary Clinton’s campaign spokesperson has requested a clarification, and was subsequently quoted as having said:
My collie says:
CyberCipher on October 19, 2007 at 2:27 PM
Proof positive that Elvis and Tom Jones weren’t/aren’t Burmese.
mugged on October 19, 2007 at 2:28 PM
FINALLY, an excuse to sortie B-2 bombers on a carpet bombing mission with panties! God bless the U.S.A. I LOVE BEING AN AMERICAN!
THE BURMESE ULTIMATUM (echoing FDR)
Surrender to our demands or you can expect a rain of “lacy-and-stylish-but-comfortable” terror from the sky the likes of which have never before been seen in the history of mankind.
Semper Thong!!!
Lone Star on October 19, 2007 at 2:57 PM
Superstitious junta members believe that any contact with female undergarments – clean or dirty – will sap them of their power
“Wimmin gots wiles, I don’t know what they are, but wimmin gots ‘em.”
Grumpy Dwarf understands, crazy military Junta. Now, thanks to the internet, we can conclude that wiles reside in sexy underwear.
Krydor on October 19, 2007 at 3:00 PM
Y’know, the kooky Jihadis may actually have a valid point, consider the cotton petri dish known as Paris Hilton’s skivvies.
Just imagine all the critters in that primordial swamp…a silky WMD!
Alden Pyle on October 19, 2007 at 3:03 PM
The ultimate panty raid.
James on October 19, 2007 at 3:08 PM
To think that Victoria’s Secret could win this whole thing for them.
Rightwingsparkle on October 19, 2007 at 3:45 PM
Why am I totally shocked that Michelle didn’t post this……
How do you ever keep these guys in line????
EricPWJohnson on October 19, 2007 at 3:52 PM
Perhaps I should send my jock strap?
No, I guess not. The fact that the junta are attacking Buddhist monks tells me that the junta has nothing to put in a jock strap.
Om! Manu Padmi Hum!
The False Dervish on October 19, 2007 at 4:14 PM
The comments alone here are priceless. You guys have the best sense of humor of anyone I’ve ever come across. Except sailors, soldiers, Marines and frat members.
Subsunk
Subsunk on October 19, 2007 at 5:39 PM
When I rolled over the link and saw ‘manties’ in the address, I excersized the better part of valor. I think I have some bleach lying around if you need it.
ticticboom on October 19, 2007 at 6:02 PM
BTW, remind me again how their culture and superstitions are eqaual or superior to ours. The only time I’m afraid of a women’s panties is when it’s that time of the month.
On second thought, maybe they have a point.
ticticboom on October 19, 2007 at 6:05 PM
Yeah, think of it, they would be multi-functional on a long patrol. They could be used against the jihadis, as a catapult or set up as a tent.
The brown would just be extra camo.
91Veteran on October 20, 2007 at 9:21 AM